Sporting Fingal FC

DSB · 07-07-2009 7:52pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

And am i out by 50 or 60

A massive difference, really Not when we are talking about hundreds of fans as apposed to thousands. You need to tone down these words you keep using Gigantic, Massive. It gives the wrong impression. Maybe the word large or big would suite you better.

Anyway not the main point we are on about is it though.

50 or 60 times 9 or 10 is say 450 or 600 people, in LOI Division 1 terms that is absolutely huge to be fair.

Lamper.sffc · 07-07-2009 8:50pm

DSB wrote: »

50 or 60 times 9 or 10 is say 450 or 600 people, in LOI Division 1 terms that is absolutely huge to be fair.

Ill say it again. Am i out by 50 to 60?

We are talking about averages here. You dont just add it all together and say 450 to 600 just to try and add weight to an argument you havnt even answered the question to.

DSB · 08-07-2009 12:33pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

Ill say it again. Am i out by 50 to 60?

We are talking about averages here. You dont just add it all together and say 450 to 600 just to try and add weight to an argument you havnt even answered the question to.

Yes we're talking about averages, and what constitutes averages? The 9 or 10 different attendances over the season that you're finding the attendance of. So of course it is relevant.

Lamper.sffc · 08-07-2009 12:54pm

DSB wrote: »

Yes we're talking about averages, and what constitutes averages? The 9 or 10 different attendances over the season that you're finding the attendance of. So of course it is relevant.

Am I out by 50 or 60? (I think thats 4 times now)

What exactly is this so called point you are fumbling to try and make. You keep going on about how the average at 50 or 60 will amount to 450 or 600 over 10 games when you havnt even identified whether my original figure is out by that much or not. So why are you constantly sticking to this point when this is not what we where talking about. Nothing else to say I guess

Am I out by 50 or 60? (just thought id put it in again for you)

DSB · 08-07-2009 6:09pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

Am I out by 50 or 60? (I think thats 4 times now)

What exactly is this so called point you are fumbling to try and make. You keep going on about how the average at 50 or 60 will amount to 450 or 600 over 10 games when you havnt even identified whether my original figure is out by that much or not. So why are you constantly sticking to this point when this is not what we where talking about. Nothing else to say I guess

Am I out by 50 or 60? (just thought id put it in again for you)

Yes you're out in the average by 50 or 60, if you want to put it that simply.

Lamper.sffc · 09-07-2009 1:42am

DSB wrote: »

Yes you're out in the average by 50 or 60, if you want to put it that simply.

Yay well done.

Explain please

dsmythy · 09-07-2009 5:15pm

There's not much merit talking about attendence comparision until the club is 5 years old if you ask me.

Lamper.sffc · 09-07-2009 6:02pm

dsmythy wrote: »

There's not much merit talking about attendence comparision until the club is 5 years old if you ask me.

I know but the chat has been quiet in here of late so might as well chat/argue about something.

oldyouth · 10-07-2009 1:38pm

Hi Lads/Ladies

I've yet to get around to registering on your forum, but I will soon. Can I ask if you can throw some light on a rumour in Wexford that one of your players is to sign for the Youths. I don't have the name or position even. All I'm told is that he got his game last year, but not this and that he lives in the Gorey area

Any ideas?

Cheers

Paulw · 10-07-2009 11:28pm

Very good result tonight. Some very well taken goals. Tight enough in the first half though.

Lamper.sffc · 11-07-2009 3:30am

oldyouth wrote: »

Hi Lads/Ladies

I've yet to get around to registering on your forum, but I will soon. Can I ask if you can throw some light on a rumour in Wexford that one of your players is to sign for the Youths. I don't have the name or position even. All I'm told is that he got his game last year, but not this and that he lives in the Gorey area

Any ideas?

Cheers

Players who played for us last year and are stil here not getting much of a game are Colm James ( very good player) Fiachra Mc ardle ( can be quite good on his day) Dinny ( young striker who needs more experience)

Lamper.sffc · 11-07-2009 3:32am

Paulw wrote: »

Very good result tonight. Some very well taken goals. Tight enough in the first half though.

Really wasnt happy for the most part. I know we won 4 to nothing but we where sh#t up until the first goal

Roll on shels

DSB · 11-07-2009 12:14pm

Ah 4 nil is always a good performance overall. If you think otherwise you're expecting too much, Shels were fantastic last night, seems that my predictions of us eventually stopping grinding out results and beginning to win convincingly were correct.

Rizzla King · 11-07-2009 1:16pm

Roll on next week:D

Paulw · 11-07-2009 1:20pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

Really wasnt happy for the most part. I know we won 4 to nothing but we where sh#t up until the first goal

They were lacking that penetration up front for the first half. Plenty of the ball, plenty of passing, but just not getting anything up front.

Conan did well taking his three goals, especially scoring the shot from half way.

DSB · 11-07-2009 10:50pm

Just out of interest, if you were to be in the First Division again next season, dya reckon you'd be working off a lower, higher or similar budget next year?

Paulw · 11-07-2009 11:30pm

DSB wrote: »

Just out of interest, if you were to be in the First Division again next season, dya reckon you'd be working off a lower, higher or similar budget next year?

A similar budget. Then again, the club has a lot going on, and a new stadium/facility will cost, but it seems the money is there.

DSB · 11-07-2009 11:44pm

Paulw wrote: »

A similar budget. Then again, the club has a lot going on, and a new stadium/facility will cost, but it seems the money is there.

Jaysus, is that kind of budget really sustainable for 2 years minimum in a league with new attendances/no TV money, I assumed it was being pumped in this year as a means to create future income, if it failed I can't imagine them trying the same approach until it works.

Lamper.sffc · 12-07-2009 3:18am

DSB wrote: »

Ah 4 nil is always a good performance overall. If you think otherwise you're expecting too much, Shels were fantastic last night, seems that my predictions of us eventually stopping grinding out results and beginning to win convincingly were correct.

No its not.
I said to my mates we will win 4 nil as a joke at half time. They laughed their ass off because it was such a ridiculous statement based on how we where playing.
Even though we won 4 nil we where terrible and if we play similar against yous we will lose,

DSB wrote: »

Jaysus, is that kind of budget really sustainable for 2 years minimum in a league with new attendances/no TV money, I assumed it was being pumped in this year as a means to create future income, if it failed I can't imagine them trying the same approach until it works.

Ah the usual Dsb bull.

Ask what seems to be an honest footballing question but in fact its just a way of getting on to a topic he has already made up his mind about.

Its getting Tired Dude.

DSB · 12-07-2009 9:38pm

Ah now, lets not act like you know me. That was a genuine question.

Paulw · 13-07-2009 11:07am

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

No its not.
I said to my mates we will win 4 nil as a joke at half time. They laughed their ass off because it was such a ridiculous statement based on how we where playing.

Yeah, they just weren't getting much up front in the first half. But, as Kirby said after the first goal, it was down to patience. Keep plugging away and the goals will come.

The game this Fri should be good. I hope I can make it.

Lamper.sffc · 13-07-2009 1:14pm

DSB wrote: »

Ah now, lets not act like you know me. That was a genuine question.

I dont know you but i have been reading your posts on here for over a year now and its what you tend to do. It doesnt take a genius to realise you ask a question so you can start up the usual rant about our finances. Read back there are plenty of examples. Sure didnt I just post up a good few examples of them a while ago. Im just saying change the record.

Lamper.sffc · 13-07-2009 1:19pm

Paulw wrote: »

Yeah, they just weren't getting much up front in the first half. But, as Kirby said after the first goal, it was down to patience. Keep plugging away and the goals will come.

The game this Fri should be good. I hope I can make it.

Its the big one alright. You have to make this one if possible. If we get the win it will be a big step in getting us back in touch with shels plus it would be a great confidence booster for the team.

oldyouth · 13-07-2009 2:01pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

Players who played for us last year and are stil here not getting much of a game are Colm James ( very good player) Fiachra Mc ardle ( can be quite good on his day) Dinny ( young striker who needs more experience)

Lamper, I have a bit more info. He is a young lad (U20) who is an attacking midfielder. Does that narrow it down?

Cheers

Lamper.sffc · 13-07-2009 6:47pm

oldyouth wrote: »

Lamper, I have a bit more info. He is a young lad (U20) who is an attacking midfielder. Does that narrow it down?

Cheers

The only one who comes close is Daniel Corcoran (Dinny). He is a striker though. I think he did fill in in midfield once or twice. He started a few games towards the end of last year when Liam was leaving Doyle and Hynse out.
He is only back from injury in the last week or so (out all season with a hamstring injury). He got a goal against Harps on his return. Iv never been too impressed by him but he is young so could develop into a good player. When all our strikers are fit there would be four lads ahead of him so maybe thats why he might end up with yous.

The other option would be Colm james. Dont think he fits the description though. Midfielder who scored a couple of crackers for us last year. Very good player and im a bit disappointed he isnt playing more at the moment. Not sure of his age but im sure its older than 20. I would not be happy if he went.

DSB · 14-07-2009 6:04pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

I dont know you but i have been reading your posts on here for over a year now and its what you tend to do. It doesnt take a genius to realise you ask a question so you can start up the usual rant about our finances. Read back there are plenty of examples. Sure didnt I just post up a good few examples of them a while ago. Im just saying change the record.

Its not a crime to have the same opinion on an ongoing issue, and to ask how fans of the club feel that particular issue is progressing, given that part of the plan isn't going well so far.

Lamper.sffc · 15-07-2009 1:30am

DSB wrote: »

Its not a crime to have the same opinion on an ongoing issue, and to ask how fans of the club feel that particular issue is progressing, given that part of the plan isn't going well so far.

It is when you dont even listen to what others have to say and just stick to the same opinions of which you voice over and over again until people would rather stick pins in their eyes than have to listen to one more dsb rant on sporting fingals budget.

DSB · 15-07-2009 1:27pm

Lamper.sffc wrote: »

It is when you dont even listen to what others have to say and just stick to the same opinions of which you voice over and over again until people would rather stick pins in their eyes than have to listen to one more dsb rant on sporting fingals budget.

If you've a problem with anything I say, report it.

Lamper.sffc · 15-07-2009 1:59pm

DSB wrote: »

If you've a problem with anything I say, report it.

Nah. I wouldnt stoop to that. Im quite able to deal with you on my own. Plus its amusing sometimes to see what way you are going to wriggle out of the latest argument. My favourite is when you just dont answer. Great stuff.

Rizzla King · 15-07-2009 2:05pm

To be honest, I was getting a bit tired of coming on here and arguing a case, you seem to have an answer for everything:D

Any injuries ahead of Friday for Fingal?

Sporting Fingal FC

Comments