Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Car Issue

Options
  • 22-07-2007 1:57pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭


    Hope this is the right forum...Bought a car off reputable dealer..04 car with 6000 miles...Daewoo lacetti...
    Driving into athlone yesterday and timing belt snaps with 56000 on the clock...engine is gone...
    Just wondering where i stand here as garage cant help me until 9.00am tomorrow..The head salesman has told me off record that mileage was low for this to happen but he doest have the final say on this..(rang him this morning at his house)


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    Hope this is the right forum...Bought a car off reputable dealer..04 car with 6000 miles...Daewoo lacetti...
    Driving into athlone yesterday and timing belt snaps with 56000 on the clock...engine is gone...
    /QUOTE]

    It's the wrong forum but someone will move it.

    Your 04 car has 6,000 miles (seems very low) but the timing belt has 56,000 on the clock.

    I'm confused. Is you car clocked or something? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    sorry for confusion..i bought the car with 6000 miles on the clock..it was only 9 months old...when belt went yesterday car had 56000 on clock...the only reason i mentioned buying it with 6000 on clock was im not sure of warranty on 2nd hand cars..timing belt should not have to be changed im told between 60000 and 65000.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Squall


    So youve put 50000 miles on the car since you bought it? Seeing that its a 04thats under 3 years. Thats a fair bit of driving in such a short period of time.... could be why the belt went sooner than expected.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,386 ✭✭✭EKRIUQ


    Most warranties won't cover more than 10,000 miles, if you after putting 50,000 miles on the clock since you got it why at your last service wasn't it noticed???

    I'd guess your out of luck


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    real sickener to buy a decent car and have to replace the engine after only 56000 miles..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 994 ✭✭✭Carrigart Exile


    real sickener to buy a decent car and have to replace the engine after only 56000 miles..

    That happened to me and ever since every second hand car I've bought has got a new timing belt


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭cast_iron


    real sickener to buy a decent car and have to replace the engine after only 56000 miles..
    Em, it's a Daewoo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    in this day and age a car with 56000 miles should not have problems no matter what make...its not like its a lada??


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Get a Toyota instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    A few things.

    You have the car over two years and your going back to the garage with the issue? :rolleyes:

    Did you not get the timing chain checked on last service? When was this?

    Who told you the engine was 'gone'?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    i am on here to see where i stand...guy that services the car told me last nite that a timing belt does not need to be changed until between 60000 and 65000.Car was serviced on time since i got it.
    Im not one to cry so if its not covered by warranty then fine...just someone told me that it should not have gone after 56000


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭tommycahir


    unfortunately i have a feeling that the garage will say that that as mentioned above the warranty was for 12 months or 10,000 miles which ever comes first.

    I personally make a point of changing the timing belt every 45-50 k miles. As I put up over 33k miles per year on a 1.4 petrol i think that it is best to get the belt changed sooner than recommended as I am putting the car under more than average mileage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,454 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Car would be sold with manufacturers 3 year warranty from date of registration. It's not the garage's problem now I'm afraid.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,280 ✭✭✭✭Esel


    ...guy that services the car told me last nite that a timing belt does not need to be changed until between 60000 and 65000....
    If your mechanic was talking about any timing belt, he was well wrong. Different cars have different intervals. It's always better to change early, as you have found out.

    It may be the case that your engine is not 'gone'. Some engines are 'non-interference', which means that timing belt failure does not cause engine damage. Check this aspect out for your car.

    Also, afaik, the damage (if there) will usually be confined to pistons and valves etc. so you probably won't need a complete replacement engine. Might be cheaper to get a s/h one from a breakers though. If doing this, be sure your mechanic gives it the OK first.

    Not your ornery onager



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭patrickc


    theres always give or take with timing belts,, depends on the driving also.. i personally change them 5k below recommended mileage


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭rebel.ranter


    If the manufacturer says that 60k to 65k miles is the interval for the timing belt then you may have a case. You'll have to have proof of that though that the interval is 60-65k. In additon I think Daewoo come with a 4 year manufacturuer warranty too.
    EDIT: Just checked it's only 3 years


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,714 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    When on 2004 was the car registered?
    When did you buy the car and did that garage just use the manufacturers warranty or was a dealer engine and gearbox warranty given & if so was it in writing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭Darven


    okay, i couldnt even read to end of all the replies, think bluetonic touched on what i was thinking. my golf had timing belt done at 54k. the engine is gone? what? you replace timing belt and water pump and away you go. its labour intensive but the belt might cost you 30 or 40 quid.

    also saying a belt shouldnt go is like saying you shouldnt have to refill window washers but once a month. its essential maintenance, same as clutch or gear box to certain extent.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭gyppo


    OP,

    If my reading on this is correct, your timing belt went before the manufacturers specified replacement interval. Have you a service history that can be verified and confirmed?
    If so, then I'd be onto the irish distributors of this car, and see what they have to say...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    ok here is the latest..rang garage today and was told that belt needed to be changed at 48000 which is fair enough..my mechanics fault...but this has me fuming..im at home with no car and my place of work is 40 miles away and im due in at 1pm..i asked garage could they fix the car at my cost and give me another car to get me around while fixing mine and i was told no that they dont want anything to do with the car and to feck off.that they were under pressure with a 2 week backlog.brilliant after sales service..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 799 ✭✭✭MR DAZ


    You cant really blame them ... if you haven't been getting your car serviced there...and it is nearly a year since you bought it from them right?

    Why not go back to your mechanic and get him to fix it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    hold on im not blaming them for timing belt but after shelling out 14000 euros 2 years ago im sick to the teeth with their after sales treatment.I would have paid to get it fixed but no feck off and stop annoying me was what i got on the phone....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭\m/_(>_<)_\m/


    hold on im not blaming them for timing belt but after shelling out 14000 euros 2 years ago im sick to the teeth with their after sales treatment.I would have paid to get it fixed but no feck off and stop annoying me was what i got on the phone....

    well i suspect that the boys in the dealers aren't thick and coped that you were looking to blame them and get them to replace the engine...when that didn't work you asked them to do the work at cost....
    is their something your not telling us... like does you dad own the dealership, because you seem to be expecting quite a lot from them, they owe you nothing, the car is two years old, you never went back to them for a service you got your own guy, but now you expect them to drop everything an fix your car...forget about their regular customer who buy and return for the service.

    i would have said the same.... nobody wants or needs customer like that. sorry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭OKenora


    IMHO You have no recourse here against anyone except yourself. As owner of the car you are supposed to know when it needs servicing, it's all in the manual.

    If it needed a belt at 48k it should have got one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    You need to check this stuff out:
    a) What duration is the manufacturer's warranty?
    b) From the date of purchase, is the car still under warranty?
    c) What is the timing belt interval? You need to find this out from the manual.


  • Registered Users Posts: 673 ✭✭✭TychoCaine


    There's two things at play here, warranty and product quality. Your warranty is up, so you have no claim there. In your case the timing belt is designed to last 60000 miles, but the dealers are instructed to check the timing belt as part of every service in case it's wearing faster than normal. Wear time depends as much on the type of driving done as on actual milage covered, so the 60K is only a guideline.

    If the timing belt snaps before 60k, and a Daewoo approved mechanic checked it at the previous service and did not tell you to change it early, then you have a claim. I have heard of this happening on Ford cars, and in each case Ford have covered the cost of the new engine.

    In your case the services were carried out by mechanics other than manufacturer certified ones, so who's to say they checked the belt at all? If you can't prove that manufacturer specified checks designed to prevent this were carried out, then you're on your own. :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,316 ✭✭✭lafors


    esel wrote:
    If your mechanic was talking about any timing belt, he was well wrong. Different cars have different intervals. It's always better to change early, as you have found out.

    It may be the case that your engine is not 'gone'. Some engines are 'non-interference', which means that timing belt failure does not cause engine damage. Check this aspect out for your car.

    Also, afaik, the damage (if there) will usually be confined to pistons and valves etc. so you probably won't need a complete replacement engine. Might be cheaper to get a s/h one from a breakers though. If doing this, be sure your mechanic gives it the OK first.


    esel, afaik when the timing belt goes is how your engine will fare. It the belt goes while your doing a decent speed on the motorway (for example) then yes your engine will probably be mince meat. If it goes at a low speed, then maybe it'll only have minor damage. Many variables :(

    Same thing happen to my dad's passat about a month ago, engine was wrecked, I went to the garage to see the damage after it was removed, amazing the damage that was done. He was doing 120 on the M50 when it happened.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭bookiebasher


    quite a few people are missing my point here..

    1.I am not expecting garage to do repairs for free..i would have paid to get it done
    2..someone said i wasnt a customer of them as i got the car serviced elsewhere..HELLO i purchased the car from this garage..i would have thought that they would have fixed it at my expense and given my a car to get to work while it was being repaired.
    3..i posted here yesterday just to find out where i stood as regards the belt snapping after 56000 miles..i never stated as a poster wrote earlier that i wanted work carried out for free..


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭OKenora


    Quite a lot of people seem to be posting without reading

    THE TIMING BELT INTERVAL IS 48K

    It broke at 56k (wasn't changed at 48k), nobody to blame, no warranty will cover it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 673 ✭✭✭TychoCaine


    If you have an interference engine then the inlet or exhaust valves will still be open, and in the way, when the pistons comes up when the belt snaps. The valves will be snapped off and driven into the cylinder head. It means new valves, cylinder head and pistons. Lafors is wrong when he says that slow driving has an effect. The cylinders are hammering up and down @ 12 times a second even at idle, so engine or wheel speed is irrelevant.

    Non-interference engines are ones where the valves don't drop low enough in the cylinder to be hit by the piston at any time. When a timing belt goes in one of those the car just comes to a spluttering halt on the side of the road. The worst damage you'll get is a messed up catalytic converter from unspent fuel going into the exhaust system, and that's rare.

    The valves and cylinder head are easily replaceable, but the pistons are attached to the crank shaft at the bottom of the engine. Getting at it means removing the engine and almost total disassembly, which gets stupidly expensive at garage rates. It is almost always cheaper to replace the entire thing with a 2nd hand/recon engine. In most cases even a new engine is still cheaper than repairing the original.

    The thing is that the Lacetti isn't the most common car on the roads, and the oldest is only 3 years old, so you're not going to have an easy time finding one in a scrap yard.


Advertisement