Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

3D Mark 06 ?!

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭shrapnel222


    i ran 3dmark06. my set up is Q6600 on an abit x35pro board and GPU is an ati x1950pro. nothing overclocked i'm getting 5535. does that seem low to anyone? i'll try again when i overclock the cpu

    i've now overclocked my cpu to 3.3GHz and it's been running stable for a week or so, and just ran 3dmark06. the result is only 5686. not much of a boost to be honest. is the card that much of a bottleneck that there's so little difference or could there be something else i'm missing?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭BadCharlie


    I was getting around 4600points with a X1950Xt overclocked & on a 939 AMD 3700+ chip. I changed this card to a 8800GTS 2 weeks back and scored 6600points. Now i changed from Winxp to Vista and also a E6600 Core Duo and now scoring around 9500points.

    The video card i bought my self was real cheap on ebay & is alot better then i thought.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭ionapaul


    Just tried this on my new rig (Q6700, 4GB RAM, GTX 260 - nothing overclocked) and got 12607. Seems like an alright score...?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,434 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    You should be gettign higheer than that.
    I'd say up around the 15,000 mark.


  • Registered Users Posts: 683 ✭✭✭Scram


    just as i checked this post i thought id check the ATI site and sure enough 8.9 drivers are out;
    http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx?p=vista64/common-vista64


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 5,676 ✭✭✭jayteecork


    Got 13132 3DMarks on my new Ankermann computer, nothing overclocked.


    windows XP, Core 2 Duo e8400, and Nvidia Geforce 9800GTX+. 4GB RAM but XP only recognises 3GB being 32 bit.

    got like 237 on my laptop, lol. Integrated intel GMA 950.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭BadCharlie


    5th upgrade in 6months.

    http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=23389zy1.jpg

    23389

    i7 920 @ 4000mhz for this benchmark
    2x4850 (700/1100)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    E8600
    4Gb Ram
    1GB 4870

    14,700.

    06 always was a stupid measure of performance though with more modern hardware. My last setup was markedly inferior to my current on in terms of games performance but could easily pull a much faster 3dmark score (Q6600, 8800GTS 512MB)

    Remember my first time running 3dMark'06. Pentium 4 3.4Ghz, 1.5Gb Ram, 7600GT. Got 1.5K. :o


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,676 ✭✭✭jayteecork


    ionapaul wrote: »
    Just tried this on my new rig (Q6700, 4GB RAM, GTX 260 - nothing overclocked) and got 12607. Seems like an alright score...?

    Seems a bit low.
    I beat you and I have an inferior card (9800GTX+)


  • Registered Users Posts: 683 ✭✭✭Scram


    BadCharlie wrote: »
    5th upgrade in 6months.

    http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=23389zy1.jpg

    23389

    i7 920 @ 4000mhz for this benchmark
    2x4850 (700/1100)

    Christ almighty i know thats double my score! Seems Intel are top again.

    Jesus i only upgraded a few months and the upgrade did feck all really..went from a AMD X" 6000 to AMD Phenom x4 9850. Ive kept the same memory DDR2 800 would new memory DDR2 1066 boost my Score/preformance much?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Nope. Not at all really. Might give you a better/easier overclock though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭Silenceisbliss


    14879

    e6600 @ 3.6Ghz
    GTX260 (core 216) 700/1550/1300
    4GB PC8500


Advertisement