Find Out About The Real David Icke.

Nevyn

Why is this still in AH why wasn't it moved to conspiracy forum ?

Jesus Wept

Thaedydal wrote:

Why is this still in AH why wasn't it moved to conspiracy forum ?

If the mods wanted, they could move about 50% of topics to different forums I think.

Terry

So Glad wrote:

No, we're using evidence contained in his lectures and books.

David Icke live at Brixton 1/3
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-258176915603157993&q=David+Icke+Brixton

David Icke live at Brixton 2/3
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3889267722613677476&q=David+Icke+Brixton

David Icke live at Brixton 3/3
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=8801627582496210409&q=David+Icke+Brixton

Watch if you care....

Love & Peace!

So Glad

I preferred this Brixton performance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhIMf61NeB8

Nevyn

The-Rigger wrote:

If the mods wanted, they could move about 50% of topics to different forums I think.

Wow David Icke too screwball for conspiracy theories and so it is here in AH, wow.

Jesus Wept

Thaedydal wrote:

Wow David Icke too screwball for conspiracy theories and so it is here in AH, wow.

eh?

Setun

Woghd wrote:

Folks, there is no need to be in disarray.

In order to grasp the truth, you must use your free will and freedom of thought. Do not let your mind get trapped within the religious or scientific paradigms. Religion, history and science are simply forms of control that were created by the ruling elite long before you were born. And thus, it is a shame that after being born on this planet, you were raised on either of those three lies.

Naturally, since you have been lied to about reality your entire life, any truthful revelations contradicting your false worldview may indeed appear to be far-fetched. But, to make things even worse, human beings are stubborn creatures who let their egos override everything else: Instead of learning about new information that does not fit within your current worldview, you would rather exercise your ego by letting others know what is and is not possible, merely based upon your personal knowledge and feeble understanding of what actually exists.

The spirit of inquiry, the search for greater truth beyond religion, history and science, the profound seriousness of doing real thinking, philosophy and ontology – these are almost totally lacking in humanity. Humanity is therefore subhuman from lack of genuine intelligence....they automatically reject any emergent facts or realities that do not fit their brain dead cognitive pattern of belief and disbelief. Basically, you all watch too much television.

Go to youtube and do a search under "reptilian", you will find all the evidence you need to see. Unfortunately, I'm afraid that most of you don't believe anything that isn't spoonfed to you by the news man... But I hope you will try. Rather than ridicule, try, just for a few seconds, to take a look at what we are saying. Try this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZGh5cCiEF8

If you don't like it, there are many many others, made by many many people, too many to simply ignore I think.

Archangel

Yes I think I can handle the idea that our worldviews have been obviously altered by the many relgious ethos (ethi???), the history of the planet, and yes, scientific discoveries, and can definitely understand how all three have in many ways limited our understanding of life, the universe and everything. I think I can also grasp your idea that these three pillars could have been developed with creating an empire in mind - well, religion certainly.

But I get lost with the reptiles. That's when, to me anyway, I feel that Icke gets a bit sinister or just plain unbelievable.

humanji

[QUOTE=Woghd]The skeptics always start with the assumption that their belief system is correct, and, for whatever reason, vehemently refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they may have actually been deceived all along by their belief system. And thus, when confronted with counter-evidence, they automatically reject it.[/QUOTE]

Where as:

The conspiracy theorists always start with the assumption that their belief system is correct, and, for whatever reason, vehemently refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they may have actually been deceived all along by their belief system. And thus, when confronted with counter-evidence, they automatically reject it.

the ironing is delicious!

edit: oh dear lord. I just got to watch the demon girl video. That is pathetic. Not only are most of the "anomilies" a result of the dodgy quality, but the rest are caused by image editing. Not video editing, they just froze it and morphed the image. Come on now, it's 2007. You can do much better than that. Why is it that those who always seem to have "the truth", never give any actuall evidence, but instead rely on dodgy youtube videos?

Gone West

crap! they're onto us!

release the monkeys!!!!!!

Jesus Wept

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heUWNqg3oE0

So Glad

I'd like to point out that I don't believe the reptilian thing either, fully anyways. I am more than willing to discuss it, but I will like yourselves wait for better proof to come along. I hope that you don't overlook Icke purely because of this, as he has a LOT of other things to say!!!

Love & Peace!

So Glad

Setun

When/how did Icke get his epiphany? It seems everybody who watched him on the tv was very shocked to hear him talk the way he does now. Just wondering what the heck made him change so suddenly/completely?

So Glad

Daddio wrote:

When/how did Icke get his epiphany? It seems everybody who watched him on the tv was very shocked to hear him talk the way he does now. Just wondering what the heck made him change so suddenly/completely?

From the mid -1980's onwards, he had also lost interest in television. He was doing it not because he actually desired to do it but to earn money to spend on what he really wanted to do - environmental campaigning. He found television to be an empty, soul-less world in which insecurity and fear abounded. And after the events of March 1990, his time in television was soon to be over.

He wrote a book in 1989 called It Doesn't Have To Be Like This, setting out the vision and agenda of the Greens because he felt they were talking to each other and not to the public as a whole. As he was writing the book, and in his work for the BBC, he began to feel a presence around him, like there was always someone in the room when there was not. There was a point in 1990, while sitting on the side of a bed in a hotel room in London, where he was compelled to look up and say to whomever or whatever: "If you are there will you please contact me because you are driving me up the bloody wall!"

Soon afterwards, events began to move quickly.

In March, 1990, he was playing soccer with his son Gareth on the seafront at Ryde on the Isle of Wight and he said they would go and have some lunch at the railway station café a short walk away. The café was full and they turned to walk away when someone recognised David and began to ask questions about soccer. When the conversation was over, David couldn't see Gareth, but he knew he would be in the newspaper shop nearby looking at books he liked. So it was. David stood at the entrance to the shop and said they were going now to find another café, but as he turned to leave, his feet would not move. They were stuck to the ground as if two magnets were pulling them to the floor. He then heard a voice in his head say: "Go and look at the books on the far side." His immediate thought was: "What the hell was this all about"?

He knew this shop very well and the books in that section were of no interest to him. But given the voice and what was happening to his feet, he went over to see what would happen. The first book he saw was one by a psychic lady and he was immediately intrigued because of this presence he had felt around him. He wondered if she would be able to tell him what was going on. She was also a hands-on healer and so he wrote to her and made an appointment for healing, not telling her about the presence or anything else. To her, he was a client wanting healing for his arthritis. He only saw her four times and in the first two visits nothing happened of note, except that he talked with her about other dimensions and the wider vision of life.

Then, on the third visit, he was lying on the couch while the healing was being done when he felt like a spider's web on his face. He had remembered reading in her book that this can happen when "spirits" are trying to make contact. He said nothing to her, but within fifteen seconds, no more, she threw her head back and said: "This is powerful, I'll have to close my eyes for this one!" She said she was seeing a figure who wanted her to pass on messages to him. The same happened a week later and this is what the "figure" asked her to tell him on those two occasions:

He is a healer who is here to heal the earth and he will be world famous. He will face enormous opposition, but we will always be there to protect him. He is still a child spiritually, but he will be given the spiritual riches. Sometimes he will say things and wonder where they came from. They will be our words. Knowledge will be put into his mind, and at other times he will be led to knowledge.

More here:

http://www.davidickebooks.co.uk/index.php?act=viewDoc&docId=1

Love & Peace!

So Glad

So Glad

This is a brilliant video outlining the historic evidence for these reptile folks, maybe it'll make things a little clearer (it's not a shape-shifter video!!)

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=KTcF-7opGLU

Love & Peace!

So Glad

Nevyn

Daddio wrote:

When/how did Icke get his epiphany? It seems everybody who watched him on the tv was very shocked to hear him talk the way he does now. Just wondering what the heck made him change so suddenly/completely?

He fell in with Betty Shine.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/osm/story/0,,870731,00.html

The 10 worst decisions in the history of sport


Sunday January 12, 2003
Observer Sport Monthly

1. Visiting Betty Shine

In 1990 David Icke was a TV sports reporter/commentator tipped for the top. Then he visited a medium in Brighton called Betty Shine who, having chatted to Socrates (the philosopher not the footballer), was able to pass on the information that he was the Son of God.

Humbled, Icke instructed all his followers to wear turquoise tracksuits and travelled the world making prophesies (e.g Teesside and Kent would shortly be underwater following earthquakes measuring eight on the Richter scale). None of his prophecies came true.

So Glad

Terry, why are you edited the colour of my posts? Why are you also taking out the love & peace part? Is that against forum guidelines????

Terry

I'm performing a service to other members.
The big coloured text is an eyesore.

humanji

I found it quite soothing

So Glad

Ok, for the benefit of other member who seem to be so offended by COLOURS, I won't use green anymore. But Terry why do you feel the need to delete my message of "love & peace"?? That is ridiculous...

Love & Peace!

So Glad

joe dole

AlmightyCushion wrote:

I'll have to admit I've never heard his name before seeing this thread. My opinion of him now is that he is a twat. I don't fancy watching a 2 hour video so can you please post up a list of some of the things that prove this theory.

condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Albert einstein

Mahatma coat

Daddio wrote:

Yes I think I can handle the idea that our worldviews have been obviously altered by the many relgious ethos (ethi???), the history of the planet, and yes, scientific discoveries, and can definitely understand how all three have in many ways limited our understanding of life, the universe and everything. I think I can also grasp your idea that these three pillars could have been developed with creating an empire in mind - well, religion certainly.

But I get lost with the reptiles. That's when, to me anyway, I feel that Icke gets a bit sinister or just plain unbelievable.

Yeah, Hip Cool Daddio

(cant believe I just said that)

but yeah, the whole reptile thing! Had a guy try to convince me there were Lavamen last week inNimbin, I was like yeah I subscribre ta many of yer theories but nah lad theres a line of plausibility, Bildeberg, Masons secret societies etc... OK, bloodlines hmmm may be a tiny bit of ,<fadein=Spookymusic>something there, did go on fer ages like, but seriously, or is that the wholeconspircy of it, to make thetruth so ridiculous that no one believes it </spookymusic>

Terry

So Glad wrote:

Ok, for the benefit of other member who seem to be so offended by COLOURS, I won't use green anymore. But Terry why do you feel the need to delete my message of "love & peace"?? That is ridiculous...

That bit just irritates me.

BTW, happy birthday.

So Glad

Terry wrote:

That bit just irritates me.

BTW, happy birthday.

Love & Peace irritates you? Have you any idea how worrying that is to hear? hehe

Love & Peace!

So Glad

Mahatma coat

Wif Terry n da rest on dat man, tis a Sig2Big issue tbh, deres rues n'all

<edit>
Actually where is Ruu? he could sort all this out with a nicecupoftea & asitdown

Crucifix

It's poor internet forum ettiquette. You're posting a signature, outside of your designated signature, that would probably break the size rules if it was in your signature.
We're living in a society here! [/Costanza]

Ciaran500

So Glad wrote:

Love & Peace irritates you? Have you any idea how worrying that is to hear? hehe

Its annoying to read every time and makes the page pointlessly longer. Please stop posting it or just add it to your signature so people can disable if they want to.

So Glad

OK, I'll walk to the lines for you.

How's this?


Love & Peace!

So Glad....

tbh

So Glad wrote:

Love & Peace irritates you? Have you any idea how worrying that is to hear? hehe

Love & Peace!

So Glad

stick it in your signature so those of us who don't want to see it everytime don't have to. Can you do that? Or are you just going to keep on doing what you want because you believe you are right?

Look, David Icke had a nervous breakdown. Simple. I'll make a deal with you. You dedicate the rest of your life following David and living your life according to his teachings. I'll dedicate the rest of my life to being happy and raising my family. After we're dead we can compare notes.

So Glad

tbh wrote:

stick it in your signature so those of us who don't want to see it everytime don't have to. Can you do that? Or are you just going to keep on doing what you want because you believe you are right?

Look, David Icke had a nervous breakdown. Simple. I'll make a deal with you. You dedicate the rest of your life following David and living your life according to his teachings. I'll dedicate the rest of my life to being happy and raising my family. After we're dead we can compare notes.

What is a "nervous breakdown" and why do people brush David off as having a "Mid-life crisis" as if this is something that is just illusory and contains no meaning? A nervous breakdown is when you see the world for what it is, and can't take it anymore. A lot of people ignore reality so they're not harmed by it. Others see it for what it is and have a "mid-life crisis" or a "nervous breakdown". These are good things as they wake a person up to the illusion of reality, big time.

You live your life whatever way you want to mate, and just for the record, I DON'T live my life according to how David Icke wants me to live, that would be just another form of deceit. David tells NO-ONE how to live, he gives information about reality and you do with it what you will. I live my life according to how I feel.

:cool:

Ciaran500

Considering some of the thread you have started before all over boards.ie you seem to believe in anything you read on the internet untill it is proven that whatever/who ever you read about is BS.

Have you not learned to be a bit more cynical on the internet yet?

muboop1

AlmightyCushion wrote:

Here's a video that 'proves' Larry King is a reptillian because he licks his lips occasionally. I mean this is just plain rediculous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrfh1Jp--Tw

dont reptiles have a frked tongue? if anything, this proves he isnt one...cs his tongue is plainly rounded....

tbh

So Glad wrote:

You live your life whatever way you want to mate, and just for the record, I DON'T live my life according to how David Icke wants me to live, that would be just another form of deceit. David tells NO-ONE how to live, he gives information about reality and you do with it what you will. I live my life according to how I feel.

:cool:

yeah? Well, you've told people what he believes on this thread, and most people don't want to know. And yet you persist?

Nehpets

So Glad... I did


YORE MA!

Setun

I can't believe those reptilian videos. Firstly because they clearly take advantage of poor clipping and low-def glitches.

Secondly because that mysterious Archangel Systems who claim to have researched all the morphing appear to be associated with Heaven's Gate. And I can't take them seriously either.

Interestingly, there is an american business also called Archangel Systems (Inc) who are developing equipment for the U.S military. I don't know if they are related in any way other than name though??

So Glad

Daddio wrote:

I can't believe those reptilian videos. Firstly because they clearly take advantage of poor clipping and low-def glitches.

Secondly because that mysterious Archangel Systems who claim to have researched all the morphing appear to be associated with Heaven's Gate. And I can't take them seriously either.

Interestingly, there is an american business also called Archangel Systems (Inc) who are developing equipment for the U.S military. I don't know if they are related in any way other than name though??

I also wouldn't put any attention on those videos either, I think they're ridiculous too and completely over exaggerated.

So Glad

David Icke talking with Zulu shaman about the Reptilian species:

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=BrVDS8Utm_E

(There's multiple parts)

:cool:

muboop1

Mahatma coat wrote:

Yeah, Hip Cool Daddio

(cant believe I just said that)

but yeah, the whole reptile thing! Had a guy try to convince me there were Lavamen last week inNimbin, I was like yeah I subscribre ta many of yer theories but nah lad theres a line of plausibility, Bildeberg, Masons secret societies etc... OK, bloodlines hmmm may be a tiny bit of ,<fadein=Spookymusic>something there, did go on fer ages like, but seriously, or is that the wholeconspircy of it, to make thetruth so ridiculous that no one believes it </spookymusic>

Nimbin? hippie colny in australia?

AlmightyCushion

joe dole wrote:

condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Albert einstein

I am condemning him because he's of the mindset that he is always right no matter what you say. That is why I condemn him, that is why I call him a twat. I would like to point out that a single shread of undeniable proof has not yet been posted here.

the_syco

Woghd wrote:

The skeptics always start with the assumption that their belief system is correct, and, for whatever reason, vehemently refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they may have actually been deceived all along by their belief system. And thus, when confronted with counter-evidence, they automatically reject it.

By belief system, do you mean what everyone but those who believe that the lizard people have taken over, or by belief system, you the popular notion?

Jesus Wept

So Glad wrote:

Love & Peace!

So Glad

I've being ignoring all your posts for 2 pages because of this. It's sig material, and I don't read sigs.

So Glad

Don't worry, the big bold love & peace sign is gone....

tbh

Woghd wrote:

I don't understand the hostility. I was hoping to offer some info, in a polite and positive way to those who may have never heard of it. It's ok if somebody does not care to believe, or if their belief system is not yet ready, but I wasn't expecting hostility and name-calling. I certainly would be embarrassed to behave that way myself. (you guys don't have to be embarrassed, I'm just saying that I would be embarrassed)

Is this how you guys treat everyone with a little new information?

Archangel

you told us what you think is the truth - we don't accept it.
We told you what we think is the truth - i.e. David Icke is talking shite - and you don't accept it.

We're not so different, except we don't spam you.

Giblet

He`s a paranoid schizophrenic with delusions of grandure. Par for the course for the mentally ill.

So Glad

Giblet wrote:

He`s a paranoid schizophrenic with delusions of grandure. Par for the course for the mentally ill.

Me or David Icke? Either way, you're completely wrong and it's horrible of you to say who is mentally ill or not.

tbh

why is it horrible to say that someone with a mental illness is mentally ill?

So Glad

tbh wrote:

why is it horrible to say that someone with a mental illness is mentally ill?

What is the mental illness? Who is mentally ill, and why?

Lord Oz

Has it occured to anyone that this guy is just trolling?

tbh

sorry, misread your post. For the record tho, if you ask me "Is DAvid Icke right, or is he mentally ill" - I would say "mentally ill". There's a thousand winos in dublin who preach with as much passion and proof as DI, but I wouldn't listen to them either.

So Glad

tbh wrote:

sorry, misread your post. For the record tho, if you ask me "Is DAvid Icke right, or is he mentally ill" - I would say "mentally ill". There's a thousand winos in dublin who preach with as much passion and proof as DI, but I wouldn't listen to them either.

Does labeling him as "mentally ill" make you feel safer in the fact that you can brush off his works without even considering it?

Giblet

No, the fact that he is mentally ill explains where his crazy and utterly wrong ideas come from.

The ability to brush them aside comes from not being a complete ****ing idiot.

tbh

So Glad wrote:

Does labeling him as "mentally ill" make you feel safer in the fact that you can brush off his works without even considering it?

I don't feel threatened by him in any aspect whatsoever, so I'm not calling him mentally ill to make myself feel safer. Look, you're obviously convinced that he's right - why is that not enough for you? You've found something that works for you, so I'm happy for you. In my opinion, he's talking crap. I don't feel the need to go to his website and harangue users there. And by the way - I've read some of his books, so don't assume that I havn't considered it. You're obviously assuming that anyone who sees the same evidence you do will come to the same conclusion as you, and that's either arrogance or insecurity imo.