Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

2005 BMW 520d - Manual or Auto

Options
2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭Climate Expert


    Balfa wrote: »

    Torque converters waste a percentage of torque. Hence they're slower and less efficient. By what amount will obviously vary.
    Also, comparing the top speeds of a 4 speed auto vs 6 speed manual is pointless, because (a) no one actually drives at the top speed and (b) it's usually electronically limited. Looking at numbers that matter, there's no way a 4 speed auto could accelerate quicker than a well-driven 6 speed manual with a couple of extra horses (due to not wasting them in the torque converter).

    Finally: It probably doesn't apply much to someone buying a 520d, but if someone's looking for a sporty car, an auto is an awful damper on the handling: Because it's not directly connected to the wheels through a clutch plate, and because it's hard to keep it in the gear you want, the throttle response is awful, and you can't really steer the car using the accelerator, and it removes a significant amount from the driving experience.
    Hey you know what you are talking about. Thats not allowed on motors.


Advertisement