Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back a page or two to re-sync the thread and this will then show latest posts. Thanks, Mike.

Co Ax booster/amplifier

  • 23-07-2007 1:33pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 174 ✭✭


    I have set up a new LCD tv in a downstairs room, have co ax running from a sky box upstairs, using a tv-link for the remote. it's about 10 metres of a run.

    Thing is the picture quality is only ok. Would a signal booster help this or is using co-ax always going to limit the quality ?

    The co-ax cable downstairs is chased into the wall - so changing to another cable type would be a pain, and i'd also need a new way of using the sky remote.

    all suggestions welcome ...


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭big_moe


    boosters are ok in some circumstances. they boost the signal, so if you have a grainy signal, the grain will get boosted. Coax isn't great to start with so you're never going to get great quality.

    moe


  • Registered Users Posts: 174 ✭✭kevodaly


    its a pity my coax is already behind plaster. its so neat just having the tv on the wall with no cables visible.

    i guess s-video would be the best connection ? i'm sure i'd figure out a way of getting it to the back of the tv without much of a mess.

    tv is hanging on a cavity wall - so perhaps i could bore through to the cavity and drop the cable down from the attic.

    would an s-video run of over 10 metres lose quality ? it'd still be better than the coax though right ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭big_moe


    yeah s-vid is the way to go. the only thing is your sky box mightn't have an s-vid output.

    we use a 15 metre run of s-video in work and its grand, signal looks perfect.

    moe


  • Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 19,124 Mod ✭✭✭✭byte
    byte


    Just bear in mind that you'll still need a remote extender of some sort to be able to change channels, probably best to just leave the Coaxial cable and Sky eye there for that purpose.

    If you do go ahead with S-Video, bear in mind you'll also need to consider audio cabling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 174 ✭✭kevodaly


    Thanks a lot for the replies...

    The Sky box has s-video and audio outputs alright - i'll look into the best way of concealing the cables in the room - I don't really want to have to drop them from the ceiling.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement