Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Frequency automation

Options
  • 05-08-2008 7:52pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,182 ✭✭✭


    Do you automate a frequency for certain parts of a vocal track? I was co engineering a session with Stefano Soffia last Saturday for a boards member and he mentioned this?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭sei046


    Never really thought of it to be honest. It seems a little like an overly complicated way of getting vocals to stand out/ sit back. I presume thats why? I could be wrong. The nearest I do to that is possibly a but of multiband compression.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,182 ✭✭✭dav nagle


    I have come across the odd vocal take here and there and the odd word needs an extra boost in the higher end and well I suppose this is a way of going about it. I remember one time I selected a phrase and changed the frequency but it sounded way to out of place so automating the frequency might sound more natural, wind and the likes you know?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭PaulBrewer


    Jaysus, If that's your only problem yer laughin' !


  • Registered Users Posts: 843 ✭✭✭trackmixstudio


    I would certainly do this sometimes. If you have trouble getting a snare to cut through a dense mix in certain parts of song, it is often helpful to automate a wideband boost in the attack of the sound just for the problem section.
    Or instead of pulling back the volume of rhythm guitars during a guitar solo I would often automate the high mids to come come back slightly so all the low mids don't drop out of the mix.
    I would also use a deesser sometimes (only if absolutely necessary), which is an automatic, frequency specific automation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Seziertisch


    It is the reason some eqs have side chains.

    I know it gets used (not necessarily always on vocals) in a live context quite a bit. Say you've got a heavy guitar sound which needs to sound the way it does when it is playing on its own but is inclined to swamp the vocals. As soon as the singer starts the guitar sound (or whatever) is side chain eq'ed (fed by the vocals) to remove or mellow certain frequencies which compete with the vocals.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,182 ✭✭✭dav nagle


    This is very interesting lads, thanks:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    That's a real Mutt Lange thing right there.
    That happens all the time, and on multiband compressors on vocals too.
    I use two seperate tracks for verse and chorus alot of the time...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,759 ✭✭✭Neurojazz


    Well, if one word needs work.... you cut/slice part - and duplicate track...

    Using something like a dynamic eq to affect the sound how you want.. render... reinsert slice... bobs your uncle.

    A high quality De-esser sometimes may not perform well over the whole passage, so sometimes the slice treatment does the trick on the problem words.


  • Registered Users Posts: 308 ✭✭tweeky


    you gotta do what you gotta do, frequency auto, autotune auto, desser auto
    Ampfarm auto, and that's after comping the bejazus of the Vocal/Gtr/Drums etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 440 ✭✭teamdresch


    Do you mean automating an Eq plugin on or off on one section of a song?
    Sure, all the time.
    For one word or two here and there on a vocal?
    It's happened, but not too often.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement