Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The free state army mutiny 1924

Options
  • 19-06-2008 2:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭


    What was it exactly? I assume it was a reaction of an officer corps which was loyal to a recently deceased Mick Collins to the realization that the new free state army wasn't going to be used to help unify the country. Another side of it I've heard that it was a reaction to the downsizing of the army by soldiers worried about loosing their jobs in an uncertain time. How widespread was the mutiny, what form did it take and was there ever a danger it would lead to a military coup? Did it have any lasting effect on the governments attitude to the army?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 838 ✭✭✭purple'n'gold


    What was it exactly? I assume it was a reaction of an officer corps which was loyal to a recently deceased Mick Collins to the realization that the new free state army wasn't going to be used to help unify the country. Another side of it I've heard that it was a reaction to the downsizing of the army by soldiers worried about loosing their jobs in an uncertain time. How widespread was the mutiny, what form did it take and was there ever a danger it would lead to a military coup? Did it have any lasting effect on the governments attitude to the army?

    it's all here
    http://www.military.ie/dfhq/history/history.htm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭McArmalite


    What was it exactly? I assume it was a reaction of an officer corps which was loyal to a recently deceased Mick Collins to the realization that the new free state army wasn't going to be used to help unify the country. Another side of it I've heard that it was a reaction to the downsizing of the army by soldiers worried about loosing their jobs in an uncertain time. How widespread was the mutiny, what form did it take and was there ever a danger it would lead to a military coup? Did it have any lasting effect on the governments attitude to the army?
    I actually had a grand uncle who was one of those who got promotion sideways by the 'Free' State govt. This so called 'mutiny' was a mix of both from what I know. There was disquiet among many of the officers who had fought in the IRA before 1921 that nothing was been done to reunify the country. The Machevilain founding fathers of our state, or british puppets may be a more accurate description, wee Willie Cosgrave, Kevin O'Higgins* etc where getting rid of the old guard and replacing them with younger, more obedient officers, which was naturally resented by the older officers.


    *( O'Higgins had spoke out strongly against the 1916 rising as he was a memeber of Redmond's IPP, but swithched around 1918 seeing Sinn Fein as the coming force )


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 138 ✭✭bartholomewbinn


    McArmalite wrote: »
    I actually had a grand uncle who was one of those who got promotion sideways by the 'Free' State govt. This so called 'mutiny' was a mix of both from what I know. There was disquiet among many of the officers who had fought in the IRA before 1921 that nothing was been done to reunify the country. The Machevilain founding fathers of our state, or british puppets may be a more accurate description, wee Willie Cosgrave, Kevin O'Higgins* etc where getting rid of the old guard and replacing them with younger, more obedient officers, which was naturally resented by the older officers.


    *( O'Higgins had spoke out strongly against the 1916 rising as he was a memeber of Redmond's IPP, but swithched around 1918 seeing Sinn Fein as the coming force )

    Ah yes, another public house “republican” with his own slant on history. If you don’t like how it happened, sure just make up your own version.


  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭Shutuplaura


    So what happened then? I'm not playing devils advocate by the way. It just seems to me like it was a fairly important event in the early years of the state, when the Irish Government openly adopted a policy on unification that basically paid lip service to the position of Collins pro treaty stepping stone argument.

    However, I read somewhere that it was not the case and dissatisfaction was based on industrial relation reasons not idealogical ones. I was just curious. I'm also curious to see if you have anything to add other than an insult.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭McArmalite


    Ah yes, another public house “republican” with his own slant on history. If you don’t like how it happened, sure just make up your own version.
    Hi pal, watch yourself there. I'm far from being a public house “republican”. I'm not going to claim I've ever been in the Provos as I've been well aware that I wouldn't be up to it, but I've done my fair share of leafleting, marching, meetings, petitions etc starting from my late teens with the Hunger Strikes, then campaigns such as anti extradition, Dublin bombings, Birmingham six/Guildford four, opening border roads, Time to Go campaign, as well as picketing the Zionist embassy, pro divorce, anti Iraq war etc, etc. I have no doubts who is the one who sits on his ar$e in a public house spouting sh!te. And anyway, I just basically concured with Shutuplaura's OP " This so called 'mutiny' was a mix of both from what I know. " So Einstein, just stay off the thread if you can't " have anything to add other than an insult" ;).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 138 ✭✭bartholomewbinn


    McArmalite wrote: »
    Hi pal, watch yourself there. I'm far from being a public house “republican”. I'm not going to claim I've ever been in the Provos as I've been well aware that I wouldn't be up to it, but I've done my fair share of leafleting, marching, meetings, petitions etc starting from my late teens with the Hunger Strikes, then campaigns such as anti extradition, Dublin bombings, Birmingham six/Guildford four, opening border roads, Time to Go campaign, as well as picketing the Zionist embassy, pro divorce, anti Iraq war etc, etc. I have no doubts who is the one who sits on his ar$e in a public house spouting sh!te. And anyway, I just basically concured with Shutuplaura's OP " This so called 'mutiny' was a mix of both from what I know. " So Einstein, just stay off the thread if you can't " have anything to add other than an insult" ;).

    You remind me of the character in “Citizen Smith” Freedom for tooting!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_Smith


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭McArmalite


    You remind me of the character in “Citizen Smith” Freedom for tooting!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_Smith

    Just keep sitting on your ar$e in a public house spouting sh!te - if you can get anyone to listen to you :rolleyes:.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,056 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    Group hug anyone?:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,084 ✭✭✭eroo


    The Army Mutiny:

    1.Many officers who sided with Collins felt the Free State Govt. wasn't doing enough to make advances towards re-unification.Before Collins was murdered he was supplying IRA units in the North,both pro- and anti-Treaty,with weapons.Once Collins was dead,this stopped and focus was taken off N.I.FS officers didn't like this.

    2.The FS Army had 55,000 personnel towards the end of the Civil War.The Govt. downsized it to a peacetime force of roughly 25,000.Not many Army men were happy about this.

    3.Many officers wanted the Army Council of the Free State Army disbanded.Richard Mulcahy,COS and MforD,was a member if I'm not mistaken.As a result he was forced to resign.

    The Army Mutiny was an important event because it signalled the Govt taking control of the Army,which could've posed a threat to the Stability of the country.Also,many of Collins supporters were ousted,which made things easier for DeValera when he came to power in 1932.He could now put his supporters into the Army without much resistance.Hence,the 'Fianna Failisation' of the Army(Cathal Brugha barracks,Austin Stack barracks ...)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭McArmalite


    eroo wrote: »
    The Army Mutiny:

    1.Many officers who sided with Collins felt the Free State Govt. wasn't doing enough to make advances towards re-unification.Before Collins was murdered he was supplying IRA units in the North,both pro- and anti-Treaty,with weapons.Once Collins was dead,this stopped and focus was taken off N.I.FS officers didn't like this.

    2.The FS Army had 55,000 personnel towards the end of the Civil War.The Govt. downsized it to a peacetime force of roughly 25,000.Not many Army men were happy about this.

    3.Many officers wanted the Army Council of the Free State Army disbanded.Richard Mulcahy,COS and MforD,was a member if I'm not mistaken.As a result he was forced to resign.

    The Army Mutiny was an important event because it signalled the Govt taking control of the Army,which could've posed a threat to the Stability of the country.Also,many of Collins supporters were ousted,which made things easier for DeValera when he came to power in 1932.He could now put his supporters into the Army without much resistance.Hence,the 'Fianna Failisation' of the Army(Cathal Brugha barracks,Austin Stack barracks ...)

    Good stuff there eroo, concurs with the OP regarding some of the politicking and skullduggery going on in the background. Sadly, things never change.

    As for 'Fianna Failisation':), that's a term I'll have to remember, the 'cute hoors' and all that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 320 ✭✭The_Banker


    Apologies for resurrecting a 2 year old thread but does anyone know if there was ever a book written about the Army Mutiny of 1924?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭who the fug


    What was the IRB role in this?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The_Banker wrote: »
    Apologies for resurrecting a 2 year old thread but does anyone know if there was ever a book written about the Army Mutiny of 1924?

    "Almost a Rebellion: the Irish Army Mutiny of 1924"

    author: Valiulis, Maryann G


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What was the IRB role in this?

    I think there was a general resentment among IRB members, who largely supported the treaty, because of Collins, and resented the placement of ex-British army officers within the Irish Army, this was the case with my grandfather anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭who the fug


    I think there was a general resentment among IRB members, who largely supported the treaty, because of Collins, and resented the placement of ex-British army officers within the Irish Army, this was the case with my grandfather anyway.

    Dursey

    Thanks for the book, have put it on order


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭heartofarebel


    I have only been using boards now for a short while and have just come across the thread. My great uncle was Vinny Byrne who was the last surviving member of the Squad. He took part in the Mutiny of '24.

    They took over a building in Parnell Square, which was later used as the meeting house for the 1916-21 club, which he was also the chairman of. His main reason and many of the others who took part was because of the then government, especially Kevin O'Higgins trying to forge closer links to England even going as close as changing the Tricolour as our flag to the blue and gold harped flag of St. Patrick.

    If anybody had relatives that were involved in the times and wants to know if they took part in the Mutiny, I have a clipping from a newspaper at the time that gives a full list of the men who resigned their commision form the army after the Mutiny.

    It's great to see so many people interested in our history. History in this country has often been swept under the carpet to keep other people happy. I don't think that history is thought as much in schools now as it should be. History has made the world what it is today, good or bad.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    1924 was an interesting year. Its a pity that it also led to the demise of one of the founding fathers of Irish Democracy (Richard Mulcahy)

    Many of the Free State officers rightfully felt let down that the promises made about moving towards unification of Ireland were going nowhere. They felt that having fought a terrible war to secure the integrity of the new State, they were being brushed aside and Irelands national aspirations were overlooked by the political classes.

    From a moral and democratic perspective, the government were more than correct in squashing the mutiny, as the last 5 years had demonstrated the dangers of men with guns having the right to hold the democratic verdict of the people to ransom through sheer violence. But the individuals involved were moved by a higher purpose, but were ultimately flawed. This is the great human tragedy involved in both the Civil War and the Army Mutiny. I think the mutiny was a hangover of the civil war, an afterglow of bitterness from a group of men alienated after having to fight a civil war against former comrades.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭PatsytheNazi


    Denerick wrote: »
    1924 was an interesting year. Its a pity that it also led to the demise of one of the founding fathers of Irish Democracy (Richard Mulcahy)

    Many of the Free State officers rightfully felt let down that the promises made about moving towards unification of Ireland were going nowhere. They felt that having fought a terrible war to secure the integrity of the new State, they were being brushed aside and Irelands national aspirations were overlooked by the political classes.

    From a moral and democratic perspective, the government were more than correct in squashing the mutiny, as the last 5 years had demonstrated the dangers of men with guns having the right to hold the democratic verdict of the people to ransom through sheer violence. But the individuals involved were moved by a higher purpose, but were ultimately flawed. This is the great human tragedy involved in both the Civil War and the Army Mutiny. I think the mutiny was a hangover of the civil war, an afterglow of bitterness from a group of men alienated after having to fight a civil war against former comrades.
    Was not the democratic right of the people of Ireland denied by sheer violence and the threat of more of it ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    Was not the democratic right of the people of Ireland denied by sheer violence and the threat of more of it ?

    What are you alluding to? The Treaty was ratified by a national vote, most were content with it bar a 'virtuous' minority. Those people asserted their elitist claims in arms, against the expressed wishes of the people.

    This is why patriots like Kevin O'Higgins and Richard Mulcahy are the founding fathers of Irish Democracy. They had to do unpalatable things, but these were unpalatable times.


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭heartofarebel


    I completely agree with you that they must have felt totally let down by the political establishment of the time. They had fought a nasty war and an equally vicious civil war. The Mutiny had no chance of success and they knew that but I think that it was only meant as a token gesture.

    How many times in the course of world history has the people who fought the wars been let down by their political masters who went on to become the exact replica of what they had fought against.

    1916 happened against the wishes of the people. The prisoners were abused by the public after the rising. If the rising didn't happen, would we still be under British Rule? Where would our democratic rights be now? I don't condone violence but in some cases no matter how horrible and tastless it is, violence is the only answer.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,488 ✭✭✭Denerick


    I completely agree with you that they must have felt totally let down by the political establishment of the time. They had fought a nasty war and an equally vicious civil war. The Mutiny had no chance of success and they knew that but I think that it was only meant as a token gesture.

    How many times in the course of world history has the people who fought the wars been let down by their political masters who went on to become the exact replica of what they had fought against.

    1916 happened against the wishes of the people. The prisoners were abused by the public after the rising. If the rising didn't happen, would we still be under British Rule? Where would our democratic rights be now? I don't condone violence but in some cases no matter how horrible and tastless it is, violence is the only answer.

    I'm not prepared to go into 1916, I've sparred with many forumers about it before.

    What I will say is that at times violence is legitimate, but most of the time its not. Some of the proponents of revolutionary violence would have been better off getting a girlfriend and chilling out. Thats what it amounts to most of the time.

    As for the Civil War generation, they didn't even have the luxury of ambiguity when the anti treaty side launched their rebellion. It was a bad time for all concerned though, so its probably better not to castigate them too much, for fear of losing perspective.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    This is way off topic. Mod.


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭heartofarebel


    Some do jump on the bandwagon of violence just for the sake of it. History always has many sides to it. Everybody has their own view depending on which side they fall on.

    In the end who's to say who's right or wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39 siniman


    If anybody had relatives that were involved in the times and wants to know if they took part in the Mutiny, I have a clipping from a newspaper at the time that gives a full list of the men who resigned their commision form the army after the Mutiny.

    .

    Hi there - i know it has been quite a while since your post but i was hoping you could let me know whether my grandfather resigned his commission because of the mutiny - he was a lt col we think at the time of the mutiny and appears to have left the army around that time.... would appreciate if you could get in touch re this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭heartofarebel


    siniman wrote: »
    Hi there - i know it has been quite a while since your post but i was hoping you could let me know whether my grandfather resigned his commission because of the mutiny - he was a lt col we think at the time of the mutiny and appears to have left the army around that time.... would appreciate if you could get in touch re this.
    Hi Siniman, can you give me your grandfathers name. I don't have the clipping any more but I can contact the chap who has it. It might take a little while to comeback to you but I will.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39 siniman


    thanks so much - have sent on a private message (hopefully) with the details. am new enough to this posting lark so may not have done it correctly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    siniman wrote: »
    thanks so much - have sent on a private message (hopefully) with the details. am new enough to this posting lark so may not have done it correctly.

    Hi Sinman - I am the new owner of that collection of documents, photos and scrapbook :

    http://www.militaria-archive.com/
    Coming hopefully January 2011; a document, photograph & postcard collection including a large independence era scrapbook which belonged to the youngest 'Apostle' of Michael Collins' legendary Squad - Comdt. Vincent Byrne II Bn, Dublin Brigade, Old IRA. This collection contains documents, letters, cards and notes including an 'Irish War News', flyers, leaflets and believed to be unpublished photographs of the Rising Rebels at Stafford Gaol before transport to Frongoch. Irish War of independence and Civil war era letters right up to some colour photographs of commemorations of the 1970's and 1980's.

    as you can see I have not managed to put it online yet though I am working on it. *If you pm me your Grandfathers name I will check for that particular cutting and try to get back to you with an answer in the next couple of days.

    Cheers,

    * actually now that I think of it I will post that full clipping here for anyone who is interested in it - this evening hopefully.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Notorious97


    Morlar wrote: »
    Hi Sinman - I am the new owner of that collection of documents, photos and scrapbook :

    http://www.militaria-archive.com/



    as you can see I have not managed to put it online yet though I am working on it. *If you pm me your Grandfathers name I will check for that particular cutting and try to get back to you with an answer in the next couple of days.

    Cheers,

    * actually now that I think of it I will post that full clipping here for anyone who is interested in it - this evening hopefully.


    Thanks if you do post it, id be really interested to see anything on Vinny Byrne also, hes the grandfather of a friend i was in school with, always been an interesting figure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39 siniman


    Morlar wrote: »
    Hi Sinman - I am the new owner of that collection of documents, photos and scrapbook :

    http://www.militaria-archive.com/



    as you can see I have not managed to put it online yet though I am working on it. *If you pm me your Grandfathers name I will check for that particular cutting and try to get back to you with an answer in the next couple of days.

    Cheers,

    * actually now that I think of it I will post that full clipping here for anyone who is interested in it - this evening hopefully.


    thats great - thanks! will pm the name just in case. appreciate your assistance.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    Here is the one in question for anyone who is interested in it ;
    Vincent-Byrne-Scrapbook-136_low.jpg


Advertisement