Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Unsuccessful - post here

Options
13031333536106

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Sinemo


    Failed today in Raheny with 15 grade 2s and no grade 1s or 3s... I also think I got sunburnt... (doesn't make for a good day!)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭Faith+1


    Sinemo wrote: »
    Failed today in Raheny with 15 grade 2s and no grade 1s or 3s... I also think I got sunburnt... (doesn't make for a good day!)

    Sorry to hear that:(. That isn't too bad overall, my friend got 21 blues and 2 reds on his first test!!:eek:
    Just a little bit of tweaking and you'll fly it next time!:cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,171 ✭✭✭af_thefragile


    I failed again...
    This one went worse than the previous one.
    20 grade 2s.
    Had to deal with road works, lots of traffic, parked cars everywhere, cars stopping in the middle of the road to drop/pick people. The residential estate was pretty horrible as well. Quick consecutive corners (take next left then right then left again...) barely giving me any time to get my positioning and observation right. Cars parked on both sides of the road. I drove the best I could without any incident or anything and still got faults everywhere.

    I drove much much better than I did in my last test but ended up getting more faults than I did last time. Its like going backwards. When this time I know how to drive well (last time I did agree I didn't have much practice and experience).

    Bah... I'm quite gutted after that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭erwinvr101


    sorry to hear that. what time was your test? sounds like peak hours


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,171 ✭✭✭af_thefragile


    Was at 11am.
    Last time my test was on a saturday morning so was fairly quiet and the tester didn't take me on busy roads.
    This time it looked like the guy was picking out the busiest and trickiest possible routes to take me out on. Road works everywhere, weird roundabouts and junctions and all.
    And all the faults he gave me were for absolutely pedantic little things.

    I got 1 grade 2 for observation while doing the turnabout. It was a small empty corner of a street with no one around and I looked around around the car before making every mode.

    I got 3 grade 2's for progress at traffic lights. Ok, I was maybe 2secs too slow (not slow enough to cause any annoyance to anyone), like maybe I took about 3 secs to completely pull off from the lights. This is because my car has a very light clutch and so I need to pull out gently. If not I either end up stalling the car or revving it high and the car shoots out. But like, maybe it could be justified if I was falling asleep at the lights and taking 5-6secs to pull off but I didn't. No one ever beeped at me for being too slow. No one ever does because yes, I may not be as fast as everyone else but you still couldn't call it slow.

    Got a couple more grade 2's for gears. A couple of grade 2's for reaction towards hazards, there were roads works everywhere, people jumping in from every direction, I looked out for everything, slowed down when needed to and didn't hit or cause disruption to anything, what more was I supposed to do...

    Got a few grade 2's for observation and positioning while turning left, again I barely had time in those fast corners to get things right and I don't remember a single incident where I forgot to check the appropriate mirror or look in the right direction while making turns. I did everything by the book. Still it wasn't good enough.

    And I got a few more grade 2's for stupid crap like that. It was absolutely disappointing. Considering that now I know how to drive well. I've driven on all kinds of roads in the past month at all kinds of speeds in all kinds of traffic and haven't had a single incident. I've improved significantly since I got my own car and I'm much more confident at the wheel.

    I know people who are much worse drivers than me and they all managed to pass their test 1st or 2nd time. Especially some of the girls I know who aren't great drivers have passed their test with no problems. I feel the testers are partial towards female drivers. How is it that most girls I know who aren't great drivers pass their test without any problems while most guys I know who're much more confident and better drivers end up failing their test for pedantic things like observation, position, progress and such.

    Sorry if I'm ranting. I'm just in a very bad mood after that.
    Hopefully I should be better tomorrow after a good night's sleep! :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭erwinvr101


    about girls passing easily, i think that's a given specially if the tester is a dude. anyway, rant away mate. you have every right to. sometimes you just don't know what the testers want. and sometimes it all boils down to what they feel on that day


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭Toes


    I failed this morning in Wilton, Cork. I am hugely dissapointed. I felt that i drove very well and safely. Got 16 grade 2's overall. 2 for position on the straight and 1 at roundabouts. I got 5 grade 2's overall for observation, the instructor told me i used my mirrors too much. I also got 4 g2's in progress for on the straight.

    Tbh i would dispute a lot of them. I genuinely feel that if i had a different tester i would have passed.

    Driving ten months at this stage and had 4 pre tests. Crushed


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭ztoical


    I know people who are much worse drivers than me and they all managed to pass their test 1st or 2nd time. Especially some of the girls I know who aren't great drivers have passed their test with no problems. I feel the testers are partial towards female drivers. How is it that most girls I know who aren't great drivers pass their test without any problems while most guys I know who're much more confident and better drivers end up failing their test for pedantic things like observation, position, progress and such.

    While I don't agree testers are more partial towards female drivers there might be some connection between driving tests and gender studies that show women tend to test better then men in academic settings but only within certain age groups and as age goes up the difference balances out to null. There has been a number of studies of the junior and leaving results and the breakdown with regard to gender.

    There is also the element of children to add in....any of my female friends who passed first time were mothers who were either single parents or the main person looking after the child/children and as alot of their driving was focused on around town driving at times when schools were going in or letting out they were far more use to driving in test situations then say people who were mainly driving to/from work on main roads/between towns etc I know when I was learning I mainly got out for lessons in the evening after work and my first test ended up being at lunch time through the center of town and the school kids were almost throwing themselves in front of the car.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭zynaps


    ztoical wrote: »
    While I don't agree testers are more partial towards female drivers there might be some connection between driving tests and gender studies that show women tend to test better then men in academic settings but only within certain age groups and as age goes up the difference balances out to null. There has been a number of studies of the junior and leaving results and the breakdown with regard to gender.
    Which academic settings? I thought the current observations were that women tend to perform worse in many technical subjects. There's a very interesting argument that these differences in performance by males/females/ethnic groups/etc are a result of "stereotype threat" - specifically when the results of a test are considered important or meaningful (i.e. equally-skilled women and men take a "significant" maths test and women perform less well, but when the subjects are told the results are meaningless and it's just a lab tool, men and women perform equally well).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Just failed.

    As soon as I met the tester I knew there was no way I was going to pass. Savage weirdo, totally unfriendly, no sense of humour.

    He failed me because he said I consistently made these two mistake.

    1. I am taking my foot completely off the accelerator when changing gears.
    2. I am going into first gear when the car isn't at a complete stop, i.e. when rolling up to a stop sign very slowly I am changing down to first gear.

    These sound like ridiculous reasons to fail someone.

    Annoyed!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Melia


    I disagree with the comments about male testers being more likely to pass girls, based on my own experiences and those of people I know. I failed my first two tests, with male testers, and passed my third, with a female tester!
    Was at 11am.
    Last time my test was on a saturday morning so was fairly quiet and the tester didn't take me on busy roads.
    This time it looked like the guy was picking out the busiest and trickiest possible routes to take me out on. Road works everywhere, weird roundabouts and junctions and all.
    And all the faults he gave me were for absolutely pedantic little things.

    I got 1 grade 2 for observation while doing the turnabout. It was a small empty corner of a street with no one around and I looked around around the car before making every mode.

    I got 3 grade 2's for progress at traffic lights. Ok, I was maybe 2secs too slow (not slow enough to cause any annoyance to anyone), like maybe I took about 3 secs to completely pull off from the lights. This is because my car has a very light clutch and so I need to pull out gently. If not I either end up stalling the car or revving it high and the car shoots out. But like, maybe it could be justified if I was falling asleep at the lights and taking 5-6secs to pull off but I didn't. No one ever beeped at me for being too slow. No one ever does because yes, I may not be as fast as everyone else but you still couldn't call it slow.

    Got a couple more grade 2's for gears. A couple of grade 2's for reaction towards hazards, there were roads works everywhere, people jumping in from every direction, I looked out for everything, slowed down when needed to and didn't hit or cause disruption to anything, what more was I supposed to do...

    Got a few grade 2's for observation and positioning while turning left, again I barely had time in those fast corners to get things right and I don't remember a single incident where I forgot to check the appropriate mirror or look in the right direction while making turns. I did everything by the book. Still it wasn't good enough.

    And I got a few more grade 2's for stupid crap like that. It was absolutely disappointing. Considering that now I know how to drive well. I've driven on all kinds of roads in the past month at all kinds of speeds in all kinds of traffic and haven't had a single incident. I've improved significantly since I got my own car and I'm much more confident at the wheel.

    I know people who are much worse drivers than me and they all managed to pass their test 1st or 2nd time. Especially some of the girls I know who aren't great drivers have passed their test with no problems. I feel the testers are partial towards female drivers. How is it that most girls I know who aren't great drivers pass their test without any problems while most guys I know who're much more confident and better drivers end up failing their test for pedantic things like observation, position, progress and such.

    Sorry if I'm ranting. I'm just in a very bad mood after that.
    Hopefully I should be better tomorrow after a good night's sleep! :)

    How are you feeling about it now? I know how frustrating it is. But it doesn't matter how many times you've sat the test, it's nobody's business but yours anyway. And you will get it soon. Hopefully next time you'll have a different tester and you'll pass.

    Just a comment - I wouldn't call observation etc. pedantic things to be marked on - remember your close shave before because you didn't see a car in your blind spot? Maybe it's because these guys you know are overconfident that they're lax with these basics and aren't driving safely enough.

    I hope you've applied again, and wish you the best of luck with your next (and hopefully last!) test.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭Melia


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    Just failed.

    As soon as I met the tester I knew there was no way I was going to pass. Savage weirdo, totally unfriendly, no sense of humour.

    He failed me because he said I consistently made these two mistake.

    1. I am taking my foot completely off the accelerator when changing gears.
    2. I am going into first gear when the car isn't at a complete stop, i.e. when rolling up to a stop sign very slowly I am changing down to first gear.

    These sound like ridiculous reasons to fail someone.

    Annoyed!!

    Sorry to hear that. Have you reapplied?

    #1 seems odd, I'm pretty sure I do that too. I'll have to check next time I'm driving.

    #2 seems fair enough if you're switching down a gear when you don't need to, but at least it's something you can work on. Are you switching down a gear too early because you're worried you'll stall?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Melia wrote: »
    Sorry to hear that. Have you reapplied?

    #1 seems odd, I'm pretty sure I do that too. I'll have to check next time I'm driving.

    #2 seems fair enough if you're switching down a gear when you don't need to, but at least it's something you can work on. Are you switching down a gear too early because you're worried you'll stall?

    Thanks for the reply.

    Regarding #2, let's say I am approaching a junction where I know I am going to have to stop. As I approach the junction I'll be breaking, and then just before the junction instead of stopping in say 3rd gear, changing into 1st gear and then moving off, I'll move down to 1st gear just before the stop (I'll already be about about 5 kph) so I am ready to go as soon as it's safe. This is what my instructor and his schools DVD said I should do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭zynaps


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    Regarding #2, let's say I am approaching a junction where I know I am going to have to stop. As I approach the junction I'll be breaking, and then just before the junction instead of stopping in say 3rd gear, changing into 1st gear and then moving off, I'll move down to 1st gear just before the stop (I'll already be about about 5 kph) so I am ready to go as soon as it's safe. This is what my instructor and his schools DVD said I should do.
    About #1, completely taking your foot off the accelerator when changing gears is similar to keeping your foot down - when you upshift you need to drop the engine speed a bit, and increase the engine speed a bit when you downshift... otherwise you'll get that jerky moment when releasing the clutch resolves the imbalance between transmission and engine RPM. However, the engine speed will of course shoot up if you hold your foot as-is when pressing the clutch, since it's suddenly freewheeling... so most people (including me) just ease off the throttle like you do, but not so far as to lift your foot right off it.
    You probably compensate by releasing the clutch slowly and smoothly, so it's not a big deal.

    #2 is odd, but seems slightly related to engine braking, which some instructors seem indifferent about and some recommend you don't do - mine used the adage "gears to go, brakes to slow". More specifically relating to your case, he asked me to slow down and stop in third because it's good to have both hands on the wheel, staying in control of the car.
    It seems somewhat arbitrary and a personal choice thing - surely taking one hand off the wheel at 5kph (and slowing) to change gears is less significant than taking one hand off the wheel at 50kph (which we do all the time) - if it's considered dangerous or indicative of a lack of control at very low speeds, then obviously it's even more so at cruising speeds.

    Soon after I passed the test, I got an automatic anyway and have both hands on the wheel all the time now (which is, I must say, superb fun :D), but before that I got used to stopping in 3rd, then switching to first when ready... it felt more controlled and relaxed.

    Did you actually get grade 2 faults for those things (and how many)? They both seem like flimsy reasons to fail someone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    zynaps wrote: »
    About #1, completely taking your foot off the accelerator when changing gears is similar to keeping your foot down - when you upshift you need to drop the engine speed a bit, and increase the engine speed a bit when you downshift... otherwise you'll get that jerky moment when releasing the clutch resolves the imbalance between transmission and engine RPM. However, the engine speed will of course shoot up if you hold your foot as-is when pressing the clutch, since it's suddenly freewheeling... so most people (including me) just ease off the throttle like you do, but not so far as to lift your foot right off it.
    You probably compensate by releasing the clutch slowly and smoothly, so it's not a big deal.

    #2 is odd, but seems slightly related to engine braking, which some instructors seem indifferent about and some recommend you don't do - mine used the adage "gears to go, brakes to slow". More specifically relating to your case, he asked me to slow down and stop in third because it's good to have both hands on the wheel, staying in control of the car.
    It seems somewhat arbitrary and a personal choice thing - surely taking one hand off the wheel at 5kph (and slowing) to change gears is less significant than taking one hand off the wheel at 50kph (which we do all the time) - if it's considered dangerous or indicative of a lack of control at very low speeds, then obviously it's even more so at cruising speeds.

    Soon after I passed the test, I got an automatic anyway and have both hands on the wheel all the time now (which is, I must say, superb fun :D), but before that I got used to stopping in 3rd, then switching to first when ready... it felt more controlled and relaxed.

    Did you actually get grade 2 faults for those things (and how many)? They both seem like flimsy reasons to fail someone.

    Thanks for the reply.

    He gave me 12 grade 2 faults for these two issues, so I failed the test. I would have passed if he didn't do this.

    Regarding your two replies:

    #1: so are you saying when I am going from say 2nd to 3rd gear, I should keep my foot on the accelerator?! Won't that just make the engine go WHEEEE! If so, keep it where it was in 2nd, or release it a bit but not all the way...?

    #2: yeah, I can understand why you might stop in say 3rd, then change to 1st, but it just seems quicker to already be in 1st and ready to go...

    But honestly, I think he was going to fail me no matter what. He seemed mighty pissed off with life.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭zynaps


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    He gave me 12 grade 2 faults for these two issues, so I failed the test. I would have passed if he didn't do this.
    That's pretty disturbing and maybe worth chasing up with the RSA.
    AARRRGH wrote: »
    #1: so are you saying when I am going from say 2nd to 3rd gear, I should keep my foot on the accelerator?! Won't that just make the engine go WHEEEE! If so, keep it where it was in 2nd, or release it a bit but not all the way...?
    No, I mean set the throttle so the engine speed will (roughly) match the input to the gearbox, which will suddenly change when you shift gears.

    Note that I'm not an expert at any of this, but it seems logical... so take it with a grain of salt! :D

    At higher gears, the wheels are turning faster without the engine speed increasing (think of going up gears on a bicycle - you have to push harder, rather than faster).
    When you go from 2nd to 3rd, your wheel speed will be fixed (during that short gear change period), but the gearbox side of the clutch will slow down. e.g. If 3rd gear was twice the ratio of 2nd gear (it's not, but easy to visualise), the clutch-to-gearbox shaft would slow down to half its speed when you shift up.

    So going from 2nd to 3rd, drop off the throttle a bit. Going down from 3rd to 2nd is the opposite, you would increase the engine speed a little but that will happen automatically since it has less work to do when you press the clutch. Experiment with it until gear shifts feel smooth (i.e. car doesn't jerk faster/slower) without having to declutch slowly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭DriveSkill


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    Thanks for the reply.

    Regarding #2, let's say I am approaching a junction where I know I am going to have to stop. As I approach the junction I'll be breaking, and then just before the junction instead of stopping in say 3rd gear, changing into 1st gear and then moving off, I'll move down to 1st gear just before the stop (I'll already be about about 5 kph) so I am ready to go as soon as it's safe. This is what my instructor and his schools DVD said I should do.

    I think it would entirely depend on the type of junction, what you seem to be decribing is a technique sometimes referred to as a 'rolling stop' (i.e. almost stopped, move into 1st and then off again) and is applicable to 'Yield' junctions rather than STOP junctions. If the juction is a STOP then in my opinion you should not be going into 1st gear before you have stopped. The correct procedure would be to arrive at the junction, stop in whatever gear you are in, then while making your observations you should be selecting 1st gear and then be ready to move off if clear. There is no real advantage in being in 1st gear as you approach as you must come to a complete stop anyway, ensure its clear and then move off.


  • Registered Users Posts: 242 ✭✭greyc


    DriveSkill wrote: »
    I think it would entirely depend on the type of junction, what you seem to be decribing is a technique sometimes referred to as a 'rolling stop' (i.e. almost stopped, move into 1st and then off again) and is applicable to 'Yield' junctions rather than STOP junctions. If the juction is a STOP then in my opinion you should not be going into 1st gear before you have stopped. The correct procedure would be to arrive at the junction, stop in whatever gear you are in, then while making your observations you should be selecting 1st gear and then be ready to move off if clear. There is no real advantage in being in 1st gear as you approach as you must come to a complete stop anyway, ensure its clear and then move off.

    I was taught to roll into 1st before stopping and that's what I did on my test without any problem. Perhaps it does depend on the junction but I disagree that it's no advantage rolling into 1st before stopping or that it should only be done at a Yield junction. Surely by doing this you are eliminating the possibility of picking up faults for progress.

    Remember most people doing a driving test are not experienced and are likely to be nervous as well. If you approach a stop junction and change back into 1st as you're stopping, while at the same time observing left and right, you're going to get away that bit quicker, rather than say approaching the junction in 3rd, braking, pressing down the clutch, coming to a stop, taking it back out of gear, finding 1st, looking left and right, finding the bite point, then moving off.

    Maybe that's driving by the rule book but I don't think it's necessarily a better way of doing it, and I certainly can't understand why anyone would be marked for rolling into 1st. I don't even know what you could be marked for. If you only change into 1st as you're stopping, you can't be done for coasting, and if you're allowed stop in any gear, you can't be marked for gears. It makes no sense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭zynaps


    greyc wrote: »
    If you only change into 1st as you're stopping, you can't be done for coasting, and if you're allowed stop in any gear, you can't be marked for gears. It makes no sense.
    I think gear faults would also include changing gears at inappropriate moments? But I don't think it makes sense to mark for this either... and certainly not 12 grade twos between the two complaints.


  • Registered Users Posts: 242 ✭✭greyc


    zynaps wrote: »
    I think gear faults would also include changing gears at inappropriate moments? But I don't think it makes sense to mark for this either... and certainly not 12 grade twos between the two complaints.

    Yes I agree, if you change down to 1st while still doing 20kmh you'll get marked for gears, and maybe that's what happened in this case, but from reading the post it doesn't seem like that happened

    My best friend failed her test last year. She had 5 grade 2's, 4 of them for gears. The tester told her it was because she DIDN'T change down thru the gears when stopping. She got a cancellation 3 weeks later, had the same tester, drove exactly the same as the first test, ie stopped in whatever gear she was in, and passed with no gear faults.
    It just makes you wonder sometimes.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    greyc wrote: »
    Yes I agree, if you change down to 1st while still doing 20kmh you'll get marked for gears, and maybe that's what happened in this case

    Definitely not what happened in this case. :)

    I would only ever change down to 1st gear if the car was at a walking pace (or slower than walking pace).

    I think he basically just wanted to fail me as he knew I was a new driver. He couldn't get me on anything else (my reversing, turnabout, progression, observation, etc. were fine) so he got me for this.

    But honestly I could tell when I met him I was going to fail. He seemed in a very odd mood.

    Thanks for the replies everyone. I have considered everything you have said so far.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭Explosive_Cornflake


    My thoughts on 1st gear is that it would only be used to impart momentum into the car, i.e. to bring it from 0kph until it's moving. If the car is moving at all you have no need to be in 1st, apart from say making you way onto a roundabout in stop/start traffic and your speed isn't going above 5kph.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭zynaps


    greyc wrote: »
    My best friend failed her test last year. She had 5 grade 2's, 4 of them for gears. The tester told her it was because she DIDN'T change down thru the gears when stopping. She got a cancellation 3 weeks later, had the same tester, drove exactly the same as the first test, ie stopped in whatever gear she was in, and passed with no gear faults.
    It just makes you wonder sometimes.
    Another disturbing tale of arbitrary, inconsistent decisions by testers. :eek: Although I'm somewhat surprised that people have been getting any sort of specific feedback from them (which leaves them open to rightful scrutiny). On both occasions, the testers refused to give me a single bit of advice, telling me simply to present my marking sheet to my driving instructor (even after I passed) who would magically understand (which is hilariously stupid, since all the contextual information on what actually happened on the road is lost). :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,171 ✭✭✭af_thefragile


    zynaps wrote: »
    Another disturbing tale of arbitrary, inconsistent decisions by testers. :eek: Although I'm somewhat surprised that people have been getting any sort of specific feedback from them (which leaves them open to rightful scrutiny). On both occasions, the testers refused to give me a single bit of advice, telling me simply to present my marking sheet to my driving instructor (even after I passed) who would magically understand (which is hilariously stupid, since all the contextual information on what actually happened on the road is lost). :confused:

    All my tester told me was to read the back of the test sheet to figure out where I went wrong and I failed because I got more than 8 grade 2s...
    Very helpful...

    Shouldn't the testers take into consideration the traffic and road conditions while you're doing the test?

    Anyway, about the gears, when I'm stopping at lights, I just press the brake to slow the car down and when the revs drop below 1000rpm, I press in the clutch and bring the car to a stop. Once the car is stopped, I push it into 1st.

    This makes sense to me as firstly when you're just bringing your car to a stop in gear, the engine is using almost no fuel, so you're saving there. And secondly you're stopping the car anyway and there is no point going down the gears before you come to a complete stop, you're only giving yourself more work to do.

    But then I got like a couple of grade 2s for gears so maybe this is where I'm going wrong!

    I use the 1st gear when taking off from a stand still and at some corners which I need to take slowly and 2nd gear struggles at those slow speeds (around 5mph).


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,315 ✭✭✭phonypony


    Had my test declined to be conducted because of my fading L plates, which the nice tester described on the letter as 'barely usable' (surely that means they are usable, if only barely???), citing section 9 (3) of the 'final checks' leaflet, which actually says nothing about fading colours. I take it this is how they make their money. He initially said he was going to conduct the test anyway, but then suddenly changed his mind (probably realising he could have another tea break instead). Given the centre has a 42% pass rate of those who actually get to take the test, I wonder what the pass rate is of those who apply...


  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Sinemo


    phonypony wrote: »
    Had my test declined to be conducted because of my fading L plates, which the nice tester described on the letter as 'barely usable' (surely that means they are usable, if only barely???), citing section 9 (3) of the 'final checks' leaflet, which actually says nothing about fading colours. I take it this is how they make their money. He initially said he was going to conduct the test anyway, but then suddenly changed his mind (probably realising he could have another tea break instead). Given the centre has a 42% pass rate of those who actually get to take the test, I wonder what the pass rate is of those who apply...

    If you believe that this was unfair, the RSA invites people to bring their cases to them. If they side with you, then they will pay for the test...
    (feel free to correct me!)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭MascotDec85


    phonypony wrote: »
    Had my test declined to be conducted because of my fading L plates, which the nice tester described on the letter as 'barely usable' (surely that means they are usable, if only barely???), citing section 9 (3) of the 'final checks' leaflet, which actually says nothing about fading colours. I take it this is how they make their money. He initially said he was going to conduct the test anyway, but then suddenly changed his mind (probably realising he could have another tea break instead). Given the centre has a 42% pass rate of those who actually get to take the test, I wonder what the pass rate is of those who apply...

    Post a picture of the faded L Plate. That way more experienced ADI's can determine whether or not you have a case.

    Section 9 (c) states:
    9. The following must be displayed on your vehicle:

    c) ‘L’ plates front and rear (a rectangular plate or sign bearing the letter ‘L’ not less than fifteen centimetres high in red on a white background and a border of at least 2 centimetres). From 1st December 2007 all provisional licence/learner permit holders for motorcycle.........................................


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,315 ✭✭✭phonypony


    Sinemo wrote: »
    If you believe that this was unfair, the RSA invites people to bring their cases to them. If they side with you, then they will pay for the test...
    (feel free to correct me!)

    They'd probably waive the re-booking fee alright, but I'm one of those who'd see pursuing it as more hassle than it's worth, for the sake of convenience, just buy new L plates, pay the fee and get a cancellation ;)...

    I'll try get a photo when I've a chance, my own instructor personally would have accepted them, but I guess that's just the inconsistent nature of humans and their interpretation of discretion, not much you can do about that!


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭Degag


    phonypony wrote: »
    They'd probably waive the re-booking fee alright, but I'm one of those who'd see pursuing it as more hassle than it's worth, for the sake of convenience, just buy new L plates, pay the fee and get a cancellation ;)...

    I'll try get a photo when I've a chance, my own instructor personally would have accepted them, but I guess that's just the inconsistent nature of humans and their interpretation of discretion, not much you can do about that!

    Sorry mate, that must have been a kick in the teeth.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭zynaps


    phonypony wrote: »
    They'd probably waive the re-booking fee alright, but I'm one of those who'd see pursuing it as more hassle than it's worth, for the sake of convenience, just buy new L plates, pay the fee and get a cancellation ;)...
    I'm one of those who would pursue it relentlessly on principle, even though it probably wouldn't be worth the price of the phone calls/wasted time :D


Advertisement