9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

CB_Brooklyn

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

By CB_Brooklyn


Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."


There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:


1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.

2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.

3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.



Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.

Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?

Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?

Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.



***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction.

Mineta steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the “Cheney stand down order” hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871



***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm

Jones steered the “truth movement” toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60

Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as ”These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm



***Physicist Greg Jenkins’ has connections to the NSA and DEW:

"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf

Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm

Jenkins steered the “truth movement” away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html



***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html

Romero steered the “truth movement” toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html

Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?



***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.

Bowman steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE

Although he is in Jim Fetzer’s Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood’s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he “doesn’t fall for conspiracy theories” with regard to controlled demolition.

Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?





Also of note is the following:

The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:

Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA’s website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST’s denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html



The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence of explosives?

The New York Times steered the “truth movement” towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html

However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html



Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?

*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089

*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg

*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs

*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html

*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD’s jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE


*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8

Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case

*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients’ (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions


In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:

"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."

MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3

============================================
============================================
============================================


The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.


Continued here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...d=151&Itemid=60

zarathustra

CB_Brooklyn wrote: »

Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?

The 9/11 truth movement has been infiltrated by the CIA, that is part of their job to infiltrate such groups that they would deem some kind of a "threat" to the government. This is why many of the original members of the 9/11 movement have left, they know it is being hijacked by certain people attemping to steer it in the wrong direction. However 9/11 truth is spreading all the time, mostly through the internet which is quite difficult to censor, even though they are trying very hard to gain control of the web. The growth of the web has surprised those in power.

Interesting post you made there. of course Lenin wasn't the first or only person to recognise that it was best to control the opposition. Big businesses buy out their opposition all the time. In Uk and USA you have a predominant 2-party system, and an examination of the 2 respective parties shows they are really one party system with 2 different names.
Clinton and Bush are somehow supposed to be "opposition", which is a lame joke as they are both on the same side.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORM75G-Jby4

you may be interested in this clip, if you haven't seen it already
Sep 11 Tv Fakery

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7879451094134182289&q=september+11+clues&total=205&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

oscarBravo

I wouldn't bother zarathustra, CB_Brooklyn is the one person less interested in an actual discussion than you are.

Jocksereire

Ok i dont trust the no plane evidence and tv fakery and as you say, the CIA have infilitrated the the turth movement which was to be expected. I believe it is them who push the no plane and DEW theory in my opinion.
Is this not a piece of an airplane on the streets ?
http://www.garagetv.be//video-galerij/bartvanbelle/unseen_footage_9_11.aspx?utm_source=GTVPlayer-&utm_medium=LopendFilmpjeExtern

But what was important on what you say above is that you mentioned a company called ARA. You say that they work on DEWs. Is this the same ARA who NIST have outsourced the investigation into the collapse of WTC7?????

Oracle

That's a huge post there CB Brooklyn. I seem to recall you've posted a lot about this topic in the past. Because most of your post is links to other articles and web pages, I think it would be better suited to the sticky links thread, or the 9/11 mega thread (if it's still available.)

jessop1

I have no doubt as to the existence of advanced directed energy weapons, including microwave weapons and lasers. This stuff was being developed in the 50s. Look how technology in general has advanced since then. And its reasonable to assume, in my opinion, that whats available to secret military ops etc is far ahead of whats disclosed to the public in general.

Whether its DEW or demolition, one thing is for sure, the official explanation of 911 is an utter crock.

Peace
jessop

CB_Brooklyn

I find it quite interesting that many well known people within the "truth movement" have affiliations with DEWs, such as Bob Bowman. And some of them speak up against DEWs, such as Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins.

And let's not forget Van Romero's "relatively small amount of explosives" comment, and all the recognition/awards/grants he got afterwards. Romero made presentations at the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) before and after 9/11!

And of course, Norman Mineta was VP of Lockheed Martin, a Gold-Level sponsor of DEPS.

And NIST contracted with ARA and SAIC; both are sponsors of DEPS.


One must ask themselves... what are all these DEW-affiliated people doing in and around the truth movement? Why are they here? And why do they speak up against DEW evidence?

Be sure to check out the FULL timeline on checktheevidence.com for all the information:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60



2000, Winter - DEPS’ Newsletter “Wave Front”

The first article in Volume 1, Issue 1 of Wave Front starts with the following quote:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf

Captain Chaos

I'm sorry but thats a load of BS on energy based weapons. The USAF has spent years and billions of dollars trying to get one in a converted 747 for shooting down ICBMs and SCUDs in their terminal phase. Its still very immature tech, the laser is chemical based and has just about enough power to melt a warhead never mind vapourise it outright.

Sure they are trying to develop a small 25MW laser for the F-35. They estimate that the wepon will be ready in about 10 years and will ony be powerful enough to destroy small targets like tanks and SAM site lunchers.

They would not waste all this time and money if these weapons were so advanced after being worked on since the 50s. Which they have been and 50yrs later they havent moved on much relative to every day tech.