Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why can't people accept that I have lost my faith??

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    kelly1 wrote: »
    ...Terrible crimes have happended but that does not diminish God's power to operate through His ministers.


    But Noel don't you see that the mere fact that he has "to operate through His ministers" diminishes his supposed power to most non RC's not just atheists. If tomorrow I were to believe in god the only thing that would change is that I would believe in god (don't hold your breath :rolleyes:) Something declared as powerful as your god needs no middle man or a civil service.
    Also what was wrong with eastern philosophies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    MrPudding wrote: »
    I think you are still missing my point. I am way way beyond worrying about the church now. The behaviour of the church and the individuals within it caused me to question not only that church but also christianity in general and then the existence of god. It was a kind of gradual process where questioning one thing led me to question the next and so on.
    Why would the CC cause you to lose faith in Jesus? Did he ever do or say anything, in the bible, that made you question His claim to be the Son of God? Was He somehow flawed in your opinion?
    MrPudding wrote: »
    News flash Kelly1, in case you missed the clues, I am not a catholic.
    I'm fully aware of that MrP! I'm trying to address the root of the problem.
    MrPudding wrote: »
    Each to their own. My discovery, covered by point 3 in the charter, has made my life so much happier. It now makes sense. Everything.
    Excellent. Would you like to enlighten us about questions such as:-

    - Where did the universe come from?
    - Where did life come from?
    - Where does intellect, consciousness and will come from?
    - How does love come from a complex arrangement of atoms?
    - How are some people capable of unspeakable evil?
    - Why do we have a conscience?
    - How do miracles happen?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Why would the CC cause you to lose faith in Jesus? Did he ever do or say anything, in the bible, that made you question His claim to be the Son of God? Was He somehow flawed in your opinion?
    The behaviour of the catholic church caused me to question that institution. Once this process was complete I began to question organised religion as a whole. After I had, to my satisfaction decided that religion held no comfort for me I began to question the existence of god and jesus. The catholic church did not cause me to question jesus, it was simply the first step.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    I'm fully aware of that MrP! I'm trying to address the root of the problem.
    Keep on plugging
    kelly1 wrote: »
    Excellent. Would you like to enlighten us about questions such as:-
    Certainly.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    - Where did the universe come from?
    Don’t know. Interesting question and I find the research fascinating. Perhaps one day we will know, perhaps not. I am happy with that.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    - Where did life come from?
    I am glad you brought that one up. I believe the answer to that one is, I don’t know. Again the research in fascinating. I believe that evolution is the process by which we got to where we are today, and I can’t wait to find out where the original life came from.

    kelly1 wrote: »
    - Where does intellect, consciousness and will come from?
    Don’t know, but again an interesting subject.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    - How does love come from a complex arrangement of atoms?
    Don’t know. But isn’t love great?
    kelly1 wrote: »
    - How are some people capable of unspeakable evil?
    Ah, the good old nature nurture debate. Personally I believe it is a mixture of both. A genetic or chemical propensity toward anti social behaviour exacerbated by an upbringing in a particular environment. Or perhaps some people are just bad.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    - Why do we have a conscience?
    Why not?
    kelly1 wrote: »
    - How do miracles happen?
    They don’t.

    I will add a few more you.

    -What will happen to me after I die? Nothing. I will be dead and gone.
    -Does death worry me? No, not since I became an atheist.
    -Am I happy with nothing to look forward to? I have lots to look forward to. I have four beautiful children and a beautiful and amazing girlfriend and I look forward to spending the rest of my life with them.

    MrP

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    But Noel don't you see that the mere fact that he has "to operate through His ministers" diminishes his supposed power to most non RC's not just atheists. If tomorrow I were to believe in god the only thing that would change is that I would believe in god (don't hold your breath :rolleyes:) Something declared as powerful as your god needs no middle man or a civil service.
    God has always operated through intermediaries. e.g. prophets and priests in the Old Testament and Apostles and bishops in the NT.

    Where you don't have a human organization, you have disunity. Problems arise when people stop acknowledging the authority of the Church start accepting scripture alone. Human beings are weak and prone to sin and we often take the easy option but not what's pleasing to God. It's clear that people's separation from the Church and reliance on the bible alone has resulted in thousands of disunited churches all with different takes on what it means to go God's will. Christ wanted one flock and one fold and we don't have that today.

    Submitting to the authority of the Church also takes humility, another virtue very highly rated by God. e.g confession of one's sins to a priest takes humility.
    Also what was wrong with eastern philosophies.
    Lots. Ideas such as reincarnation and self-realization are totally contrary to the truth of Christianity. There is one life and one judgment after death.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    kelly1 wrote: »

    Human beings are weak and prone to sin and we often take the easy option but not what's pleasing to God.
    Lucky the church is made up of non humans then.... no wait....
    kelly1 wrote: »
    Submitting to the authority of the Church also takes humility, another virtue very highly rated by God. e.g confession of one's sins to a priest takes humility.
    It takes something, but I would not call it humility.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    Lots. Ideas such as reincarnation and self-realization are totally contrary to the truth of Christianity. There is one life and one judgment after death.
    And christianity is right because?

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    kelly1 wrote: »
    God has always operated through intermediaries. e.g. prophets and priests in the Old Testament and Apostles and bishops in the NT.

    Where you don't have a human organization, you have disunity. Problems arise when people stop acknowledging the authority of the Church start accepting scripture alone. Human beings are weak and prone to sin and we often take the easy option but not what's pleasing to God. It's clear that people's separation from the Church and reliance on the bible alone has resulted in thousands of disunited churches all with different takes on what it means to go God's will. Christ wanted one flock and one fold and we don't have that today.

    Submitting to the authority of the Church also takes humility, another virtue very highly rated by God. e.g confession of one's sins to a priest takes humility.

    Nice one Noel you gave me a nice lesson about what you believe which doesn't explain anything and totally side stepped the issue. Just because god has always done something hasn't really explained why its right. There are no why's just whats it seems.
    kelly1 wrote: »
    Lots. Ideas such as reincarnation and self-realization are totally contrary to the truth of Christianity. There is one life and one judgment after death.

    Hold on a second when you "looked east" you had lost respect for the "truth of Christianity" am I wrong? Unless the actual truth is you never fully walked out side of the RC room (so to speak) never completely rejected it, that is, never really explored anything just looked for ways to reinforce what you already believed. Or the above comment is a typo?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    MrPudding wrote: »
    Oh thank you Biro. All these years I have been wrong about my starting reason for begining to question the question of gods existence. :rolleyes:

    You're always quick to knock people who take you up wrong. You took me up wrong. Can you in 100% honesty say to me that if nothing ever happened in the past regarding crimes and sins from members of authority in the Catholic Church that you'd never have become an athiest?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    MrPudding wrote: »
    Is that so? If no one judged others priest would still be raping kids with impunity and there would be no, or at least less, law and order in society in general. We do have the right to judge. In fact I think we have a responsibility to judge.
    I don't think anyone should judge, but questioning is always good, and it has done the church good.
    MrPudding wrote: »
    It deserves no respect.
    That's your opinion, as you said here :
    MrPudding wrote: »
    Each to their own.
    MrPudding wrote: »
    My discovery, covered by point 3 in the charter, has made my life so much happier. It now makes sense. Everything.
    Good for you, my choice and reasoning makes me very happy.
    MrPudding wrote: »
    As it should. I feel sorry for you that you have so much faith in an organisation that seems to do so much to make it hard for people to continue to follow it.
    Don't feel sorry for me, I'm well fit to rise to the challenge!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    Why can't atheists accept that I have lost my atheist faith?

    It's been 27 years since I abandoned my atheism - yet when I post a testimony to answered prayer to encourage other Christians in the Christianity forum all I get is atheists wanting to argue about it.

    How weird is that? :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Excellent. Would you like to enlighten us about questions such as:-

    - Where did the universe come from?
    - Where did life come from?
    - Where does intellect, consciousness and will come from?
    - How does love come from a complex arrangement of atoms?
    - How are some people capable of unspeakable evil?
    - Why do we have a conscience?
    - How do miracles happen?

    "God did it" is not an answer. It is a response designed to stop questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    PDN wrote: »
    Why can't atheists accept that I have lost my atheist faith?

    It's been 27 years since I abandoned my atheism - yet when I post a testimony to answered prayer to encourage other Christians in the Christianity forum all I get is atheists wanting to argue about it.

    How weird is that? :)
    "PDN", and others who are replying: The guy put up a genuine post about his concerns, giving his story as background. He can't understand why people can't accept his decisions.
    As has been said by others, you need to back down, as some of you are coming across as sarcastic and agressive.(Kelly1, etc) This does not help your case, and god-loving individuals should not get agressive with a polite fellow asking a personal question online. He is not challenging anybody, he is not presenting a fake case to start up a ruckus.

    The chap merely seems to be confused and is looking for answers to "why" they can't accept it, not the logistics or the semantics.

    Just my €0,02


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    PDN wrote: »
    Why can't atheists accept that I have lost my atheist faith?

    It's been 27 years since I abandoned my atheism - yet when I post a testimony to answered prayer to encourage other Christians in the Christianity forum all I get is atheists wanting to argue about it.

    How weird is that? :)

    In a thread where someone is talking about their rejection of religion I think we have a place. Those of us who pursue you to badger you about atheism where it is inappropriate are wrong to do so in my opinion, but this thread is not one of those places.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    PDN wrote: »
    Why can't atheists accept that I have lost my atheist faith?

    I dunno maybe cause there's no such thing.
    PDN wrote: »
    It's been 27 years since I abandoned my atheism - yet when I post a testimony to answered prayer to encourage other Christians in the Christianity forum all I get is atheists wanting to argue about it.

    How weird is that? :)

    Not very weird, we're just trying to encourage you for the love of FSM so see sense and stop wasting your minds :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    I dunno maybe cause there's no such thing.



    Not very weird, we're just trying to encourage you for the love of FSM so see sense and stop wasting your minds :D

    Perhaps PDN shall one day be enlightened by the grace of His Noodley Appendage. We can only hope.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    Btw still waiting for an answer to this post here Noel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    FuzzyLogic wrote: »
    "PDN", and others who are replying: The guy put up a genuine post about his concerns, giving his story as background. He can't understand why people can't accept his decisions.
    I accept it. No further comment is necessary but I have the right and duty to defend Christianity/Church.
    FuzzyLogic wrote: »
    As has been said by others, you need to back down, as some of you are coming across as sarcastic and agressive.(Kelly1, etc)
    Maybe I was slightly sarcastic when I asked Mr. P to enlighten us but I don't think I've been agressive!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,374 ✭✭✭Gone West


    No, you were extremely sarcastic and agressive.

    He is not attacking your religion, he is merely asking a question.
    You have no "right" to defend on here, sorry dude, none whatsoever.
    You have no "duty" to "defend" your religion, when the lad is only asking a question.
    He happens to be an athiest, live with it.

    Choose your fights more carefully, theres better ways to put in your energy than multi quoting some bloke on the internet to death.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    FuzzyLogic wrote: »
    You have no "right" to defend on here, sorry dude, none whatsoever.
    You have no "duty" to "defend" your religion, when the lad is only asking a question.
    He happens to be an athiest, live with it

    Sorry, 'dude', but any poster has the the right to defend their beliefs on here - atheist, Christian or whatever.

    The lad happens to be an atheist, so his family find that strange and get on to him about it.

    When I became a Christian my family found that strange, so they used to keep on at me. I have one brother who is still an atheist and he still can't accept the fact I'm a Christian and keeps wanting to argue with me. It's the way of the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    Btw still waiting for an answer to this post here Noel? Or are you going to conveniently ignore as you've done in the past.
    Patience is another virtue. I'm busy in my 9-5 job and I'll answer it when I'm ready, not that I have to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Patience is another virtue. I'm busy in my 9-5 job and I'll answer it when I'm ready, not that I have to.

    I appreciate that you don't have to. Now I know what it means when you don't answer though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    I'd like to quote Douglas Adams at this point to illustrate what I think is going on in this thread:


    "Religion doesn't seem to work like that. It has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred or holy. What it means is- here is an idea or emotion that you are not allowed to say anything bad about. You're just not. Why not? Because you're not."

    "Why should it be that it's perfectly legitimate to support the Republicans or Democrats, this model of economics versus that, Macintosh instead of Windows, but to have an opinion about how the universe began, about who created the universe- no, that's holy. "

    "So we're used to not challenging religious ideas. And it's very interesting how much of a furore Richard (Dawkins) creates when he does it. Everybody gets absolutely frantic about it. Because you're not allowed to say these things. Yet when you look at it rationally, there is no reason why those ideas shouldn't be as open to debate as any other. Except that we've agreed somehow between us that they shouldn't be."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    FuzzyLogic wrote: »
    "PDN", and others who are replying: The guy put up a genuine post about his concerns, giving his story as background. He can't understand why people can't accept his decisions.
    As has been said by others, you need to back down, as some of you are coming across as sarcastic and agressive.(Kelly1, etc) This does not help your case, and god-loving individuals should not get agressive with a polite fellow asking a personal question online. He is not challenging anybody, he is not presenting a fake case to start up a ruckus.

    The chap merely seems to be confused and is looking for answers to "why" they can't accept it, not the logistics or the semantics.

    Just my €0,02

    Who do you refer to as "others"? I politely answered a polite question.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    studiorat wrote: »
    I'd like to quote Douglas Adams at this point to illustrate what I think is going on in this thread:


    "Religion doesn't seem to work like that. It has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred or holy. What it means is- here is an idea or emotion that you are not allowed to say anything bad about. You're just not. Why not? Because you're not."

    "Why should it be that it's perfectly legitimate to support the Republicans or Democrats, this model of economics versus that, Macintosh instead of Windows, but to have an opinion about how the universe began, about who created the universe- no, that's holy. "

    "So we're used to not challenging religious ideas. And it's very interesting how much of a furore Richard (Dawkins) creates when he does it. Everybody gets absolutely frantic about it. Because you're not allowed to say these things. Yet when you look at it rationally, there is no reason why those ideas shouldn't be as open to debate as any other. Except that we've agreed somehow between us that they shouldn't be."

    I think you've stumbled on the wrong thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    Biro wrote: »
    I think you've stumbled on the wrong thread.

    You'll have to be a bit more specific. It's a valid point considering the reaction the OP seems to be receiving from family and friends. The crux of the matter, if you'll pardon the pun is why can't people accept the conclusion the OP has come to. I think the Adams quote covers at least some of these reasons.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    studiorat wrote: »
    You'll have to be a bit more specific. It's a valid point considering the reaction the OP seems to be receiving from family and friends. The crux of the matter, if you'll pardon the pun is why can't people accept the conclusion the OP has come to. I think the Adams quote covers at least some of these reasons.

    I highlighted the important part there. You said you think you see what's going on in this thread. In actual fact, your Adams quote might serve to explain what's going on in the OP's life outside this thread, regarding his family and friends acceptance. But I don't see it in here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    I hope you haven't been holding your breath....
    Nice one Noel you gave me a nice lesson about what you believe which doesn't explain anything and totally side stepped the issue. Just because god has always done something hasn't really explained why its right. There are no why's just whats it seems.
    OK, so you want to know why God uses intermediaries? I don't know is the answer. But as I said earlier, I would speculate that using intermediaries helps to promote unity. It is also clear that God wants us to have faith so if He were to reveal Himself to every person on the planet, there would be no need for faith. So the real question to me is why does God require faith of us.

    I have a book here called called the Glories of Divine Grace by a theologian called Fr. Matthias Scheeben which I think gives a good argument for why faith is required by God. It will take me a while to summarize and type so I'll come back to you later with that. Basically he argues that faith is a sacrifice of reason.
    Hold on a second when you "looked east" you had lost respect for the "truth of Christianity" am I wrong? Unless the actual truth is you never fully walked out side of the RC room (so to speak) never completely rejected it, that is, never really explored anything just looked for ways to reinforce what you already believed. Or the above comment is a typo?
    Basically I started believing in reincarnation and the idea that Jesus was one of many "advanced masters" or avatars who had achieved enlightenment. I did not believe at the time that Jesus was needed for salvation because I didn't believe there was a need to be saved. If reincarnation is true, then there is no hell and no need to be saved. I also believed that enlightenment could be achieved through meditation and special breathing techniques. I was a sucker!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,245 ✭✭✭✭Fanny Cradock


    Nooooo! Religion, undone at last! And we would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling atheists.

    D -

    Must try harder, Sean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭AtomicHorror


    Nooooo! Religion, undone at last! And we would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling atheists.

    I'm going to quote this out of context some time. It's gold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭CerebralCortex


    kelly1 wrote: »
    I hope you haven't been holding your breath....


    OK, so you want to know why God uses intermediaries? I don't know is the answer. But as I said earlier, I would speculate that using intermediaries helps to promote unity. It is also clear that God wants us to have faith so if He were to reveal Himself to every person on the planet, there would be no need for faith. So the real question to me is why does God require faith of us.

    I have a book here called called the Glories of Divine Grace by a theologian called Fr. Matthias Scheeben which I think gives a good argument for why faith is required by God. It will take me a while to summarize and type so I'll come back to you later with that. Basically he argues that faith is a sacrifice of reason.


    Basically I started believing in reincarnation and the idea that Jesus was one of many "advanced masters" or avatars who had achieved enlightenment. I did not believe at the time that Jesus was needed for salvation because I didn't believe there was a need to be saved. If reincarnation is true, then there is no hell and no need to be saved. I also believed that enlightenment could be achieved through meditation and special breathing techniques. I was a sucker!

    Thanks for the reply, sorry if I came off pushy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Phototoxin


    True Christianity's source is the Bible

    but the bible comes from what ? I thought it was a few infallible CATHOLIC councils..
    Point 1. No priest can forgive sin, only God.

    bible says in the NT to confess yours sins to one another, also JC tells the apostles those whos sins you forgive are forgiven
    Point 2. In relation to Catholic statues:

    Exodus 20:4
    Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth

    what is a *graven* image? If you take that as 'no images whatsoever' then that means no photos, no forum avatars, no pictures, no drawnings, no crucifixes...
    Point 3. In relation to Mary as 'divine':

    she wasn't divine, besides I dont think that the RCC with what appears to be some sort of marian-fetish even claim that.
    Point 4. And finally in relation to priest and "Father O Reilly" etc etc:

    in one of the letters it states ; I john, your father.

    the passage is about treating people like god.



    dont y'all love bible tennis ?

    I then fully went of the catholic church. Too much of the priests breaking
    their own rules and raping kids for my liking.

    you mean about 4-5% the same as teachers at the time ? Did you go out of school too ?
    It's just that you've broken group solidarity and you are now seen as a threat to the security of the dominant group. In order to nullify the percieved threat you will have to be reabsorbed back into the group to cancel out the 'danger' to group cohesiveness that you represent.

    amen, its odd how un-christian Christians can be to ex-christians. Even my GF thought that I would become totally different or suddenly loose all morals or something. So I totally sympathise with the OP in his dilemma.
    surely if the popes word is infallible the first one should have got it right? Why are we still waiting?

    popes are NOT infallible EXCEPT on teachings of faith and morals ONLY. Popes can and have been wrong on other areas


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭studiorat


    Biro wrote: »
    You said you think you see what's going on in this thread. In actual fact, your Adams quote might serve to explain what's going on in the OP's life outside this thread, regarding his family and friends acceptance. But I don't see it in here.

    I see. A question of Internet Forum Semantics. Apologies.

    I thought the thread had calmed down a bit though.

    I posted it because I thought it was relevant, DA is a very clever man IMO. I thought the post was relevant to the OT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,980 ✭✭✭wolfsbane


    MrPudding wrote: »
    Small point. It is a christianity forum not christian forum. :D

    This is how it kind of worked with me. I was raised as a catholic. For various reasons I started to question a lot of the stuff I had been told.

    I then fully went of the catholic church. Too much of the priests breaking
    their own rules and raping kids for my liking. When you dismiss an entire church like I did, it raises some fundamental questions about what they were teaching. This led me down the path I am currently on, and very very happy about.

    I understand that you will argue that they were wrong and what they were teaching was wrong, but it still raises questions. If they are so wrong why would god allow them to continue their untruth? Why would god allow an organisation that supposedly represents him on earth behave so badly? So in this way a church not only turned me off christianity but made me question the existence of god.

    MrP
    He doesn't. Such organisations claim to represent Him, but they are lying. Here's how God deals with His true church, in its local forms:
    Ephesus
    Revelation 2:4 Nevertheless I have this against you, that you have left your first love. 5 Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent and do the first works, or else I will come to you quickly and remove your lampstand from its place—unless you repent.

    Smyrna
    10 Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer. Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life.

    Pergamos
    14 But I have a few things against you, because you have there those who hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual immorality. 15 Thus you also have those who hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. 16 Repent, or else I will come to you quickly and will fight against them with the sword of My mouth.

    Thyatira
    20 Nevertheless I have a few things against you, because you allow that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, to teach and seduce My servants to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols. 21 And I gave her time to repent of her sexual immorality, and she did not repent. 22 Indeed I will cast her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds. 23 I will kill her children with death, and all the churches shall know that I am He who searches the minds and hearts. And I will give to each one of you according to your works.

    Sardis
    “I know your works, that you have a name that you are alive, but you are dead. 2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die, for I have not found your works perfect before God. 3 Remember therefore how you have received and heard; hold fast and repent. Therefore if you will not watch, I will come upon you as a thief, and you will not know what hour I will come upon you.

    Philadelphia
    10 Because you have kept My command to persevere, I also will keep you from the hour of trial which shall come upon the whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth.

    Laodicea
    15 “I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot. I could wish you were cold or hot. 16 So then, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth. 17 Because you say, ‘I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing’—and do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked— 18 I counsel you to buy from Me gold refined in the fire, that you may be rich; and white garments, that you may be clothed, that the shame of your nakedness may not be revealed; and anoint your eyes with eye salve, that you may see. 19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent.

    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=revelation%202-3;&version=50;

    Why Rome or its Orthodox sister thinks they would be permitted to exist in corruption for over a thousand years is beyond any defence. It is a blatant denial of the Bible. The Church Christ promised would not be defeated is not any one organisation, but all true believers in Christ through history.

    When the local church becomes corrupt and refuses to repent, Christ terminates it. It may continue to profess His name, but He has disowned it. He no longer moves in it, but treats it like the rest of the world. His people are called to leave it and meet with one another elsewhere. They have done so from the earliest centuries AD.

    They are without prestige and power and easily written off by historians of the corrupt church, but it is they to whom God has committed the gospel of His grace. They persevere in persecution, and the blood of the martyrs is seed for new generations of true Christians.

    This is not to say Protestant/Evangelical churches do not face the same sanctions from Christ - many good churches in a generation or so go off the rails, imbibe heresy or condone sinful practices or just grow cold and refuse to repent. God leaves them, taking the faithful elsewhere. The true Church continues, while its local forms come and go.

    Your experience was certainly off-putting of the gospel, since you assumed this was authentic Christianity. I'm glad to point out that it isn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    wolfsbane wrote: »
    and all the churches shall know that I am He who searches the minds and hearts. And I will give to each one of you according to your works. .

    A point I have said on many occasions. Its really not about which club your in, as a catholic would have you believe. It really is about the state of ones heart and mind, whatever Christian denomination you are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    Some people never miss an opportunity :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Some people never miss an opportunity :(

    I'm glad you are on this forum Kelly.

    When ever I feel put upon by Christians on this forum and their self-righteous assurance in their own God given authority I just remind myself that I'm glad I'm not a Catholic :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    Wicknight wrote: »
    I'm glad you are on this forum Kelly.

    When ever I feel put upon by Christians on this forum and their self-righteous assurance in their own God given authority I just remind myself that I'm glad I'm not a Catholic :D
    Why Catholic? Why not Christian?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Why Catholic? Why not Christian?

    Because Catholics seem to be the people who other Christians gang up on and, as you say, take pot shots at.

    From the perspective of a total non-believer it is quite a bizarre situation to observe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    kelly1 wrote: »
    Some people never miss an opportunity :(

    Its not all about catholics my sensitive friend. Jehovahs Witnesses do it too, as do alot of denominations. Most people in this country relate to the catholic example though, which is why I'd use it. Obviously you disagree, as you do believe one should be part of your church to be a true christian. Just pointing out another example of Christ being in the heart and mind, not in the walls and pages of particular denominations. No offence should be taken. Just pointing out something that shows what Christ views things.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Because Catholics seem to be the people who other Christians gang up on and, as you say, take pot shots at. From the perspective of a total non-believer it is quite a bizarre situation to observe.
    It's not all that bizarre -- I can't think of a single in-group that doesn't define itself, at least in part, by reference to some out-group. And the catholics are simply (and unfortunately) the largest and most well-defined group of christians available for this purpose. It's certainly not very nice to see, but it does seem to be something that most humans, especially those who self-select, have a strong tendency to do.

    In an moment of uncharacteristic insight, Freud named this tendency to take potshots at one's close neighbors, "The Narcissism of Minor Differences" and described it thusly in Civilization and its Discontents:
    It is always possible to bind together a considerable number of people in love, so long as there are other people left over to receive the manifestations of their aggressiveness. I once discussed the phenomenon that it is precisely communities with adjoining territories, and related to each other in other ways as well, who are engaged in constant feuds and in ridiculing each other—Germans and South Germans, the English and the Scotch, and so on. I gave this phenomenon the name of 'the narcissism of minor differences,' a name which does not do much to explain it. We can now see that it is a convenient and relatively harmless satisfaction of the inclination to aggression, by means of which cohesion between the members of the community is made easier. In this respect the Jewish people, scattered everywhere, have rendered most useful services to the civilizations of the countries that have been their hosts

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    robindch wrote: »
    It's not all that bizarre -- I can't think of a single in-group that doesn't define itself, at least in part, by reference to some out-group. And the catholics are simply (and unfortunately) the largest and most well-defined group of christians available for this purpose. It's certainly not very nice to see, but it does seem to be something that most humans, especially those who self-select, have a strong tendency to do.

    In an moment of uncharacteristic insight, Freud named this tendency to take potshots at one's close neighbors, "The Narcissism of Minor Differences" and described it thusly in Civilization and its Discontents:

    .
    kelly1 wrote:
    Some people never miss an opportunity

    Thought Noels quote would be quite apt here also. LOL.:D Oh you guys.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    robindch wrote: »
    It's not all that bizarre -- I can't think of a single in-group that doesn't define itself, at least in part, by reference to some out-group. And the catholics are simply (and unfortunately) the largest and most well-defined group of christians available for this purpose. It's certainly not very nice to see, but it does seem to be something that most humans, especially those who self-select, have a strong tendency to do.

    In an moment of uncharacteristic insight, Freud named this tendency to take potshots at one's close neighbors, "The Narcissism of Minor Differences" and described it thusly in Civilization and its Discontents:

    .

    Why look for a complicated lot of psychobabble when Occam's razor would give you a much simpler explanation.

    The Catholic Church claims to be the one true Church and that all other forms of Christianity are therefore illegitimate and defective. We live in a society where most people, including atheists, were indoctrinated in that belief through the educational system. Therefore there is a tendency in threads like this for posters to assume that 'Catholic' is synonymous with 'Christian'.

    If adherents of other churches challenge this erroneous notion they are then accused of taking pot shots at Catholicism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    Phototoxin wrote: »

    you mean about 4-5% the same as teachers at the time ? Did you go out of school too ?
    And how would one do that? It was not within my power to get out of school, whereas it was well within my power to leave the church and read up on the subject. One does what one can.

    MrP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    MrPudding wrote: »
    It was not within my power to get out of school

    Some of us used to manage it on a fairly consistent basis. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    PDN wrote: »
    Some of us used to manage it on a fairly consistent basis. :)
    Good point, but skipping a day of school to go doen the amusments doesn't really count as withdrawing yourself completly.

    MrP


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    PDN wrote: »
    Why look for a complicated lot of psychobabble when Occam's razor would give you a much simpler explanation.
    The "psychobabble" isn't all that complicated if you spend a few moments reading it -- as I said, it's a moment of uncommon clarity for Freud. All he's trying to do is to explain something that Noel, Wicknight and myself seem to feel is happening -- that non-catholics have a tendency to hit upon catholics more than the other way around.

    It's a straightforward explanation which explains why this is happening with a good degree of Occam's economy :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    robindch wrote: »
    All he's trying to do is to explain something that Noel, Wicknight and myself seem to feel is happening -- that non-catholics have a tendency to hit upon catholics more than the other way around.

    Them non-catholic bullies. Never knew you cared. But while we're making juvenile claims, I've observed you pick on creationists and christians an awful lot. Wicknight too.

    Or

    We could all just grow up and realise that we have disagreements with various people of various opinions and we express them here on a discussion board.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Phototoxin


    I agree, however if you delve into the realm of catholic apologetics then there is protestant bashing, but in a mature, reconstruct their arguments way.

    This of course leaves me ina pickle as I don't acceppt the RCC but know that the other Christians are wrong as the apologetics are based on rationale and logic as opposed to faith.

    psychobabble - I'd rather technobabble


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    JimiTime wrote: »
    But while we're making juvenile claims
    I think we agree that people of similar religious beliefs don't always get on very well -- I don't think it's all that juvenile to try to make a stab at understanding why this happens. BTW, exactly the same kind of thing happens elsewhere too; Glasgow Rangers and Glasgow Celtic come to mind.
    JimiTime wrote: »
    I've observed you pick on creationists and christians an awful lot.
    I'm certainly not afraid of standing up to the people behind the creationist movement and calling them what they are. And bearing in mind that a lot of them are extremely well-known and well-respected (at least within their religions) and not obviously short of cash, the idea that I'm somehow "picking on" them really does fall short of the truth :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    robindch wrote: »
    And bearing in mind that a lot of them are extremely well-known and well-respected (at least within their religions) and not obviously short of cash, the idea that I'm somehow "picking on" them really does fall short of the truth :)

    Yet somehow it doesn't fall short of the truth if someone 'picks on' the Catholic Church which is extremely well-known, well-respected (at least by millions of its own adherents), and is extremely rich?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement