Help for conclusion of my Legal Science Casenote

Lockstep · 11-01-2008 7:09pm #1

I had to do a legal science case note on O'Reilly v Limerick Corportation 1989.

Problem is I can't get the conclusion done.

with mod's permission, would it be ok if I posted up my case note in case anyone's able to give me a hand.

I've hit complete writers block for the conclusion, any help would be greatly appreciated.

Lockstep · 13-01-2008 1:21pm

Any help at all?

I'm fairly deperate here.

Havnt a clue how to finish off the essay.

Tom Young · 13-01-2008 3:15pm

Apologies, I've not had time to get back to you. I will though. What's the deadline?

dermot_sheehan · 13-01-2008 4:47pm

aren't there rules in your institution about plagiarism/original work? if we write the conclusion for you won't we be helping you violate those rules.

Lockstep · 13-01-2008 6:20pm

gabhain7 wrote: »

aren't there rules in your institution about plagiarism/original work? if we write the conclusion for you won't we be helping you violate those rules.

Nono, I mean just how to write a conclusion for a case note in general.
Any guidelines would be very appreciated.

skyhighflyer · 15-01-2008 12:57am

1. Set out the facts
2. Summarise arguments of defendant
3. Summarise arguments of plaintiff
4. Summarise judgment and law applied
5. Set out how this is an important case / changes the previous position in relation to the subject matter

walrusgumble · 16-01-2008 12:49am

and also the future cases which haevily relied upon the o'reilly case. eg td & sinnott cases. look at the massive change of attitude of the supreme courts in relation to unenumerated rights since o'reilly particularily ones in relation to socio economic rights contained (implied by courts) in articles 40-44.

out of interest, that case is an unreported case, where can you get a full text of that judgement. i have been trying the net for ages.

Tom Young · 16-01-2008 1:56am

Charleton J in Doherty is a 2007 case on similar issue.

walrusgumble · 16-01-2008 11:55pm

another issue to conclude, costello j was the judge in the o'reilly case. however in the unreported case of o'brien v bray udc 1995, (similar enough) his views that he held in o'reilly change might be worth looking at.

maybe come from the angle of whether the court are happy or not happy about been prevented from intervening into the powers of the executive and or legislative where the legislative and or executive are clearly not doing their jobs in looking after society's resources etc.

Tom Young · 17-01-2008 12:05am

Yeah I think so too, although the SC have baulked at the thoughts of change, in re. Sinnott.

There is no right without a remedy? Ubi jus ibi remedium

Really! ?

Help for conclusion of my Legal Science Casenote

Comments