Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Conversation with a muslim
Comments
-
It depends very much on the country. For example UK/Ireland the woman is given preference to bring up the children, not the man. Extremely unfair if you ask me. In South Korea (not a Muslim country) the man has the priority over who keeps the children. Religion doesn't come into it.
And once again, in the case of men's divorce, this is seen as being the word of God and very much a religious issue because these countries aren't secular democracies. It still doesn't rule out the fact that men have a much easier form of divorce from their spouse than women.
The obligation of having a mahram isn't a flaw of a country, its a flaw of extremist religious views and the failure to seperate religion from law.
Ahh, my points on Jews and homosexuals were ignored. Hum...0 -
Actually, under Irish law parents have joint custody unless one parent is unfit or doesn't want to see the child.
Not completely correct. You will find that shared parenting only happens if both parents agree it is not an issue. When it becomes an issue then the preference tends to favour the mother over the father. Exceptions being you can prove the mother is insane or a junkie (as examples).
That is why you have the likes of "Fathers Rights Party" appearing.Women just happen to be the person who ends up bringing up the children-
As I said it depends on the country and there are many fathers in Ireland/UK who wouldn't share your opinion.It still doesn't rule out the fact that men have a much easier form of divorce from their spouse than women.
Depends on the country tbh. Yemen for example the man only has to say I divorce you once. But in the UK for example they still have to follow UK law.
Also you fail to point out that when a man divorces a woman he is not entitled to take back any gifts from the woman he may of given. If the woman divorces then he can claim back wedding gifts. In the case of settlement the man is only entitled to half his assets at most. The woman on the other hand does not have to share any of her assets with the husband. Again I am sure this varies from country to country.
Also as I understand it in Muslim laws a husband divorcing a wife without a valid reason is considered to be a bad Muslim.
Although I would like to know more about the option of beating your wife as a means to reconciliation. Seems a bit contradictory.The obligation of having a mahram isn't a flaw of a country, its a flaw of extremist religious views and the failure to seperate religion from law.
Normally only because the extremists run the country.Ahh, my points on Jews and homosexuals were ignored. Hum...
Perhaps if you worded in a context that was consistent with the forums charter you would not receive such a negative response. Or if that is not possible there are other forums on boards.ie you can continue that.0 -
Depends on the country tbh. Yemen for example the man only has to say I divorce you once. But in the UK for example they still have to follow UK law.Also you fail to point out that when a man divorces a woman he is not entitled to take back any gifts from the woman he may of given. If the woman divorces then he can claim back wedding gifts. In the case of settlement the man is only entitled to half his assets at most. The woman on the other hand does not have to share any of her assets with the husband. Again I am sure this varies from country to country.
[quote=Hobbes;55926591}Also as I understand it in Muslim laws a husband divorcing a wife without a valid reason is considered to be a bad Muslim. Although I would like to know more about the option of beating your wife as a means to reconciliation. Seems a bit contradictory. Normally only because the extremist run the country[/quote]
Women can't use the reason that a husband is beating her up as reason for divorce in Saudi Arabia (consult Carmen Bin Ladin's book if you have any qualms about that fact) and if a man chooses to divorce her wife in court, the woman doesn't even have to be present. Her consent is not required and she doesn't have any safeguard against her husband casually depriving her of her home. The Muslim man is not required to give a reason, or register the divorce with any religious or secular institution. A Muslim woman, however, can obtain a divorce only with her husband's consent. (source: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2872/is_4_28/ai_94208061)
Equality... ha!Perhaps if you worded in a context that was consistent with the forums charter you would not receive such a negative response. Or if that is not possible there are other forums on boards.ie you can continue that.0 -
That just proves my point- while Islamic law doesn't cater for equality towards women in regards to divorce, secular law does.
No it doesn't. I just took 2 countries as an example. The rules change from country to country.What good are little rings and trinkets when a woman can't even keep her own children?? To me it seems like a half-hearted settlement on the men's behalf.
What if the woman owns her own business? In which case the husband gets nothing. How about the husband not being entitled to keep all his assets? I agree it is unfair though when one gender gets preference over who keeps the children.Women can't use the reason that a husband is beating her up as reason for divorce in Saudi Arabia
Actually that is not what I meant at all. Part of the reconciliation process is that you beat your wife. Step 3? Appears to have limitations (like can only do once) but seems to contradict other parts of the process.The Muslim man is not required to give a reason,
That is not entirely true. It may be true of say Yemen, but reading up on it the Man can't just divorce a wife for no reason.A Muslim woman, however, can obtain a divorce only with her husband's consent.
As I understand it from reading various sources that is not completely true either. They do have to go to court. But the wife cannot be forced to stay in a marriage that isn't working. I am not a scholar, but even a casual search on it mentions this.
Again if your picking a particular country as your baseline ymmv.In fairness, it was a pretty fair question
It is how you word questions here is what is important.0 -
No it doesn't. I just took 2 countries as an example. The rules change from country to country.What if the woman owns her own business?Actually that is not what I meant at all. Part of the reconciliation process is that you beat your wife. Step 3? Appears to have limitations (like can only do once) but seems to contradict other parts of the process.
The fact is, when one chooses a country to compare laws against and picks Saudi Arabia, this is the destination of every muslim once in their lifetime, this is the direction they face when they pray and this is the area in which the stricted form of Islam is in place. In short, it is Islam in action and if it is flawed... well, what does that say about Islam's ability to work?It is how you word questions here is what is important.0 -
Advertisement
-
First of all the thread should be called a Conversation with an idiot.
Jannah, if you spoke to one muslim or even 10 this does'nt mean that all of Muslims share the same ridiculous views. otherwise its just a case of stereotyping.Ahh, but we are assuming that her Mahram (father/ husband/ brother/ son) has given her PERMISSION to do so first...
Are you serious?...what period of time you're talking about? I have lived over 18 years in what you call "islamic countries" and have never ever witnessed such procedures and regulation of women to travel!:rolleyes:its interpretation is obviously going to be exploited by a lot of people to beat their wives badly.
Absolutely not, If a man beats his wife then he is responsible for such an act regardless of this religion. domestic violence is an issue in all societies all around the world regardless of their ethnic or religious background.
and the set example is only to demonstrate how silly/belittling/pointless it is to take any violent act with any woman. and if people do exploit the rule they will face their actions when judged.
by the way do I get from you're posts that only muslim men are wife beaters!?The fact is, when one chooses a country to compare laws against and picks Saudi Arabia, this is the destination of every muslim once in their lifetime, this is the direction they face when they pray and this is the area in which the stricted form of Islam is in place.
You cannot take Saudi and then generalise, it would be very naive of you. Saudi's laws & politics are theirs. Just because the country holds the Holy cities it does'nt mean that everyone should copy them. Real example...Do you find the same rules in other neighbouring Gulf states like Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and Bahrain? what about Syria, Lebanon and Jordan?
I have said this before, cultural background play a role in the practice of any religion. Can you really say that an American Catholic would form the same practice as a say Syrian Catholic?
Even Arabic muslims have different customs and cultural backgrounds. The Gulf region (Saudi, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Yamen) The Cham region (Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan). The North Africans (Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Mauritania ) The Egyptians tend to have their own with a close link to Sudan.In short, it is Islam in action and if it is flawed... well, what does that say about Islam's ability to work?
Islam has the same message that Moses and Christ have brought us and added few more rules. also it is know as the fast growing faith in the world with major converts in Europe and the states.
I would advice you to read more on the subject without any prejudice, just so you'll have a clearer view.0 -
Before I begin my post, please allow me to apologise for writing quick answers. I'm a little pushed for time at the moment.Jannah wrote:But you didn't mention Hitler. I am curious, since in the Qur'an Jews are classed as "swines and apes" does this mean that they were deserving of their punishment? Just a thought.
I think you'll find that the Quran describes those Jews who went right up against God's commands in arrogance as swine and apes and not all Jews in general.Jannah wrote:I just don't understand why a higher power is needed to be a 'moral' person.Jannah wrote:1. Men are given children following a divorce- surely there should be a fair court procedure in which women can have a chance at taking care of their own children? I have heard of many cases in which women were bribed into staying in an abusive marriage for the sake of keeping their children, which is terribly sad and wrong.Jannah wrote:2. While men can simply say "I divorce you" 3 times, a women must go through a lengthy court proceedure before being granted a divorce. Why?Jannah wrote:3. In strict Islamic countries a woman must have a mahram with her if she wishes to leave the house- this mahram (her father/ husband/ even her SON!) is the person who decides whether she travels, works, receives an education... is this not ownership of a fellow human being?
It's very important to draw a distinction between Islamic law (God's law) and the law of a particular state. Saudi Arabia does not follow Sharia law as it is supposed to and the fact that it has the holy lands on it is not significant in this sense.
It would be most unfair of me to say that "because there are loads of cases of priests being with young boys in the Vatican, what does this say about the Catholic church?" I know that that's unfair because that's not how you measure any religion.
It's also worth mentioning that Saudi Arabia wasn't always like this. The overwhelming effect of Wahabism has really begun to cause problems in Saudi Arabia and is unfortunately beginning to spread to some other countries.
So, what I know is that a woman can and does travel alone as long as she's safe (such as in a very public place).
A woman must have a mahram (someone who cannot marry her) with her when she's:
1.: Going to travel in a dodgy area (such as the desert, the jungle)
2.: Going to meet a male who she can marry
And possibly some other situations that don't spring to mind at the moment.Jannah wrote:You mentioned that women wear hijab because it is Gods will, which is perfectly correct, but what about the women who DON'T want to wear hijab and who are harassed- or in some cases, beaten- by religious police in the name of Islam?Jannah wrote:Surely a woman should have the right to choose? In these cases, it it not fear of God but fear of how society will see her and the punishment that she will recieve that drives her to cover.Jannah wrote:They are bullied into shutting their shops and going to Mosques, they are arrested if they don't wear hijab, they are banned from practicing their own religions (all in Saudi Arabia, hope of the 'purest' form of Islam, but I am positive that they happen elsewhere too)Jannah wrote:Oh, excuse me, it is the lesbians and gays who should be killed.
As for gays, there are differing opinions about how to deal with them. I myself have not researched this area enough to know to be honest with you.Jannah wrote:Why should someone have to renounce their own sexuality in order to spare their life? Surely we were all made by God, and therefore deserve to be treated equally? This is such a contradiction, I don't even know where to begin!!Jannah wrote:If a Hadith is unfavourable it is said to be 'unreliable'- so how do we know if ANY of the hadiths have any truth in them whatsoever? Surely if it could include a few mistakes, then it could include many more that we are incertain of? I myself would be very cautious in relying on such a flawed text
Sometimes, even the scholars disagree on the authenticity of a hadith so I guess in a situation like that, you read what you can and then try and make your mind up and finally your heart.Jannah wrote:Yes, they fought over a horse race, which, in itself is ridiculious, but I still don't understand why marrying a woman would help solve any problems? To me it sounds like an easy cop out and completely undermines a woman's right to choose her own partner. Lol, what did they say to their grandkids!?! "Hey, grandmaw, tell me about how you fell in love with Grandpaw?" "Well, it all began with a fight about horses..."
Oh, and by the way, a woman is never forced to marry someone she doesn't want to. That's one of the most important Islamic principles when it comes to marriage. In fact, there was once a case where a woman came to the Prophet (peace be upon him) and asked that she be divorced from her husband. The Prophet asked her a series of questions asking about whether the man was unkind to her, violent, miserly etc to which she answered that he was a good man on all account and that the only reason for her wanting a divorce was just because she couldn't stand to be with him. The Prophet ordered that the marriage end.Hobbes wrote:That is why you have the likes of "Fathers Rights Party" appearing.Hobbes wrote:Although I would like to know more about the option of beating your wife as a means to reconciliation. Seems a bit contradictory.Jannah wrote:What good are little rings and trinkets...0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »I think you'll find that the Quran describes those Jews who went right up against God's commands in arrogance as swine and apes and not all Jews in general.
Cheers. Actually I was looking for more info on that as that was the first I heard.I know this is completely OT but isn't that for men who aren't married to the mothers?
Not really sure, I had only heard of them in passing (and occasional batman tying themselves to big ben). But they cover a load of things.
This topic has been covered in great detail in other threads. Here's a good link.
Just goes to show I don't read everything here. But intresting to learn about "Daraba" meanings.
I am curious (maybe another thread). But as Quran cannot be changed, maybe people have been changing the Arabic language to get around this?0 -
First of all the thread should be called a Conversation with an idiot.Are you serious?...what period of time you're talking about? I have lived over 18 years in what you call "islamic countries" and have never ever witnessed such procedures and regulation of women to travel!
As far as wife beating goes, I would NO WAY say that it is a practice confined to muslims!! Lets just get that clear!! In happens eeeeverywhere. I just think that since the Qur'an is so open to interpretation that that particular section may be misconstrued and used to really harm women. I still don't quite understand why its done. The muslim in school said (one of his few logical moments) that if a muslim breaks their promise, they must fast for 3 days and if, in a fit of anger, a man says to his wife he will beat her, he must fulfill that promise (although lightly) if he is to keep it. That makes sense, I suppose, but I still think there should be allowances on 'promises' made when someone is that emotion to save them the bother of having to embarrass both parties by hitting them with a toothbrush!!
I was using Saudi as an example because of its obvious importance in Islamic terms. What country should I pick? What muslim country has used Sharia in the correct way?
As far as Christ having used the same logic in his time, I think Sharia law could really benefit from the parable about Jesus saying to the people that if they are without sin, may they throw the first stone at the adulterous woman. Personally, I'm not into the whole Catholic side of things at all, but as one of the prophets, it would be wise if this idea could be brought in to countries that carry out this horrible form of punishment.
You mentioned Islam being the fasted growing religion in the world, but I really don't know where this comes in in terms of it being a great religion. Not saying that its bad, just that its fast spread isn't a sign of goodness either.the_new_mr wrote: »I think you'll find that the Quran describes those Jews who went right up against God's commands in arrogance as swine and apes and not all Jews in general.the_new_mr wrote: »A woman must have a mahram (someone who cannot marry her) with her when she's:
1.: Going to travel in a dodgy area (such as the desert, the jungle)
2.: Going to meet a male who she can marrythe_new_mr wrote: »To be technical. Lesbians are not to be killed but rather to be kept at home "until God's opens a way for them through repentance" such as being approached for marriage by someone who doesn't know about/forgives their past.
This is much more complicated than that. There's the whole nature vs nurture plus the possibility of someone having a hormonal imbalance etc etc
Ahhh now! WHY on earth would someone go through the terrible emotional ordeal of coming out of the closet to their family members if they wouldn't mind repenting it later??! Now, I know that Islam isn't the only religion that is anti-gay, which is pretty much the reason that I'm not endorsing any religion here, but... it just doesn't make sense!! My cousin is gay, and it certainly isn't a hormonal imbalance or a 'phase' or any of the other silly suggestions people make to try and explain it. Thats simply how he was made, and a person can't change- and more importantly, shouldn't change who they are or apologise for what is natural to them for the sake of religion. Surely, if God has made us all, and some people turn out gay, isn't it part of his 'divine plan' that they should be like that?
You're very much correct when it comes to Islam not endorsing forced marriages and I've heard of many instances where it has spoken against them. They seem to be more of a Hindu practice than anything else, although there will always been some madman who will do it in any other religion anyway.0 -
Hobbes wrote:Not really sure, I had only heard of them in passing (and occasional batman tying themselves to big ben
). But they cover a load of things.
Hobbes wrote:I am curious (maybe another thread). But as Quran cannot be changed, maybe people have been changing the Arabic language to get around this?
I have a few ideas about that which I think are all true. One is that some people have been abusing and misinterpreting the Quran on purpose to suit their needs. Terrorists are famous for doing stuff like this.
Another is that the meaning of the Quran is still being understood. Actually, it's a well known fact that the true 100% meaning of the Quran has still not been understood. Some of the Surahs open with letters such as Alif-Lam-Meem. The reason for the presence there is still not understood by anyone in the world.
I've talked before about how one understanding of a word in the Quran had been misunderstood for literally hundreds of years before it was properly understood. Perhaps it's not even correctly understood even now. Here's that post.
Another theory of mine (and this might not necessarily be correct) is that perhaps God wants a different meaning to be understood at different times because different interpretations may have been needed at different points in human history. It's a possibility. I'm not saying that's the way it is for sure.Jannah wrote:Yep, I've read about it various times and I also have a friend currently living in Saudi Arabia and he is responsible for his mother and where and when she goes places because his father has died.Jannah wrote:The muslim in school said (one of his few logical moments) that if a muslim breaks their promise, they must fast for 3 days and if, in a fit of anger, a man says to his wife he will beat her, he must fulfill that promise (although lightly) if he is to keep it. That makes sense, I suppose, but I still think there should be allowances on 'promises' made when someone is that emotion to save them the bother of having to embarrass both parties by hitting them with a toothbrush!!
Al-Maaida:89
"Allah will not hold you accountable for that which is unintentional in your oaths, but He will hold you accountable for your deliberate oaths. The expiation of such oath is feeding of ten poor persons on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or give a slave his freedom. If it is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths you have sworn. Guard your oaths. Thus Allah does make clear to you His signs, that you may be grateful."Jannah wrote:Ahh, is it only the Jews of his time that he means so? But what about the part where it says "There is no compulsion in religion"? Surely the Jews don't have in their Torah that the Muslims are apes and pigs?!
And I'm sure that there's no mention of Muslims in the sense we know now in the Torah since the Quran came after the Torah and the Gospel even though all the previous Prophets such as Adam, Abraham, Noah etc (peace be upon them all) are considered Muslims as far as the Quran is concerned and even Jews before Jesus (peace be upon him) would have been following God's religion at the time. But, there are good and bad Jews, good and bad Christians and good and bad Muslims and the Quran talks about bad Jews when naming them apes and swine.Jannah wrote:Are you sure its only to the dodgy areas? I've read lots of accounts where a woman needs a mahram when going to the shop and pretty frivilous places like that (but then again, these books are based in Saudi). Is the situation in Afghanistan just completely Islam totally misconstrued and gone bananas so?! Because women aren't even allowed on public transport without a man with her there (which pretty much leaves them very much stuck where they are! My biggest fear would be that these women are being almost held captive- not exactly ideal for anyone!!Jannah wrote:I was using Saudi as an example because of its obvious importance in Islamic terms. What country should I pick? What muslim country has used Sharia in the correct way?Jannah wrote:Ahhh now! WHY on earth would someone go through the terrible emotional ordeal of coming out of the closet to their family members if they wouldn't mind repenting it later??! Now, I know that Islam isn't the only religion that is anti-gay, which is pretty much the reason that I'm not endorsing any religion here, but... it just doesn't make sense!! My cousin is gay, and it certainly isn't a hormonal imbalance or a 'phase' or any of the other silly suggestions people make to try and explain it. Thats simply how he was made, and a person can't change- and more importantly, shouldn't change who they are or apologise for what is natural to them for the sake of religion. Surely, if God has made us all, and some people turn out gay, isn't it part of his 'divine plan' that they should be like that?
I've often heard of people who are completely straight say that they have been tempted (or were in fact tempted) to engage in some same sex activities and described that it came out of some kind of curiosity or perversion. It's possible that homosexuality is a more intense form of these kind of feelings.
Honestly though, I've been interested to find out more about this so that I can try and understand where it comes from a bit better. I don't presume to solve any mystery or come up with any conclusions that other people haven't been able to come up with but I'd definitely like to find out more so that I can know for my own self. Perhaps I'll chat to some gay and lesbian people or something. I don't know.
Anyway, one thing I do know and that's God considers homosexual acts wrong.0 -
Advertisement
-
DublinWriter wrote: »Yes, unlike Catholicism *rolls eyes*
Meh, all religions are right about one thing, and that is that all the others are completely wrong.0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »Well, first of all, "no compulsion in religion" means you can't force someone to be a Muslim if they don't want to be.
Covered in shame
Cursed
deaf, dumb and blind
not allowed into paradise
humiliated
in delusion
have lost their souls
will never triumph
and (this is probably Islam at its most ridiculious) 'The worst of creatures':
al-Bayylinah 6. "Verily those who disbelieve from among the people of the book and the polytheists shall in in the fire of Hell, to abide therein forever. It is they who are the worse of creatures"
So while there is freedom of religion, it doesn't stop them from saying that we're all destined for Hell if we don't believe in Islam- hum!!the_new_mr wrote: »But, there are good and bad Jews, good and bad Christians and good and bad Muslims and the Quran talks about bad Jews when naming them apes and swine.the_new_mr wrote: »The sad truth is that there isn't one country today performing Sharia correctly. Malaysia is probably one of the closest. Saudi Arabia have it right on some things but usually not with anything to do with women.the_new_mr wrote: »I've mentioned this before on here and I know it hasn't necessarily been very popular but it's at least a possibility and that's that it could be their test from God. I believe that everyone gets tested in something in particular and a desire for someone of the same sex could be one of those tests that some people get.
I've often heard of people who are completely straight say that they have been tempted (or were in fact tempted) to engage in some same sex activities and described that it came out of some kind of curiosity or perversion. It's possible that homosexuality is a more intense form of these kind of feelings.
Holy crap... Well, where does one begin with something like this? All I can say is- a person is born with their sexuality. It is not a trick of the mind, a weakness or a 'test'- it is WHO THEY ARE. It is not "perversion", it is how they express their love and to be quite honest with you, if "God" created everyone, then why exactly would he have chosen to make them gay if it displeases him so much? Surely he wouldn't despise his own creation? Its a disgusting and completely discriminatory aspect of many religions and whatever one may say, this is NOT the word of God, but the theories of very ignorant people.0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »Yeah, I think those guys are about getting rights for fathers of children who aren't married to the mothers (as in children had out of wedlock).
I think it would cater for married men who've been seperated/divorced too.
Jannah not that many countries actually enforce Sharia law. AFAIK there's Saudi, Nigeria(think only applies to Muslims), Malaysia)only applies to Muslims), Indonesia?(not sure on that one), Pakistan(thoguh I think non-Muslims exempt) Afghanistan under Taliban.
There could be more. I don't think any of the North African countries enforce it. I know Jordan doesn't either.
As TNM pointed out in Malysia it works pretty well, look at the other countries & see they've all huge problems other than Sharia law0 -
Jannah wrote:the_new_mr wrote:Well, first of all, "no compulsion in religion" means you can't force someone to be a Muslim if they don't want to be.
And I'd like to elaborate a little bit on the knowingly business. It's my own personal belief (and I hope not be held responsible in front of God for this belief as I'm nobody really) that since someone can only be punished for their true intentions, perhaps if someone is 100% sincere in following another faith then they'll be okay on the day of judgement. Especially seeing as there is so much bad rap for Islam these days that people cannot help but be influenced by it.
At the same time, maybe they didn't pursue any questions they had in their heart. They may have woke up one day and asked themselves "I wonder if I'm really in the right religion" and not pursued it any further out of convenience or laziness. Or because they don't want to pursue it any further because they're afraid that if they find Islam to be the truth, they won't be able to live the life they want to (drinking and the like). I've literally heard about people doing that.
Or perhaps I'm making too little of the idea of associating partners with God (the greatest sin in the eyes of God in the Quran). It could be that because it's the instinct of the soul to follow only One God then anyone who does otherwise is committing a crime against God which they should not regardless of their religion.
In the end, it's God Who will judge and it's best to leave it to Him.Jannah wrote:and (this is probably Islam at its most ridiculious)Jannah wrote:Their 'sin' being the oh so terrible deed of staying true to their own religion- they wouldn't convert to Islam so they are dismissed as being apes and swine- well, that pretty much trashes the whole freedom of religion idea, doesn't it?
Some of the verses in question (for those interested):
Al-'Araf:162-166
"But those among them who were bent on wrongdoing substituted another saying for that which they had been given: and so We let loose against them a plague from heaven in requital of all their evil doings.; And ask them about that town which stood by the sea: how its people would profane the Sabbath whenever their fish came to them, breaking the water's surface, on a day on which they ought to have kept Sabbath -because they would not come to them on other than Sabbath-days! Thus did We try them by means of their [own] iniquitous doings.; And whenever some people among them asked [those who tried to restrain the Sabbath-breakers], "Why do you preach to people whom God is about to destroy or [at least] to chastise with suffering severe?" -the pious ones would answer, "In order to be free from blame before your Sustainer, and that these [transgressors, too,] might become conscious of Him."; And thereupon, when those [sinners] had forgotten all that they had been told to take to heart, We saved those who had tried to prevent the doing of evil, and overwhelmed those who had been bent on evildoing with dreadful suffering for all their iniquity; and then, when they disdainfully persisted in doing what they had been forbidden to do, We said unto them: "Be as apes despicable!"
Second of all, just for the record, freedom of religion means being allowed to follow the faith you want to.Jannah wrote:Doesn't it appear odd to you that, with the amount of countries practicing Sharia and for the length of time they have been practicing it, nobody seems to have 'gotten it right'? Perhaps they have got it right- maybe what we see isn't a disaster but in fact Sharia in action. What good are laws when they can't even be practiced properly by people who have no doubt memorised the Quran and studied it for decades?Jannah wrote:Holy crap... Well, where does one begin with something like this? All I can say is- a person is born with their sexuality. It is not a trick of the mind, a weakness or a 'test'- it is WHO THEY ARE. It is not "perversion", it is how they express their love
Honestly though, you don't know what it is exactly that makes someone a homosexual. I think it's safe to say that it's something neither you nor I can say we understand very well which is why I intend to research it a bit whenever I get the chance. I'm not saying that they are necessarily bad people, just that they're doing a bad thing.Jannah wrote:and to be quite honest with you, if "God" created everyone, then why exactly would he have chosen to make them gay if it displeases him so much?
Anyway, as I say, it's something that I'd like to try and understand more if possible.
//Edit
I decided there's no time like the present after happening across this article when producing the link for the article above. It's step 1 to becoming more educated on the matter anyway but it seems very informative. No doubt, loads of people will call it biased due to its source but I think the writer has some interesting references.
An interesting read anyway.0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »It's important to make a distinction between the idea of no compulsion in religion and kuffar (or those who knowingly reject the truth when they see it).the_new_mr wrote: »Or because they don't want to pursue it any further because they're afraid that if they find Islam to be the truth, they won't be able to live the life they want to (drinking and the like). I've literally heard about people doing that.the_new_mr wrote: »In the end, it's God Who will judge and it's best to leave it to Him.the_new_mr wrote: »First of all, I think you'll find that you if read the verses in question, you'll find that the Jews described as being apes and swine are bad Jews and are actually contrasted with good Jews in the Quran.the_new_mr wrote: »I remember someone once putting forward the idea that we're in a kind of Islamic dark age. I rejected that idea at first but the more I think of it, the more it seems to make sense. Knowledge has been lost.the_new_mr wrote: »I think it's safe to say that it's something neither you nor I can say we understand very well
Also, it's not the being gay as it is the "doing" gay.
Lol. "Doing gay"... you can say buggering if you want!0 -
Jannah wrote:So if a person has never heard about Islam and dies, they are okay but if a person finds out about Islam and STILL rejects it, thats bad?
I guess you could say that as long we are all going to be judged by God (who calls Himself The Most Just in the Quran) then we've nothing to worry about as long as we have been 100% honest with ourselves.
One thing which Islam is very clear about is that, unlike most other religions, simply being Muslim doesn't guarantee you entry into heaven. There's no carte blancheGood deeds should be performed and bad deeds avoided.
Jannah wrote:I really do think thats a huge part in it- I know myself, even if I am fully convinced by Islam, it would be really difficult to tell my parents (who have already told me their views on it, and needless to say they're very... very... non-PC... :S Thats all I'll say about that) particularly about hijab, theres something about hijab that drives my mom mad and although I think I might actually like to be a muslim if I can sort out some parts of it in my head (not to mind after reading up on it a lot more) I really worry what they would say- I'd even go as far to say as they would find it less traumatising if I said I wanted to get a tattoo on my face!! Its just that the messages being sent out in the media are so bad and older people tend to be slower to change their ways... ah well.
A close friend of mine who became Muslim from having been Catholic before (but before I met him) told me about how he was so afraid about what people would think and how his parents would react. He said that it actually turned out better than he thought. His parents apparently weren't that surprised because he had been talking about Islam and some Muslim friends of his so positively for so long that they were kind of expecting it to happen
Some people tend to get bad backlash but I think it's mainly down to ignorance and if they can see that the person who has become Muslim is genuinely happier with themselves then they usually become happy with it as well.Jannah wrote:I think thats the main point that showed me that the guy I talked to wasn't practicing Islam properly- by him saying that Benazir Bhutto and countless other people weren't 'good' muslims was pretty much just him assuming a role that was never his place to judge.Jannah wrote:Anyone I had asked about the Jew situation said that Jews, because they didn't accept Islam and kept their own faith, were apes and pigs because of that.Jannah wrote:Apologies, I should have read the entire thing.
What a lot of people don't know is that the "no compulsion in religion" verse was revealed to defend Jewish youth.
In the time of ignorance in Arabia before Islam was revealed, the idolaters who had lost a lot of sons as babies used to make a promise to God that if they had a son and he stayed alive, they would make them Jews (which makes you wonder what they thought of their own idolatry behaviour). Anyway, later on when Islam was revealed to the Prophet Mohamed (peace be upon him), these idolaters later became Muslims and then started to try and force their Jewish children to become Muslims themselves. This verse was revealed to prevent this kind of behaviour. What's the point of becoming Muslim anyway if you don't want to be yourself?Jannah wrote:I think that person might have been on to something. In Benazir Bhutto's book (lol, I know I keept talking about this flipping book, but its a really brilliant book!!) she talks about how the Quran was always meant to be interpreted in a way that suited the time period it was in and that is why some parts may seem slightly ambigious.
I don't like labelling myself as one of those "modern Muslims". I believe that Islam should be understood as it should be. What that is requires education and, most importantly of all, a sincere heart. But I don't like the method that some people use to justify what they want to justify for their own sake and try to twist the verses of the Quran to suit them. Just like some terrorists do it to justify terrorism, you find some people trying to justify homosexuality or drinking by twisting verses.
I like Dr. Zakir Naik actually. I haven't heard that many of his lectures but I liked the ones I did hear. He knows his stuff that's for sure
I think that the article I linked to had some interesting points. I think that there is still the possibility that it could be in someone's genes that they might have a tendency to be gay but that doesn't mean that they have to be gay. A couple of homosexuals who are experts on the subject even said that being gay is a combination of things including possible biological traits and child-parent relationships along with life experiences. Something which I was quite shocked about was that according to one study conducted, something like 48% of gay people surveyed were sexually abused as a child. It's a big complicated topic but there's always the element of choice. I certainly don't believe that someone has to be gay anyway and I'm certainly not of the opinion that they're born that way.Jannah wrote:Lol. "Doing gay"... you can say buggering if you want!0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »As I say though, there's so much negative rap about Islam these days that by the time someone might know enough to have a serious think about it, they've already got all this crap in their head put there by the media.the_new_mr wrote: »A close friend of mine who became Muslim from having been Catholic before (but before I met him) told me about how he was so afraid about what people would think and how his parents would react. He said that it actually turned out better than he thought. His parents apparently weren't that surprised because he had been talking about Islam and some Muslim friends of his so positively for so long that they were kind of expecting it to happenthe_new_mr wrote: »I like Dr. Zakir Naik actually. I haven't heard that many of his lectures but I liked the ones I did hear. He knows his stuff that's for sure0
-
Jannah wrote:I think the way religion is taught in school has a lot to do with it too- my religion teacher only told us parts of Islam like "Muhammad was a pig farmer", women wear hijab after their first blood (who says that?!) and how they stone women, cut off limbs etc and it was treated like a complete joke
I think a lot of it comes from the fact that the people who write the religion books are so afraid of the potential influence that Islam might have on the people that they purposefully misinform students and others and make it look like the weird religion from Arabia that they want it to. Much in the same way that Muslims used to be called Saracens or (even worse) Mohammedens trying to imply that Muslims worship Mohamed (God Be above that) in the past.
I was amazed at how many people really know nothing about Islam. About 8 years ago, I was told by a well educated Irish woman that she thought that we worshipped Mohamed (God be above that). I had to explain that we believe that Mohamed (peace be upon him) is a messenger of God along with Jesus, Moses and the rest (peace be upon them all) and she was surprised to hear all this and this was a woman in her forties who had received a third level education.
Even more recently, a friend of mine asked me the honest question of "What's the difference between a Muslim and an Islamic?" He honestly didn't know what you call a follower of Islam. Islamic seemed to make senseSomeone else even said "You worship the sun, right?"
But you know who's really responsible for this rotten ignorance? Muslims. It's our fault. How can so many people be so ignorant of Islam when we are now all over the world. It's a disgrace really and I'm ashamed of it. The media certainly doesn't help but if we even did half of what we should then at least people would have an educated opinion.Jannah wrote:Whoah! Those are some seriously cool parents!! Although, I think its a little easier for male coverts as they don't have to change their physical appearance, but with women the hijab is a pretty huge deal.
It's definitely harder for women though. Especially because people think that women are considered as second class citizens in Islam or something and that she's "hiding her femininity behind the veil" and all that. I can see how they might think that but I think it's just down to innocent ignorance really.Jannah wrote:I pointed out on her dashboard the virgin Mary wearing a headscarf and mentioned that in the Bible it says that if a woman doesn't cover her head she should shave off her hair, but she just dismissed it as being "old fashioned."You make a good point actually and it's actually a point often brought up by many presenters of Islam. Hope you're not being too disrespectful to your mother though. They may get our nerves sometimes but it's important for people to respect their parents at all times whether you're Muslim or not.
The Prophet Mohamed (peace be upon him) when asked by a man "Who is the most deserving of my respect?" replied "Your mother". Then the man asked "And then?" to which the Prophet replied "Your mother" and then the man asked "And then who?" to which the Prophet replied "Your mother". Then the man asked again "And after that?" to which the Prophet replied "Your father".
Hope I don't sound like I'm preaching but it's just that I see many people disrespecting their parents these days. I'm not saying you do or anything. Just putting it out thereJannah wrote:But I saw the sadest report of a convert who's relatives actually spiked her drink just because she coverted to Islam and couldn't drink alcohol. Bad form.Jannah wrote:Isn't it insanely cool?!!? I find it amazing that he can just rhyme off all the quotations like that, not just from the Quran but from other books too! But he's still very modest, I saw a lecture where a person started a question with "Since you're an expert on Islam, I was wondering-" and he corrected them by saying that he wasn't an expert but just a student of Islam- I thought that was pretty greatMay God increase his knowledge and grant him even more humility and a place high in paradise.
0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »Even more recently, a friend of mine asked me the honest question of "What's the difference between a Muslim and an Islamic?" He honestly didn't know what you call a follower of Islam. Islamic seemed to make sense
Someone else even said "You worship the sun, right?"
the_new_mr wrote: »But you know who's really responsible for this rotten ignorance? Muslims. It's our fault. How can so many people be so ignorant of Islam when we are now all over the world. It's a disgrace really and I'm ashamed of it. The media certainly doesn't help but if we even did half of what we should then at least people would have an educated opinion.the_new_mr wrote: »I understand that the mother still prays for him to return to Catholicism every day but I think he has his mind made up.
“Heaven liveth at the feet of mothers”
I'll never forget the day that I saw a fellow in my class disrespecting a muslim's mother- popped him one right in the balls!0 -
Jannah wrote:Ah now, don't be harsh on yourself- Muslims are actually the most open people I've ever met to discussing their religion. A Muslim in my year gave me the names of sites and books and everything and he's always open to questions and discussions.Jannah wrote:I really wouldn't say I'm disrespectful to my mom in the slightest, she's one of my best friends. As Muhammad himself said:
“Heaven liveth at the feet of mothers”Jannah wrote:I'll never forget the day that I saw a fellow in my class disrespecting a muslim's mother- popped him one right in the balls!0 -
Advertisement
-
the_new_mr wrote: »Yeah but it needs to be more organised. Having the odd Muslim here and there ready to give the name of sites and books is all well and good but the fact that so many people just don't have a clue reflects very badly on the Muslim community.
Glad to hear it. Just for the record, it's heaven lies at the feet of mothers.
Glad to hear that you're standing up for people and defending them... although I'm not sure about your techniques :eek:
LOL- nonono, it was the guy whose mother they were talking about who popped him one in the balls!! Haha!! I wish!!! I don't think I'd have the nerve, somehow!!
Oops, blame google and its messed up traslations lol!!
I never realised how badly Islam was being portrayed until I actually started talking to my family about it. We'd been listening to the hijab debate on the radio (don't know if anyone else heard it, but it was pretty horrific the things people were coming out with) and the arguments against people wearing it... they were unbelievable! From people thinking it is a threat to Ireland's traditions to worrying about 'equality' in schools (and really, I would personally prefer to see a load of hijabis in place of teenage girls wearing belts for skirts) its crazy. People really do need to get over their own insecurities before they make their opinions as widespread as those. My mom went on for ages afterwards, really pissed off about "Those girls wearing korans on their heads" ...!!! (gotta love parents, but its madness!)
Btw, the girl I mentioned who converted and whose drink was spiked actually has a pretty good video on youtube if anyone's interested: http://youtube.com/watch?v=tJ5JE4nfvXY&feature=related
Sadly there's also videos of pretty mad people who coverted too (wait till you get to the part where she talks about fornication... yep....)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uguiV5zyUxs0 -
Jannah wrote:LOL- nonono, it was the guy whose mother they were talking about who popped him one in the balls!! Haha!! I wish!!! I don't think I'd have the nerve, somehow!!Jannah wrote:I never realised how badly Islam was being portrayed until I actually started talking to my family about it. We'd been listening to the hijab debate on the radio (don't know if anyone else heard it, but it was pretty horrific the things people were coming out with) and the arguments against people wearing it... they were unbelievable! From people thinking it is a threat to Ireland's traditions to worrying about 'equality' in schools (and really, I would personally prefer to see a load of hijabis in place of teenage girls wearing belts for skirts) its crazy. People really do need to get over their own insecurities before they make their opinions as widespread as those. My mom went on for ages afterwards, really pissed off about "Those girls wearing korans on their heads" ...!!! (gotta love parents, but its madness!)Jannah wrote:Btw, the girl I mentioned who converted and whose drink was spiked actually has a pretty good video on youtube if anyone's interested: http://youtube.com/watch?v=tJ5JE4nfvXY&feature=relatedJannah wrote:Sadly there's also videos of pretty mad people who coverted too (wait till you get to the part where she talks about fornication... yep....)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uguiV5zyUxsNot personally or anything but I saw that video before about 3 or 4 years ago. I don't think she's mad at all. I actually have a lot of respect for her. She's such a strong character too. May God bless her and her family. I wonder where she is now...
0 -
the_new_mr wrote: »Why should wearing mini-skirts, getting rotten drunk or anything like that be part of Irish identity?the_new_mr wrote: »Something which I always find interesting is that people are often critical of the lifestyle and not the actual beliefs. Almost as if it's not really the beliefs that they have a problem with.the_new_mr wrote: »I know Amina!
Not personally or anything but I saw that video before about 3 or 4 years ago. I don't think she's mad at all. I actually have a lot of respect for her. She's such a strong character too. May God bless her and her family. I wonder where she is now...
0 -
Jannah wrote:Completely- or even worse, they aren't able to distinguish one from the other!Jannah wrote:At the start she seemed like a lovely jolly person, but towards the end she got very... intense!! I suppose she's in Yemen now- wow, long way from home!0
-
Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,267 CMod ✭✭✭✭Join Date:Posts: 36407
A sample of one? While it might be interesting to chat with someone of a particular faith, the fact of the matter is they are not statistically representative of all members of that faith. The evidence is anecdotal, statistically insignificant, and non-generalisable to others. And what if by chance you spoke with a member of the faith that fell way outside the norm? How distorted a picture you might get?0 -
This post has been deleted.0
-
the_new_mr wrote: »I'd be interested in knowing what it was exactly that made her seem intense to you. Just the talk about fornication and that? What is that you object to? I'm just curious.
It was mainly because of how pissed off she seemed at the idea of it, when, in fairness, other people fornicating isn't her business to begin with. She should realise that her videos are reaching a wide audience. And yes, she does have the freedom of speech, but I do find it a little insulting that she says how since she's married a muslim man she doesn't have to worry about him coming in completely hammered from the pub unlike with an English man (or something to that effect) which is pretty offensive to the English men AND their wives. Also the part where she accosted the camera man and asked him if he would be attracting to a woman wearing the niqab... poor fellow seemed absolutely petrified!!0 -
Also the part where she accosted the camera man and asked him if he would be attracting to a woman wearing the niqab... poor fellow seemed absolutely petrified!!
I find this so strange.
Is sexual attraction the only form of 3rd party admiration that is frowned upon in the Muslim world or does it stretch to other areas?
For example, is it ok to leer over a neighbour's nice car?
I know they probably follow the "Though shalt not covet thy neighbour's...." rules but what is it about sexual attraction that is so much worse than coveting other things?
Surely if God found the sexual attraction area so bad he would have highlighted it more when he gave the 10 commandments? No?
From Wiki the commandments state:
"You shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour."
I could very well be wrong here as I am not exactly too well versed in the ways of your Lord but surely he would have been more specific in his teachings when he made the commandments if it meant so much to him.
He even mentions the neighbours house before the neighbours wife so it can't have been too high on his agenda.
I know your prophet came after the commandments and made all these extra revelations but surely as God is omniscient he wouldn't need to make future revisions though the mouth of others?
I'm interested in hearing responses to this but if you feel I'm taking the piss or a new thread should/could be started then so be it.0 -
I find this so strange.
Is sexual attraction the only form of 3rd party admiration that is frowned upon in the Muslim world or does it stretch to other areas?
For example, is it ok to leer over a neighbour's nice car?
I know they probably follow the "Though shalt not covet thy neighbour's...." rules but what is it about sexual attraction that is so much worse than coveting other things?
Surely if God found the sexual attraction area so bad he would have highlighted it more when he gave the 10 commandments? No?
From Wiki the commandments state:
"You shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour."
I could very well be wrong here as I am not exactly too well versed in the ways of your Lord but surely he would have been more specific in his teachings when he made the commandments if it meant so much to him.
He even mentions the neighbours house before the neighbours wife so it can't have been too high on his agenda.
I know your prophet came after the commandments and made all these extra revelations but surely as God is omniscient he wouldn't need to make future revisions though the mouth of others?
I'm interested in hearing responses to this but if you feel I'm taking the piss or a new thread should/could be started then so be it.
I'd say its pretty frowned upon to leer at a neighbour's car (the modern donkey, if you will!:D) although there's a difference between being envious and thinking "wow, thats a pretty sweet ride, I'd love one myself" and being jealous and thinking "That goddammed SOB thinks he's the shiz, well I'm gonna key his car, bust his tyres AND sleep with his wife!!"
... buuuut thats just my ponderings on it!:p0 -
Advertisement
-
Jannah wrote:And yes, she does have the freedom of speech, but I do find it a little insulting that she says how since she's married a muslim man she doesn't have to worry about him coming in completely hammered from the pub unlike with an English man (or something to that effect) which is pretty offensive to the English men AND their wives.Jannah wrote:It was mainly because of how pissed off she seemed at the idea of it, when, in fairness, other people fornicating isn't her business to begin with.Conar wrote:I'm interested in hearing responses to this but if you feel I'm taking the piss or a new thread should/could be started then so be it.
Also, although I don't want to give you the circular argument thing, Muslims believe that there are some things that God does that we can't always understand. That doesn't answer your question obviously but I guess it can help to see what other people believe.
0
Advertisement