these people are seriously sick

Rb

tech77 wrote: »

Eh the "IMO" was obviously less than earnest .
Didn't you see that (what with it being distanced from the main body of text and all).

Tell me you at least got the point about "IMO" being redundant in the previous post, please!!


Anyway more to the point: when did the omission of "IMO" become the equivalent of not acknowledging difference of opinion.
You're inferring too much from it's absence.
If that was the case you'd have to qualify everything with "IMO".

So of course i acknowledge difference of opinion.
But the other view is just different and invalid.

The point is:
I'm sure any right-minded person would find scaring the sh1t out of a woman in such a sinister way unfunny-
and any right-minded person would not think the above statement needed to be qualified with "IMO".

Christ why do i bother.

You fail at life and now the internetz, thats why.

tech77

rb_ie wrote: »

You fail at life and now the internetz, thats why.

Haha, now we're down to random personal abuse that seems to have been written by a 12 year old.
Exactly the type of person who would get a kick out of this stuff i guess.
Hmm...starting to make sense now- you're like 12 aren't you?

FFS surely an internet success like yourself knows that personal abuse is the last resort of the pwned.
Address the argument not the poster.

Actually TBH mate i'm worse for arguing with a 12 year old mindset- i'm going to get nowhere.
I'll leave you at it.
Bye.

oleras

tech77 wrote: »

Again would you play this "prank" on a girl you know, a girlfriend or sister even.

Thats a very sexist attitude.

Off to the Ladies Lounge with you !!

tech77

oleras wrote: »

Thats a very sexist attitude. Off to the Ladies Lounge with you !!

Eh, it was a WOMAN being scared senseless in the video so the issue under discussion was acceptability of WOMEN being scared senseless.

So in keeping with the issue I just ASKED the relevant (gender-specific but non-sexist) question and got no response (apart from what I suspect was a trolling one).

I know you're being facetious but there's actually nothing there to be facetious about. It was gender-specific but importantly non-sexist in that I didn't mention DIFFERENCE between men and women in this regard.
That's another issue again tbh.

oleras

tech77 wrote: »

Eh, it was a WOMAN being scared senseless in the video so the issue under discussion was acceptability of WOMEN being scared senseless.

So in keeping with the issue I just ASKED the relevant (gender-specific but non-sexist) question and got no response (apart from what I suspect was a trolling one).

I know you're being facetious but there's actually nothing there to be facetious about. It was gender-specific but importantly non-sexist in that I didn't mention DIFFERENCE between men and women in this regard.
That's another issue again tbh.

Oops, my jokie was bad............

dude, get some sleep or coffee......im going for some sleep. tis only an internet thingie.

Davidius

Believe it or not I would pull this prank on any of my siblings, 2 of which are female.

I can't see what's so sick about it. They scared her, she got into a stupid fit over the joke and I laughed. Big deal.