Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Windows 2003 - 2 NIC license problem.

  • 28-05-2008 5:34pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭


    Dear All,

    Server: 2 NIC's
    OS : Windows server 2003

    3D application license is configured to NIC 1 IP

    NIC 1 = 10.1.1.201
    NIC 2 = 192.168.128.111 connected to disk storage

    3D application launches when NIC 2 is disabled. When NIC 2 is enabled it says license error and aborts the application launch.

    Any Windows Admin enthusiasts here to help me out to solve this problem. I am new to Channel bonding and NIC teaming. Any help in this regard would e appreciated.

    Contact the support team to revoke NIC 1 (IP) license and issue for the IP on NIC 2. But this doesn't really give solution to the problem if there are 200 more machines are to be added.

    Cheers


Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,427 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    the license is most likely bound to the MAC of one of the cards

    at the command prompt type
    ipconfig /all to see the MAC


    If the binding is done by the network driver then there should be a utility that allows you to choose which of the MAC's to use when bound together.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭redhat_newbie


    No license is bound to the IP and not to the MAC.
    I have confirmed that.

    Thanks for thinking here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭cance


    this isn't nic teaming, this is using two network cards.

    Its a software vendor issue, escalate it to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,339 ✭✭✭✭LoLth


    Just out of curiosity, is NIC temaing with 2 Ipaddresses applied to the virtual interface an option or do the nics *have* to (physically) be on two seperate LANs ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 330 ✭✭irishpartyboy


    NIC teaming is to provide redundancy. There are various different options, depending on manufacturer. You would normally configure the virtual interface with a single IP address, same LAN. You may configure one of the nics to act as primary / active and leave the other as standby. The two nics may be plugged into separate switches. That would typically be called Switch Fault Tolerant, again depending on manufacturers terminology.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,427 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    it can also provide more bandwidth depending on how it's setup

    if you do it at the network driver level not only do you get one IP you can also get one MAC

    and yes you can put both in to the same switch


    on a different note you can have two IP's on one NIC , very handy when doing an IP changeover , one trick is to setup ipenablerouting in the registry on the box that gets most traffic so clients on either subnet don't try to go through a router if they get the other IP from a dns request or whatever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 140 ✭✭redhat_newbie


    Thanks for all the thinking and discussion here lads. Seems to be
    1) NIC teaming
    2) Channel Bonding/Binding
    3) Vendor issue here.

    Will escalate the problem to the respective groups.

    Many thanks.


Advertisement