Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clonsilla Railway overpass

Options
  • 07-05-2008 2:03pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭


    Does anyone know why there is a perfectly good overpass between coolmine and clonsilla that has not been linked up to the back road?

    There is a roundabout there with an unused exit (fenced off) and there is nothing but a stretch of field that some farmer sticks his cows in every now and again. It runs beside the apartments along by the porterstown crossing to the back road that leads down towards wesmanstown (not sure of the road name).

    It has been like this for years!!! A CPO should have been placed on that little field and the road built. The amount of traffic that it would divert from clonsilla, especially at rush hour when the (human controlled) crossing goes down and stays down for up to 15 mins at a time. The porterstown crossing which is automatic goes up and down as the trains come so you are never waiting there for long.

    Seriously, CPO the land, build the damn road and in a few weeks you could fix the congestion around clonsilla.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    Expect to see some noises been made about it over the coming months with the upcoming attempt to rezone the Kellystown green belt area.

    Which the County Manger favours and the Local Councillors oppose.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    Saruman wrote: »
    Does anyone know why there is a perfectly good overpass between coolmine and clonsilla that has not been linked up to the back road?
    The Porterstown Link Road is in the works.
    Submissions closed two months ago. You could email the roads department to ask on the timeframe for this project.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    About time, as if to make a lie of my "The porterstown crossing which is automatic goes up and down as the trains come so you are never waiting there for long."
    I was stuck there for almost 20 mins at 17:40 today as 5 or 6 trains went by and the barriers stayed down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Personally I'm not a fan of the new changes. It will get all the cars coming down Clonsilla, and from Lucan (and beyond) all coming down into Laurel Lodge and toward Castleknock College. Both bad bottlenecks as it is. It will turn all those estates into even worse rat runs than they are already.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    BostonB wrote: »
    Personally I'm not a fan of the new changes. It will get all the cars coming down Clonsilla, and from Lucan (and beyond) all coming down into Laurel Lodge and toward Castleknock College. Both bad bottlenecks as it is. It will turn all those estates into even worse rat runs than they are already.
    I hear this claim a lot but I'm not sure it will happen. Those driving over the bridge are likely to be those that used the Porterstown Road to get to the Luttrellstown Road. I expect that they'll continue to go to the Luttellstown Road - going down Diswellstown Road to Castleknock College or into Laurel Lodge are known bottlenecks and people will avoid them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    Exactly, i just want to get from Leixlip to Blanchardstown without sitting at train tracks for up to 20 mins.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Saruman wrote: »
    Exactly, i just want to get from Leixlip to Blanchardstown without sitting at train tracks for up to 20 mins.

    Er...why not sit on the train instead? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    daymobrew wrote: »
    I hear this claim a lot but I'm not sure it will happen. Those driving over the bridge are likely to be those that used the Porterstown Road to get to the Luttrellstown Road. I expect that they'll continue to go to the Luttellstown Road - going down Diswellstown Road to Castleknock College or into Laurel Lodge are known bottlenecks and people will avoid them.

    The current bottle necks including the one at the crossing isn't making it less desirable as a rat run. Thats what I'm basing my opinion on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    BostonB wrote: »
    Er...why not sit on the train instead? :confused:
    Don't be ridiculous. :rolleyes: I said i get from Leixlip to Blanch but my location clearly says Westmeath. No train from my town to Blanch and even if there was, not much use to me as i drive around the city/country doing IT stuff so public transport is not an option.

    If my job was in one place and i could get a train each way every day, i would.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    My bad I missed that. :o

    Buy a Scooter? I guess you're stuffed if you need a car.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭oblivious


    It is supposed to be upgrade ,but I think there primary school is going in first and then the flyover will be connected up to the porterstown road


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    BostonB wrote: »
    My bad I missed that. :o

    Buy a Scooter? I guess you're stuffed if you need a car.

    Love to see how i do carrying a server on a scooter... and when i head up to Roscommon to install 33 wireless access points, that will be fun on a scooter :D

    No i need a car, i drop my wife to work in Blanch most mornings and that suits me as my office is also in Blanch, or i head from there in to town.

    If it makes you feel better, if i am doing a country run instead of Dublin, i drop my wife to Mullingar and she gets the train in :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,883 ✭✭✭madds


    Saruman - I make the Leixlip to Blanch run every day and the route I take means I never have to cross a train track, except for the one in Confey.

    Where specifically in Blanch are you heading for?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    Shopping centre and then either town, or up to Ballycoolin but i need to go the the shopping centre first to drop off my wife.

    I think i know the route you are talking about, but that leads all the way up towards Dunboyne and you come back in through Ongar? Its all the wrong direction. Unless there is another one you are talking about?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Saruman wrote: »
    Love to see how i do carrying a server on a scooter... and when i head up to Roscommon to install 33 wireless access points, that will be fun on a scooter :D....

    Considering the travelling you do. Seems bad luck that you have to cross coolmine at that time that often. I don't think I'd have the patience for it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,883 ✭✭✭madds


    No, it's a different one.

    From Confey, take the first left after the graveyard and then take a left and quick right at the next junction. Half a mile up this road take a right (don't go straight on towards Dunboyne), up over a hill and then straight on (taking a left would bring you back towards Leixlip/Lucan.

    At the next t-junction, take a left which brings you into Clonee village.

    Take a right and proceed through Clonee village and head onto the N3 which will bring you down towards the shopping centre turnoff.

    From Leixlip, it's about a 30-minute trip.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    Actually madds thats exactly the route i thought you were talking about. The problem is that like i said, its the wrong direction. I could either go from clonee to ongar or down the N3. Either way i would be stuck in traffic approaching the shopping centre for longer than i would sitting at the crossing (unless its a real bad day).
    My route is usually more like 20 mins in total, unless the traffic at clonsilla is backed up around the corner.


  • Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭StrawDub


    The Kellystown rezoning will be a disaster if it goes through, 1500 more houses in an area where the infrastructure cant cope currently. The primary and secondary schools that are being built along the Porterstown road appear to be the hit the builder was willing to take so that he can get permission for the houses. He was refused permission a number of years ago.

    About the pass over and the link with the Porterstown road, that land has already been CPO for the Metro, the Metro will run the length of the Porterstown rd with a station at Porterstown, so unless they built a new bridge over the proposed link road the current mess with the Porterstown crossing will reemerge in a number of years when the metro is constructed.

    I live extremely near the junction of the porterstown rd and Luttrellstown rd, this junction is going to be upgraded as part of the works with traffic lights and all that lark, but the country feeling of the area is going to be destroyed for good when all this development is finished. My family have lived in Porterstown for 5 generations and to see what it has turned into today is a disgrace.

    Also that farmer you are talking about is a good friend of mine so I only want to hear kind words!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    StrawDub wrote: »
    The Kellystown rezoning will be a disaster if it goes through, 1500 more houses in an area where the infrastructure cant cope currently. ..

    Its disgusting greed tbh. The area is ruined by the over development, lack of proper planning and poor transport planning. Eventually they'll have built on every scrap of green area left. Its only a matter of time and money.
    Saruman wrote: »
    ...Seriously, CPO the land, build the damn road and in a few weeks you could fix the congestion around clonsilla.

    The traffic has no where to go, you'll just move the congestion slightly further along, but in time it will back up, to Clonsilla again because there's no where for it to go. This mass movement of people from west to east through D.15 all has to go through about 3 single lane roads.

    You've either got to widen the roads, not really possible in Castleknock/Laurel Lodge/Chapelizod, get people off the roads (public transport) or get them moving in another direction.

    IMO the easiest is to get people on public transport. Better public transport is feasible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    StrawDub wrote: »
    the Metro will run the length of the Porterstown rd with a station at Porterstown, so unless they built a new bridge over the proposed link road the current mess with the Porterstown crossing will reemerge in a number of years when the metro is constructed.
    Metro West will run on a new bridge to the east of the current Dr Troy Bridge i.e. between the bridge and Woodbrook. The maps are online. The Porterstown stop will be on the bridge.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 101 ✭✭dtf


    Its disgusting greed tbh. The area is ruined by the over development, lack of proper planning and poor transport planning. Eventually they'll have built on every scrap of green area left. Its only a matter of time and money.

    I agree that the areas infastructure can hardly handle any more houses let alone the 1500 that are now proposed.
    What I would be worried about is, if the planning gets knocked back now, and the developer reapplies in a few years time when the Maynooth line might be upgraded and the Metro West is on line, will he be given planning permission for an even higher density housing as a result of the rail improvements?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    The agenda seems to be to keep building regardless. Makes no sense to me. The whole planning system seems broken. With enough pressure it seems they can build anywhere.

    That said theres always hope that any developer will think twice in the current conditions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    dtf wrote: »
    What I would be worried about is, if the planning gets knocked back now, and the developer reapplies in a few years time when the Maynooth line might be upgraded and the Metro West is on line, will he be given planning permission for an even higher density housing as a result of the rail improvements?
    The current Local Area Plan allows for high density development in the vicinity of the rail line. Those that wrote the LAP obviously haven't travelled on the peak hours trains. :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Isn't that the truth.


  • Registered Users Posts: 591 ✭✭✭Rosser


    The Kelly's Town rezoning is alarming to say the least, does anyone know what the stated position is of the local TD's and Councillors?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,694 ✭✭✭ciaran76


    I have seen a few posters up around the Clonsilla village area about it but couldn't read who was behind it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    Rosser wrote: »
    The Kelly's Town rezoning is alarming to say the least, does anyone know what the stated position is of the local TD's and Councillors?
    On Tuesday 13th Leo Varadkar and Eithne Loftus of Fine Gael had a public meeting on the issue. Leo's website doesn't state their position - maybe they are seeing how the electorate feels.
    Socialist Party had a public meeting in Clonsilla Inn on Tuesday 6th May. They are opposing.
    Joan Burton's website doesn't state a position either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭oblivious


    daymobrew wrote: »
    maybe they are seeing how the electorate feels.

    you can certainly bet on that, unfortunately these development tend to go head in some from or other. The real issue will be identify the point that will have the most effect upon the community and suggesting amendments.

    i.e. maybe change the density to reduce congestion or better road/rail connections


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    oblivious wrote: »
    you can certainly bet on that, unfortunately these development tend to go head in some from or other. The real issue will be identify the point that will have the most effect upon the community and suggesting amendments.

    i.e. maybe change the density to reduce congestion or better road/rail connections
    Or suggest appropriate "phasing" e.g. provide playground when 100 units are built.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭oblivious


    daymobrew wrote: »
    Or suggest appropriate "phasing" e.g. provide playground when 100 units are built.

    yea, just make sure it something Fingal County Council is interested in and be will agree maintain it, as playground an other public amenities are something developers lover to put on the plans with any though who will maintain them. I This is especially with playground as the can be security and anti social behavior problems that will only be addressed with Fingal County Council management.

    and don't forget you allowed to make planning suggestions, not all are objection, a number end up helping the development.


Advertisement