Maria's Playboy pics leaked online!!

Minto

I can't remember if the pics were leaked early for Ashley's or any other diva who has done Playboy, but 8 of Maria's pics are online. Four of them are topless and they're hot. I might actually buy this Playboy, if I can find it in town. Well worth a look lads (or lassies )!!

Mossy Monk

They turned out better than Ashleys

Double C

The lack of links in this thread is really quite disappointing.

Kid Nothing

Double C wrote: »

The lack of links in this thread is really quite disappointing.

Seconded!

Mossy Monk

I believe the posting of links to nudity is against boards rules. Google will show you where they are.

Fozzy

Mossy Monk wrote: »

I believe the posting of links to nudity is against boards rules.

That is true

She still does nothing for me unfortunately!

calex71

Fozzy wrote: »

That is true

She still does nothing for me unfortunately!

you really should get that checked

krudler

shes got wierd nipples, still totally would though

Dr_MaSoN

krudler wrote: »

shes got wierd nipples, still totally would though

lol not many wouldnt


but ye saw em, nothing special about em tbh.

flahavaj

krudler wrote: »

shes got wierd nipples, still totally would though

Having done some ahem, research and seen said pics, I agree on both counts. However the meticulousness she shows in keeping the lawn trimmed is highly commendable.

krudler

flahavaj wrote: »

Having done some ahem, research and seen said pics, I agree on both counts. However the meticulousness she shows in keeping the lawn trimmed is highly commendable.

indeed it is:D

FutureGuy

google ftw lol

Doctor DooM

Just saw them.

Foly huck, she's not ugly.


She's going to be stalked if she comes to Ireland, isn't she?

fatal

Fozzy wrote: »

That is true

She still does nothing for me unfortunately!

She does little for me aswell.Still though,I would;)

Didnt care for them at all.

Playboy sucks in general anyway. I've never been highly impressed with any of their WWE photoshoots.

Maria's was terribly in my opinion

Charlie

Deleted User wrote: »

Didnt care for them at all.

Playboy sucks in general anyway. I've never been highly impressed with any of their WWE photoshoots.

Maria's was terribly in my opinion

QFT

No doubt she's daycent, but Playboy is just....meh and there are far better looking women out there.

Minto

After seeing the fully nude ones (thanks Dean), I gotta say I'm defo getting the mag when it comes out.

Mossy Monk

Dean820 wrote: »

Links are allowed as far as I'm aware on here:

Even after a mod agreed that they weren't?

Dean820

I believe the posting of links to nudity is against boards rules.

Believing isn't fact.

Fozzy

Dean820 wrote: »

Believing isn't fact.

It was fact when I quoted it and said that it's true

ShaneU

They really didn't do her justice.

ShaneU

ShaneU wrote: »

They really didn't do her justice.

They didn't?

What did you want them to do? As far as I know, they airbrushed the hell out of her pictures.

Maria was a horrible choice for Playboy. Melina, Mickie, Candice, Torrie, etc. are all fine, cos they have huge racks. Playboy shy away from "explicit" pictures, so having the nothing-more-than-regular Maria there was a bad, bad choice. A huge rack is a must for a WWE diva playboy shoot, as its all that Playboy will show much of anyway.

They'd make more money and get better publicity releasing some kind of softcore porn DVD every year. I mean, I'm sure we all seen Mickie's old photos?

She's obviously more than willing to do some hardcore stuff, so with her willingness, and a decent magazine/dvd/whatever behind them, they could do some amazing stuff.

Maria's 'i don't really wana do this, I'll have to think about it' attitude, and Playboy's fear of a decent photo-shoot make for some pretty crappy results.

I'm pretty sure most people would have rathered be in something more 'extreme' and be praised for it, than do a watered down photo shoot and hear tonnes of negative feedback.

Vince135792003

Deleted User wrote: »

They'd make more money and get better publicity releasing some kind of softcore porn DVD every year.
.

Yep, that's the kind of publicity every public company wants. Sure Vince could play the lead guy.

Fozzy

Val Venis would finally have something to do

Charlie

In fairness I agree with KKV about Maria being a poor choice.

Some people seem to rave about her, and whilst she is good looking, I never thought she was true diva material e.g. Stacey, Torrie, Sable, or Trish (I guess a titted up Vanilla whore, although Stacey wasn't packing heat up top, was she?)

I often think that people who rated Maria did so because of her ditzy image. She gives the impression that even Snitsky could coax her into the scratcher.

Kelly Kelly would be an ideal choice.

Vince135792003

Vince135792003 wrote: »

Yep, that's the kind of publicity every public company wants. Sure Vince could play the lead guy.

But of course, Triple H would be the main event, and his co-star, would have to 'job' to him :P

I often think that people who rated Maria did so because of her ditzy image. She gives the impression that even Snitsky could coax ger into the scratcher.

I kinda agree, and thats a very sad thing to be able to say.

I never seen Maria as anything special. My pick would definitely have been Mickie. Shes great looking, hugely popular and fan-friendly.

Charlie

Deleted User wrote: »

My pick would definitely have been Mickie. Shes great looking, hugely popular and fan-friendly.

She's kinda stumpy though isn't she? It looks likes she was once Lita's size, and then got a bit squished down.

EdK

Mickie has an unattractive flange too

FreckleFaceFred

Um

charlie mchugh

charlie mchugh wrote: »

She's kinda stumpy though isn't she? It looks likes she was once Lita's size, and then got a bit squished down.

.... What?

I have no idea what you mean by that. I mean, yeah, she's not exactly perfect in every way, but I wouldn't say she's "stumpy".




I don't see any problems with her. I know i could have picked a less seductive picture, where she's walking into an arena or something, but i thought that might suit my argument better :cool:

EdK wrote: »

Mickie has an unattractive flange too

Now thats just complaining about anything. Although i have heard people say the same thing. I dunno.. I like it. I'm not a doctor who studies women's bodies, so im not gonna get upset because some people think she has the roast beef thing going on down there.

Still prefer it over Maria though.

Charlie

Look at those legs, two little tree stumps on her. Google, mickie james stumpy, and you'll see i'm not the only one who thinks it.

Also, she looks pretty bland in her porno pics, real genric actually.

Here's one of the pics before they got all xxx, very meh

hyn-zie

I can't find the poxy pic's, some one pm me

flahavaj

I like that oily guy's style, droppin the shnaky hand......

rossie1977

charlie mchugh wrote: »

In fairness I agree with KKV about Maria being a poor choice.

Some people seem to rave about her, and whilst she is good looking, I never thought she was true diva material e.g. Stacey, Torrie, Sable, or Trish (I guess a titted up Vanilla whore, although Stacey wasn't packing heat up top, was she?)

I often think that people who rated Maria did so because of her ditzy image. She gives the impression that even Snitsky could coax her into the scratcher.

Kelly Kelly would be an ideal choice.

people like maria because she is NATURAL unlike most of the others you have mentioned who have got so much cosmetic surgery over the years its hard to know which parts are real anymore :eek: ie trish, sable, torrie and kelly kelly is following those girls too i might add. Just look at the metamorphis the likes of Beth and Jillian hall have gone through in a few years, they don't even look like the same people any more

ashley, torrie, sable and candice's spreads were so air-brushed they looked stupid, obviously no need for mega-airbrushing with maria.

personally i hate playboy and all the crap that surrounds the franchise

Cactus Col

rossie1977 wrote: »

people like maria because she is NATURAL

hear hear! She's the best looking "diva" since Molly Holly.

charlie mchugh

charlie mchugh wrote: »

Look at those legs, two little tree stumps on her. Google, mickie james stumpy, and you'll see i'm not the only one who thinks it.

Also, she looks pretty bland in her porno pics, real genric actually.

Here's one of the pics before they got all xxx, very meh

Well i cant see any problem with her legs to be honest. I think they're pretty damn nice.

Also, yeah, her pictures coulda been a lot better, but i don't think she was over what was happening in them, even though, they were still better than anything WWE and Playboy have put out.

Fozzy

Mickie looked better before she lost weight

Fozzy.. Have you got comparison pictures? I don't really remember her ever being a heavy person..

Minto

I'd much prefer Mickie or Kelly Kelly in Playboy, but Maria did herself justice in the pics. She isn't a plastic barbie doll and the shoot came out well.

Fozzy

Deleted User wrote: »

Fozzy.. Have you got comparison pictures? I don't really remember her ever being a heavy person..

It's not that she was ever heavy, but she has been looking skinnier lately. Look at her now: http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/mickiejames/photos1/2008rawphotos/ compared to when she debuted: http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/mickiejames/photos1/psychophotos/

I just hope that it was her own decision to lose weight and that there wasn't pressure from WWE

grames_bond

Fozzy wrote: »

I just hope that it was her own decision to lose weight and that there wasn't pressure from WWE

so do i but the likelyhood is that it wasnt her decision, i honestly preferd her before, more cushin for the pushin if you will! but the wwe is god and they tell you what to do!

Fozzy

Fozzy wrote: »

It's not that she was ever heavy, but she has been looking skinnier lately. Look at her now: http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/mickiejames/photos1/2008rawphotos/ compared to when she debuted: http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/mickiejames/photos1/psychophotos/

I just hope that it was her own decision to lose weight and that there wasn't pressure from WWE

I do see a small difference. Nothing hugely noticeable though. I don't really mind her either way. I guess she does kinda look better in her "before" pictures, but damn, man.. Mickie's God, either way.

Actually, Mr. T is god, but Mickie's a close second:D

Fozzy

Links to the photos are not allowed

ShaneU

Fozzy wrote: »

Links to the photos are not allowed

okay?

Fozzy

Someone had posted a link, which is why you don't see their post anymore

ShaneU

mmkay, thought you would have just edited their post.

Fozzy

Fozzy wrote: »

Someone had posted a link, which is why you don't see their post anymore

I wonder why sites actually ban links to porn. I mean... look at google. Its the place most people start when they click into their internet connection.

Just boggles me.

ShaneU

Deleted User wrote: »

I wonder why sites actually ban links to porn. I mean... look at google. Its the place most people start when they click into their internet connection.

Just boggles me.

Because playboy can sue boards for copyright infringement.

ShaneU

ShaneU wrote: »

Because playboy can sue boards for copyright infringement.

Doubtful. 99.9999999% of websites have a disclaimer saying they cant be held responsible for what their members post.

Besides, i know of a wrestling website that has tonnes of diva pics (of all kinds) and they never get into any trouble, ever.

bellba

very vfibrexv]

Charlie

bellba wrote: »

very vfibrexv]

Yeah I know, but not as vfibrexv] as Sable's.