FE1 Exam Thread (Mod Warning: NO ADS)

Mojo22

Good luck to everyone doing Tort 2moro

Caoileann

I am covering:

Separate Legal Personality
Borrowing
Directors (including model reg 80, legislative controls, common law duties, to whom duties are owed and types)
Fradulent and Reckless Trading
Restrictions and Disqualification
Shareholder Protection
Transfer and Transmission of Shares (but nothing else on shares!)
Examinership
Compulsory Grounds of Winding up (but not the rest of liquidation)
Disposition of Corporate Assets
Ultra Vires
Consequences of Incorporation

Then if time section 25, articles of assoc.

I am worried about leaving out receivers and Corporate authority. Should I be okay with my list or would you add these two also?

Please God tomorrow goes reeeeeally slow!

Mojo22

Caoileann wrote: »

I am covering:

Separate Legal Personality
Borrowing
Directors (including model reg 80, legislative controls, common law duties, to whom duties are owed and types)
Fradulent and Reckless Trading
Restrictions and Disqualification
Shareholder Protection
Transfer and Transmission of Shares (but nothing else on shares!)
Examinership
Compulsory Grounds of Winding up (but not the rest of liquidation)
Disposition of Corporate Assets
Ultra Vires
Consequences of Incorporation

Then if time section 25, articles of assoc.

I am worried about leaving out receivers and Corporate authority. Should I be okay with my list or would you add these two also?

Please God tomorrow goes reeeeeally slow!

I have done the same topics as you including S25 & Arts of association & ROTC.
I reckon we should be ok with what we have done. Just give a read over them if u have time. We should be fine.

Caoileann

Mojo22 wrote: »

I have done the same topics as you including S25 & Arts of association & ROTC.
I reckon we should be ok with what we have done. Just give a read over them if u have time. We should be fine.

Great minds think alike! After covering all of that I would just be sick if I hadn't 5 Q's on the paper. I think I'll just make sure I know these topics inside out rather than overloading with new info. Please Mr Courtney be nice

Jev/N

Best of luck to everyone starting the FE1s tomorrow.

I, on the other hand, have the FE2s, which should hopefully be a lot less stressful

Also, Luas now operating from Hueston outbound. Alternative is the 13 bus from college green, stopping outside the hotel.

qz

Jev/N wrote: »

Best of luck to everyone starting the FE1s tomorrow.

I, on the other hand, have the FE2s, which should hopefully be a lot less stressful

Also, Luas now operating from Hueston outbound. Alternative is the 13 bus from college green, stopping outside the hotel.

I've always wondered, what's the FE2?

How so Joe

For those of you who were wondering, there's 947 exam numbers listed for these exams.

boomtown84

Nice tort exam today i thought.
Q1- causation essay
Q2- Occupiers Liability problem
Q3- Passing Off problem
Q4- Pure Economic Loss essay
Q5- Vicarious Liability problem
Q6- Defective Products problem
Q7- Nervous Shock essay
Q8- Nuisance and Trespass problem

I did the ones underlined.
If i didn't pass it this time i'll go fackin mental!

qz

Seems grand, occupiers' liability is generally a pretty tidy area, as are defective products and nervous shock iirc.

chops018

My first one isn't till Friday. Just wondering what to expect as to exam atmosphere and where to go etc?

boomtown84

chops018 wrote: »

My first one isn't till Friday. Just wondering what to expect as to exam atmosphere

Great laugh in there mate...it'll be hoppin!:D

erinp

Does anyone have sample answers??? I have EU I'd be willing to swap

RandolphEsq

I enjoyed that passing off question a little too much and spent an hour on it. Economic loss being restricted to Irish law was a slight curve ball and I was stuck for time so just spewed out two cases and a light dressing around them.

MoneyMilo

RandolphEsq wrote: »

I enjoyed that passing off question a little too much and spent an hour on it. Economic loss being restricted to Irish law was a slight curve ball and I was stuck for time so just spewed out two cases and a light dressing around them.

mmm, tasty

chops018

boomtown84 wrote: »

Great laugh in there mate...it'll be hoppin!:D

ha, but seriously, what should I expect?

MoneyMilo

chops018 wrote: »

ha, but seriously, what should I expect?

It's pretty relaxed, don't worry about it.

boomtown84

chops018 wrote: »

ha, but seriously, what should I expect?

Dude Its a big room full of people sitting down in silence for 3 hours. Same as every exam The study must really be getting to you...go out and get some air!

eggchaser

q8 in tort so was the interference with land nuisance or continuing trespass, I'm hoping the latter

boomtown84

RandolphEsq wrote: »

I enjoyed that passing off question a little too much and spent an hour on it. Economic loss being restricted to Irish law was a slight curve ball and I was stuck for time so just spewed out two cases and a light dressing around them.

Yeah i thought that was a bit of a nightmare...i still used a lot of the english cases and compared them to the irish ones. The Irish position hasn't really evolved though has it...always just basing decisions on the proximity between the parties?

boomtown84

eggchaser wrote: »

q8 in tort so was the interference with land nuisance or continuing trespass, I'm hoping the latter

I thought the fact he was disposing of waste onto your man's property for 3 weeks was a nuisance and throwing the bowl of lettuce over him was a battery.

eggchaser

boomtown84 wrote: »

I thought the fact he was disposing of waste onto your man's property for 3 weeks was a nuisance and throwing the bowl of lettuce over him was a battery.

Ok, I got the battery part and I wasn't sure was it nuisance or continuing trespass, thanks

DeSourire

boomtown84 wrote: »

I thought the fact he was disposing of waste onto your man's property for 3 weeks was a nuisance and throwing the bowl of lettuce over him was a battery.

I didn't do that question for that sole reason-it was completely unclear. and i had done sooo much of trespass to the person. I didn't study trespass to land but I thought that was it as well as battery. No idea though.

MoneyMilo

Val's predictions delivered big time. No complaints about the paper. just waited too long to start writing however, and I had some serious blanks in terms of cases but hopefully I scrape by

boomtown84

DeSourire wrote: »

I didn't do that question for that sole reason-it was completely unclear. and i had done sooo much of trespass to the person. I didn't study trespass to land but I thought that was it as well as battery. No idea though.

He didn't trespass onto the land though. It was an interference with Richards use of his own land. Courts would have regard to the duration (3 weeks) and malice (cutting the wire mesh). Patterson v Murphy - active conduct causing the unreasonable disturbance.

boomtown84

MoneyMilo wrote: »

Val's predictions delivered big time. No complaints about the paper. just waited too long to start writing however, and I had some serious blanks in terms of cases but hopefully I scrape by

Cheers for the heads up ya Pr**********ck!!!!!!
Been askin for those tips for ages!! :rolleyes:
I got lucky with the questions anyway so you're off the hook......this time.

yunthunter

Since I've been studying in my own little bubble this entire time, I completely missed out on this John Grace case thats been mentioned a few times. Is there any chance someone could sum up its significance and how it might apply to a question on the paper please? I feel I don't have time at this stage to look at it in detail so just wondering if it can be left out.

eggchaser

boomtown84 wrote: »

He didn't trespass onto the land though. It was an interference with Richards use of his own land. Courts would have regard to the duration (3 weeks) and malice (cutting the wire mesh). Patterson v Murphy - active conduct causing the unreasonable disturbance.

I thought that if you directly cause anything to come into contact with the land it would be a trespass

Kamilat

erinp wrote: »

Does anyone have sample answers??? I have EU I'd be willing to swap

What subjects are you looking the sample answers for?

JCJCJC

boomtown84 wrote: »

Cheers for the heads up ya Pr**********ck!!!!!!
Been askin for those tips for ages!! :rolleyes:
I got lucky with the questions anyway so you're off the hook......this time.

Best comment of the year here so far in 2012 in my humble, LMAO! :pac: Glad y'all seem to have liked Tort anyway.

Say two acts of contrition for the poor pub musician, facing Thomas B tomorrow morning...

DeSourire

eggchaser wrote: »

I thought that if you directly cause anything to come into contact with the land it would be a trespass

Ya but for nuisance do you not need competing rights? I'm probably wrong hence the reason I didn't do the question. I know that with trespass to land if you cause something to come into contact with another persons land it can be deemed to be a trespass but I don't know! I was sickened cause I wanted to do the question but just wasn't sure.

It just dawned on me-god I'm slow! Thanks