Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) - advice

  • 08-08-2008 5:49pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 227 ✭✭


    Has anyone done one?

    I've a student trying to optimise at the moment and I'll fully admit I'm not great at molecular technique theory (I view it akin to witchcraft, if Harry Potter had attempted site-directed mutagenesis I wouldn't have thought anything of it).

    We've nice clean genomic DNA in high yields, the antibodies were good and our primers are good.

    The problem, it seems, is that genomic DNA is very sticky and our bead and IgG controls are seeing amplification.

    Any ChIP experts here who can give advice?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭tenandtracer


    Are you blocking the beads? If not try this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17 Mooch


    Without seeing your protocol, it's difficult to try to trouble shoot. As tenandtracer said, blocking is very important. You could also try increasing the stringency of your washes following your IP, by varying the salt/detergent concentration.
    Alternatively, you could try to use dot blotting and southern hybridisation as a read-out instead of PCR.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 227 ✭✭Syke


    Mooch wrote: »
    Without seeing your protocol, it's difficult to try to trouble shoot. As tenandtracer said, blocking is very important. You could also try increasing the stringency of your washes following your IP, by varying the salt/detergent concentration.
    Alternatively, you could try to use dot blotting and southern hybridisation as a read-out instead of PCR.

    Thanks for this.

    The blocking was fairly stringent. It was actually an issue of gDNA vs cycle number (and primerdesign to some extent). Getting nice readouts now.


Advertisement