Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Porsche now control VW-AG

Options
  • 17-09-2008 12:40pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭


    Porsche now own a 35% share of VW, more than any other shareholder.I, personally find this very disappointing as i can see porsche eliminating any competition to its models.Its Audi and Lamborghini i'm most worried about.I dont think porsche are too fond of models like the R8. Thats in direct competition with the 911 and is way better IMO.Other models in direct competition are the TT(Especially the TTS AND TTRS), RS4(Arguably in competition with the cayman), S8 and pretty much all high end audis.Anyone have any thoughts on this??


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,282 ✭✭✭Bandara


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    Porsche now own a 35% share of VW, more than any other shareholder.I, personally find this very disappointing as i can see porsche eliminating any competition to its models.Its Audi and Lamborghini i'm most worried about.I dont think porsche are too fond of models like the R8. Thats in direct competition with the 911 and is way better IMO.Other models in direct competition are the TT(Especially the TTS AND TTRS), RS4(Arguably in competition with the cayman), S8 and pretty much all high end audis.Anyone have any thoughts on this??

    why would Porsche want to eliminate the competiton of a company they own a large part off and take a large proportion of the profits off?

    do you not think they will now perfect the Audi/Lambo ranges even more and concentrate on eliminating their direct competitors, which will result in an upping of the stakes and better cars for us all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Hammertime wrote: »
    why would Porsche want to eliminate the competiton of a company they own a large part off and take a large proportion of the profits off?

    do you not think they will now perfect the Audi/Lambo ranges even more and concentrate on eliminating their direct competitors, which will result in an upping of the stakes and better cars for us all.


    I have my optimistic hat on too. Porche arent just "some" company, they have a successful working relationship and personal family connection to VAG. If they were concerned about the RS range surely they wouldnt have developed the original RS car with Audi to begin with (the RS2)?

    And if they do start to act in poor business taste, the EUs strict anti-competition laws will click into place. This isnt the US!


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    Yes but they only own a controlling stake(~35%) so for every car VW-AG sell, they'll only get 35% of profit as opposed to the whole lot if they sell an actual porsche.I'm only worried really about the high end models really.I'm interested on knowing, though why porsche were so willing to take on absolutely huge debt in order to get this much of VW-AG???

    Edit: I wonder what this could be???


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,667 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    I'm interested on knowing, though why porsche were so willing to take on absolutely huge debt in order to get this much of VW-AG???

    Because they are a tiny company as regards units sold and economies of scale, VAG on the other hand are massive. Porsche probably need to do this to survive in the long term and to be able to afford to develop new technology.

    I wouldn't worry about competition to porsche to be honest. BMW, Mercedes and Fiat are not going anywhere for the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Zonda999 wrote: »
    I'm only worried really about the high end models really.I'm interested on knowing, though why porsche were so willing to take on absolutely huge debt in order to get this much of VW-AG???

    could be???


    Official line was to protect their materials supplier wasnt it? Something like 40% of Porche parts are sourced from VAG parts. Then of course their is the Cayenne/Touareg shared platform. The connection between the two runs deep.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭TomMc


    Porsche are the most profitable motor manufacturer in the world. Some can see far more potential for VAG (in global terms), than is the case at present. Add economies of scale and it makes sense.

    Add a bit of family history into the mix, a personal crusade of sorts for Herr Piech and some power politics within Porsche itself and things are spicing up nicely. Better than an Old Firm Derby.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    maidhc wrote: »
    Because they are a tiny company as regards units sold and economies of scale, VAG on the other hand are massive. Porsche probably need to do this to survive in the long term and to be able to afford to develop new technology.

    ...mmmm, tiny company..........not anymore, with 200k + Boxsters sold alone, it's hardly bespoke manufacturing. More importantly though, it's actually the most profitable company in the world. IIRC, they make about EUr 7k profit per car, in manufacturing. VW make, again, iirc, on average Eur 270 per car. You only need one tiny recall on a Golf/etc, to completely put you in the red, financially. Audi and the Mk1 TT is a good example. I'd be shocked if, after all their recalls, they ever made any money on them. Porsche's philosophy is fundamentally different.

    On the other side, Porsche did need, and have access to VAG technology, witness the new Diesel Cayenne and Panamara out in 09. The Cayenne D is out, afaik, in Jan 09.

    Besides, you have to admire the fact they wouldn't let an overseas outfit buy VW. The germans are - rightly - unashamedly proud of their car industry, and make no apologies in protecting it. I'm all for it.

    Contrast that with our govt and, say, agriculture or fisheries.......

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭DubDani


    The thing is that even though Porsche now "owns" Volkswagen, it is not able to make any real decissions on it's own, as the Regional Government of Lower Saxony holds a 20.3% blocking minority in Volkswagen, which means Porsche can't take any big decissions without their agreement, even if they have all other shareholders in their boat.

    They need 80% of the Votes to make big decissions (like exchanging the VW Boss), which can't be gotten without the Regional Governments support.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭TomMc


    Yeh, look whats left of the British Motor Industry apart from the more specialist cottage industry manufacturers.

    Porsche use to always put engineering first, but in more recent times volume aka profit is their prime mantra. They really want to crack mainstream America with VAG, in much the same way they did with the Cayenne.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,091 ✭✭✭Biro


    The only bad thing from this is that the "GT TDI" drivers will be claiming that their car is basically a Porsche... They already claim that they're as quick as one!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,667 ✭✭✭maidhc


    galwaytt wrote: »
    ...mmmm, tiny company..........not anymore, with 200k + Boxsters sold alone, it's hardly bespoke manufacturing. More importantly though, it's actually the most profitable company in the world. IIRC, they make about EUr 7k profit per car, in manufacturing.

    And VW have sold 3.31 million units in the first half of 2008!!!!

    Porsche are a tiny bespoke manufactuer, albeit a very profitable one at the moment.

    I don't buy the "trying to eliminate competition" argument for one second. As I said above, there are plenty of companies making competing cars. Even if Porsche was the only european sportscar manufacturer left, it would be easy for the Japanese or Americans to build a competing car.

    I think this is a good thing for VW as well, indeed the best thing for VW would be if the unions and goverment could be completely removed from the board and Porsche get total control... then hard decisions could be made and maybe quality might be then back to Golf Mk1 golf levels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,461 ✭✭✭Max_Damage


    Sure British Leyland had a load of vehicles competing with one another. Then again, look what happened to it....


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,667 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Max_Damage wrote: »
    Sure British Leyland had a load of vehicles competing with one another. Then again, look what happened to it....

    Porsche and VAG dont really compete. Sure some of them may cost the same, but the Audi RS whatever is a 4 door saloon, while the 911 is a rear engined sportscar.

    No one will really bemoan the passing of the Audi TT if that ever happens, and it probably wont because that and a Boxter/Cayman are very different cars.

    The reason BL failed was ultimately the lack of quality of their vehicles and the lack of investment in new models.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,257 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    If Audi/Skoda/VW can all compete in much more similar segments, then why is this situation any different?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    maidhc wrote: »
    ...No one will really bemoan the passing of the Audi TT if that ever happens..

    Oi ! check my username ! :D:D

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 690 ✭✭✭VH


    galwaytt wrote: »
    Besides, you have to admire the fact they wouldn't let an overseas outfit buy VW. The germans are - rightly - unashamedly proud of their car industry, and make no apologies in protecting it. I'm all for it.
    interesting - it was rumoured at the time that it was toyota that was going to buy out VW as they have enough actual cash in the bank to buy any other car maker on the planet - VW falling into japanese hands wouldnt go down well with the germans I'd say


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    VH wrote: »
    interesting - it was rumoured at the time that it was toyota that was going to buy out VW as they have enough actual cash in the bank to buy any other car maker on the planet - VW falling into japanese hands wouldnt go down well with the germans I'd say

    Fair point.I dont think it would go down well with europeans and car-lovers the world over, at that!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,445 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Hold on a minute!

    The article on Autocar states that:
    Autocar wrote:
    Porsche has finally secured control of Volkswagen by pushing its share ownership above 35 per cent. This buys sufficient votes on the board to dictate the major management decisions at the Skoda-to-Bugatti group.

    This is incorrect. Porsche do not have control over VAG. By owning more than 35% they legally have to make an offer on the entire group, but the offer can be rejected

    Porsche is still a long way away from having control of VAG


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    What's also interesting is that VW chief Ferdinand Piech is also a part owner of Porsche and the cousin of the current Porsche director (not GM) Wolfgang Porsche ...and apparently the family is at each other's throats over this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭TomMc




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 65,445 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    TomMc wrote: »

    That article is misleading too. 35% does not mean control!


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,445 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    peasant wrote: »
    apparently the family is at each other's throats over this.

    Making a better car than Porsche ever had must have been satisfying, but I'll say Piech will stop at nothing until he runs the entire Porsche-VAG group :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭samih


    Knowing that there will be EU CO2 emission rules of average of 120 g/km *per manufacturer* in 2012 (although probably delayed) I see a pattern emerging here...

    Yes, I see big engined VWs dying in the medium term.


Advertisement