Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Religious riddle

Options
  • 14-11-2007 7:19pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭


    Here's an interesting one, don't know where I heard it though;

    If God is all powerful and can do anything, can he create something that even he can't lift?

    Think about it!


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    could he make a toilet big enough to fit a turd of infinite size?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    If God is all powerful and can do anything, can he create something that even he can't life?

    I assume that the last word is supposed to be lift. And I've heard it too many times, from some of my friends who are atheists.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭18AD


    Can god lift himself?

    I know I can't. :(

    Peace.
    AD.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    Would god be able to outrun The Flash?


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Would God win in a fight with Chuck Norris?

    I think this is one of the original versions of this:
    Epicurus wrote:
    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
    Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
    Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
    Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 443 ✭✭Fallen Seraph


    Descartes came up with a solution to this paradox that I've always found most pleasing.

    He simply assumes that god isn't bounded by consistency (I see no reason as to why he should be).

    And so, what happens is this:

    1) Atheist challenges god to create a rock so big that even he can't lift it.
    2) God creates such a rock.
    3) Atheist says "Aha! I thought you were omnipotent!"
    4) God lifts the rock.

    :D I gotta say, I get a great bang from that argument.

    Also, I do consider it rigorous. See The first entry here.

    But I probably see it as rigorous, simply because it find it so aesthetically pleasing :)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Think about it!
    Um, no.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    that's... not right though

    all he did was create a rock he could lift, which wasn't the original request at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    At least when estebancambias makes an awful pointless thread you can be guaranteed some interesting, if insanely bizarre, conversation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭Acid_Violet


    Jakkass wrote: »
    I assume that the last word is supposed to be lift. And I've heard it too many times, from some of my friends who are atheists.

    Did you ever answer it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 443 ✭✭Fallen Seraph


    Mordeth wrote: »
    all he did was create a rock he could lift, which wasn't the original request at all.

    But he couldn't lift it when he created it it :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    But he couldn't lift it when he created it it :D

    Hmm. In that case the riddle simply becomes "can God create a rock He can never lift?".

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,417 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Scofflaw wrote:
    In that case the riddle simply becomes "can God create a rock He can never lift?"
    Or, "Can god create a rock that he can neither lift, nor not lift, nor neither nor both?", which, I think, covers all bases.

    Of greater possible interest are questions like "Can god lie about his promises in the bible?", "Can god lose out to Satan?", "Can god self-destruct permanently?" and so on.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Or can God make himself a mere mortal... no wait.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭18AD


    If there is just god and a massive rock there is no way to determine if he moves the rock or if he moves away from the rock. He must first create the eternal stationary rock-lifting arena.

    Now that I would pay to see.

    All the best.
    AD.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Did you ever answer it?

    Did you ever look the word "paradox" up in a dictionary?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭aidan24326


    Here's an interesting one, don't know where I heard it though;

    If God is all powerful and can do anything, can he create something that even he can't lift?

    Think about it!

    Why do you think this question is even vaguely interesting?

    'All-powerful' implies that 'god' can do absolutely anything, without limit. The answer then to any question beginning with 'can god create...?' is necessarily yes, as otherwise he/it would not be all-powerful in the first place.

    The Epicurus riddle posted by 5uspect sums up the contradictions of the bible god pretty well, but any christian presented with that paradox will usually switch to block my ears and shut my eyes mode immediately.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    could a heterosexual god make a man so sexy that he turns god gay?


  • Registered Users Posts: 228 ✭✭MrB




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Mordeth wrote:
    could a heterosexual god make a man so sexy that he turns god gay?

    He already did ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,523 ✭✭✭✭Nerin


    could god make fred phelps kiss a guy?
    hmmmmm
    sexy
    could he make vanilla ice number one in 2008?
    hmmmmm
    malevolent


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭Acid_Violet


    Zillah wrote: »
    Did you ever look the word "paradox" up in a dictionary?

    Point?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    The point being that if you looked up the word paradox in a dictionary (and understood it), you'd realise that your riddle has no answer. So demanding an answer from Jakkass is somewhat irrational.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭Acid_Violet


    I thank my intellectual superior for bringing that to my attention.

    'Asking' (not demanding an answer :rolleyes:) Jakkass this isn't irrational, it's rhetorical because this logic (as far as I am aware at least) proves the concept of an omnipotent God is a fallacy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭18AD


    I don't really think it proves an omnipotent god doesn't exist. The question assumes that 'god' exists in a realm that is subject to the laws of physics and logic.
    If anything it proves he can't perform miracles in this realm/dimension/existence etc...


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    To me the riddle is questioning the concept of omnipotence; not any specific deity. Of course if omnipotence is impossible that has repercussions for any self-respecting god.


  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭RuailleBuaille


    Here's an interesting one, don't know where I heard it though;

    If God is all powerful and can do anything, can he create something that even he can't lift?

    Think about it!

    He made Mary Harney didn't he? :D

    LOL @ Mordeth


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    humanji wrote: »
    He already did ;)

    You don't mean azezil do you? :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    Can God prove that Black is White and get killed at the next zebra crossing?

    RIP Douglas Adams


  • Advertisement
Advertisement