geography-yeah despite all the happiness thats going around on boards i did ****.

maggie18x

short questions:alot of tricky ones dispearsed there
physical geog:****ing dickheads mixing up the layout.
Regional:you would want to have covered everything to do well.
Culture and identity:where the **** was language?

i am very angry person right now.:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Haven't a Clue

Well, I'm not gonna help your anger but **** it - there's already a thread on the geography paper. Use the bloody thing.

mang87

maggie18x wrote:

short questions:alot of tricky ones dispearsed there

Whaaa? :eek:

Oatesy

No offence but the short Qs were almost insultingly easy.. (ALMOST)

Haven't a Clue

And your own personal opinion on the geography paper doesn't warrant a thread on its own either.

maggie18x

Haven't a Clue wrote:

And your own personal opinion on the geography paper doesn't warrant a thread on its own either.

oh god im so sorry it will never happen again

genericgoon

There is no official layout people. The course is only 2 years old. The department is well within its rights to alter the paper a bit at this early stage of its development.

cabla

Haven't a Clue wrote:

And your own personal opinion on the geography paper doesn't warrant a thread on its own either.

Who is this guy..who invited him

mathew

maggie18x wrote:

****ing dickheads mixing up the layout.

They didnt mix anything up.. Theres nothing to say they cant put rocks in with rivers etc. The idea is to test you.. on th whole course

maggie18x wrote:

Regional:you would want to have covered everything to do well.

this is a test of everything.. ie the whole course.. not just parts.

cheater

christ, why must people disect what another person posts, their unhappy about their geography, thats their opinion stop ****ing giving your opinion as fact, the department are well within their right, how the **** do you know what the department have the right to do or not? shut the **** up, of course an opinion on geography warrants a thread of its own.. ****ing clowns

cabla

cheater wrote:

christ, why must people disect what another person posts, their unhappy about their geography, thats their opinion stop ****ing giving your opinion as fact, the department are well within their right, how the **** do you know what the department have the right to do or not? shut the **** up, of course an opinion on geography warrants a thread of its own.. ****ing clowns

oooo somebody's a bit or a moany Michael today

Jay112

cheater wrote:

christ, why must people disect what another person posts, their unhappy about their geography, thats their opinion stop ****ing giving your opinion as fact, the department are well within their right, how the **** do you know what the department have the right to do or not? shut the **** up, of course an opinion on geography warrants a thread of its own.. ****ing clowns

Wow, Id give you some credit only you ave 5 posts!

GretchenWieners

I agree, fairly disappointed myself. Missed out on my A. Def got a B though but only barely. It'll be marked easier I'd say. I'm grateful for our teacher overflowing on the SRPs now! Made a mess of part C in physical, overpopulation in elective and half the geoecology.

cheater

Jay112 wrote:

Wow, Id give you some credit only you ave 5 posts!

Ya do you know why I have 5 posts, because I'm not a fckn loser who spends all his time on these boards.. your pass geography paper went well anyways.. you tit

Patricide

jeese dude no need to lose the head, if you think theese boards are so nerdy then leave, wel all be better off without the agro

Jay112

cheater wrote:

Ya do you know why I have 5 posts, because I'm not a fckn loser who spends all his time on these boards.. your pass geography paper went well anyways.. you tit

I predict your going to get on well with the boards you go and have fun with your aggressive ways:rolleyes:

cheater

who asked you to offer your wealth of knowledge?

Jay112

cheater wrote:

who asked you to offer your wealth of knowledge?

These boards are open to everyone so he/she is entitled to their views

cheater

Jay112 wrote:

These boards are open to everyone so he/she is entitled to their views

nice one

cabla

haha

glenroe2006

mathew wrote:

They didnt mix anything up.. Theres nothing to say they cant put rocks in with rivers etc. The idea is to test you.. on th whole course



this is a test of everything.. ie the whole course.. not just parts.

No, I think we're all pretty clear on what the "idea" of the Leaving Cert is. I think what she means is that in the 2006 exam paper and in ALL of the sample papers the physical questions were all separated. Of course we all knew it could happen, I myself didn't think it would this year. The way you're talking you sound like you're from the SEC.

cheater

exactly...

Haven't a Clue

cheater wrote:

shut the **** up, of course an opinion on geography warrants a thread of its own.. ****ing clowns

No it doesn't. Express the opinion within the thread that's already started about the geography exam. It's how the majority of people like to do it.

cheater

ya well maybe she's not part of the majority... she felt her opinion was important enough to warrant a thread of its own, so whats the problem?

FunkZ

Jaysus what a thread.

Mcj metroid

cheater wrote:

who asked you to offer your wealth of knowledge?

Lol you are gas.


Serriously though i found it quite hard too. nothing i wanted came up and it seems like i could do 2 parts of each question but never the whole lot.

Haven't a Clue

cheater wrote:

ya well maybe she's not part of the majority... she felt her opinion was important enough to warrant a thread of its own, so whats the problem?

It wasn't really important enough. If everyone thought their opinion on a specific paper was important enough, we'd be having a thread a minute here.

maggie18x

genericgoon wrote:

There is no official layout people. The course is only 2 years old. The department is well within its rights to alter the paper a bit at this early stage of its development.

ok sorry if im the only one it came as a shock to but the sample paper in 2006 they gave,the leaving cert in 2006,my mock this year and all the sapmle papers in the exam papers were done with this layout.the guy on 606 also said that they couldnt change the layout.
this just proves that whoever set out this paper wanted screw everyone over.and i was really banking on rivers an all to bring up my grade.i just realised in question one of the regional-the subcontinental q i wrote only about one primary activity-agriculture and they asked about activities.....me and my stupid brain....

go on cheater ya legend thanks for sticking up for me.me not so angry any more

FunkZ

Mcj metroid wrote:

Serriously though i found it quite hard too. nothing i wanted came up and it seems like i could do 2 parts of each question but never the whole lot.

Exact same with me, feckin' horrible.

maggie18x

QUOTE]=Haven't a Clue]No it doesn't. Express the opinion within the thread that's already started about the geography exam. It's how the majority of people like to do it.[[/QUOTE]

yeah well maybe i didnt feel like expressing myself in a thread that was dominated by how well people are doing.alot of people come on boards looking for advice saying that they are sooooo dead in whatever exam.and then all ya hear after the exam is "oh my god im so worried dont think i got the A1 in that exam".i just wanted to console anybody who did bad that they are not alone in how they are feeling.im after throwing away a whole career because of this exam and i was pissed off.is that ok with you robocop?

analyse this

cheater wrote:

who asked you to offer your wealth of knowledge?

Isn't that the point of the boards? ...to offer whatever knowledge you can?