Britain's Most Active Terrorists

ageary08 · 02-10-2008 4:54pm

Gotta love sky news, or infact any 24 hours news service, if I watch any of them they do my head in after about 20 minutes because they just spout the same old crap.

Sky seem to be the worst and relentlessly harp on about the same topics, which usualy are

1. Terrorists (zomg evil durka durka men are gonna get us)
2. pedos or anything to do with child safety (lock up your kids !)
3. the royals

and of course a smattering of any other news staple such as the new great depression or global warming.

sunnyjim · 02-10-2008 6:38pm

RSF Cill Dara wrote: »

you are in no way a republican, sure u cant even spell it ! when did anti GFA republicans target civilians?

You're one to call people on spelling. How about checking your own. Perhaps even learn to punctuate properly...

Read Poccingtons post. Actually, read his other posts in this thread too.

RSF Cill Dara · 02-10-2008 6:42pm

Quinine wrote: »

Don't you know that 9/11 changed everything! Every other terrorist organisation disappeared and there are only Muslim terrorists now.

In the context of 800 years of struggle against the british,9/11 is irrelevant !

RSF Cill Dara · 02-10-2008 6:46pm

Poccington wrote: »

Why not?

you can not compare them as the IRA are a Liberation movement and the Al-Qaeda are nothing but scumbag terrorists

sunnyjim · 02-10-2008 6:52pm

Are you for real?!

Fratton Fred · 02-10-2008 6:53pm

RSF Cill Dara wrote: »

In the context of 800 years of struggle against the british,9/11 is irrelevant !

that's just plain stupid.

Fratton Fred · 02-10-2008 6:54pm

RSF Cill Dara wrote: »

you can not compare them as the IRA are a Liberation movement and the Al-Qaeda are nothing but scumbag terrorists

fixed that for ye

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar · 02-10-2008 7:04pm

i can't believe someone actually referenced '800 years' and wasn't doing it ironically.

Nehaxak · 02-10-2008 7:12pm

Country needs another civil war tbh, we never really settled the last one.

Gyalist · 02-10-2008 7:12pm

RSF Cill Dara wrote: »

you can not compare them as the IRA are a Liberation movement and the Al-Qaeda are nothing but scumbag terrorists

Of course you can since the main goal of al-Qaeda is to liberate Saudi Arabia from the presence of U.S. troops. Oops, I just remembered that this is After Hours where inconvenient things like facts are never allowed to get in the way of a good argument.

andrewlownie101 · 02-10-2008 7:21pm

what planet are you lot living on??

you need to have an enemy, real or imaginary. Without this the plebs would not willingly give up the few rights they had.

Nehaxak · 02-10-2008 7:24pm

Well, really now, Al Queda is only a continuation of the Nazi movement - funded I might say by the government of the very people they targetted.

Certain world governments needed a fake war, they got one, Osama Bush is winning either way.

It's 2008, Ireland has moved on and so has the bulk of it's citizens so really, people can fck off with bringing up the past as the debate about it'll just go on forever.
Both sides and everyone else in-between carried out attrocities for their causes/reasons, that fact is plainly clear.

Poccington · 02-10-2008 7:24pm

Nehaxak wrote: »

Well it would be like comparing the Irish defence forces with the British army. More or less the same people, same ideals, same type of people, full of british agents, both have worked with loyalist terrorists in the past and both have killed Irish people.

If we're comparing the IRA to Al Queda then it's only fair to compare the Irish defence forces to the UDA/UVF/UFF/British Army

Though of course there is more truth in the "Irish" (lol) defence forces being alligned and working with loyalist terrorists and British agents during the past troubles.

I'd really love to see how you plan on explaining such an argument.

Nehaxak · 02-10-2008 7:25pm

You do it all for me...

Poccington · 02-10-2008 7:25pm

RSF Cill Dara wrote: »

you can not compare them as the IRA are a Liberation movement and the Al-Qaeda are nothing but scumbag terrorists

Ah of course.

I forgot that 1 of the main factors in a liberation movement was the targeting of innocent civilians :rolleyes:

Poccington · 02-10-2008 7:26pm

Nehaxak wrote: »

You do it all for me...

Thanks ever so much.

You explained that really well.

carbsy · 02-10-2008 7:29pm

My grandfather was shot by the Black And Tans.... Up Eire!

andrewlownie101 · 02-10-2008 7:31pm

Hold on, what are you all debating about???

They are creating an enemy so they can take away your rights. End of story, forget your politics.

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar · 02-10-2008 7:44pm

Ron Paul 08

ageary08 · 02-10-2008 10:28pm

andrewlownie101 wrote: »

Hold on, what are you all debating about???

They are creating an enemy so they can take away your rights. End of story, forget your politics.

Its clearly the evil men in black and not the hysterical masses that are voting in governments that give people what the want (additional "security" )

From where im standing its nothing but politics.

Overheal · 02-10-2008 10:42pm

digitally-yours wrote: »

Just read the following story on sky news.I think its just complete rubbish
and no truth in it. Do you agree ?

just want to see what's the general option here.

Linky

when you think about it what are you more likely to find in Isreal: Islamic terrorists, or the IRA?

dlofnep · 02-10-2008 10:58pm

As an Irish Republican, I can safely say that they will do more damage than though. It's time for peace on this Island. I will always work for Irish Unity, but I think that an armed campaign pushes both societies apart rather than bring them together. Britain created the divide. We will created the Unity.

Four-Too · 03-10-2008 2:58am

Bottle_of_Smoke wrote: »

Seems like bull at first but you have to remember that after 9/11 & 7/7 Islamic terror makes much better headlines given they attack civillians primarily.

The IRA had hundreds of members, what exactly do you expect guys with no qualifications & lived all their life dedicating themselves to the cause to do nowadays?

Not trying to sound like a provo myself, I'm a complete supporter of the GFA & bloody well glad the RIRA is full of touts

The IRA members in my area anyway got huge payoffs for their service over the years - hence their big houses. Now where did this money come from??

Fratton Fred · 03-10-2008 8:02am

Four-Too wrote: »

The IRA members in my area anyway got huge payoffs for their service over the years - hence their big houses. Now where did this money come from??

monitoring elections in Columbia?

RSF Cill Dara · 03-10-2008 11:57pm

Fratton Fred wrote: »

that's just plain stupid.

what would a little ignorant english man know? **** all ? yeah

RSF Cill Dara · 04-10-2008 12:00am

Gyalist wrote: »

Of course you can since the main goal of al-Qaeda is to liberate Saudi Arabia from the presence of U.S. troops. Oops, I just remembered that this is After Hours where inconvenient things like facts are never allowed to get in the way of a good argument.

yes but different tactics for achiving their objectives!

RSF Cill Dara · 04-10-2008 12:02am

Poccington wrote: »

Ah of course.

I forgot that 1 of the main factors in a liberation movement was the targeting of innocent civilians :rolleyes:

the IRA never targeted civilians ! iv had this debate with you on another thread

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar · 04-10-2008 12:45am

(1) yes they did, you jackass.

(2) RSF_Cill_Dara banned for a week for personal insults

lostexpectation · 04-10-2008 12:51am

i shout into the wind and towards any non snarky non-r'its like a roman forum' deluded moderators, but why is this thread topic in after hours.

Nehaxak · 04-10-2008 11:54am

Uh, how is calling someone ignorant a personal insult and worthy of a ban ? Far as I'm concerned he was right.

Poccington · 04-10-2008 4:53pm

Nehaxak wrote: »

Uh, how is calling someone ignorant a personal insult and worthy of a ban ? Far as I'm concerned he was right.

"An ignorant little english man"

Looks a lot like a personal insult I reckon.

Poccington · 04-10-2008 4:54pm

RSF Cill Dara wrote: »

the IRA never targeted civilians ! iv had this debate with you on another thread

Yes, they quite blatantly did.

Nehaxak · 04-10-2008 6:51pm

There's an awful lot of ignorant people in here, not just one Englishman. Considering a lot of other comments and insults thrown around toward people in some of these threads, far as I can see it that RSF guy was just singled out by a mod for banning for no reason other than a difference of stated opinion and his perceived "insult" was used as an excuse toward that end.

As much as I don't agree with his points of political view, banning someone for them (or perception as such, far as I can see) is rediculous.

turgon · 04-10-2008 6:55pm

Mordeth wrote: »

you jackass....banned for a week for personal insults

The irony!!

AlmightyCushion · 04-10-2008 7:06pm

Nehaxak wrote: »

Uh, how is calling someone ignorant a personal insult and worthy of a ban ? Far as I'm concerned he was right.

Attack the post not the poster. If I called you a dickhead it would be personal abuse no matter how right someone thought it was. If someone is ignorant then it should shine through in their posts and as such someone can easily pick apart their post and show them how ignorant they are without saying it.

Nehaxak · 04-10-2008 7:46pm

Or use the ignore function, which I've just started to use now and thanks to this thread added a couple of people with ignorant/racist and/or just plain old anti Irish views. Don't see the point in arguing with loyalist terrorist sympathisers or anyone that comes anywhere near close to them, including british agents and their ilk in our own laughing stock of a defence force that's rediculed the world over, all 12 members.

I can't nor won't defend the indefensible of *some* past actions of the IRA but it's stupidly plain to see when the comments are coming mostly from those on the boards here who have expressed anti Irish views in the past and at the same time refused or went completely silent when loyalist terrorists, their supporters in the RUC and British establishment were brought up in regards the attrocites they carried out.

Poccington · 04-10-2008 7:56pm

Nehaxak wrote: »

their ilk in our own laughing stock of a defence force that's rediculed the world over, all 12 members.

You mustn't have spoken to many people about the Defence Forces if you think that.

SV · 05-10-2008 1:02am

Mordeth wrote: »

(1) you jackass.

(2) RSF_Cill_Dara banned for a week for personal insults

:rolleyes:

Bottle_of_Smoke · 05-10-2008 11:26am

bottle_of_smoke wrote:

Seems like bull at first but you have to remember that after 9/11 & 7/7 Islamic terror makes much better headlines given they attack civillians primarily.

The IRA had hundreds of members, what exactly do you expect guys with no qualifications & lived all their life dedicating themselves to the cause to do nowadays?

Not trying to sound like a provo myself, I'm a complete supporter of the GFA & bloody well glad the RIRA is full of touts

Four-Too wrote: »

The IRA members in my area anyway got huge payoffs for their service over the years - hence their big houses. Now where did this money come from??

Organised crime /Gaddafi/American donaters. I don't really see why that relates to anything that you've quoted me saying.

DanGerMus · 05-10-2008 9:50pm

Mordeth wrote: »

(1) yes they did, you jackass.

(2) RSF_Cill_Dara banned for a week for personal insults

Irony...dripping with...no? Intentional? Let's wait and see....

Papad · 05-10-2008 10:14pm

Mordeth wrote: »

(1) yes they did, you jackass.

(2) RSF_Cill_Dara banned for a week for personal insults

See, this is the reason why I use boards so little. The people who own this company are too blinkered to see how badly moderated it is (for the most part).

javaboy · 05-10-2008 10:49pm

KTRIC wrote: »

I for one welcome our Dissident Republican terrorist overlords

Someone had to say it

Why?

Britain's Most Active Terrorists

Comments