Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

BMW 530i - What's the point?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,660 ✭✭✭maidhc


    fletch wrote:
    I enjoy them for quiet motorway cruising, 75mph = 2,200rpm in my 1.9TDI :). The equivalent capacity petrol engine would be over 3,000rpm.

    The best reason of all to buy a diesel would be reliability. The old non-common rail diesels were simply indestructible, and would start in spite of your best efforts... all you need is a bit of compression and a bit of fuel (any fuel) and you are away.

    If ever we do have a day after tomorrow scenario, the old VW Golf and Merc 123/4 diesels will be selling for bigger money than the 545i does today!


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    fletch wrote:
    I enjoy them for quiet motorway cruising, 75mph = 2,200rpm in my 1.9TDI :). The equivalent capacity petrol engine would be over 3,000rpm.

    How is a diesel quieter than a petrol? Diesel, even refined diesels are much more pronounced than a petrol engine, and even though the dB ratings would be close (JK confirmed this when testing the 535d on top gear), it's the lower pitch, and harsher noise of the diesel that makes it much more apparent, and grating than a petrol engine. A petrol engine runnng at 3krpm really isn't much more louder than a petrol engine running at 3krpm either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 232 ✭✭richie_rvf


    Diesel cars have much more sound proofing than petrol cars, they need it as the engines are noisier due to the higher compression ratio and the self igniting nature of the fuel.

    My car sits at below 2500 at 75mph

    Richie.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭fletch


    richie_rvf wrote:
    Diesel cars have much more sound proofing than petrol cars, they need it as the engines are noisier due to the higher compression ratio and the self igniting nature of the fuel.

    My car sits at below 2500 at 75mph

    Richie.
    You do drive a 5.0 V8 though :D

    I just find mine very relaxed on the motorway, but yeh it sounds like a bag of spanners on startup :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 232 ✭✭richie_rvf


    fletch wrote:
    but yeh it sounds like a bag of spanners on startup :D


    So does mine :p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭fletch


    richie_rvf wrote:
    So does mine :p
    I doubt that very much :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭michaelanthony


    mike65 wrote:
    Changing gear is for poor people. ;)

    Any big derv BMW should be an auto.

    Mike.

    I did not want to say this cos people probably would take offence but it is true that manuals are for povs!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,660 ✭✭✭maidhc


    I did not want to say this cos people probably would take offence but it is true that manuals are for povs!!!

    And for those who like the driving experience of a Volvo Bus!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    mike65 wrote:
    Changing gear is for poor people. ;)

    ...and people under a certain age who still have the hips they were born with :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,055 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    im a 530i owner :D albeit an e39, never considered the 530d,

    few factors, i do 8k miles per year max so mpg isnt a major issues, sounds from a 6cyl bmw petrol is wonderful, 530i is noticeably faster than a stock 530d, and i dont like diesel clatter and they ALL have it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 65,388 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Cyrus wrote:
    i do 8k miles per year max so mpg isnt a major issues

    Low mileage and a low second hand price mean it's probably cheaper to run a 530i second hand!

    The 530i is only pointless when buying it new


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭michaelanthony


    The sound out of it alone justifies it's existence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭Mr. Larson


    Thanks for all the insightful posts... has been very interesting reading and has defintely changed my thinking on the two. Not only can I now clearly see the point of the 530i (on reflection it was probably ill informed to question it's raison d'être and probably offiensive to 530i owners) but I'd probably plumb for the 530i now over the 530d if anything....

    but I've decided to go for a Skoda Octavia instead.;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    but I've decided to go for a Skoda Octavia instead.;)

    In fairness, it does have a massive boot! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    MarkN wrote:
    Get yourself into a 3.0TDI VAG V6 car or a BMW 335D and come back and tell me it's slow. :p

    Indeed, in case anyone has forgotten, the 335d has the same power as the original E28 M5 and E36 M3 had. I've never heard anyone describe either of these cars as slow.

    The new 123d has only 6 bhp less than the original E30 M3.

    I would say to the OP drive both of them, and make up your mind on that.

    By the way, the E60 530i before the 07 facelift had 231 bhp(04 and start of 05) or 258 bhp after that, the 530d had 218 bhp in 04and start of 05, and 233 bhp afterwards.

    Before the E60 got its facelift, the 530i did around the 30-31 mpg mark, and the 530d did around 39 mpg, so the benefits of Petrol power ironically have only increased this year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,388 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    ned78 wrote:
    In fairness, it does have a massive boot! ;)

    LOL :D

    Yeah not even a BMW can beat that boot :D


Advertisement