Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Broadband Throttling BitTorrent?

Options
12346

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭Nehaxak


    Hi there,

    Well I myself have been experiencing terrible download speeds on torrents for the last week or so. To be honest, all I use the BT for is an episode of heroes and prison break once a week plus maybe an episode of desperate houswives (for the missus only of course :D ), watch and delete after 'cos I couldn't be arsed taking up space on the Hard Drive and I'd never be bothered watching another episode again.

    Anyway... Torrent is also used for World of Warcraft patch downloads (by Blizzard themselves) and the downloads can be fairly hefty at times - so the latest patch has been a nightmare to download :(

    More importantly though, other online games, especially those form Sony like Star Wars Galaxies, PlanetSide, EQ2 (and others that I'm not bothered with) utilise all sorts of ports outside of the norm. Even their Station logon software uses port 7000. All of these games have also been effected by whatever is going on at Irish Broad Band recently. Within these games I am now experiencing 30% to 60% packet loss and connecting via the station logon application is taking multiple restarts of it and at least 2 hours. That plus trying to download patches from Sony is taking 2 or 3 days in the case of Star Wars Galaxies.

    So whatever traffic shaping or otherwise that is or is not going on, it is effecting other applications and games in particular.

    Tabula Rasa is another game that is heavily effected by these recent goings on at IBB.

    All the games I've mentioned from Sony are now unplayable.

    Further investigations into the packet loss on Star Wars Galaxies from Sony throw up the following pathping info (edited a bit to take personal ip info etc away at my end)...

    >pathping 199.108.6.33

    Tracing route to sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
    0 blahblah [x.x.x.x]
    1 my.router [x.x.x.x]
    2 xx.irishbroadband.ie [x.x.x.x]
    3 xx.irishbroadband.ie [x.x.x.x]
    4 xx.irishbroadband.ie [x.x.x.x]
    5 213.242.106.61
    6 so-4-1-0.bbr1.London1.Level3.net [4.68.128.113]
    7 as-0-0.mp2.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.128.149]
    8 so-8-0.hsa1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.112.130]
    9 vl861.sdtermswitch-1.sonyonline.net [63.215.251.130]
    10 vl831.sdkollsw-1.sonyonline.net [64.37.144.82]
    11 sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]

    Computing statistics for 275 seconds...
    Source to Here This Node/Link
    Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
    0 blahblah [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    1 0ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% my.router [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    2 27ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% xx.irishbroadband.ie [x.x.x.]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    3 5ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% xx.irishbroadband.ie [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    4 11ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% xx.irishbroadband.ie [x.x.x.x]
    1/ 100 = 1% |
    5 8ms 1/ 100 = 1% 0/ 100 = 0% 213.242.106.61
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    6 21ms 2/ 100 = 2% 1/ 100 = 1% so-4-1-0.bbr1.London1.Level3.net [4.68.128.113]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    7 159ms 2/ 100 = 2% 1/ 100 = 1% as-0-0.mp2.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.128.149]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    8 153ms 3/ 100 = 3% 2/ 100 = 2% so-8-0.hsa1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.112.130]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    9 157ms 3/ 100 = 3% 2/ 100 = 2% vl861.sdtermswitch-1.sonyonline.net [63.215.251.130]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    10 159ms 7/ 100 = 7% 6/ 100 = 6% vl831.sdkollsw-1.sonyonline.net [64.37.144.82]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    11 154ms 1/ 100 = 1% 0/ 100 = 0% sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]

    Trace complete.

    As you see, there is packet loss on 213.242.106.61 onwards, IBB's high sites etc., (the hops I have marked with xx.irishbroadband.ie) are fine apart from the final one which dropped a packet. The packet loss and problems are experienced from what seems to me, where they hand off to their peering partner (tiscali or level3) or whatever to get to the site I require.

    To confirm this, I start up my private VPN service which I use for work access from home or while travelling and carry out the same pathping, as follows (again, anything confidential hidden with x.x.x.x)...


    >pathping 199.108.6.33

    Tracing route to sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
    0 blahblah [x.x.x.x]
    1 x.x.x.x
    2 x.x.x.x
    3 x.x.x.x
    4 x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    5 ae0-6.stk30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.72.61]
    6 so-2-0-0.nyc33.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.197]
    7 Te-3-4.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.110.77]
    8 ge-1-3-0-79.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.16.66]
    9 * as-2-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [64.159.1.137]
    10 so-10-0.hsa1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.113.38]
    11 vl861.sdtermswitch-1.sonyonline.net [63.215.251.130]
    12 vl831.sdkollsw-1.sonyonline.net [64.37.144.82]
    13 sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]

    Computing statistics for 325 seconds...
    Source to Here This Node/Link
    Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
    0 blahblah [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    1 61ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    2 58ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    3 66ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    4 74ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x.[x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    5 67ms 3/ 100 = 3% 3/ 100 = 3% ae0-6.stk30.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.72.61]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    6 166ms 1/ 100 = 1% 1/ 100 = 1% so-2-0-0.nyc33.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.197]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    7 183ms 4/ 100 = 4% 4/ 100 = 4% Te-3-4.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.110.77]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    8 171ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ge-1-3-0-79.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.16.66]
    2/ 100 = 2% |
    9 243ms 2/ 100 = 2% 0/ 100 = 0% as-2-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [64.159.1.137]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    10 234ms 3/ 100 = 3% 1/ 100 = 1% so-10-0.hsa1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.113.38]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    11 245ms 5/ 100 = 5% 3/ 100 = 3% vl861.sdtermswitch-1.sonyonline.net [63.215.251.130]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    12 243ms 2/ 100 = 2% 0/ 100 = 0% vl831.sdkollsw-1.sonyonline.net [64.37.144.82]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    13 237ms 2/ 100 = 2% 0/ 100 = 0% sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net[199.108.6.33]

    Trace complete.

    It would therefore seem to me at least, that either tiscali or level3 are the ones who have implemented some sort of traffic shaping and/or some change which has both impacted bit torrent traffic and any other traffic (like online gaming which I've mentioned here) in a huge way. So much so as to make the games unplayable and the torrents unuseable.
    At the very least, either or both of them are responsible for crap quality connections and high packet loss.

    I used to get the torrents at full 6mb download speeds over the VPN from work (yeah I know, bit naughty) but now can not get above 50Kbps over the VPN. still a lot better than over IBB which is going now at 1Kbps on my 3mb breeze wireless at home. My games work ok over the VPN in regards packet loss, never goes above 10% but the high pings make them then unuseable plus it's my work related VPN so cannot use it for gaming other than for this testing really.

    Whatever is the case, it's not the loss of torrents that pisses me off, it's the fact that my online gaming now has suffered badly, so much so that I have had to cencel my Station access subscription to the sony games, cancel my Tabula Rasa within it's feckin free month and also having to resort to download the Blizzard patches for Wow manually from possibly unsafe sites a day or two after the patches go live.

    A gamer that is not feckin' happy at all at the moment ! :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    ^^ Yea I play a game called Trackmania Nations and for the last 2 months it has been unplayable online.. I keep getting booted from the servers with 10054 errors. There is one server hosted in Ireland (by me, in work) and its the only one I have no problems with so it would make sense that the problem arises when/as your connection leaves Ireland.

    Nehaxak: Were you on to IBB about this?

    RE: torrents. I switched to port80 last week and my speeds on a private tracker site went form 40kB/s to 350kB/s instantly. Upspeed, which is REALLY important on these private sites went from .5 to 200kB/s.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭Nehaxak


    No Scotty, haven't been on to IBB about it yet. Might get on to them tomorrow from work if I get the time, see what they have to say or can do about it.

    I'll try the same pingpath test from work tomorrow also and see what comes back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭Nehaxak


    Further pathping test to same destination from work, using Eircom leased line (confidential info replaced with x.x.x.x)...

    >pathping 199.108.6.33

    Tracing route to sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
    0 x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    1 x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    2 x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    3 x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    4 x.x.x.x
    5 83.71.115.142
    6 12.118.100.5
    7 tbr1.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.86.166]
    8 cr2.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.16.133]
    9 cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.3.38]
    10 tbr1.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.16.22]
    11 tbr1.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.30]
    12 tbr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90]
    13 tbr2.phmaz.ip.att.net [12.122.10.82]
    14 tbr1.phmaz.ip.att.net [12.122.10.193]
    15 gbr1.sd2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.2.141]
    16 gar1.sd2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.145.161]
    17 12.122.255.30
    18 mdf4-bi8k-2-eth-2-2.san2.attens.net [63.241.0.166]
    19 vl20.sdkollsw-2.sonyonline.net [63.241.6.50]
    20 sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]

    Computing statistics for 500 seconds...
    Source to Here This Node/Link
    Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
    0 x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    1 0ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    2 0ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    3 13ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    4 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% x.x.x.x
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    5 83ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 83.71.115.142
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    6 82ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 12.118.100.5
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    7 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% tbr1.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.86.166]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    8 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% cr2.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.16.133]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    9 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.3.38]

    0/ 100 = 0% |
    10 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% tbr1.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.16.22]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    11 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% tbr1.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.30]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    12 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% tbr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    13 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% tbr2.phmaz.ip.att.net [12.122.10.82]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    14 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% tbr1.phmaz.ip.att.net [12.122.10.193]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    15 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% gbr1.sd2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.2.141]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    16 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% gar1.sd2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.145.161]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    17 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 12.122.255.30
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    18 161ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% mdf4-bi8k-2-eth-2-2.san2.attens.net [63.241.0.166]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    19 158ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% vl20.sdkollsw-2.sonyonline.net [63.241.6.50]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    20 150ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net[199.108.6.33]

    Trace complete.


    ^^ As you can see, absolutely perfect all the way.

    Will be calling IBB today hopefully to find out wtf is going on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Nehaxak wrote: »

    Trace complete.


    ^^ As you can see, absolutely perfect all the way.

    Will be calling IBB today hopefully to find out wtf is going on.

    Do let us know how you get on please!! although any time I ring from work they always say to call back when i am at home so i can bypass my router etc...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    yeah they like the old by pass router thing. If you try this yourself at home and then when your on the phone say that you did that already the night before. Don't tell them your in work and if they say to try again, say okay and wait a few minutes and then say that you tried it and it was the same as when you tried it the previous night.

    That's what I do with Dell tech support when I know what they are saying is nonsense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭Redisle


    Guys.. does anyone know if its possible for ibb to restrict torrent traffic from certain trackers while allowing torrent traffic from other trackers? I mean if I download a well seeded torrent from a well known public tracker I get maybe 50kbps using encryption and port 80... it dosent get higher, however, downloading various trailers and things from the Azureus Vuze application Im getting the full 3mb.. getting 350kbps at the moment..

    This isnt the first time I have noticed this either.. stuff from various public trackers comes in really slow.. and stuff from Azureus Vuze comes in at full speed..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭Nehaxak


    Well, it would seem to me at least, from further testing at home that IBB are not throttling bandwidth (mine at least) nor are they traffic shaping torrent traffic.

    However, their connections/peering via tiscali and level3 on certain routes are feckin' abysmal with stupidly high packet loss but that's another issue i need to take up with them now.

    My guess is that the seeders of some torrents are being traffic shaped by their ISP or that for some reason they are shaping IP addresses to Irish Broadband (or maybe Ireland as a whole ?).

    3 Torrents last night (as a test) - 2 were running constantly at 1Kbps and the third was running at 3Mb down ! All from the same torrent source but the third only had 3 seeds, all from Sweden. The rest on the other torrents were from the UK, Canada and the US.

    Strange indeed !

    Anyway, I've gone back to using Usenet for my weekly TV Heroes and Prison Break fix as I just can't be arsed anymore with all this messing about with torrents.

    Wouldn't mind but I'd happily pay to watch new episodes of my programmes online from official sources :/

    Anyway, in short, from what I can tell myself - it would seem that IBB are not responsible for the traffic shaping and possibly the finger should be pointed more toward tiscali and level3 - or ISPs elsewhere in the world who are cracking down on torrent traffic and shaping their own customers.

    Would be nice to get an official or even semi official word from IBB on this one though. They won't reveal nothing over the phone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,216 ✭✭✭MrVestek


    Well that's pretty much what I've been saying all along... think I posted earlier in the thread that it could easilly be OTHER users being traffic shaped thus affecting other connections.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭Protocol7


    I did a pathping on the same IP here on my Digiweb line and the only packet loss was on one of the Sony IPs. No Tiscali though so possibly that's where the problem lies.

    pathping 199.108.6.33

    Tracing route to sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
    4 217.112.144.155.gvnx.com [217.112.144.155]
    5 so-4-1-3.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [208.50.25.77]
    6 ge4-3-10G.ar4.LON3.gblx.net [67.17.104.2]
    7 level3-2.ar2.LON3.gblx.net [208.50.13.194]
    8 ae-0-53.bbr1.London1.Level3.net [4.68.116.65]
    9 as-2-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [64.159.1.137]
    10 so-8-0.hsa1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.112.130]
    11 vl861.sdtermswitch-1.sonyonline.net [63.215.251.130]
    12 vl831.sdkollsw-1.sonyonline.net [64.37.144.82]
    13 sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net [199.108.6.33]

    Computing statistics for 325 seconds...
    Source to Here This Node/Link
    Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
    4 14ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 217.112.144.155.gvnx.com [217.112.144.155]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    5 16ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% so-4-1-3.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [208.50.25.77]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    6 38ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ge4-3-10G.ar4.LON3.gblx.net [67.17.104.2]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    7 35ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% level3-2.ar2.LON3.gblx.net [208.50.13.194]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    8 24ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-0-53.bbr1.London1.Level3.net [4.68.116.65]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    9 162ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% as-2-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [64.159.1.137]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    10 158ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% so-8-0.hsa1.SanDiego1.Level3.net [4.68.112.130]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    11 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% vl861.sdtermswitch-1.sonyonline.net [63.215.251.130]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    12 169ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% vl831.sdkollsw-1.sonyonline.net [64.37.144.82]
    0/ 100 = 0% |
    13 161ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% sdkswg-01-01.starwarsgalaxies.net[199.108.6.33]

    Trace complete.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭pete


    Nehaxak wrote: »
    Anyway, in short, from what I can tell myself - it would seem that IBB are not responsible for the traffic shaping and possibly the finger should be pointed more toward tiscali and level3 - or ISPs elsewhere in the world who are cracking down on torrent traffic and shaping their own customers.

    Have to disagree - as far as I can tell it's IBB doing the torrent traffic shaping, and not just because they've actually stated this to be the case in the sunday turbine.

    A completely unscientific test - take any given poorly performing torrent and observe the average & maximum download speeds from a few peers. Next, change your client's configuration to one of the well known methods for avoiding traffic shaping. Wait a while and observe what happens to the peers' speeds. Then switch back to the original config, wait a while & check out the speeds again.

    I've repeatedly seen downloads go from ~10k to ~300k to ~10k again by doing this. ymmv.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,606 ✭✭✭Jumpy


    pete wrote: »
    Have to disagree - as far as I can tell it's IBB doing the torrent traffic shaping, and not just because they've actually stated this to be the case in the sunday turbine.

    A completely unscientific test - take any given poorly performing torrent and observe the average & maximum download speeds from a few peers. Next, change your client's configuration to one of the well known methods for avoiding traffic shaping. Wait a while and observe what happens to the peers' speeds. Then switch back to the original config, wait a while & check out the speeds again.

    I've repeatedly seen downloads go from ~10k to ~300k to ~10k again by doing this. ymmv.

    Then they havent configured their shaper correctly.
    It should be able to determine torrent traffic. Not just ports.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭pete


    Jumpy wrote: »
    Then they havent configured their shaper correctly.
    It should be able to determine torrent traffic. Not just ports.

    Well, yes.

    But - hypothetically - if the torrent traffic is on a port normally used for other traffic and is encrypted in some way, then a traffic shaper is going to have a hard time differentiating between torrent traffic and the encrypted traffic one might normally expect to see on that port.

    I'd imagine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    Bittorrent has a quite unique traffic profile. It's not hard to spot, whether you encrypt the data and use common ports or not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭pete


    Moriarty wrote: »
    Bittorrent has a quite unique traffic profile. It's not hard to spot, whether you encrypt the data and use common ports or not.
    I'd tend to agree, but the evidence suggests otherwise :)... because any traffic that's not automatically identified by the shaping hardware needs to be manually classified? Or not.

    Anyway it's not the issue here. The question is "are IBB throttling / shaping torrent traffic?" and, even though their commerical director has explicitly stated in the turbine that they are, people still don't believe it because IBB's staff have told them that they don't throttle / traffic shape at all.

    The suggested experiment shows that some trivial reconfiguration of the client to make its traffic profile look slightly less like torrent activity can avoid traffic shaping and drastically improve speeds. So, is the shaping occurring (and therefore being avoided) at every single one of the other peers' ISPs, or at the local ISP?


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 7,485 ✭✭✭Red Alert


    I'm getting 2kb/s on a legal torrent that has over 80 peers at the moment. Bad move for IBB.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭ilovelamp2000


    I've only skimmed through this thread and picked up some good info (Thanks to all ).

    One question though, I'm finding it pretty much impossible to keep a connection on Xbox live open for the past week or so. Presumably this is caused by the "traffic-shaping" too ?


    I use Irish Broadband too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,373 ✭✭✭Irishpimpdude


    I was failing to keep a connection to the ps2 network, but i then changed my MTU on my router to 1450 and all is good now :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    Depends where you are. I've had trouble at times with IBB and XBox Live with high ping times when the service is heavily loaded but most of the time it works fine. I play online regularly and downloaded two demos just the other night without any disconnects in most cases.

    It should be noted, Xbox Live has been down a lot recently (for an online service). Microsoft have been having problems and need to invest in their network.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭Rattlehead_ie


    Your disconnection from xbox live may not be and unlikely is a result of traffic shaping. I know for a fact IBB recommend a router in between console and alvarion unit if you are playing online, so if you have a router we need to look at something else, if you dont have a router, I recommend you get one.

    If you do have a router it could be a possible issue with "jitter" or packet loss. Wireless ISP is not PERFECT for gaming, but it still should work. As recommended above change MTU size to 1450 and work up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,216 ✭✭✭MrVestek


    I was failing to keep a connection to the ps2 network, but i then changed my MTU on my router to 1450 and all is good now :P

    I knew it worked :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 896 ✭✭✭clansman


    just got IBB 3Mb and my torrents are at about 20K, i have no history with IBB, so they dont know if i am a high user. If i take my laptop to my parents house where i have an 2Mb eircom dsl connection i get about 150K+... this is the same torrent same computer and about the same number of seeds... IBB are doing something, its as clear as day. what and why is another story..

    Also my ping for gamming is 100+ on a fu(Kin 3Mb up connection!!!!! how can i fix this, as i get about 35 with eircom...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,082 ✭✭✭carbsy


    They are stating that they don't traffic shape so it sounds like they have oversold (again????!!!!???) their service and there's too many leechers on it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,115 ✭✭✭Pacifico


    Yeah obviously their "No cap" broadband has attracted too many high torrent users/abusers ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭pete


    carbsy wrote: »
    They are stating that they don't traffic shape so it sounds like they have oversold (again????!!!!???) their service and there's too many leechers on it.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=54415328&postcount=148

    Is there some part of that direct quote from IBB's commercial director that's hard to understand?


  • Registered Users Posts: 498 ✭✭gerryo


    clansman wrote: »
    Also my ping for gamming is 100+ on a fu(Kin 3Mb up connection!!!!! how can i fix this, as i get about 35 with eircom...

    You can't. Mine is the same.

    Maybe if you moved nearer the mast ;)

    Seriously, this is the downside of IBB wireless broadband, it can have high-ish ping times.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭Nehaxak


    Nah, your ping times should be standard at least below 10ms before they hand off outside of IBB.

    Do a tracert to www.bbc.co.uk and post the results (you can delete the private IP info relating to yourself) - you should get a standard response from that BBC site of usually 20ms and your hops between masts should be under 10ms each.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    I get 23ms ping times to bbc.co.uk on IBB Breeze.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭pete


    ping www.bbc.co.uk

    Pinging www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.251.202] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 212.58.251.202: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=249
    Reply from 212.58.251.202: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=249
    Reply from 212.58.251.202: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=249
    Reply from 212.58.251.202: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=249

    Ping statistics for 212.58.251.202:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 21ms


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Shiny


    Well my torrents have been snailing along at less than 20K/sec all of
    today and now all of a sudden bang 100K/sec constant.

    Look at the time.
    The speed has gone up in the last 10 minutes and this isn't the first
    time I have seen this happen.

    If you want torrents on the IBB network, get them over night
    between 12am and 8am offpeak. ;)

    On Ripwave btw.


Advertisement