Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Greens pushing to reduce speed limits

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,122 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    BTW Dan Boyle has been a boards.ie user for years. He's posted in the motors section before, although he hasn't been around since he got his promotion...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭steveone


    the greatest single bunch of <SNIP>, the green party,,


    saving us from ourselves, they make suicide an option..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,088 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Ah yet another ridiculous, impractical (after all, they can't enforce the limits we have) nanny-state idea from the Greens backed up by an organisation fronted by a TV presenter who just doesn't know when to leave (kinda like the Simpsons really! :D)

    Maybe if the politicians were serious about reducing CO2 emmisions - this year's political buzzwords - they'd start lobbying places like China about the number of coal-fired plants they have and are still building, but nope it's a lot easier to be seen to do something, than actually do something which is after all about the only thing our politicians excel at!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,984 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Next thing you know the we'll only be given four options of car depending on our needs.
    No more 2+ litre cars at all.
    No cars that do less than 20 MPG in City locations.
    etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,088 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    kippy wrote: »
    Next thing you know the we'll only be given four options of car depending on our needs.
    No more 2+ litre cars at all.
    No cars that do less than 20 MPG in City locations.
    etc etc
    If the Greens (and some of the posters here and in Commuting/Transport) had their way, we'd all be getting buses/trains or cycling/walking everywhere.

    Yet ironically they've no problem in taking their cut of motor tax, fuel costs, VRT etc. Hypocritical? You decide..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭steveone


    kippy wrote: »
    Next thing you know the we'll only be given four options of car depending on our needs.
    No more 2+ litre cars at all.
    No cars that do less than 20 MPG in City locations.
    etc etc

    INGSOC


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭steveone


    i see my post was snipped. perhaps the term "pathetic humans" would have sufficed, i suppose i shouldn't lower the tone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭AugustusMaximus


    unkel wrote: »
    BTW Dan Boyle has been a boards.ie user for years. He's posted in the motors section before, although he hasn't been around since he got his promotion...

    I'd be very interested if Dan will reply in this thread.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,234 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I'm confused.
    I thought that Mary White was the one who came out with stupid ideas for the greens. I know this idea is stupid but by Dan Boyle coming out with it, does this mean that its more stupid than a Mary White idea or less stupid?
    Still, its a stupid idea nonetheless.

    Maybe they should go the whole hog and ban any form of transport.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,259 ✭✭✭Rowley Birkin QC


    2793523787_257ca1abb6.jpg?v=0

    :D:D

    His future prospects of making friends don't look too good either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Joker wrote: »
    I'm disgusted at Fianna Fáil, I thought they had some control over these despicable fools.

    Not over what they say, but FF tends to be well able to curtail the implementation of the ideas when incompatible with the national will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,722 ✭✭✭maidhc


    bigkev49 wrote: »
    2793523787_257ca1abb6.jpg?v=0

    :D:D

    His future prospects of making friends don't look too good either.

    dbtd?

    he will have to wait at least 4 more years before he can use that username :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 773 ✭✭✭D_murph


    VH wrote: »
    thats me done with this thread

    good and dont let the door hit you on the way out :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,259 ✭✭✭Rowley Birkin QC


    Anyone hear Dan on The Last Word the other evening?

    He seemed to totally back away from this proposal as a serious measure towards the end of the interview when Matt Cooper was asking him if he would actually like to see it implemented.

    Flying this particular kite obviously didn't go according to plan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,339 ✭✭✭congo_90


    this is just another big scam to punish the average joe, increase frustration and get more "speeding" tickets. We're slowly losing all freedom like the new drinking law.

    My car runs at its best at around 100km/h +-5km/h. At that speed its using minimum fuel in "the sweet spot". By reducing speeds on primary roads (which I spend a lot of time on), It will Increase my fuel consumption!!

    This proposal just has bad news all over it and I can safely say they will get it.

    Thats my 2cents


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,123 ✭✭✭stepbar


    I'd like to see them try and bring that one in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    pburns wrote: »
    The move is aping similar legislation in Spain and Germany.

    So...whatya think?

    I think it's bollox - and here's why: No to Speed Limits

    More

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,613 ✭✭✭Lord Nikon


    Tbh, we're all worrying about nothing. I know the majority of us in here go over the speed limit at some time of the day, what difference will it make if the new limits are introduced? Probably none.

    This idea ranks up there with their new "planning permission to build a patio in your back garden, to prevent bad flooding" idea. Ha ha, bollox.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Caoimhín wrote: »
    Another daft hippie idea from the tofu munchers.

    Hey less of the Hippy bashing please! :) I'm a Hippy, but would NEVER vote green.

    Listened to their cuckoo brained idea 11 years ago about diesel being 'the thing'. Now, it's public enemy #1.

    The green party should come with a health warning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    And you just know if they get away with this, that's it; the limits will stay the same forever. Look at the USA, they lowered the limits in the 70s due to the fuel crisis and they stayed that way for more than 20 years :eek:

    Fcuking Greens, obviously decent public transport isn't possible to make happen so let's just penalise people wth no alternative. Again.

    Than again, by allowing them into governmant the Irish

    have only themselves to blame. *Rubs hands in anticiaption of next general election* Cnuts.

    Totally agree with every ducking word above. Another angle for me is these tax hungry vultures know there will be uproar if they slap any tax on in these eerie times. So these duckers lower the speed limit people forget and hey presto, Gatso/Fardai have another E80 in the governments coffers.

    But what the he’ll, someone voted these trash into power.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    unkel wrote: »
    BTW Dan Boyle has been a boards.ie user for years. He's posted in the motors section before, although he hasn't been around since he got his promotion...


    Oh, we not good enough for him now? Hehe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Decoda


    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=114079637#post114079637

    Current thread here.....for anyone caught in the 12 year time warp.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,362 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Hey less of the Hippy bashing please! :) I'm a Hippy, but would NEVER vote green.

    Listened to their cuckoo brained idea 11 years ago about diesel being 'the thing'. Now, it's public enemy #1.

    The green party should come with a health warning.
    Totally agree with every ducking word above. Another angle for me is these tax hungry vultures know there will be uproar if they slap any tax on in these eerie times. So these duckers lower the speed limit people forget and hey presto, Gatso/Fardai have another E80 in the governments coffers.

    But what the he’ll, someone voted these trash into power.
    Oh, we not good enough for him now? Hehe

    Your replying to posts made 12 years ago dude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,634 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    bazz26 wrote: »
    Your replying to posts made 12 years ago dude.


    I am? Damn I put greens decreasing speed limit into search and this came up.

    Apologies Mods please feel free to delete if so rsauired.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 12,514 Mod ✭✭✭✭byhookorbycrook


    I drive a particular N route more days . A part ( 80 ph) of it is where one would normally overtake as it is wide and straight . The speed van sits at the point you’d normally overtake, it’s there 3 days a week. Revenue gathering and damn all ok o do with safety .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,987 ✭✭✭mikeym




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,362 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    I drive a particular N route more days . A part ( 80 ph) of it is where one would normally overtake as it is wide and straight . The speed van sits at the point you’d normally overtake, it’s there 3 days a week. Revenue gathering and damn all ok o do with safety .

    Well if you don't want to be shot in a barrel then don't be the fish in it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭i57dwun4yb1pt8


    it lives again, kill it with fire ..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    I drive a particular N route more days . A part ( 80 ph) of it is where one would normally overtake as it is wide and straight . The speed van sits at the point you’d normally overtake, it’s there 3 days a week. Revenue gathering and damn all ok o do with safety .

    You do know that it costs more to implement the go safe vans than what they generate in revenue?


Advertisement