LOL Coppers

NorfolkEnchants

This thread is getting off point a little.

Bottom line - what a hero

Homer

username123 wrote: »

Why would she be a laughing stock?

Irish attitude and mentality. I'm not saying it's right but of course I think people would point and laugh at her situation and the way she has gone about things.

Thousands of people have one night stands. Thousands of people use protection and it fails.

Agreed. But thousands of people don't go on national radio in an effort to find the father a year and a half later knowing little or nothing about the father.

Anyone who thinks she is a laughing stock is clearly too immature to see that she is actually doing the right thing by her child by making an effort to find the father.
Is she really doing the right thing or is she a gold digger? We don't know her true motives for wanting to find the father? Why did she wait so long?
Of course she could be genuine but don't assume she is and berate other people for inferring otherwise?[/QUOTE]

Wreck

NorfolkEnchants wrote: »

This thread is getting off point a little

I agree, apologies. Back on topic, I strongly disagree with the atitude of a lot of posters which can be summed up as 'drunken slapper gets what she deserves and should not try to find the father', while praising the guy for getting his hole and 'getting away with it'.

kraggy

Mirror wrote: »

Yes, it does. Let's say there was a nurse living in your town named Roisin. And she had a baby five months ago. And she's not married. Would you not be able to put two and two together?

Most would.

Perhaps she's not from a small town.

username123

industria wrote: »

Is she really doing the right thing or is she a gold digger? We don't know her true motives for wanting to find the father? Why did she wait so long?
Of course she could be genuine but don't assume she is and berate other people for inferring otherwise?

Why would she be called a gold digger at all? A man should be made to take on his financial responsibilities for his own child surely? If she found him and took him to court for maintenance she would only be awarded money to support the child - she herself wouldnt benefit - I dont understand how a girl can be construed as a gold digger for expecting a man to take on his financial responsibilities to a child that he played a part in bringing into the world?

Homer

kraggy wrote: »

Perhaps she's not from a small town.

All nurses are from small rural towns! Fact! Even small filipino towns!

woodyg

I wonder did she call the baby Jacqueline?

Adam

kraggy wrote: »

Perhaps she's not from a small town.

I didn't say a small town did I? If you knew her, the size of the town would be irrelevant! Honestly...

Adam

Wreck wrote: »

I agree, apologies. Back on topic, I strongly disagree with the atitude of a lot of posters which can be summed up as 'drunken slapper gets what she deserves and should not try to find the father', while praising the guy for getting his hole and 'getting away with it'.

stfu

I have sympathy for the child. But she was a dumb cow and it serves her right.

And point of fact, if men had the kids and women just "got their hole", I'd be calling the guy a dumb cow.

While gently rubbing my also inevitably impregnated belly.

NorfolkEnchants

Wreck wrote: »

I agree, apologies. Back on topic, I strongly disagree with the atitude of a lot of posters which can be summed up as 'drunken slapper gets what she deserves and should not try to find the father', while praising the guy for getting his hole and 'getting away with it'.

This is what I mean by getting off topic. The original post was meant to give people a little laugh at the girl's situation, it was not intended to provoke a moralistic debate on the responsibilities of the father of the child.

All credit to the lad for getting his hole. That's the bottom line. I was in Coppers last night and didn't even get a sniff of hole, not a sniff. The football excuse, what a hero

Defenestrate

She probably told him to 'hoss it up de boss' too.

username123

Mirror wrote: »

But she was a dumb cow and it serves her right.

Nice - I hope you never have a daughter who has to come home and tell you she is pregnant from a one night stand with a stranger.

Ciaran B

Dave! wrote: »

Something tells me the dad is gone to ground! :eek:

I'd say the babydaddy was on the first flight back to Brum after that radio broadcast.

Wreck

Mirror wrote: »

stfu

I have sympathy for the child. But she was a dumb cow and it serves her right.

And point of fact, if men had the kids and women just "got their hole", I'd be calling the guy a dumb cow.

While gently rubbing my also inevitably impregnated belly.

Sorry but I guess we are just going to have to disagree. Imo, the man is equally responsible. Calling her a dumb cow is just unwarranted. Fair enough, having uprotected sex is a really stupid thing to do, but we don't even know if this is the case. And if having unprotected sex is a stupid thing, it follows that the man did a stupid thing also, so why are you not refering to him as a 'dumb cow'?

NorfolkEnchants

Ciaran B wrote: »

I'd say the babydaddy was on the first flight back to Brum after that radio broadcast.

Reckon babydaddy had to leave Brum due to a similar scenario over there?

Imhof Tank

This sounds a lot like Roddy Doyle's The Snapper

Rosin the Nurse = Sharon
Birmingham Footballer = Fictional Spanish Sailor
?? = Georgie Burgess

"

Adam

username123 wrote: »

Nice - I hope you never have a daughter who has to come home and tell you she is pregnant from a one night stand with a stranger.

I hope I meet you some night, ride the bladder o' ye and plant my little seed. Then you can deal with our daughter when she's dumb enough to do like poor old Roisin there.

P.S. If you wish for a more intellectual debate on the matter, please attempt to actually address my post. Alternatively, you can call 1890-555-****OFF to speak to a representative. Who will probably tell you to fuck off...

Homer

NorfolkEnchants wrote: »

This is what I mean by getting off topic. The original post was meant to give people a little laugh at the girl's situation, it was not intended to provoke a moralistic debate on the responsibilities of the father of the child.

All credit to the lad for getting his hole. That's the bottom line. I was in Coppers last night and didn't even get a sniff of hole, not a sniff. The football excuse, what a hero

Couldn't have put it better myself!



/off to practice english accent and my keepie uppy skills to impress potential wimmenz/

Reku

Wreck wrote: »

The fact that giving out inaccurate infromation would be pointless and self-defeating given she is trying to find the guy lends to the credibility of her statments. This is not the same thing as accepting something as 'Gospel'.

Seeking a guy who's name she doesn't even know, using memories recalled through the haze of a drunken one nighter sounds pretty pointless to me, more to the point intentions and the strength of them have SFA to do with credibility, seriously go look up the word as clearly you have little idea of its meaning.
Once more I state that the information supplied by her could be completely inaccurate and is proabably at least partly so, and as she's a twit for wasting peoples' time trying to deal with her mistake.

The lad was a fool for sleeping with someone who didn't even know his name as for all he knew she may have been under age or riddled with STDs.

The baby is misfortunate, not just for the circumstances of its conception and the absense of its father, but also for the fact that it was born to a mum who's clearly either not the brightest or not of sound mind. Lets all hold our breath for when the mum goes on the national radio to try find the baby's binky, which she can't remember the colour of and can't remember what date it was lost on.:rolleyes:


This is not the first incident of it's kind, a teenager (underage) was out celebrating her JC results a few years ago and had much the same happen, lad over on holidays from the UK hooks up with her, has his way & goes home, she turns out to be pregnant and family are furious, try to find the lad with the details the girl remembers from her drunken fumble -> no luck. At least that girl I'd have simpathy for as she was just a teenager so some degree of stupidity as regards looking after herself while drunk is to be expected, Roisin is a fully grown woman and should behave as such & take responsibility for her own actions and subsequent decisions (e.g. to keep the child in spite of the father not being around).

Adam

Wreck wrote: »

Sorry but I guess we are just going to have to disagree. Imo, the man is equally responsible. Calling her a dumb cow is just unwarranted. Fair enough, having uprotected sex is a really stupid thing to do, but we don't even know if this is the case. And if having unprotected sex is a stupid thing, it follows that the man did a stupid thing also, so why are you not refering to him as a 'dumb cow'?

Holy **** on a stick! :eek: Did you read my post???

Mirror wrote:

And point of fact, if men had the kids and women just "got their hole", I'd be calling the guy a dumb cow.

I don't think Roisin is the only dumb one around here... :rolleyes:

Wreck

Mirror wrote: »

Holy **** on a stick! :eek: Did you read my post???
I don't think Roisin is the only dumb one around here... :rolleyes:

Yes I did.You said

if men had the kids I'd be calling the guy a dumb cow

This is clearly not the case.
I asked given that both of them did this stupid thing, why do you not refer to the guy as a 'dumb cow'.

Tigger

i'd say she wouldn't recognise him if he pulled her over for driving on a provisional

TwoShedsJackson

A nurse called Roisin, picked up whilst drunk in Coppers. Some stereotypes do hold up it seems

username123

farohar wrote: »

The lad was a fool for sleeping with someone who didn't even know his name as for all he knew she may have been under age or riddled with STDs.

+1

Totally agree with that. I think there is a degree of foolishness on both sides.

melekalikimaka

this is all so funny.

wreck your great, defended the "underdog" all the way through, give this man a nobel prize for his humanitarian work


and get this girl a chasity belt

Tigger

Wreck wrote: »

This is clearly not the case.
I asked given that both of them did this stupid thing, why do you not refer to the guy as a 'dumb cow'.

why do people come on boards to pick at each other
do they do it in real life

only people who have regrets are stupid for doing things
the copper in question (sorry some bloke over for the footie)
got his hole and now is probably laughing to him self after hearing darcy the other morning thinking "that coulda been me"

she however is the laughying stock of the buff nurses association of ireland not knowing to use adequate protection

username123

Mirror wrote: »

Holy **** on a stick! :eek: Did you read my post???

Yes - your posts are the ramblings of an idiot.

Kinetic^

She got fùcked!!!!!!!! :pac:

Defenestrate

Kinetic^ wrote: »

She got fùcked!!!!!!!! :pac:

That's how it works mate.

Kur4mA

I hope the guy doesn't remember the night/morning of it at all. They should rename the face LOLLERFACE JAX.

Wreck

farohar wrote: »

Seeking a guy who's name she doesn't even know, using memories recalled through the haze of a drunken one nighter sounds pretty pointless to me, more to the point intentions and the strength of them have SFA to do with credibility, seriously go look up the word as clearly you have little idea of its meaning.
Once more I state that the information supplied by her could be completely inaccurate and is proabably at least partly so, and as she's a twit for wasting peoples' time trying to deal with her mistake.

I'm not going to get into an argument about semantics, but I can assure you I fully understand the meaning of the word credibility.
Inaccurate or not, her recollection of the guy is all she has to go on. I don't see how she is wasting anyone's time, and I think trying to find the father is a reasonable thing to do. Given Darcy has a record for faciliating this kind of thing, it makes sense that she would contact the show in an attempt to find the father. Whether she is sucessful in doing so remains to be seen.

farohar wrote: »

Roisin is a fully grown woman and should behave as such & take responsibility for her own actions and subsequent decisions (e.g. to keep the child in spite of the father not being around).

There is nothing to suggest that she is not taking responsibility for her actions. Indeed, it seems to me that trying to find the father is the responsible thing to do.

username123

Wreck wrote: »

I'm not going to get into an argument about semantics, but I can assure you I fully understand the meaning of the word credibility.
Inaccurate or not, her recollection of the guy is all she has to go on. I don't see how she is wasting anyone's time, and I think trying to find the father is a reasonable thing to do. Given Darcy has a record for faciliating this kind of thing, it makes sense that she would contact the show in an attempt to find the father. Whether she is sucessful in doing so remains to be seen.



There is nothing to suggest that she is not taking responsibility for her actions. Indeed, it seems to me that trying to find the father is the responsible thing to do.

Absolutely agree with everything in this post

Homer

farohar wrote: »

Lets all hold our breath for when the mum goes on the national radio to try find the baby's binky, which she can't remember the colour of and can't remember what date it was lost on.:rolleyes:

Bwahahahahahahah classic!

melekalikimaka

Wreck wrote: »

There is nothing to suggest that she is not taking responsibility for her actions. Indeed, it seems to me that trying to find the father is the responsible thing to do.

its the right thing not the responsible thing.

are you in some way connected to this girl or experienced something similar, your arguements seem to push this.

tho i pity the girl, i have no doubt shes reading this, given the sites size and whatnot.

hi roisin


wonder if she'll call the kid jackie?

Wreck

melekalikimaka wrote: »

wreck your great, defended the "underdog" all the way through, give this man a nobel prize for his humanitarian work

I'd prefer some kind of cash reward please.

username123

melekalikimaka wrote: »

tho i pity the girl, i have no doubt shes reading this, given the sites size and whatnot.

If she is Id say she is delighted - regardless of what people think of her, the more people who read this and talk about it the better chance she has of tracking the guy down.

humanji

Mirror wrote: »

I hope I meet you some night, ride the bladder o' ye and plant my little seed. Then you can deal with our daughter when she's dumb enough to do like poor old Roisin there.

P.S. If you wish for a more intellectual debate on the matter, please attempt to actually address my post. Alternatively, you can call 1890-555-****OFF to speak to a representative. Who will probably tell you to fuck off...

I rang that number and it wouldn't connect

Anyway, as NorfolkEnchants said, this is all going off topic. The point is, it's very very funny if you're not involved.

Adam

username123 wrote: »

Yes - your posts are the ramblings of an idiot.

I thank you for your opinion. Excuse me a moment while I fail to give a crap.

Here's a picture of me trying to give a crap:http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/funny-pictures-black-cat-sees-caption.jpg

Homer

humanji wrote: »

I rang that number and it wouldn't connect

Anyway, as NorfolkEnchants said, this is all going off topic. The point is, it's very very funny if you're not involved.

+1

Which should be the population of the country minus 1



/ok 1 and a half if you include the bastard/

Adam

humanji wrote: »

I rang that number and it wouldn't connect

Anyway, as NorfolkEnchants said, this is all going off topic. The point is, it's very very funny if you're not involved.

Actually, it would be funnier if you were involved! As long as you weren't Roisin.

Or the kid.

pwd

kevin doyle is trying writing after not having much luck at reading

Reku

melekalikimaka wrote: »

its the right thing not the responsible thing.

are you in some way connected to this girl or experienced something similar, your arguements seem to push this.

+1 on both points.

In fact, can we blame the lad for disappearing, he meets some lass who doesn't ask his name and offers him a shag regardless, he then makes a hasty exit afterwards. Odds are the poor lad is thinking "wow, slept with a hooker and didn't even have to pay, best be careful not to run into her again or her pimp will break my legs!" Poor guy probably only realised in the morning he'd forgetten to visit a drink-link in his drunken stupor and then paniced at having to explain he couldn't pay. :P

username123

farohar wrote: »

In fact, can we blame the lad for disappearing, he meets some lass who doesn't ask his name and offers him a shag regardless, he then makes a hasty exit afterwards. Odds are the poor lad is thinking "wow, slept with a hooker and didn't even have to pay, best be careful not to run into her again or her pimp will break my legs!" Poor guy probably only realised in the morning he'd forgetten to visit a drink-link in his drunken stupor and then paniced at having to explain he couldn't pay. :P

She knew his first name. She could well have asked his surname but forgot it after the event. He may not have asked her name - they are equally as bad as each other, I dont understand why the girl is being referred to as being a hooker? The guy was just as much an equal party in it all.
If you think that a one night stand makes a girl a hooker then youre not living in the real world.

melekalikimaka

username123 wrote: »

She knew his first name. She could well have asked his surname but forgot it after the event. He may not have asked her name - they are equally as bad as each other, I dont understand why the girl is being referred to as being a hooker? The guy was just as much an equal party in it all.
If you think that a one night stand makes a girl a hooker then youre not living in the real world.

well i think hooker is meant loosely ( no pun intended...or is there...:D). hooker is meant in the way...she seems...SEEMS from the evidence to be easy, coppers, girl, sex... its typical coppers behavior, and everyone knows coppers girls are easy

http://youtube.com/watch?v=5wN1O63ix5c

thats yer daddy right there, its how he got her in the sack

Adam

username123 wrote: »

She knew his first name. She could well have asked his surname but forgot it after the event. He may not have asked her name - they are equally as bad as each other, I dont understand why the girl is being referred to as being a hooker? The guy was just as much an equal party in it all.
If you think that a one night stand makes a girl a hooker then youre not living in the real world.

It's you, isn't it? Because according to the article she does not know his name.

Kudos for the effort though!

username123

melekalikimaka wrote: »

well i think hooker is meant loosely ( no pun intended...or is there...:D). hooker is meant in the way...she seems...SEEMS from the evidence to be easy, coppers, girl, sex... its typical coppers behavior, and everyone knows coppers girls are easy

http://youtube.com/watch?v=5wN1O63ix5c

thats yer daddy right there, its how he got her in the sack

so why doesnt he seem easy then?
She went to coppers, met someone, had sex with them.
He went to coppers, met someone, had sex with them.

I dont see a difference in behaviour!

Dudess

DarkJager wrote: »

So she acted the slut and now wants to find the guy so she can reap the maintenance payments from him? Sounds like a nice girl alright.

She acted the slut? She had a one-night stand Do you have one-night stands? Or are you against them? What if you brought home a girl you really fancied and she didn't want sex - would you be pissed off? Calling her a frigid possibly?

Preset No.3 wrote: »

Id say her parents are really proud of the daughter they raised!:P

In these times of infecyion, std's etc, a nurse has unprotected sex. Yeh, real classy. Next she'll be suing coppers because they allowed her to get so drunk she had unprotected sex!!!! :mad:

marti101 wrote: »

And shes a nurse she must have **** for brains.Didnt she hear of the morning after pill or condoms,no wonder our health service is ****e.ESPECIALLY WITH "NURSES LIKE THAT"

Oh right. I didn't realise the onus was purely on the woman to use protection. Even though a condom is actually put on the penis... Interesting.

weemcd wrote: »

theres a part of me who hopes this chap gets away scot free...

But... he impregnated her

'Ol wrote:

What a dumbass! firstly for getting up the duff

Oh so she's a self-fertilising hermaphrodite type.

Deleted User wrote: »

She didn't have to carry it for 9 months. It was her decision to keep it.

Maybe she couldn't afford an abortion.

Mirror wrote: »

Women have a responsibility to themselves to not put themselves in this situation. If you're planning on bumping uglies with a guy, protection or not, you should at the least have his fecking name!

Look, if you're a guy who has one-night stands, what you've said above is just a huge joke.

Wreck wrote: »

The amount of undeserved abuse for this girl and double standards from alot of posters in this thread is unreal.The guy bears just as much responisbility for the pregnancy as she does. There is nothing wrong with having sex, so why all the abuse?

Oh there is if you're female and it's a one-night stand. Apparently females who have one-night stands have to drag guys into their bed and force penises into themselves and beat the guys into submitting to have their cocks sucked...

Silly, irresponsible girl who had sex with a silly, irresponsible boy.

And she may simply be curious as to who the father of her child is, how the **** do any of you know she's only chasing maintenance? And if the "poor" guy didn't want to father a child and later on get caught for maintenance, he should have used a condom. If she said she was on the pill, he should have still used a condom.

Can't believe the assholes here. You disgust me. Stop having one-night stands so if you're going to view the women whom you sleep with like that. Otherwise you're grotesque hypocrites. Think you can stop having those one-night stands? Nope, didn't think so...

brick tamland

in fairness how many lads havent had a one night stand with a nurse in coppers. its not like they go there for the music or the decor is it.

i'd be fairly sure that this lad is a policeman called sean or finbar and was just doing an accent:D

Homer

melekalikimaka wrote: »

http://youtube.com/watch?v=5wN1O63ix5c

thats yer daddy right there, its how he got her in the sack

What you're saying he was an overweight bob marley impersonator??

Surely that'll narrow the search down

melekalikimaka

username123 wrote: »

so why doesnt he seem easy then?
She went to coppers, met someone, had sex with them.
He went to coppers, met someone, had sex with them.

I dont see a difference in behaviour!

he's easy too, clearly.

but he's not the one with the baby is he

your some wally