Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

The VW Golf Mark III - a critical appraisal

Options
  • 03-12-2007 7:22pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭


    I was hoping that other posters with some experience of the Golf Mark III would offer their opinions on the car here on this thread: likes and dislikes, peeves, points of quality and annoyances. I'll start.



    I've a 1996 CL 5-speed (1.4).

    - It seems to max out at 110mph

    - Take-off is very sluggish

    - It's very heavy and solid

    - The clutch is heavy

    - The power steering could be a lot lighter

    - The gear change could be a little smoother (especially 1st gear)

    - Pick-up can sometimes be slow when overtaking, but downhill, for example, is very quick.

    - All in all, I enjoy driving it.


    I drove a 1.3 1998 Toyota Starlet over the weekend; the clutch was much lighter, and the car was peppier than my Golf.

    I was amazed at how much like a tank my car felt like when I drove her again - clunkier, more sluggish, but solid and safe, and powerful at 5th gear.


    So, what do all of you think ofthe Mark III Golf?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 73,454 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    All cars are faster downhill!

    My least favourite Golf!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    All cars are faster downhill!

    My least favourite Golf!

    Why? What do you find annoying about it? I'd like to know, because I have a number of gripes about my own, and since I've never drven another Mark III Golf, I'd like to know if the peeves of others correspond to my own.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,454 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    My main gripe is that they have none of the great handling or character of the Mk1 or MK2 Golf, or none of the quality plastics that the Mk4 and Mk5 enjoy.

    Also, I don't like the heavy controls or the styling. Or the gear change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    My main gripe is that they have none of the great handling or character of the Mk1 or MK2 Golf, or none of the quality plastics that the Mk4 and Mk5 enjoy.

    Also, I don't like the heavy controls or the styling. Or the gear change.

    I can appreciate the bit about the heavy controls for certain. My clutch is so heavy it actually creaks when I work it!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,441 ✭✭✭JoeA3


    Furet wrote: »
    - Pick-up can sometimes be slow when overtaking, but downhill, for example, is very quick.

    LOL!
    I haven't had much experience of it, but I did some driving lessons in a MK3 Golf many years ago, and I hated it! As Colm said, the controls were seriously clunky and heavy, hardly ideal learner-car material.!
    The Mk3 is generally considered the worst of the Golf incarnations.... but the MK4 wasn't much better in the ride/handling/power dept.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 73,454 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Wait till you see the Mk6...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    Ok, so why was it considered such a good car?


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,454 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Mainly because the Mk1 and Mk2 were so good.
    It did a lot of things reasonably well too. When compared with the likes of a Ford Escort, it was a good car.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,310 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    They're over weight, over rated, under powered and under spec'd. When they were contemporary, they were well over priced too.

    ComicBookGuy.jpg
    [comic book guy] Worst golf EVER! [/comic book guy]

    Furet wrote: »
    My clutch is so heavy it actually creaks when I work it!

    That could be the thrust bearing on the way out. It makes the pedal action much heavier and also a creaking sound.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    alias no.9 wrote: »
    They're over weight, over rated, under powered and under spec'd. When they were contemporary, they were well over priced too.

    ComicBookGuy.jpg
    [comic book guy] Worst golf EVER! [/comic book guy]




    That could be the thrust bearing on the way out. It makes the pedal action much heavier and also a creaking sound.

    How much would that cost to fix? And what exactly is the 'thrust bearing'?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Furet wrote: »


    I've a 1996 CL 5-speed (1.4).

    - It seems to max out at 110mph

    - Take-off is very sluggish

    - It's very heavy and solid

    - Pick-up can sometimes be slow when overtaking, but downhill, for example, is very quick.



    Yep, 60 bhp (when new) and 1200ish kg will do that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭pippip


    I drive the exact same Golf as mentioned at the start. Everything you describe is exactly how I find it and I love it.

    I did my lessons in a Nissan Micra and then got the Golf as my first car and I found it a million times easier to drive than the micra. Yes its heavy but I found it so much easier to operate (less sensitive to every nervous touch).

    Fact is that there is no better built car in its range. At least I feel I'm driving a car and not a tin can that could crumble or gets blow around like a kite when driving on days like today.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Furet wrote: »
    My clutch is so heavy it actually creaks when I work it!

    The clutch cable on the MkIII (1H) Golf had the first self adjusting cable that VW introduced. And, man, did it give some grief. This is most likely the cause of your heavy clutch. There is/was a manual adjusting version available. To replace your clutch cable you'll need to order part number 1H1 721 365. That's a weird part number - it actually infers a LHD - even though the parts catalog lists it as RHD :confused: But VW had so much hassle with clutch cables in the 90s that any part number could be viable. The manual adjusting cable is not listed on the EPC, but a bulletin was sent to dealers in the 90s listing details on how to order the manual version.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    pippip wrote: »
    I drive the exact same Golf as mentioned at the start. Everything you describe is exactly how I find it and I love it.

    I did my lessons in a Nissan Micra and then got the Golf as my first car and I found it a million times easier to drive than the micra. Yes its heavy but I found it so much easier to operate (less sensitive to every nervous touch).

    Fact is that there is no better built car in its range. At least I feel I'm driving a car and not a tin can that could crumble or gets blow around like a kite when driving on days like today.

    Really? And is your clutch very stiff an heavy too?

    How do you find take off?

    I have to say that despite my quibbles, I am fond of it. As you said, you feel very safe and solid. And yes, I did notice that when I drove the starlet the wind really tossed the car around - whereas my Golf wouldn't flinch.

    Also pippip, do you find that first gear is difficult to get every so often?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    crosstownk wrote: »
    The clutch cable on the MkIII (1H) Golf had the first self adjusting cable that VW introduced. And, man, did it give some grief. This is most likely the cause of your heavy clutch. There is/was a manual adjusting version available. To replace your clutch cable you'll need to order part number 1H1 721 365. That's a weird part number - it actually infers a LHD - even though the parts catalog lists it as RHD :confused: But VW had so much hassle with clutch cables in the 90s that any part number could be viable. The manual adjusting cable is not listed on the EPC, but a bulletin was sent to dealers in the 90s listing details on how to order the manual version.

    Thanks crosstownk, I've been told that the cable is fine - it's just really dry, and that's why it creaks. I'm clueless when it come to mechanics, however.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,393 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    Not a fan of the Mk3, especially the 60 bhp 1.4. One positive thing about the car was it had good passive safety for the time and was top of its class in independent crash tests. Contrast what happens when a Golf Mk3 and a Civic EG are subjected to the same test
    Golf
    http://www.sicurauto.it/download/contatore/link.php?link_id=468
    Civic
    http://www.sicurauto.it/download/contatore/link.php?link_id=464


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Furet wrote: »
    I've been told that the cable is fine - it's just really dry, and that's why it creaks.

    Well in my opinion, if it's dry - its fcuked - it's only a matter of time before it fails. Seriously. I've been there too many times and I'd sooner replace a cable before delving into release/thrust bearings.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    crosstownk wrote: »
    Well in my opinion, if it's dry - its fcuked - it's only a matter of time before it fails. Seriously. I've been there too many times and I'd sooner replace a cable before delving into release/thrust bearings.


    Ok - how much am I looking at to get the cable changed at a garage?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭pippip


    Furet wrote: »
    Really? And is your clutch very stiff an heavy too?

    How do you find take off?

    I have to say that despite my quibbles, I am fond of it. As you said, you feel very safe and solid. And yes, I did notice that when I drove the starlet the wind really tossed the car around - whereas my Golf wouldn't flinch.

    Also pippip, do you find that first gear is difficult to get every so often?

    Yeh, heavy clutch. Doesn't bother me but might be different when my girlfriend starts to drive it. Slow on takeoff but on slightly high revs on the other gears you can really shift it at times.

    Now and then I find 1st a problem, not a huge problem I generally pull up the clutch slightly and try again and its fine. Doesn't worry me. Its always been like it.

    Have to say I'm glad to hear mine is the same as someone else's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    pippip wrote: »
    Yeh, heavy clutch. Doesn't bother me but might be different when my girlfriend starts to drive it. Slow on takeoff but on slightly high revs on the other gears you can really shift it at times.

    Now and then I find 1st a problem, not a huge problem I generally pull up the clutch slightly and try again and its fine. Doesn't worry me. Its always been like it.

    Have to say I'm glad to hear mine is the same as someone else's.

    Me too! Does the clutch creak slightly when your working (like working up or down) through gears?

    I agree that the car isn't too sensitive either. How do you find the power steering? Again, mine is far heavier than many other cars. I find, for example, that there is no way you'd turn the wheel effortlessly with only the palm of your hand - you'd really have to press your hand quite firmly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Furet wrote: »
    Ok - how much am I looking at to get the cable changed at a garage?

    Sorry - no idea. It's a long time since I've come across a MkIII. But don't go to a main dealer, unless you want to be robbed. It might be no harm to insist on the manual cable as it's more reliable. That said, it's quite possible that the manual version is no longer available. It's been a long time since my VW days :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    crosstownk wrote: »
    Sorry - no idea. It's a long time since I've come across a MkIII. But don't go to a main dealer, unless you want to be robbed. It might be no harm to insist in the manual cable as it's more reliable. That said, it's quite possible that the manual version is no longer available. It's been a long time since my VW days :D

    Ok, thanks as usual for the advice. But when you say to insist on the manual cable, are there other cables I could get?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    Not a fan of the Mk3, especially the 60 bhp 1.4. One positive thing about the car was it had good passive safety for the time and was top of its class in independent crash tests. Contrast what happens when a Golf Mk3 and a Civic EG are subjected to the same test
    Golf
    http://www.sicurauto.it/download/contatore/link.php?link_id=468
    Civic
    http://www.sicurauto.it/download/contatore/link.php?link_id=464

    Good post - though to be fair, I wouldn't like to be in either vehicle in a situation like that!


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    There are two cables available (at least there used to be). One has a self adjuster, the other is simply a cable much like a brake cable on a bicycle. It's easy to identify - the self adjuster has a large, cylindrical plastic jobbie along the cable. The manual is just a cable. Self adjuster shown in the attachment - item 25.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    crosstownk wrote: »
    There are two cables available (at least there used to be). One has a self adjuster, the other is simply a cable much like a brake cable on a bicycle. It's easy to identify - the self adjuster has a large, cylindrical plastic jobbie along the cable. The manual is just a cable. Self adjuster shown in the attachment - item 25.

    It's a manual - thanks again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Mk III Golf, the most boat-like handling possible in a car. Reminds me of holidays on the Shannon in an Emerald Star cruiser.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Mk III Golf, the most boat-like handling possible in a car. Reminds me of holidays on the Shannon in an Emerald Star cruiser.

    I disagree - you should try navigating a 1989 Passat with no power steering :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭pippip


    Furet wrote: »
    Me too! Does the clutch creak slightly when your working (like working up or down) through gears?

    I agree that the car isn't too sensitive either. How do you find the power steering? Again, mine is far heavier than many other cars. I find, for example, that there is no way you'd turn the wheel effortlessly with only the palm of your hand - you'd really have to press your hand quite firmly.

    When I got the car it was really bad. Got the cable replaced for €100 (wasn't aware of these options). Fine after that. The power steering is heavier than most but really isn't too bad. I can turn it fairly well on palm of my hand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Mk III Golf, the most boat-like handling possible in a car. Reminds me of holidays on the Shannon in an Emerald Star cruiser.

    Built like a tank but handles like a boat. All with the power of a lawnmover.

    You get used to anything though if it what you have.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    BostonB wrote: »
    Built like a tank but handles like a boat. All with the power of a lawnmover.
    LOL! But it wasn't really built like a tank... they put reams of hardboard (yes, a notch up from cardboard) into the doors to make them feel 'heavy' and 'solid'. In fact the 1.4 CL weighed 1100Kg, ~20Kg than more than a Honda Civic of the time.
    crosstownk wrote:
    disagree - you should try navigating a 1989 Passat with no power steering
    I bow to your superior knowledge! I do remember getting stopped by the cops in 1989 with 12 of us in a Passat. He only wanted to make sure the driver hadn't been drinking. Satisfied, he let us carry on.


Advertisement