Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

does wwe.com need a history lesson?

  • 09-04-2008 12:57am
    #1
    moongoose
    Registered Users Posts: 221 ✭✭


    just looked at their latest bit called loveable losers & am still shaking my head in disgust. they're trying to make comparisons between mikey whipwreck [old ecw] & george the animal steele, eugene, gillberg, brookly brawler, barry horowitz. i'm never going to say that mikey was a main eventer but he was the only one of the 6 who got people to cheer for him because of his heart unlike the others who played off various cliches [retards mainly]. plus don't forget there'd be no stone cold stunner without the whipper snapper [stunner minus the set up kick] are wwe trying to turn fans away who know a bit about the history of wrestling???


Comments

  • #2
    Melion
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,259 ✭✭✭✭Melion


    wwe.com will always favour wwf/e stars over ex-ECW/WCW stars. Mikey was/is/always will be a legend


  • #3
    Fozzy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭Fozzy


    What do you want them to do, have a separate section for Mikey or not to include him at all?


  • #4
    Cactus Col
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cactus Col


    Wasn't Mikey Whipwrecks whole deal that he didn't get an offensive move in? He would generally just get his ass kicked? Isn't that how he got so over?

    Sounds like he fits perfectly in with the lovable losers.


  • #5
    Otis Driftwood
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,925 ✭✭✭Otis Driftwood


    :DHa ha ha,poor old Mikey,he was always good for a kicking.

    Speaking of loveable losers,what about the mean street posse?

    The most loveable losers of all time.Loved their fued with Crash Holly for the hardcore title.

    Unless Im mistaken they didnt win a single match in WWE,and there were 3 of em.

    Not thats a loser!
    :D


  • #6
    Fozzy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭Fozzy


    nedtheshed wrote: »
    Unless Im mistaken they didnt win a single match in WWE,and there were 3 of em.

    They beat Mankind in a handicap match on Raw once. Shane was the ref though. I remember because I was a big Mankind fan and I was outraged!


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Tricity Bendix
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,510 ✭✭✭Tricity Bendix


    The Mean Street Possé were hardly loveable. Man, I hated those guys. It was great watching them get destroyed.


  • #8
    Otis Driftwood
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,925 ✭✭✭Otis Driftwood


    Thats what made em so lovable for me.You knew they were going to get squashed,it was just a matter of how badly.
    :)


  • #9
    HorseRadish
    Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭HorseRadish


    They all won the Hardcore title at one stage at Wrestlemania 2000 if I do recall


Advertisement