Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Annoying Box!! Anyone know what they are??

Options
  • 30-06-2008 8:05pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭


    Here's a pic of the item in question.

    boxestl0.jpg

    Thier making my Radar Detector go bananas every time I whiz by them.

    I'm just one step away from taking a sledge to them.

    Anyone know what there for??


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    Moved from learning to drive.


  • Registered Users Posts: 94 ✭✭Brad Goodman


    You could always turn off your radar dector and just drive at the speed limit. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭eringobragh


    You could always turn off your radar dector and just drive at the speed limit. :rolleyes:

    ...and so it begins


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Cionád


    You could always turn off your radar dector and just drive at the speed limit. :rolleyes:

    4 mins after the OP, maybe you should turn off your detector ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,670 ✭✭✭mondeo


    Still does not satify the Op's curiosity... If they are emitting radar I would love to know what they are.. :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 407 ✭✭Ronanom


    You could always turn off your radar dector and just drive at the speed limit. :rolleyes:

    Bless. If someone wants to use a radar detector then all good and well for them.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Measuring traffic volume perhaps?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭alexmcred


    Measuring traffic volume perhaps?

    +1


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭eringobragh


    Measuring traffic volume perhaps?

    Thats my theory alright

    but they normally use the strips accrss the road for that but i suppose it being a dual carraigeway it wouldn't be feasible or safe


  • Registered Users Posts: 94 ✭✭Brad Goodman


    Maybe they're there to annoy people who speed and use radar detecors? :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,356 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Its a Radar-based traffic counter.

    did a quick google to try find a link:
    http://www.jamartech.com/radarrecorder.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭eringobragh


    Maybe they're there to annoy people who speed and use radar detecors? :D

    lol do us a favour and stay at the knitting forum :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭eringobragh


    sk8board wrote: »
    Its a Radar-based traffic counter.

    did a quick google to try find a link:
    http://www.jamartech.com/radarrecorder.html

    From that site:

    radarcovert2.gif

    UNAWARE :rolleyes:!! It lights up my detector like a christmas tree :p

    Cheers for the info: sk8board


  • Registered Users Posts: 94 ✭✭Brad Goodman


    lol do us a favour and stay at the knitting forum :D

    Knitting forum eh? So what you're saying is not speeding equates to being boring and speeding equals being cool? ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,668 ✭✭✭eringobragh


    Knitting forum eh? So what you're saying is not speeding equates to being boring and speeding equals being cool? ;)

    Hmm ..Show me where did i mention speeding i said i went past these boxes and it set off my Radar Detector thats it...

    Thanks for you 'valuable contributions' to this thread :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Question answered, problem solved, thread locked.

    Please dismount your high horses now ... resume normal slouched position, thank you


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement