New Heel Stable In WWE Soon??????????

john concannon

Alright I agree also.We should get back on topic.We who dislike Rovert (If your anything like me you do highly) should just ignore him or her.

Cody will turn and join DiBiase but the stable will fall within a year and a bit.

john concannon

Bubs101 wrote: »

All of you who respond to Rovert telling him X,Y and Z should just put him on your ignore list instead of throwing every thread of point. I'm finding that this forum has got a lot worse since Rovert started posting regularly, but I don't blame it on him.

Done and I disagree with fact you do not blame you-know-who

Vince135792003

Bubs101 wrote: »

It takes two to Tango. Rovert is nearly always at fault for leaving ridiculous 3 word posts but on the otherside he clearly knows his stuff and when he leaves a decent size post it tends to be quite good. All of you who respond to Rovert telling him X,Y and Z should just put him on your ignore list instead of throwing every thread of point. I'm finding that this forum has got a lot worse since Rovert started posting regularly, but I don't blame it on him.

Totally agree.

rovert

orestes wrote: »

Well maybe if you hadn't derailed this thread to the point where there hasn't been a mention of a new heel stable in wwe for about 4 pages he would have had some information on the subject and could have joined in the discussion instead of having to ask the very question that this thread was created to discuss.

Lets make sure that facts don’t get in the way of opinion orestes, clearly you haven’t read the thread completely if you are saying I didn’t join in on the discussion. What you say from here onwards has taken a hit on the creditability front. Clearly you don’t have an objective view of me.

In relation to derailing the thread all VR had to do was answer a simple question on a subject he had a pretty firm view on that was it, end of story. You will twist this anyway you want but that’s the truth.

orestes wrote: »

So you essentially got smart with a new poster for asking a relevant question in the correct thread where the information should have been but wasn't because you screwed the thread up.

Define new.

Bubs101 wrote: »

It takes two to Tango. Rovert is nearly always at fault for leaving ridiculous 3 word posts but on the otherside he clearly knows his stuff and when he leaves a decent size post it tends to be quite good.

There was been only about three short posts I’ve made on this forum. So this thing HAS been blown out of proportion

Bubs101 wrote: »

All of you who respond to Rovert telling him X,Y and Z should just put him on your ignore list instead of throwing every thread of point. I'm finding that this forum has got a lot worse since Rovert started posting regularly, but I don't blame it on him.

For every post people don’t like I get 3 or 4 replying to a thread making it unnecessarily long and off topic. For one big pile on lads you all get very little right about me. In choosing to a) return to discussing a topic or b) be another person attack me (adding very little), most of you chose B.

john concannon wrote: »

Alright I agree also. We should get back on topic. We who dislike Rovert (If your anything like me you do highly) should just ignore him or her.

You’ve a stilted view of the concept of criticism judging from your previous response, not to mention you haven’t answered any criticisms of you and your view of me which Ive made. Your dislike of me is based on little fact.

john concannon wrote: »

Done and I disagree with fact you do not blame you-know-who

Looks like you are confused between fact and opinion here, John.

Fozzy

Please keep this on topic now. I apologise for not being able to keep track of this over the last few days

john concannon

Welcome to a world where if you piss people off Rovert they have a good reason to dislike you or even hate you.

I was a bit pissy today.After calming down I have realised that I was in the wrong today for a fair bit of the breakdown of a perfectly good thread.For that I apologise to people who had nothing to do with all this of topic discussion.You all know who you are( basically everyone except Rovert and myself ).

Rovert I think you should man up while you can still win people's opinion over.
Say sorry to everyone you annoyed.

rovert

john concannon wrote: »

Welcome to a world where if you piss people off Rovert they have a good reason to dislike you or even hate you.

The majority of reasons you and others have citied are wrong and were proven to be wrong. You and others disregard the facts (novel ****ing concept here!) You rather find reasons to hate me, stretching and misrepresenting my position. Once I clarify and disprove these reasons you don’t reply. For this reason your and other's opinions mean jack **** and I WILL ask to people to back up what they say as many members as demonstrated here use little facts in their precious opinions. You and others have more harm than good to your cause and creditability.

Bubs101

john concannon wrote: »

Rovert I think you should man up while you can still win people's opinion over.
Say sorry to everyone you annoyed.

If I'm being honest, you have more to apologize for than Rovert. Instead of taking on what he said about wrestling in a way that VR did you just attacked him and not his post. If he asked you to explain your post (which I don't agree with btw) you just attacked him. This is a plural you btw before you ask for examples

Bounty Hunter

(please dont respond to any posts that have nothing to do with the topic its the easiest way people)

so....

who do you guys think should/will be in this faction?

actually whats the difference between a faction and a stable?

john concannon

I bet ROVERT will be in the faction and he will ruin a perfectly good heel group.

But they will make it another solution to keep development talent get tv time without going to ECW

rovert

john concannon wrote: »

I bet ROVERT will be in the faction and he will ruin a perfectly good heel group.

Childish and you’ve yet to respond or importantly have seemed to taken in any thing I’ve said about you or on your opinion of me.

If you what this thread to get locked (maybe you want that so you can blame it on me) fine continue the way you are.

Has this realisation worn off:

john concannon wrote: »

I have realised that I was in the wrong today for a fair bit of the breakdown of a perfectly good thread.

john concannon

Bubs101 wrote: »

If I'm being honest, you have more to apologize for than Rovert. Instead of taking on what he said about wrestling in a way that VR did you just attacked him and not his post. If he asked you to explain your post (which I don't agree with btw) you just attacked him. This is a plural you btw before you ask for examples

I agree and I apologised.But I see what he does to other people when they make an arguement.He proclaims them to be false.

A faction is a group within a larger group with the same beliefs in politics so it is probably the same in wrestling.

A stable is a group joined together for a higher purpose like Horsemen and DX if I am right.

Fozzy

Next person to post off topic here is getting a one week ban

Shaneomac

Another decent discussion ruined. Whats the point of this pathetic arguing? Why dont you set up a separate thread for this crap to contain it there?

rovert

Shaneomac wrote: »

Another decent discussion ruined. Whats the point of this pathetic arguing? Why dont you set up a separate thread for this crap to contain it there?

Ban?

Can we not start to discuss factions again, Shaneomac. I think this one will be well supported as it involves many WWE office's son.

JP Liz

Jimmy McMurtry wrote: »

Does any body else think Ted Dibiase's son n Cody Rhodes will team up(by turnin on Holly) n win d tag belts in that little angle theyve goin on? Mayb d young faction will start from there

Yes that seems to be whats going to happen

I just hope they keep Cody Rhodes away from the mic he should not be allowed to speak

chopperbyrne

JP Liz wrote: »

Yes that seems to be whats going to happen

I just hope they keep Cody Rhodes away from the mic he should not be allowed to speak

It's a bit of a catch 22.

If they don't get mic time because they suck, they won't get better, but you don't want to give mic time to someone who sucks on the mic.

Handsome Bob

You'd think someone who grew up being around Dusty Rhodes would be able to work a mic. Jesus even Goldust was free flowing enough on the mic and was entertaining. Though I've only seen Dibiase jr. once, he seems to have free flow like his father has. What's Cody's excuse?

Fozzy

LZ5by5 wrote: »

You'd think someone who grew up being around Dusty Rhodes would be able to work a mic. Jesus even Goldust was free flowing enough on the mic and was entertaining. Though I've only seen Dibiase jr. once, he seems to have free flow like his father has. What's Cody's excuse?

Maybe he's just no good with scripts? Does anyone remember Cody talking during Dusty's Hall of Fame induction? I remember people saying how great he was on the mic

rovert

LZ5by5 wrote: »

You'd think someone who grew up being around Dusty Rhodes would be able to work a mic. Jesus even Goldust was free flowing enough on the mic and was entertaining. Though I've only seen Dibiase jr. once, he seems to have free flow like his father has. What's Cody's excuse?

Speech impediment, lack of experience and ****ty material to work with.

Goldust is worse than Cody without a script.

Handsome Bob

Fozzy wrote: »

Maybe he's just no good with scripts? Does anyone remember Cody talking during Dusty's Hall of Fame induction? I remember people saying how great he was on the mic

I would have thought what he said at the HOF was a written speech.

DRakE

I think Cody Rhodes should be in the new heel stable as a time keener.

Shaneomac

How cringe inducing was Codys segment 'gettin down' with Cryme Time/Piper a few weeks ago. Up there with the office. That heel storyline could be in the works. I believe Curt Hennings Son is getting groomed in Florida and hes already tagged with Ted jr, Looks like Randy wont be involved either way now. He could have been a good leader to them

JP Liz

I think Natalya Neidhart may be drafted to RAW

rovert

JP Liz wrote: »

I think Natalya Neidhart may be drafted to RAW

Why?

They have Beth Phoenix already on Raw

Fozzy

rovert wrote: »

Why?

They have Beth Phoenix already on Raw

And Smackdown

there's going to be a women's title on Smackdown soon

rovert

Fozzy wrote: »

And Smackdown

there's going to be a women's title on Smackdown soon

I know that but they are far too similar to be on the same brand and I dont think either is turning babyface anytime soon.

JP Liz

rovert wrote: »

Why?

They have Beth Phoenix already on Raw

If they are having this heel stable on RAW it would make sense for her to be on that show if she is part of the stable

rovert

JP Liz wrote: »

If they are having this heel stable on RAW it would make sense for her to be on that show if she is part of the stable

I never said that.

chopperbyrne

rovert wrote: »

I never said that.

You asked why and she gave a reason. She didn't say that you said anything.

rovert

chopperbyrne wrote: »

You asked why and she gave a reason. She didn't say that you said anything.

I never passed any judgement that on whether it would make sense.

JP Liz

Partial Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter

WWE's website is now confirming our report that Roddy Piper will be announcing a new protégé soon.

There is talk of booking a heel stable of second-generation stars, with a veteran manager to lead them. Names being discussed for this are Afa Jr, Ted Dibiase Jr, DH Smith, Cody Rhodes and if they can't get a veteran mouthpiece, Carlito to do the talking. There is also talk of a similar idea, but not made up with all second-generation stars. CM Punk and Chris Harris have been discussed if that would be the case.

Maybe Natalya wont be joining

JP Liz

Ted DiBiase, Jr.'s mystery tag team part for his WWE World Tag Team title shot at the Night of Champions pay-per-view is expected to be DH Smith, who was pulled off the road in early May following an apparent injury angle at the egregious hands of JBL.

callaway92

JP Liz wrote: »

Ted DiBiase, Jr.'s mystery tag team part for his WWE World Tag Team title shot at the Night of Champions pay-per-view is expected to be DH Smith, who was pulled off the road in early May following an apparent injury angle at the egregious hands of JBL.

So thats another match not to look forward to so

tdv

Ted Diabiase SNR should the leader of the stable.

ShawnRaven

Been discussed already, he tried that, it sucked, it will suck again.
VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

Been discussed already, he tried that, it sucked, it will suck again.
VR!

Bwhahahahahahahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

Bwhahahahahahahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

There ya go folks, reasons not to go near F4W.
Because you too can be as interesting as insightful as rovert.

VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

There ya go folks, reasons not to go near F4W.
Because you too can be as interesting as insightful as rovert.

VR!

That was DiBiase's cartoon laugh, dude.

Seriously what is your problem with F4W or is it something you just say?

Bubs101

rovert wrote: »

Seriously what is your problem with F4W or is it something you just say?

Certain people who get F4W have a very snobbish attitude, and others just repeat what Meltzer says. I assume that is his problem

rovert

Bubs101 wrote: »

Certain people who get F4W have a very snobbish attitude, and others just repeat what Meltzer says. I assume that is his problem

And these people are? Ive never found this it has to be said, quite the opposite in fact.

What in particular is unsound about the thrust of what Meltzer says anyway? Do you read the Observer?

Vince135792003

Bubs101 wrote: »

Certain people who get F4W have a very snobbish attitude,

Names?

If you're referring to me, I've referred to the site more times than most here. Not too be snobby but to just recommend it as I've gotten alot out of it and I think others would too.

Rjd2

JP Liz wrote: »

Ted DiBiase, Jr.'s mystery tag team part for his WWE World Tag Team title shot at the Night of Champions pay-per-view is expected to be DH Smith, who was pulled off the road in early May following an apparent injury angle at the egregious hands of JBL.

Oh god I hope this does not happen, DH Smith is brutal and does not deserve to be given any sort of present for being totally ****e. :mad:

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

That was DiBiase's cartoon laugh, dude.

Seriously what is your problem with F4W or is it something you just say?

Sorry man, i misunderstood you.
Regarding to F4W, Bubs101 basically said it. It's just full of annoying c*nts in my own honest opinion. As i've said before, it's a case of "i tried it, i hated it".

Even sadder thing is it's full of self professed elitists, that spend all their time in front of a keyboard with no shread of a social life.
VR!

Fozzy

validreasoning! wrote: »

Even sadder thing is it's full of self professed elitists, that spend all their time in front of a keyboard with no shread of a social life.

On the board maybe. But most subscribers don't use the board as far as I can tell

Minto

"Thats 'oil I can stands, I can't stands no more!"

VR, we've talked about this 100 times, F4W's board is full of nut jobs (and some porn as I found out last week), I've even shown ya some screen shots of the lunacy over there, but the way you bash subscribers is total bullsh*t! As Foz said, a lot of subscribers don't touch the board. I normally steer well clear of it, except when I'm bored.

ShawnRaven

Minto wrote: »

"Thats 'oil I can stands, I can't stands no more!"

VR, we've talked about this 100 times, F4W's board is full of nut jobs (and some porn as I found out last week), I've even shown ya some screen shots of the lunacy over there, but the way you bash subscribers is total bullsh*t! As Foz said, a lot of subscribers don't touch the board. I normally steer well clear of it, except when I'm bored.

And exactly where the f*ck have you been this past week?
VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

Even sadder thing is it's full of self professed elitists

But I dont get this part at all

Minto wrote: »

I've even shown ya some screen shots of the lunacy over there

What in particular :eek:

Minto

validreasoning! wrote: »

And exactly where the f*ck have you been this past week?
VR!

Nowhere in particular, just haven't been posting! Guess I lost my smile

Minto

rovert wrote: »

What in particular :eek:

Well, there is the 4 page thread titled: A few pics of my dick. There is the entire major phycological issues forum. There's lots more lunacy over there (and a bit of homosexuality by the looks of it to, lol)!