Call of Duty: World at War - teaser trailer + pics.

CyberGhost

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html

http://cod.totalgamingnetwork.com/codpage.php?do=wawtrailerscreencaps


I'm happy they left the numbering system, it was getting ridiculous Call of Duty 17 anyone?

I'm also glad it's coming to PC, BUT I'm concerned with all this "Games for Live" crap,

1. I don't want to install anything extra
2. I'm not paying for online access
3. I'm not buying the game if they allow you some portion of online access and you have to pay for some good features.

jonski

CyberGhost wrote: »

1. I don't want to install anything extra
2. I'm not paying for online access
3. I'm not buying the game if they allow you some portion of online access and you have to pay for some good features.

I'll buy it and pay for our own server . but as above , I'm not up for paying for " Extra content "

Sod'o swords

The melee is looking fun.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOADS of stabbing!

The Queen

Looking good. Nice bit of grittiness in there...

Steffano2002

I have to say that the game is looking pretty good! I'm actually looking forward to being back in WW2 surroundings! But what's all this about paying to play online? I won't be doing that!

Indie18

ahhh back to the trusty old ww2 games originality at its very best.

christophicus

TBH, I am ,more then happen with CoD4, I am actually supprised they have started talking about this game already.

Steffano2002

It's not due until Christmas and you might be bored by then... I'm happy they're planning ahead! I just hope that game won't be a big piece of sh!t...

Indie18

Steffano2002 wrote: »

It's not due until Christmas and you might be bored by then... I'm happy they're planning ahead! I just hope that game won't be a big piece of sh!t...

it could well be and i wouldn't be surprised if it was to be honest. do they really have to go back and do another ww2 game there were other wars god dam it or if that doesn't suit them why don't they just make up a war.

Steffano2002

I actually like the fact that it is set in WW2! I'm not worried about that one bit!

What worries me is that they might go down the "tactical" route like Brothers in Arms where you have to give orders to your troups and all that cr@p... I hate this type of games! If I liked them I'd be playing Command & Conquer!

I want to play as a simple soldier and not have to worry about other people!

Sod'o swords

Hit the auld nail on the head there!
Like that full spectrum warrior!
I thought now i'd just buy myself and cheap fps game, and what i got was a large load of horse boll0cks!

I'm very glad that it's going back to ww2.
I play more cod2 than cod4 as it is!

Indie18

Steffano2002 wrote: »

I actually like the fact that it is set in WW2! I'm not worried about that one bit!

What worries me is that they might go down the "tactical" route like Brothers in Arms where you have to give orders to your troups and all that cr@p... I hate this type of games! If I liked them I'd be playing Command & Conquer!

I want to play as a simple soldier and not have to worry about other people!

i don't think they are going down the tactical route with it. i think what they are plugging with this one is online co-op campaign (not the worst idea in the world i suppose) i would hate to think that they were going to do the whole issue commands to you squad sh**e that just gets messy.
i don't hate the fact thats its set in ww2 again but it does get a little boring. but it should still be a good game.

Steffano2002

I would love a game just like CoD1 in fairness (but with better graphics obviously). It was the ONLY accurate Call of Duty game IMO. God I can still remember the KAR-98K and the MP44 on Dawnville or Carentan... They were accurate as hell! And the BAR and Thompson were just awesome... Ahhhh the memories!

Ever since CoD2 the accuracy of the Call of Duty series has been more than suspect IMO...

AnotherSociety

Its looking alot like 3 sweeeeettt:D

String

I love WW2 games but how will they get all the COD4 hardcore players to stay with this? If they are going to do weapon unlocks etc with this theres only so many guns that were available in WW2.

CyberGhost

Steffano2002 wrote: »

I would love a game just like CoD1 in fairness (but with better graphics obviously). It was the ONLY accurate Call of Duty game IMO. God I can still remember the KAR-98K and the MP44 on Dawnville or Carentan... They were accurate as hell! And the BAR and Thompson were just awesome... Ahhhh the memories!

Ever since CoD2 the accuracy of the Call of Duty series has been more than suspect IMO...

I agree 100% Steff, for me CoD1 is still by far the best in the series, I had some fun moments in that game.

Steffano2002

CyberGhost wrote: »

I agree 100% Steff, for me CoD1 is still by far the best in the series, I had some fun moments in that game.

Jesus I think I'll re-install it for the laugh!

Sephiroth_dude

cant wait for this,hope its better than 3.

pirelli

The flame thrower looks like it will be fun. I'd say it will be unpopular by sever admins though, like the martyr option is. The reason is it probably starts lots of fires and smoke and generally is annoying. I wonder how you burn a cod player to death ( im thinking flamable straw huts in the hot jungle ). Do you just die or start dying and have to move.


In another cod edition
I would like to see one big huge map for 2.5 kilometer sniper shot's which are realistically possible and can be shot accurately. The spawn would land/respawn you to where you left off.

And you would parachute back onto the map, so your enemy can see you respawning land point.

stannis

And here I was, hoping developers would start to move away from the World War 2 setting...

Zulu

Steffano2002 wrote: »

I would love a game just like CoD1 in fairness (but with better graphics obviously). It was the ONLY accurate Call of Duty game IMO.

Accurate my ass! You could throw a grenade into tomorrow! (Or the day after if you jumped)

Great game though

Steffano2002

Zulu wrote: »

Accurate my ass! You could throw a grenade into tomorrow! (Or the day after if you jumped)

Great game though

"Accurate" & "Realistic" have 2 different meanings! I meant "accurate" because you didn't get kills by aiming somewhere around the player... You had to be spot on!

CyberGhost

Zulu wrote: »

Accurate my ass! You could throw a grenade into tomorrow! (Or the day after if you jumped)

Great game though

Well they sure fixed that problem in CoD4, with shoe box maps, so you don't have to throw grenades far.

Sod'o swords

Yeah with martydom the grenade covered half the map...