Liverpool Rumours And General Discussion 2007/2008

RE*AC*TOR

Red card for Emerton there + another peno.

mayordenis

**** sake lads it was barely a foul, if you want to debate the introduction of a sinbin do it somewhere that isnt "liverpool rumours and general discussion" its completely off topic.

RE*AC*TOR

Nice

Guy:Incognito

Tttttttttttttooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssssss

NotWormBoy

Stekelly wrote: »

Nope youd just be hearing "the ref ruined the game with that red" only with " the sinbin...." every week.

Sure we get that anyways

Gotta stop listening to them sometime though - let them whinge. I have no doubts that they won't introduce sin-binning, since they haven't got the bottle, but they should. Just like they should retroactivly punish diving, etc, but they won't.

But I suppose this is the LFC thread, I'll drop it here.

mike65

Up yours haters!

Mike.

Xavi6

RE*AC*TOR wrote: »

Red card for Emerton there + another peno.

ROFL suuuuuuure

Sherifu

Fcuk sake, ref is taking the piss.



2-0 Torres. Sweet.

RE*AC*TOR

Peno number 3.

mayordenis

Xavi6 wrote: »

ROFL suuuuuuure

you're looking a bit silly at this stage, we get it you've got a completely blinkered view of this game,

that was the second professional foul, and should of been there second red, another peno there aswell, samba hasn't even been booked.

lordgoat

Dive number 2 or 3?

Guy:Incognito

Neither. That would have been a soft peno, not adive or a hack down (have I got that right Xavi?:))

Xavi6

mayordenis wrote: »

you're looking at this stage, we get it you've got a completely blinkered view of this game,

that was the second professional foul, and should of been there second red, another peno there aswell, samba hasn't even been booked.

Blinkered view? I'm watching this game as a neutral unlike you and your red tinted glasses. No way was it a peno and a red card. If something is a peno I'll be more than happy to say so. None of those incidents were definite penos.

mayordenis

Xavi6 wrote: »

Blinkered view? I'm watching this game as a neutral unlike you and your red tinted glasses. No way was it a peno and a red card.

not supporting either teams doesnt make you a nuetral.
you clearly have a dislike for liverpool why do you feel the need to just sit in this thread acting like a child?

Guy:Incognito

Xavi6 wrote: »

Blinkered view? I'm watching this game as a neutral unlike you and your red tinted glasses. No way was it a peno and a red card.

The colour of the card can be argued but it was one or the other and it cant be a card without a peno.........

machiavellianme

lordgoat wrote: »

Dive number 2 or 3?

How is it a dive? Contact was made, its slippery. Even a sure-footed mountain goat would have it hard under that kind of pressure. He didnt even contest a penalty at any point. Gerrard was harshly hauled out of it by Samba earlier. Suppose that was a dive too?
Either way, he scored a beauty and set up another on his 300th appearance for his club

Villain

Gerrard dived again but Torres should have had a Peno

dobsdave

Xavi6 wrote: »

Blinkered view? I'm watching this game as a neutral unlike you and your red tinted glasses. No way was it a peno and a red card.

:rolleyes:There is no way you are neutral in this game.Give us a break will ya.

Unearthly

Stky10 wrote: »

Ah nothing like the smell of irony in the morning. Man Utd fans going on about Gerrard being a diver, when their own hero Ronaldo is the accepted past master at it.

but Ronaldo doesn't go around accusing other professionals of ruining the game by diving.

Guy:Incognito

dobsdave wrote: »

:rolleyes:There is no way you are neutral in this game.Give us a break will ya.

As neutral as he is with Sunderland I think he meant.:)

Xavi6

mayordenis wrote: »

not supporting either teams doesnt make you a nuetral.
you clearly have a dislike for liverpool why do you feel the need to just sit in this thread acting like a child?

'Clearly'? Please explain

If anything I want them to win in order to keep Blackburn below us.

And as for my supposed acting like a child in your precious thread, is it because I'm not conforming to the Liverpool way that has you wanting me out?

RE*AC*TOR

Fair play to the lads today, was always a chance that the energy levels would be down after the midweek trashing of Arsenal. But they stuck at it, even though Blackburn were kicking the legs off most of them for the 90 minutes. Very questionable refereeing, Liverpool should have had two penalties and Samba and Emerton should have been off. But, job done. Roll on Fulham.

YNWA

Guy:Incognito

Riise and Voronin combine for a goal. Who'da thiunk it.

Right, he's injured now, lets take him off, sell him and never speak of the man again.

machiavellianme

good man voronin, increase your value

PiE

Surely the weekly fixture thread is a better place for all these annoying c*nt posts?

Delighted for Torres to keep up his scoring record.

Sherifu

Xavi6 wrote: »

Blinkered view? I'm watching this game as a neutral unlike you and your red tinted glasses. No way was it a peno and a red card. If something is a peno I'll be more than happy to say so. None of those incidents were definite penos.

Stop embarrassing yourself. 3-0

mayordenis

3-0 is a fair result

RasTa

I hope someone is going to have a word with Gerrard about his diving. 2 more for the youtube clip today.

lordgoat

machiavellianme wrote: »

How is it a dive? Contact was made, its slippery. Even a sure-footed mountain goat would have it hard under that kind of pressure. He didnt even contest a penalty at any point. Gerrard was harshly hauled out of it by Samba earlier. Suppose that was a dive too?
Either way, he scored a beauty and set up another on his 300th appearance for his club

No Samba should havewalked earlier but none of the penalty incidents were penalties. The last one gerrard left a leg trailing again, and went over too easily in my view. And yes either way he scored and set up good goals, and didn't win any penalties.

Guy:Incognito

RasTa wrote: »

I hope someone is going to have a word with Gerrard about his diving. 2 more for the youtube clip today.

Your someone, you ring him.

Guy:Incognito

Ffs.

Thought Aurelio could have doen with attacking that ball.

RE*AC*TOR

Consternation goal.

mayordenis

Xavi6 wrote: »

'Clearly'? Please explain

If anything I want them to win in order to keep Blackburn below us.

And as for my supposed acting like a child in your precious thread, is it because I'm not conforming to the Liverpool way that has you wanting me out?

how many people have you accused of not allowing you you're "non-conformist" views??
look you know full well what you're doing its a big liverpool thread and you dont like liverpool, andyou're jus arguing points were you are clearly wrong.

mike65

Who mentioned a clean sheet?

Job done up yours Everton, 4th is safe now. Now come on Utd! :pac:

Mike.

machiavellianme

Unearthly wrote: »

but Ronaldo doesn't go around accusing other professionals of ruining the game by diving.

No, he goes around accusing other professionals of not giving him enough space to "do his skills" - his main skill being diving.

RE*AC*TOR

Lads, don't feed the troll(s). Only posting in this thread to get a reaction.

walshki

That's gotta piss pepe off. Hasn't had a save to make then the defence hands one to santa cruz.

mayordenis

RasTa wrote: »

I hope someone is going to have a word with Gerrard about his diving. 2 more for the youtube clip today.

that video must be clutching at straws, i saw contact on both occassions.

Xavi6

Sherifu wrote: »

Stop embarrassing yourself. 3-0

By disagreeing? Yeah sure.

3-1. Great finish

Unearthly

machiavellianme wrote: »

No, he goes around accusing other professionals of not giving him enough space to "do his skills" - his main skill being diving.

Indeed, cause in order for a dive to work, you need to have no players around you

Skittlebrau

RE*AC*TOR wrote: »

Lads, don't feed the troll(s). Only posting in this thread to get a reaction.

Couldn't agree more. This thread is a fukking nightmare on match days.

Xavi6

mayordenis wrote: »

how many people have you accused of not allowing you you're "non-conformist" views??
look you know full well what you're doing its a big liverpool thread and you dont like liverpool, andyou're jus arguing points were you are clearly wrong.

'Clearly' wrong? Well the ref agrees me with me so 'clearly' not.

Look this thread isn't just a Liverpool love in. It's for fans to discuss the club and the games. If you don't like other supporters coming in here then go make a private forum.

Stky10

Unearthly wrote: »

but Ronaldo doesn't go around accusing other professionals of ruining the game by diving.

He does however moan to the press when he doesn't get some decisions without accepting that he might get more of the benefit of the doubt if he didn't go over like a girl at times.

Guy:Incognito

Xavi6 wrote: »

3-1. Great finish

Best Ronnie Whelan finish since the big man himself.

Warnock was very poor for the 3rd goal, thought he was playing well but he just looked at Riise jogging past hime.

mike65

Is there a match day thread?

If you don't like other supporters coming in here then go make a private forum.

Discussed that a while back.

Mike.

Guy:Incognito

mike65 wrote: »

Is there a match day thread?

Mike.

Not one thats hurtling towards 20,000 posts, no.:)

Xavi6

To be honest I like coming in here for games as it provides better debate than anywhere else. I agreed Samba should have walked while also saying that imo none of the incidents were penos. To be accused of being a troll and basically told to f*ck off is a joke.

RasTa

mayordenis wrote: »

that video must be clutching at straws, i saw contact on both occassions.

I also saw contact when Pires hung is foot out into the defender a few season back, similar to what Gerrard did today and the 2nd one he just fell over. Anyway I couldn't care less as the ref got both dives right and you won fair and square so end of story.

RE*AC*TOR

Xavi6 wrote: »

To be honest I like coming in here for games as it provides better debate than anywhere else. I agreed Samba should have walked while also saying that imo none of the incidents were penos. To be accused of being a troll and basically told to f*ck off is a joke.

http://tinyurl.com/4n6g4

mayordenis

Xavi6 wrote: »

'Clearly' wrong? Well the ref agrees me with me so 'clearly' not.

Look this thread isn't just a Liverpool love in. It's for fans to discuss the club and the games. If you don't like other supporters coming in here then go make a private forum.

fair enough that brum peno was nailed on. refs are never wrong.