Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Should cannibas be legalised????

Options
1356720

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭gsxr1


    I think it should not be made legal.

    I spent my youth smoking pot, Listening to the pro cannabis guys harping on about how it is harmless.


    what a pile of crap.

    IM 31 now and have terrible memory problems because of it. When I was 16 I was sharp as a pin but since I smoked pot for a couple of years I can hardly remember what I went out to the kitchen for.

    Plus it does lead people on to harder drugs.


    if you want to convince yourself that smoking pot is healthy , go right ahead. More fool you.

    some time in the growing up process you will regrete the move.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Terry wrote: »
    Not again.


    Do you really think that legalisation of cannabis will make any difference to its consumption and the problems that come with that?

    Do you honestly believe that making it available to those over 21 will stop kids from getting their hands on it?
    Do you honestly believe it will be cheaper if legalised?

    If you answer yes to any of those questions, then you are either stoned or really deluded.

    If it was legal the quality of the stuff with improve, can't see a shop selling weed with glass particles in it, so there's one problem it would solve with regards to the consumption of it.

    Under 21's can get their hands on the stuff as it is, making it legal won't cause any additional problems then there are at the moment.

    gsxr1 wrote: »


    Plus it does lead people on to harder drugs.

    You may have moved on to harder drugs after smoking hash, doesn't mean the majority of users do I for one have never touched any other drug bar alcohol, and I smoke cannabis.

    Hash doesn't give you a graving for harder drugs that's just daft imo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    keen wrote: »
    If it was legal the quality of the stuff with improve, can't see a shop selling weed with glass particles in it, so there's one problem it would solve with regards to the consumption of it.

    Under 21's can get their hands on the stuff as it is, making it legal won't cause any additional problems then there are at the moment.
    Some people seem to think that by legalising it, it will solve some of societies problems, such as keeping it out of the reach of children.
    That is what I was getting at in my post.

    As for it being sold without glass particles; you will get people selling it with glass particles in it to kids on the street.

    If there is money to be made, then there will be someone willing to make that money.

    You may have moved on to harder drugs after smoking hash, doesn't mean the majority of users do I for one have never touched any other drug bar alcohol, and I smoke cannabis.

    Hash doesn't give you a graving for harder drugs that's just daft imo.

    99% of the people I know who have smoked hash have gone on to do harder drugs.
    Congratulations on being in the 1%.

    Most people go for harder drugs because they are looking for a better high.

    Most of them then cop on and realise that beer is the best drug available, because you can use it in moderation and not get messed up.
    One or two social pints would not even give most people a buzz. Can you say the same about weed?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Tha Gopher


    keen wrote: »
    You may have moved on to harder drugs after smoking hash, doesn't mean the majority of users do I for one have never touched any other drug bar alcohol, and I smoke cannabis.

    Hash doesn't give you a graving for harder drugs that's just daft imo.


    I would be hard pressed to think of any young male smokers who have not tried other drugs. Yes, there are a tonne of people who smoke it at a party when its passed around, who have not touched anything else. But as regards people who buy hash and smoke it daily, not one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,414 ✭✭✭kraggy


    Legalisation?

    No way.

    Used to smoke myself. Noticed a change in my mindset and life in general and decided enough was enough.

    And know several people who have ended up in psych wards because of excessive smoking.

    And I don't agree with the argument that smokers who develop schizophrenia were always gonna develop it, the smoke just was just the trigger. I believe that cannabis CAUSES many mental illnesses including depression as well as being the trigger that brings to the surface already existing conditions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32,381 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    Terry wrote: »
    Put down your joints and think about it for a minute.
    Do you really think that legalisation of cannabis will make any difference to its consumption and the problems that come with that?
    Do you honestly believe that making it available to those over 21 will stop kids from getting their hands on it?
    Do you honestly believe it will be cheaper if legalised?

    If you answer yes to any of those questions, then you are either stoned or really deluded.
    Well I am not stoned ATM so must be deluded
    Do you really think that legalisation of cannabis will make any difference to its consumption and the problems that come with that?
    Yes, I think consumption will increase. I know a few people who do not smoke due to it being illegal. I know others whos smoking would increase, and subsequently their drinking (and other drug use) would decrease. They would be able to have a smoke outside the pub, and would drink less as they already are partially intoxicated, so will require less additional drugs to reach a desired state. It also will decrease the health risks due to contamination just like methanol alcohol poisoning decreased when prohibition was lifted, much of the "hash" in Ireland is heavily contaminated and is not suitable for smoking OR eating.
    Do you honestly believe that making it available to those over 21 will stop kids from getting their hands on it?
    No on this one- more kids will get hold of it than they can now. Just like drink. If drink was illegal it would be harder for kids to get it. ATM some people see alcohol as being legal so "must be grand, otherwise it would be illegal". So you might get people willing to buy cans for a bunch of kids outside an offie. Same would happen with cannabis. If cannabis was legal and some kidnapper held my kid and said he was going to force feed them 0.05g of high grade hash (i.e. 50%+THC) or 6 cans of beer, I would ask him to give him the hash. Both those amounts would have simlar levels of intoxication for myself.

    Do you honestly believe it will be cheaper if legalised?
    Yes, in one way it could be got cheaper. There would still be an illegal trade in it, just like you can get poitin. If alchol was illegal poitin would be more expensive due to the added risk involved wtih dealing it. So smugglers would probably face a less stiff sentence for cannabis smuggling, just like tobacco smugglers will not be charge like a cannabis smuggler would now. Therefore "drug mules" will do it for less so it will be cheaper. I think the majority of people will buy from proper sources just like they do drink, tobacco, viagra, paracetomol- why risk uncontrolled quality levels for the sake of a few quid. The legal stuff would be taxed to an acceptable point where people will not turn to illegal stuff, just like booze & fags are. If smokes went to €50 a pack more people would buy on the street.

    All drugs should be reviewed under the same criteria to determine their legality. At the moment this is not happening so they laws are hypocritical. It is the hypocrisy of the drug laws that annoys me more than any drug being legal or not.
    Terry wrote: »
    As for it being sold without glass particles; you will get people selling it with glass particles in it to kids on the street.

    If there is money to be made, then there will be someone willing to make that money.

    This is true of anything. Kids can be sold poitin on the street with high levels of methanol in it. Most kids hang around offies and ask people to get them drink, I expect the same would happen wtih cannabis.


    Terry wrote: »
    99% of the people I know who have smoked hash have gone on to do harder drugs.
    Congratulations on being in the 1%.
    That might be your experience but I have never seen stats or studies in any country that would come close to that. In almost all studies cannabis is shown to be the most widely tried drug by far. if 99% of users also had tried "harder drugs" then other drugs would be tailing close by compared to the amount of cannabis users.

    Dont know what you mean by "harder drugs" many medical professionals would deem alcohol "harder" than cannabis, there was an classification done a year or so ago on the realtive harm of recreational drugs, and alcohol and tobacco were listed up their alongside the drugs you probably consider "hard". And others you probably consider hard were way down the list, e.g. mdma.

    Now if you were to say 90%+ of people who tried heroin also tried cannabis then that would make more sense. It would be even more likely that they began on one of the even more popular recreational drugs, like alcohol, and then like you say yourself, they went off looking for a better high.

    Terry wrote: »
    One or two social pints would not even give most people a buzz. Can you say the same about weed?
    I certainly can. If you ever go to amsterdam try visiting a quiet coffeeshop, you will see local dutch people and tourist who can enjoy a simple light spliff. Just like you could find a pub in town where people can enjoy a pint or 2. People have this idea that coffeeshops are all full of complete stoners, this is the same as saying everysingle pub in town is full of blaring music with people off their minds on drink, puking everywhere. Of course there are coffeeshops where they cater to such people, just like pubs do.

    Of course people can enjoy drugs like alcohol or cannabis at threshold doses, it would be crazy to think people must overindulge in a drug simply because of its legality.

    If alcohol was illegal and you personally did not drink you would probably think people could not enjoy 1 or 2 pints too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Terry wrote: »
    Some people seem to think that by legalising it, it will solve some of societies problems, such as keeping it out of the reach of children.
    That is what I was getting at in my post.

    As for it being sold without glass particles; you will get people selling it with glass particles in it to kids on the street.

    If there is money to be made, then there will be someone willing to make that money.




    99% of the people I know who have smoked hash have gone on to do harder drugs.
    Congratulations on being in the 1%.

    Most people go for harder drugs because they are looking for a better high.

    Most of them then cop on and realise that beer is the best drug available, because you can use it in moderation and not get messed up.
    One or two social pints would not even give most people a buzz. Can you say the same about weed?

    Most of them then cop on and realise that beer is the best drug available, because you can use it in moderation and not get messed up.

    What about the people who drink and have a complete personality change? Never once saw a stoned person change their personality to the extent of becoming violent/aggressive. Lots of people can't have "one or two sociable drinks" because of the effect it has on them.

    And the friends of yours that starting smoking weed and then went on to harder stuff did they drink before smoking hash? Was drink not enough for them?

    And yes I can smoke hash without it have a major effect on me like you would have your two pints, different way of consuming it leads to different effects.

    I can see how both cannabis and drink can be used in moderation because I enjoy both you only like drink so your views are one sided.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    Terry wrote: »
    Most of them then cop on and realise that beer is the best drug available, because you can use it in moderation and not get messed up.
    Are you seriously asserting that this is not true for any other drug?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭gsxr1


    keen wrote: »
    If it was legal the quality of the stuff with improve, can't see a shop selling weed with glass particles in it, so there's one problem it would solve with regards to the consumption of it.

    Under 21's can get their hands on the stuff as it is, making it legal won't cause any additional problems then there are at the moment.




    You may have moved on to harder drugs after smoking hash, doesn't mean the majority of users do I for one have never touched any other drug bar alcohol, and I smoke cannabis.

    Hash doesn't give you a graving for harder drugs that's just daft imo.

    I am speaking generally mate.

    They way it worked on myself was that smoking pot familiarised me with drugs. Then some how it was easier for one of my mates to talk me into taking an "e".

    If kid could manage to stay away from the bad apples who smoke it , and maybe find a more constructive way to spend an evening, ie sports or hobbies then they would have a beter crack at life.

    teenagers have enough to deal with these days with out doing it with a stoned head on them.

    legalise it and it will become very available to them.

    that's my thoughts on it anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 709 ✭✭✭mac123


    Terry wrote: »
    99% of the people I know who have smoked hash have gone on to do harder drugs.
    Congratulations on being in the 1%.

    Most people go for harder drugs because they are looking for a better high.
    QUOTE]
    What makes you think the smoking of hash led them to try harder drugs? Drink would be more likely to be the drug that leads most ppl onto harder drugs imo as the effects of drink are more comparable to the out of control effects you get from harder drugs! People are always in control of there actions on weed.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    gsxr1 wrote: »

    If kid could manage to stay away from the bad apples who smoke it , and maybe find a more constructive way to spend an evening, ie sports or hobbies then they would have a beter crack at life.

    teenagers have enough to deal with these days with out doing it with a stoned head on them.

    legalise it and it will become very available to them.

    that's my thoughts on it anyway.

    See that's typical, people view people that get stoned often as wasters that do nothing but smoke hash every minute of the day and do **** all but bum and scrounge.

    I work full time play ball every week and go fishing, I have plenty of hobbies and interests and aren't a boring recluse like most people seem to view people who smoke most days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    gsxr1 wrote: »
    They way it worked on myself was that smoking pot familiarised me with drugs. Then some how it was easier for one of my mates to talk me into taking an "e".
    E isn't really any "harder" than weed though. Weed just has this image of being "soft" and "harmless" surrounding it, and as a result you get retarded statements like this:
    mac123 wrote: »
    the effects of drink are more comparable to the out of control effects you get from harder drugs! People are always in control of there actions on weed.

    Personally, I would actually consider pure MDMA to be a "softer" drug than either alcohol or weed in terms of being in control of your actions and negative health effects on the whole when taken in moderation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Tha Gopher


    rubadub wrote: »
    Well I am not stoned ATM so must be deluded


    Yes, I think consumption will increase. I know a few people who do not smoke due to it being illegal. I know others whos smoking would increase, and subsequently their drinking (and other drug use) would decrease. They would be able to have a smoke outside the pub, and would drink less as they already are partially intoxicated, so will require less additional drugs to reach a desired state. It also will decrease the health risks due to contamination just like methanol alcohol poisoning decreased when prohibition was lifted, much of the "hash" in Ireland is heavily contaminated and is not suitable for smoking OR eating.
    t.

    Id imgaine most pubs wouldnt tolerate hash smoking around the premises.
    keen wrote: »
    And the friends of yours that starting smoking weed and then went on to harder stuff did they drink before smoking hash? Was drink not enough for them?

    Why bother asking? You know they drank first.


    A larger proportion of smokers are what could be termed problem users compared o people who solely drink. The vast majority of drinkers can happil get through the weekdays without a drink. There are few if any smokers who can keep a q in their room and burn it once every 3 days and the weekend only.

    Whats with all the anti drink talk anyway. Most stoners I know like sinkin a few pints, so whats your point?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭Anto McC


    I would genuinely consider moving abroad if cannabis was legalised in this Country. I just don't think i could stomach it to live here anymore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Tha Gopher wrote: »
    Whats with all the anti drink talk anyway. Most stoners I know like sinkin a few pints, so whats your point?

    haha I'm not anti drink, I like sinking a few pints too.

    Just using it has a comparison to be honest, just think it's a but hypocritical for people that drink frequently to look down their noses at people that like to smoke frequently.


  • Registered Users Posts: 451 ✭✭Lawless_Samurai


    Anto McC wrote: »
    I would genuinely consider moving abroad if cannabis was legalised in this Country. I just don't think i could stomach it to live here anymore.

    If they did you could move to Amsterdam! Lovely city, technically under water which is just cool and they are really relaxed and easy going over there and thats mainly cause of the.... oh wait the drug thing, whoops! ;)

    Maybe move to America I hear thats a grat place to live :D:):D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,145 ✭✭✭Lands Leaving


    gsxr1 wrote: »
    since I smoked pot for a couple of years I can hardly remember what I went out to the kitchen for.

    So how can you be sure thats what caused your memory problems? Maybe you forgot that you got hit in the head with a saucepan by an angry mexican whose chili you stole and got amnesia, forcing you to keep returning to your kitchen, and its vague memories of the life you once knew...


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    rubadub wrote: »
    Well I am not stoned ATM so must be deluded
    You said it.

    Yes, I think consumption will increase. I know a few people who do not smoke due to it being illegal. I know others whos smoking would increase, and subsequently their drinking (and other drug use) would decrease. They would be able to have a smoke outside the pub, and would drink less as they already are partially intoxicated, so will require less additional drugs to reach a desired state. It also will decrease the health risks due to contamination just like methanol alcohol poisoning decreased when prohibition was lifted, much of the "hash" in Ireland is heavily contaminated and is not suitable for smoking OR eating.
    Again. There will still be crap sold on the streets.
    Look at tobacco for example.
    You can go into Dublin and buy some cheap cigarettes on the street.
    It wouldn't be any different with hash.
    As for your Poitin analogy, it's flawed. Different drinks have different flavours. People will drink something they like the taste of.
    No on this one- more kids will get hold of it than they can now. Just like drink. If drink was illegal it would be harder for kids to get it. ATM some people see alcohol as being legal so "must be grand, otherwise it would be illegal". So you might get people willing to buy cans for a bunch of kids outside an offie. Same would happen with cannabis. If cannabis was legal and some kidnapper held my kid and said he was going to force feed them 0.05g of high grade hash (i.e. 50%+THC) or 6 cans of beer, I would ask him to give him the hash. Both those amounts would have simlar levels of intoxication for myself.
    That's one strange kidnapper, even by kidnapper standards.

    Yes, in one way it could be got cheaper. There would still be an illegal trade in it, just like you can get poitin. If alchol was illegal poitin would be more expensive due to the added risk involved wtih dealing it. So smugglers would probably face a less stiff sentence for cannabis smuggling, just like tobacco smugglers will not be charge like a cannabis smuggler would now. Therefore "drug mules" will do it for less so it will be cheaper. I think the majority of people will buy from proper sources just like they do drink, tobacco, viagra, paracetomol- why risk uncontrolled quality levels for the sake of a few quid. The legal stuff would be taxed to an acceptable point where people will not turn to illegal stuff, just like booze & fags are. If smokes went to €50 a pack more people would buy on the street.
    Ok. viagra and paracetemol have no place in this debate.
    One gives you a boner and the other gets rid of your wifes headache, so that she will appreciate your boner. Then again, you always bring legal drugs into this arguement, so I shouldn't have expected anything different this time.

    Regarding the tax issue, you really are deluded if you are of the opinion that the government will not tax it to bits.

    All drugs should be reviewed under the same criteria to determine their legality. At the moment this is not happening so they laws are hypocritical. It is the hypocrisy of the drug laws that annoys me more than any drug being legal or not.
    No they shouldn't.
    Do you understand the difference between recreational drugs and medicinal drugs?

    This is true of anything. Kids can be sold poitin on the street with high levels of methanol in it. Most kids hang around offies and ask people to get them drink, I expect the same would happen wtih cannabis.
    What's with the poitin?
    It's not like there are poitin dealers all over the place.
    It's extremely rare.

    That might be your experience but I have never seen stats or studies in any country that would come close to that. In almost all studies cannabis is shown to be the most widely tried drug by far. if 99% of users also had tried "harder drugs" then other drugs would be tailing close by compared to the amount of cannabis users.
    Give it time.

    Dont know what you mean by "harder drugs" many medical professionals would deem alcohol "harder" than cannabis, there was an classification done a year or so ago on the realtive harm of recreational drugs, and alcohol and tobacco were listed up their alongside the drugs you probably consider "hard". And others you probably consider hard were way down the list, e.g. mdma.
    You know exactly what I mean by harder drugs. You are just being pedantic.

    Now if you were to say 90%+ of people who tried heroin also tried cannabis then that would make more sense. It would be even more likely that they began on one of the even more popular recreational drugs, like alcohol, and then like you say yourself, they went off looking for a better high.
    Most did start on alcohol. What's your point there?
    Most of the people I know who drink alcohol have never done anything stronger.

    I certainly can. If you ever go to amsterdam try visiting a quiet coffeeshop, you will see local dutch people and tourist who can enjoy a simple light spliff. Just like you could find a pub in town where people can enjoy a pint or 2. People have this idea that coffeeshops are all full of complete stoners, this is the same as saying everysingle pub in town is full of blaring music with people off their minds on drink, puking everywhere. Of course there are coffeeshops where they cater to such people, just like pubs do.

    Of course people can enjoy drugs like alcohol or cannabis at threshold doses, it would be crazy to think people must overindulge in a drug simply because of its legality.
    One average joint will get you high.
    One average alcoholic beverage will not get you drunk.
    If alcohol was illegal and you personally did not drink you would probably think people could not enjoy 1 or 2 pints too.
    At my age, no.
    I know plenty of people who do not drink, but they still join me and my friends in the pub and can see that we are capable of having a few sociable drinks.
    (when I say "We", I mean my friends. I'm a dipso)

    keen wrote: »
    What about the people who drink and have a complete personality change? Never once saw a stoned person change their personality to the extent of becoming violent/aggressive. Lots of people can't have "one or two sociable drinks" because of the effect it has on them.
    I've seen people become aggressive when they couldn't get any weed.
    What does that tell you?
    And the friends of yours that starting smoking weed and then went on to harder stuff did they drink before smoking hash? Was drink not enough for them?
    Obviously not.
    Most of them gave up the other crap because they knew it was ****ing up their mental and physical health.

    And yes I can smoke hash without it have a major effect on me like you would have your two pints, different way of consuming it leads to different effects.
    If you can smoke it without it having a major effect on you, then you are either immune or are getting crap hash. If it's the former, then I would say that you have a problem.
    I can see how both cannabis and drink can be used in moderation because I enjoy both you only like drink so your views are one sided.
    Again. One average joint will get you stoned.
    One average alcoholic beverage will not get you drunk.

    JC 2K3 wrote: »
    Are you seriously asserting that this is not true for any other drug?
    Ever done cocaine?
    Gimme another line. Gimme another line. Gimme another line.
    None left?
    Damn it. Call that guy and get some more. Call that guy an....


    Ever done "E"?
    Shít. this isn't working. Gimme another one.
    Crap. I'm coming down. Gimme another one.

    Heroin?
    Aww man. This is the best buzz ever. *puke*
    Yeah. *puke*

    If you're not puking, then you're in trouble.

    That weed is crap. Put more in the next joint.

    They are not social drugs.
    JC 2K3 wrote: »
    E isn't really any "harder" than weed though. Weed just has this image of being "soft" and "harmless" surrounding it, and as a result you get retarded statements like this:
    the effects of drink are more comparable to the out of control effects you get from harder drugs! People are always in control of there actions on weed.
    1 year ago, this guy was adamant that weed was harmless.
    Nice to see you have grown up a bit.
    Personally, I would actually consider pure MDMA to be a "softer" drug than either alcohol or weed in terms of being in control of your actions and negative health effects on the whole when taken in moderation.
    Nobody sells pure MDMA.
    If they tell you it's pure, then they are lying.

    Anto McC wrote: »
    I would genuinely consider moving abroad if cannabis was legalised in this Country. I just don't think i could stomach it to live here anymore.

    I'd probably join you.

    Picture Temple bar as it is now.
    Now picture it with alcohol coupled with weed.

    Careful where you step. Watch out for that puddle of vomit and that passed out English tourist.


    I'd also like to point out the flaws in the Amsterdam system.

    The place has gone to the dogs.
    There are scummy drug dealers on every corner.
    Do you really want to see your home town end up like that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,145 ✭✭✭Lands Leaving


    I just read that whole thing. that was a lot of words. good points though about the effect on temple bar and such, never really considered that


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    Terry wrote: »
    Again. One average joint will get you stoned.
    One average alcoholic beverage will not get you drunk.
    Do you not acknowledge that the vast amount of drinkers do so to get drunk rather than because they like the taste of a particular beverage that happens to be alcoholic?
    Terry wrote: »
    Ever done cocaine?
    Gimme another line. Gimme another line. Gimme another line.
    None left?
    Damn it. Call that guy and get some more. Call that guy an....


    Ever done "E"?
    Shít. this isn't working. Gimme another one.
    Crap. I'm coming down. Gimme another one.

    Heroin?
    Aww man. This is the best buzz ever. *puke*
    Yeah. *puke*

    If you're not puking, then you're in trouble.

    That weed is crap. Put more in the next joint.

    They are not social drugs.
    Out of those drugs I've done E and weed, and my experiences were absolutely nothing like you've described.

    And E is a very social drug, weed not so much.
    Terry wrote: »
    1 year ago, this guy was adamant that weed was harmless.
    Nice to see you have grown up a bit.
    Ah now, I never was adamant that it was perfectly harmless, but yes, I have grown up in that I've realised that the idea that it's distinctly less harmful than other recreational drugs is utter bs.
    Terry wrote: »
    Nobody sells pure MDMA.
    If they tell you it's pure, then they are lying.
    True, but testing kits and sites like http://ecstasydata.org are a great resource for getting an idea of what's in your pills, and a simple acetone wash does wonders for removing impurities from street pills.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    If you can smoke it without it having a major effect on you, then you are either immune or are getting crap hash. If it's the former, then I would say that you have a problem.

    You obviously know very little about cannabis.

    If I put half the amount of hash into a joint it won't get me as stoned as a normal joint this will result in me me not being as effected as I would be after smoking a normal joint.
    That doesn't mean the hash is bad nor does it mean that I've become immune to it, just means I'm consuming less, less thc in body which ends in me not being as stoned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    keen wrote: »
    You obviously know very little about cannabis.

    If I put half the amount of hash into a joint it won't get me as stoned as a normal joint this will result in me me not being as effected as I would be after smoking a normal joint.
    That doesn't mean the hash is bad nor does it mean that I've become immune to it, just means I'm consuming less, less thc in body which ends in me not being as stoned.
    Why are you smoking it if you're not going to get stoned?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Terry wrote: »
    Why are you smoking it if you're not going to get stoned?

    Who said I wouldn't get stoned? I said it wouldn't have a major affect on me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    So, mildly stoned then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭gsxr1


    JC 2K3 wrote: »
    E isn't really any "harder" than weed though. Weed just has this image of being "soft" and "harmless" surrounding it, and as a result you get retarded statements like this:

    Personally, I would actually consider pure MDMA to be a "softer" drug than either alcohol or weed in terms of being in control of your actions and negative health effects on the whole when taken in moderation.

    i would appreciate it if you could respond to my messages with out insulting me. I am not retarded and do not make retarded statements.

    E is a stronger drug than pot. This is common knowledge and is a class "A" drug.
    If i was to smoke 10 joints at one time I would probably vomit and go home

    if i was to take 10 e tabs at one time, I would probably end up in hospital. And very well die as a result.

    but off coarse MDMA is safe??????


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Terry wrote: »
    So, mildly stoned then?

    Correct I'd compare it to being a bit merry after your first two or three pints not locked but can still feel the effect of the drug.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    They should substitute alcohol for dope....


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    keen wrote: »
    Correct I'd compare it to being a bit merry after your first two or three pints not locked but can still feel the effect of the drug.
    So you're still getting stoned then, yes?



    I really don't know how you didn't see that one coming.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    gsxr1 wrote: »
    i would appreciate it if you could respond to my messages with out insulting me. I am not retarded and do not make retarded statements.
    You aren't totally in control of your actions when stoned. Your statement was false and worthy of being called retarded.
    gsxr1 wrote: »
    E is a stronger drug than pot. This is common knowledge and is a class "A" drug.
    1. What do you mean by stronger? It's just different tbh. E gives energy and euphoric feelings but no lack of coordination, lack of clarity of thought etc. whereas Marajuana is more relaxing and less euphoric yet gives a lack of coordination, impedes clarity of thought etc.
    2. It's also "common knowledge" that marajuana is extremely dangerous and causes psychosis etc. "common knowledge" means nothing.
    3. Marajuana is a class A/Schedule 1 drug in Ireland, the US and many other countries. Classification means nothing.
    gsxr1 wrote: »
    If i was to smoke 10 joints at one time I would probably vomit and go home

    if i was to take 10 e tabs at one time, I would probably end up in hospital.

    but off coarse MDMA is safe??????
    If you were to take about 8 paracetamol tablets you'd probably end up in hospital. What has some idiot taking an overdose have to do with safety?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Terry wrote: »
    So you're still getting stoned then, yes?



    I really don't know how you didn't see that one coming.

    You were saying that hash can't be consumed without it having a major effect on the user I was saying it could be.


Advertisement