Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Pre NCT STP additives

Options
  • 25-07-2007 3:08pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 56 ✭✭


    Bonzer - My petrol car is up for a nct on friday. In a pre nct they said it passed but emissions was borderline. Fail is 1.3 and it was 1.295 (!)

    Presume they tested it cold so perhaps driving to the test place in 3rd might ensure its ok.

    Does anyone know if its ok to add stp fuel additive to the tank so close to the actual test?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Marcus.Aurelius


    If you add stp to hte tank, you may push your emissions past the acceptable mark. If you think about it, adding a cleaner to your car pre-nct with such short notice cannot but increase your emissions as the stp clears out some of the gunk in your engine.

    What part of your emissions were high? CO or HCs?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    That bordeline figure is the lambda reading. I doubt that any of those additives that you put into the tank will affect it much.

    You may well have a slight blow in the exhaust which is causing this high lambda.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 56 ✭✭ciscokidder


    Gents thanks for those replies. Saved me a foolish action there, cheers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Marcus.Aurelius


    I thought lambda was 1.003 not 1.3.

    A lambda of 1.3 would mean your engine is dead!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,386 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Its 0.97-1.03, 1.003 is near perfect. Even though the OP said 1.3 I'm pretty sure he has left out a zero :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Marcus.Aurelius


    BrianD3 wrote:
    Its 0.97-1.03, 1.003 is near perfect. Even though the OP said 1.3 I'm pretty sure he has left out a zero :)

    You mean 1.000 is perfect, a perfect balanced proportion surely????

    At any rate, the STP could still throw the lambda past the tolerance levels, as it is added to the fuel mix and so it may influence gas levels in the exhaust system.


  • Registered Users Posts: 895 ✭✭✭zapata


    Sorry about hijacking this thread.

    Would an additive help out my situation?

    1999, 1.6 petrol, black top engine, mondeo failed CO emissions.
    Results

    Engine/Oil Temperature 82 celcius

    Low idle CO 0.05 vol%
    (700 rpm) HC 0 ppm

    High idle Lambda: 0.985
    (3130 rpm) CO 0.38 vol% above 0.3 % fail
    HC 120 ppm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 56 ✭✭ciscokidder


    Yeah I did miss a 0 ....
    Will be spending the day today finding out all about lambda .... :(

    :D:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 56 ✭✭ciscokidder


    So - results are in . Pass.

    Lambda was 1.00 in the nct test - so clearly something dodgy with caroll kinsella testing device (though car would haave been cold in CK and hot in NCT)


    Thanks for the advice all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,269 ✭✭✭MercMad


    So - results are in . Pass.

    Lambda was 1.00 in the nct test - so clearly something dodgy with caroll kinsella testing device (though car would haave been cold in CK and hot in NCT)


    Thanks for the advice all.


    ...........well thats your answer right there, colder engine = higher emissions !


  • Advertisement
Advertisement