Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Airsoft News [READ FIRST POST BEFORE POSTING]

Options
1125126128130131327

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    OMFG-Argh.jpg


    GIMMMMEEEEEEEEEEE

    The ultimate suit gun!!!!!!!!!!


    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭Puding


    was wondering if this would ever see the light of day after the video at the shotshow, perfect for your milsim bodyguard duty or vip :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    and only 190 euro or so.

    Wonder if it would pass customs with the ban :D

    "whatcha mean a gun, its a box, i paid 200 dollars for a magpulbox, what about it!"


  • Registered Users Posts: 816 ✭✭✭gungun


    HOLY MOLEY!! thats box would be feckin deadly(well, you know:))


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Chuck the Buck


    Leftyflip wrote: »
    Awwhh Christ it's soo nasty! Ewwww!!
    I haz just died inside!

    You sir are a cad and a charlatan! Its 3p1c, its 1337, it pwns suxsors at 25 meters!!!!

    TheDoc wrote: »
    and only 190 euro or so.

    Wonder if it would pass customs with the ban :D

    "whatcha mean a gun, its a box, i paid 200 dollars for a magpulbox, what about it!"

    Its not an airsoft gun just a shell so it may not come under the ban, and you can be sure someone over here will get a few in. Ebaybanned will have it at some point and 'ship to you soon'!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,758 ✭✭✭Stercus Accidit


    Ha ha, that's pretty cool.

    Will richies hatred of glocks cause him some confusing thoughts?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭Stonewolf


    TheDoc wrote: »
    "whatcha mean a gun, its a box, i paid 200 dollars for a magpulbox, what about it!"

    It's magpul, they'll understand


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,021 ✭✭✭Hivemind187


    goddamit!!!

    I promised myself I wouldnt spend any more money on airsoft until after I graduated but I also promised myself one of these if they ever made it ... I am NEVER going to have ANY money.

    ... it's soooooo cool though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭rossism


    a glock in a box, a glock out of a box. seems pointless to me.........


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Chuck the Buck


    rossism wrote: »
    a glock in a box, a glock out of a box. seems pointless to me.........

    there is a point, allow me to elaborate:

    1. It says Magpul on it
    2. It'll hide your Glock
    3. Its Magpul for a Glock
    4. Its made by Magpul
    5. Did I mention it says Magpul on the side?
    6. It goes FLICK


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,021 ✭✭✭Hivemind187


    there is a point, allow me to elaborate:

    1. It says Magpul on it
    2. It'll hide your Glock
    3. Its Magpul for a Glock
    4. Its made by Magpul
    5. Did I mention it says Magpul on the side?

    6. it goes FLICK. F*** sake what more do you want? :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 185 ✭✭rossism


    there is a point, allow me to elaborate:

    1. It says Magpul on it
    2. It'll hide your Glock
    3. Its Magpul for a Glock
    4. Its made by Magpul
    5. Did I mention it says Magpul on the side?

    valid points i suppose :rolleyes:, however there are better ways to spend money other than magpul gucciness. *awaits backlash from magpul fanboys*


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,778 ✭✭✭Sod'o swords


    rossism wrote: »
    valid points i suppose :rolleyes:, however there are better ways to spend money other than magpul gucciness. *awaits backlash from magpul fanboys*

    If that was the cause i'm sure most of the people posting in this thread would of lost interest in airsoft a long time ago.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,829 ✭✭✭Stone.cold


    well i was wrong heres me thinking the tavor and the SA80 were the most hideous guns i was likely to see...... but i was wrong that thing is just down right nasty


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Chuck the Buck


    6. it goes FLICK.
    CHRIST ON A BIKE!!!!!!! EPPPPPPPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    rossism wrote: »
    however there are better ways to spend money other than magpul gucciness.
    Yes thats right, the only way to win a magpul gucciness fight is with a Magpul FMG (With magpul speed plate on the mag of course!)

    Stone.cold wrote: »
    well i was wrong heres me thinking the tavor and the SA80 were the most hideous guns i was likely to see...... but i was wrong that thing is just down right nasty

    Quiet you!!! :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,401 ✭✭✭Shiva


    there is a point, allow me to elaborate:

    1. It says Magpul on it
    2. It'll hide your Glock
    3. Its Magpul for a Glock
    4. Its made by Magpul
    5. Did I mention it says Magpul on the side?
    6. It goes FLICK

    Jesus Richie.....I hope Charlie doesn't find out you stole his password.


  • Registered Users Posts: 622 ✭✭✭ZeroSignal


    Bloody hell. Airsofters certainly are an excitable bunch. :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,438 ✭✭✭✭thermo


    It looks like magpul have taken a leaf out of the IWI book and created something truly ugly!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,099 ✭✭✭Tommyboy71


    thermo wrote: »
    It looks like magpul have taken a leaf out of the IWI book and created something truly ugly!

    Oi. Back in your box.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,438 ✭✭✭✭thermo


    Tommyboy71 wrote: »
    Oi. Back in your box.

    Nope I'm out now and I'll throw my opinions around like the rest of ya!!:rolleyes:

    Is there no depths magpul won't sink to??


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 11,001 ✭✭✭✭Masada


    Ugly = good in the gun world. ie, the Tavor,

    AK's come under the catagory of "filthy" and will remain there...

    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭Stonewolf


    Tommyboy71 wrote: »
    Oi. Back in your box.

    Back in his magpul box?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭bullets


    I want! Yum Yum.

    In the late 80's/Early 90's I saw in some magazine
    A Photo a foldable machine gun that looked like an innocent case
    that was in the making, it was bigger than Pistol size but wanted
    one ever since! This one does not look the same but its better!

    Wonder if the Marushin G21 Maxi Shell Ejecting Glock would
    fit in it.

    ~B


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭MindPhuck


    ahh man, thats a sweeet looking gun.

    Time to shine up my glock and gets my black suit and shades out :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Firekitten


    Ok, first, its not that ugly... i mean, its functional... i like the concept... very sneaky. Magpull did once again however... rip off another design... this one being originally Russian.

    As for the Tavor and Sa80 being ugly... i beg to differ.... How can anyone that likes multicam and magpul stuff have the right to comment on taste or style?

    :rolleyes:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 11,001 ✭✭✭✭Masada


    Easy, like this,

    SA80 is the fat chick of the gun world. they have their uses but ya don't brag about using it to yore mates, and when your done with it, it goes back in its box out of sight, out of mind.

    The Tavor is in the same boat, only Mac, a multicam totting genius saved it a little.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Firekitten


    the sa80 isn't remotely fat... your masadas are chunkier... Infact its slim and angular.... like a model.... the only place masada's could model is in a plus size catalogue. :P (to use your own analogy against you)


    I do find it amusing you belive mac 'likes' multicam. And that he isnt simply wearing what hes paid to wear by the tv show's sponsors. This isnt really the place for this... because i can just see it taking off again where we dont want it to.

    I just resent the constant implication that certain things are 'ugly' because one group of users, with no more right than any other user, says so. Sounds a bit like bullying to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭MindPhuck


    Masada wrote: »
    Easy, like this,

    SA80 is the fat chick of the gun world. they have their uses but ya don't brag about using it to yore mates, and when your done with it, it goes back in its box out of sight, out of mind.

    The Tavor is in the same boat, only Mac, a multicam totting genius saved it a little.

    i like voluptuous chicks... do you mind :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭mcshape


    MindPhuck wrote: »
    i like voluptuous chicks... do you mind :)

    +1


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 947 ✭✭✭Frank the Manc


    Firekitten wrote: »
    Ok, first, its not that ugly... i mean, its functional... i like the concept... very sneaky. Magpull did once again however... rip off another design... this one being originally Russian.

    As for the Tavor and Sa80 being ugly... i beg to differ.... How can anyone that likes multicam and magpul stuff have the right to comment on taste or style?

    :rolleyes:


    yeah thats how Magpul roll alright.

    heres something people have done for years, lets reverse engineer it & fabricate it from a new polymer & make a load of money off a load of eejits.

    Who did the original in Russia? I always thought it was a Stoner design.
    One of the original designs:
    450pxucm215389291.jpg

    Still though if you got that, a bad auld pennies rugby jersey & a quiff you could start slinging "Nuke" to all the junkers along the boardwalk.
    Robocop2-stylee
    600pxboatman35120980.jpg


Advertisement