Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Blade Runner expected to miss Olympics

  • 19-12-2007 5:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,193 ✭✭✭✭


    Report on Eurosport dot com:

    Pistorius has "considerable advantage"

    Eurosport - Wed, 19 Dec 15:55:00 2007

    Oscar Pistorius, the self-described "fastest thing on no legs," has a considerable advantage over his sprinting rivals, a German university professor told Die Welt newspaper.
    ATHLETICS 2007 British Grand Prix Sheffield Oscar Pistorius - 0

    Gert-Peter Bruggemann, of the Institute of Biomechanics at Cologne University, has been tasked by the International Association of Athletics Federations with examining any advantage the South African Olympic hopeful has on his rivals using prosthetic limbs.

    Pistorius has carbon fibre blades attached to both his legs below the knee and both Pistorius and the IAAF agreed he would undergo a series of tests and analyses.

    He had hoped to compete in next year's Beijing Olympics against able-bodied athletes but after Friday's IAAF report and Bruggeman's findings, his chances look remote.

    "He has a considerable advantage compared with athletes without prosthetic limbs who have undergone the same tests," Bruggeman, who put Pistorius through a series of tests in November at the IAAF's request, told Die Welt.

    "The difference is several percentage points and I did not think the findings would be so conclusive."

    The 21-year-old Pistorius, dubbed by the press as the "Blade Runner", was fitted with his prosthetics when he was only 11 months old after a congenital disorder forced him to undergo the amputations.

    The report is not due to be officially released until January.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,912 ✭✭✭thirtyfoot


    His PB is still well off the 'A' standard and the South Africans are strict on qualification standards. So even if he is allowed compete he would still need to take 1.01 secs off his PB.

    Very interesting chachter and a great motivation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,193 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Report finally published today and Pistorius is out:
    Oscar Pistorius - Independent Scientific study concludes that cheetah prosthetics offer clear mechanical advantages
    Monday 14 January 2008

    Monte Carlo - The IAAF has received the results of an independent scientific study carried out by Professor Peter Brüggemann at the German Sport University in Cologne. This study made a biomechanical and physiological analysis of long sprint running by a double transtibial amputee athlete Oscar Pistorius (RSA) using “cheetah” prosthetics, and also compared this athlete with five able-boded athletes who are capable of similar levels of performance at 400m.

    The tests, which took place on Monday 12 and Tuesday 13 November in the Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, were initiated by the IAAF with the approval and participation of Oscar in order to see whether the prosthetics used by him should be considered as technical aids which give him an advantage over other athletes not using them, in contravention of IAAF competition rule 144.2.*

    The objective results of this study are that:

    - Pistorius was able to run with his prosthetic blades at the same speed as the able bodied sprinters with about 25% less energy expenditure. As soon as a given speed is reached, running with the prosthetics needs less additional energy than running with natural limbs.

    - Once the physiological potential of Oscar Pistorius and the able-bodied control athletes had been estimated, using three different methods, it is clear that Pistorius’ potential was not higher than that of the controls, even though their performance results were similar.

    - The biomechanical analysis demonstrated major differences in the sprint mechanics used by a below-knee amputee using prosthetics when compared to athletes with natural legs. The maximum vertical ground reaction forces and the vertical impulses are different in a highly significant way and the amount of energy return of the prosthetic blade have never been reported for a human muscle driven ankle joint in sprint running.

    - The positive work, or returned energy, from the prosthetic blade is close to three times higher than with the human ankle joint in maximum sprinting.

    - The energy loss in the prosthetic blade was measured at 9.3% during the stance phase while the average energy loss in the ankle joint of the able bodied control athletes was measured at 41.4%. This means that the mechanical advantage of the blade in relation to the healthy ankle joint of an able bodied athlete is higher than 30%.

    It is evident that an athlete using the Cheetah prosthetic is able to run at the same speed as able bodied athletes with lower energy consumption. Running with prosthetic blades leads to less vertical motion combined with less mechanical work for lifting the body. As well as this, the energy loss in the blade is significantly lower than in the human ankle joints in sprinting at maximum speed. An athlete using this prosthetic blade has a demonstrable mechanical advantage (more than 30%) when compared to someone not using the blade.

    IAAF Council has been able to review the full report and has decided that the prosthetic blades known as “cheetahs” should be considered as technical aids in clear contravention of IAAF Rule 144.2. As a result, Oscar Pistorius is not eligible to compete in competitions organised under IAAF Rules.

    Note for editors concerning test procedures and parameters:

    - Analysis was carried out by a team of more than 10 scientists, including staff from the physiology laboratory of Professor J. Mester (Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics).

    - 12 high speed cameras (250 frames per second) were used to record 3D kinematics, with another 4 highspeed cameras to observe sagittal plane motion

    - Force platforms were used to record ground reaction forces and point of force application

    - Athletes ran the 400m test with a K4 mask to record max VO2. VO2 testing was also carried out in the laboratory (Wingate and Ramp Test) on static bicycles. Blood lactate records were taken regularly

    - A 3D scanner was used to record body mass and anthropometric measures of all the control athletes

    - The prosthetics were also subjected to material testing


Advertisement