Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Who goes? Eviction 9
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
sharpshooterH wrote: »
haha. 2 b honest i cudn care less about stu bu i tink sum ppl take dis way 2 seriously.0 -
-
-
Mr.FuknDedlyGuy wrote: »haha. 2 b honest i cudn care less about stu bu i tink sum ppl take dis way 2 seriously.
You are not on your phone , you are on a Forum
so can you please put all the letter's in your words.;)0 -
-
sharpshooterH wrote: »You are not on your phone , you are on a Forum
so can you please put all the letter's in your words.;)
yes thats fine but i would have rathered being asked nicely.:)0 -
-
Mr.FuknDedlyGuy wrote: »ignorant ppl dont deserve all of my keyboard. no need 2 get agressiv just cuz ur wrong;):D
Ignorant is posting in txtspk which is pretty much impossible to read. The second part of your post is quite simply idiotic. I don't need to ask you nicely. You are being rude the minute you post that drivel.
Nobody is taking anything too seriously, it's a discussion. People can and will have differing opinions.Ann22 wrote:I don't think anyone in there has tried to gain the sympathy vote as much as Rachel has tbh. That was way over the top today the way she went on about the goldfish. I've always suspected she was being too martyrlike but that just made up my mind.
Being upset over the goldfish isn't looking for sympathy though, I don't see how that would make people feel sorry for her. It hardly compares to "I miss my daughter soooooooooooo much". No had you said that Rachel being upset over the goldfish shows that she wants people to think she's super nice, then yeah there'd be a lot I'm sure who would agree with you. Personally I reckon Rachel is just a nice girl who is a little naive and is probably the type who would easily cry over stuff...like animal rescue centre ads on the tv That doesn't make her manipulative or sly like Stu.Ann22 wrote:The way she fusses over 'Mikeeee!' really gets on my nerves and then today when she declared she was giving her medal to Kat! She could've given it to her without telling the whole nation.
She's being helpful to Mikey and if he had a major problem with it he'd tell ehr where to go. He's not exactly the type to hold his tongue now is he?
As for the medal, I think she did it for Kat and wanted people to see Kat have it. It could also be seen as Rachel declaring the unity of herself and Kat because in fairness, the pair of them get a lot of shít from other people in there and they support each other greatly. Remember the letters from home? She didn't tell the housemates at the time that she had forfeited her own letter so that the Hell housemates could get theirs. She's a nice girl. I'll never understand the cynicism and suspicion people have towards those who are genuinely nice.0 -
I don't think anyone in there has tried to gain the sympathy vote as much as Rachel has tbh. That was way over the top today the way she went on about the goldfish. I've always suspected she was being too martyrlike but that just made up my mind. The way she fusses over 'Mikeeee!' really gets on my nerves and then today when she declared she was giving her medal to Kat! She could've given it to her without telling the whole nation.
Ann , hi , did you not see the programme ?
She was put in charge of the goldfish by BB and made responsible for them.
She did everything on the laminate provided by BB and " Heaven
Died"
Something to do with a disease that fish get.
Mikey is her friend and so is Kat , I don't see the harm in giving her medal to Kat.
In all this Everyone is forgetting about Heaven who did the very thing Stu was saying all along , (I am dying to get out of here).0 -
Ignorant is posting in txtspk which is pretty much impossible to read. The second part of your post is quite simply idiotic. I don't need to ask you nicely. You are being rude the minute you post that drivel.
Jeeze don't cry. if it was impossible to read then how did you answer my question, which was not idiotic i simply asked you whether you thought stu was really a fake. of course you need to ask me nicely its called manners. "txtspk" isn't ignorance its laziness. you did take it too seriously, you nearly soiled yourself when you thought that someone actually didn't love rachel. if people can have their own opinions then why did you kick off so easily
?????? 0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
Mr.FuknDedlyGuy wrote: »yes thats fine but i would have rathered being asked nicely.:)
You missed out on the smilies at the end of each sentence then ,more like
than you knew.:D 0 -
Mr.FuknDedlyGuy wrote: »Jeeze don't cry. if it was impossible to read then how did you answer my question, which was not idiotic i simply asked you whether you thought stu was really a fake. of course you need to ask me nicely its called manners. "txtspk" isn't ignorance its laziness. you did take it too seriously, you nearly soiled yourself when you thought that someone actually didn't love rachel. if people can have their own opinions then why did you kick off so easily??????
ROFL! You think that was me "kicking off"....wow. I couldn't give a crap if you don't like Rachel. I disagree with your opinion, it's allowed. I'm hardly sitting here frothing at the mouth because you like Stu and don't like Rachel. You've actually made me laugh out loud with that one...love it. I'll make my point and you can make yours (although a bit more than 'Rachel is fake Stu is sound' might make for a better discussion). If you think that was me being irate I would suggest you avoid some of the other more serious forums. I'm going to assume you're new to message boards in general as you don't seem to get how they work.
Posting in txtspk is very much frowned upon on message boards. It's seen as rude and ignorant and some forums will ban you for using it. Therefore you are showing bad manners to those who post here and as such you shouldn't be surprised when people tell you to give it up.
Now, how about we get back on topic yeah?0 -
-
-
-
sharpshooterH wrote: »You missed out on the smilies at the end of each sentence then ,more like than you knew.:D
aw no i wasn't talking about you i meant chinaface. i dont really care that much anyway. again, im loving that mikey cartoon thingey. nice.0 -
Hi Sharpshooter I did see the programme. I could well be wrong,I know a lot of folk will disagree but to me I just felt the whole shebang was an act. I felt the exaggerated fussing over them just didn't ring true. I don't see anything wrong with her giving the medal to Kat but she just had to draw attention to it. Again I could be wrong.
Rach , testing the water's at the begining .
Rach , trying to figure out who her friends are.
Rach , now
Hope she Doesn't go.:)0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement