Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

A Obama victory would confirm racism

Options
  • 18-09-2008 8:49am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭


    It has been mentioned in a few threads here that the black vote will be mobilized and will register and vote in huge numbers for Obama because he is a black man running for president.

    If this happens and Obama wins as a result of a huge surge in the black vote then will it not confirm what everyone is saying, i.e. that racism is still a big problem in America

    Blacks voting for Obama just because he is black is just a racist as white people not voting for him because he is black.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭bill_ashmount


    Racism exists everywhere. In every country and every single part of society.

    White people are going to be a minority in America soon anyway. It'll be interesting to see when the first Hispanic president is elected.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 336 ✭✭geuro


    it would be a monumental, historical achievement for the first black person to become the president of the USA. Given the history of civil oppression and inequality for American blacks, i can imagine that they would feel a great sense of pride and satisfaction if a black man bvecomes president. It would be the final chapter in their struggle for social opportunity, acceptance and stature. If the colour of Obama's skin sways some of the black voters to stand behind him, it probbaly would not be the post pragmatic reason to lend their support. But i don't think it's racist either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 545 ✭✭✭BenjAii


    I would say Benedict that when an oppressed minority support themselves it cannot be equated the wrongs done them historically by the majority. They are two fundamentally different impulses.

    So an Obama victory won't be a victory for racism, just another nail in its coffin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    It has been mentioned in a few threads here that the black vote will be mobilized and will register and vote in huge numbers for Obama because he is a black man running for president.

    o_O''

    Funny because someone was saying that due to racism that Obama will lose?

    You mean he can't win on the platform he is running on? Now that is racist.


    Oh and incidently, the black vote has nearly always gone to the democrats. So it wouldn't be anything to do with him being black.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    geuro wrote: »
    it would be a monumental, historical achievement for the first black person to become the president of the USA. Given the history of civil oppression and inequality for American blacks, i can imagine that they would feel a great sense of pride and satisfaction if a black man bvecomes president. It would be the final chapter in their struggle for social opportunity, acceptance and stature. If the colour of Obama's skin sways some of the black voters to stand behind him, it probbaly would not be the post pragmatic reason to lend their support. But i don't think it's racist either.

    very well put if i may say so


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭KerranJast


    It has been mentioned in a few threads here that the black vote will be mobilized and will register and vote in huge numbers for Obama because he is a black man running for president.

    If this happens and Obama wins as a result of a huge surge in the black vote then will it not confirm what everyone is saying, i.e. that racism is still a big problem in America

    Blacks voting for Obama just because he is black is just a racist as white people not voting for him because he is black.
    If you look at the demographic map of the US you'll see that the vast majority of Black voters live in urban areas in States like New York, California, Michigan, Texas etc. Most of those states were going Democrat anyway (California & New York) and the others are so big that it would take an 80% plus turnout of Black voters to turn around the inherently Republican leanings of those states (Texas). Obamas race will have some effect but not a huge one which is a good thing really because the contest should be about issues and ideas not racism on one hand or affirmative action on the other.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 263 ✭✭rowlandbrowner


    IMO people assuming that there will be anything over a small fraction of black voters voting for Obama because “hey, he’s black too” and not based on an intelligent and informed decisions is a racist opinion. Most black Americans live in places and in conditions that Obamas policies would address problems in far more than McCains, similar to the way Clintons policies helped him commanded a high proportion of Black voters too… ow wait, no, maybe it was because he played the Sax.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    well, most black people in america are pretty much demacrat anyway, aren't they?

    it's a bit naive to think someone will vote for him just because of their skin colour. if anything...surley it's because of his polocies and issues. anyone (black & white) who will vote based only on race is probably too lavy to get off their ass and go to the voting station anyway.

    Just my opinion:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,423 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    A Obama victory would confirm racism
    Wouldn't such a victory also confirm sexism? The democrats have a very ppor record of running women for president.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    If this happens and Obama wins as a result of a huge surge in the black vote then will it not confirm what everyone is saying, i.e. that racism is still a big problem in America

    So what is your solution: that blacks shouldn't vote for Obama even if they like his policies cause he is also black? That is racism.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭Benedict XVI


    well, most black people in america are pretty much demacrat anyway, aren't they?

    it's a bit naive to think someone will vote for him just because of their skin colour. if anything...surley it's because of his polocies and issues. anyone (black & white) who will vote based only on race is probably too lavy to get off their ass and go to the voting station anyway.

    Just my opinion:D

    Of course there are black people that will only vote for Obama because he is black, there will be thousand who will only vote because he is in the race, they could not give a hoot about his policies.
    turgon wrote: »
    So what is your solution: that blacks shouldn't vote for Obama even if they like his policies cause he is also black? That is racism.

    I am not offering a solution, it's just an observation.

    From what I have observed so far it seem ok for blacks to vote for a black man because he is black but if a white man said he was voting for McCain because he was white he would be branded a F**king racist.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    Of course there are black people that will only vote for Obama because he is black, there will be thousand who will only vote because he is in the race, they could not give a hoot about his policies.

    Ah, benny, you put too little faith in the american populace. they're not the loud, stupid, fat people that they're steriotyped as


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,259 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Ah, benny, you put too little faith in the american populace. they're not the loud, stupid, fat people that they're steriotyped as
    U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

    /crush a beercan on my face


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    Overheal wrote: »
    U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.!

    /crush a beercan on my face

    ha ha! Brilliant!:pac::pac::D:pac::pac:

    Still, would a loss for Obama be just as much racist as it would mean all the white men voted for Die Hard because he's a white guy?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    AFAIK Blacks only make up 13% of American population


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 321 ✭✭CPT. SURF


    Of course there are black people that will only vote for Obama because he is black, there will be thousand who will only vote because he is in the race, they could not give a hoot about his policies.

    A racist assumption. In fact, this is practically the very definition of racism. Assuming that a person will act in a certain way or do a certain thing based on nothing other than the color of their skin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭Benedict XVI


    CPT. SURF wrote: »
    A racist assumption. In fact, this is practically the very definition of racism. Assuming that a person will act in a certain way or do a certain thing based on nothing other than the color of their skin.

    So in that case all the people who will shout that racism is rife in America when Obama loses (i.e for electing a white man when there was also a black man in the race) can themselves be called racist for Assuming that a person did act in a certain way or did a certain thing based on nothing other than the color of their skin.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 maryo'dee


    Of course there are black people that will only vote for Obama because he is black, there will be thousand who will only vote because he is in the race, they could not give a hoot about his policies.
    the vast majority of people vote without giving a hoot about policies.
    here in ireland the swing vote is always only about 20%. 80% of people are going to vote ff, fg or labour no matter what and never change over their whole life. they don't care about how good or bad the policies are.
    I suspect its the same in the usa.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭dave2pvd


    CPT. SURF wrote: »
    A racist assumption. In fact, this is practically the very definition of racism. Assuming that a person will act in a certain way or do a certain thing based on nothing other than the color of their skin.

    Nevertheless, it's frequently true. There have been many radio and TV interviews with blacks who say they will vote Obama because he is black. I have had conversations with blacks who sometimes say as much - others admit they know folks who will vote the same way, for the same reason. More than anything, the polls bear this out. His percentage of the black vote is what? 80%? Can that be based on his policies alone? I think not.

    Personally, I am going to vote for him. I think it would be great to have a black president. But that's not why I am voting for him.

    Having said all of that, I can see why Obama is a huge source of pride to so many black Americans. Finally, here is a guy who has actually made it to nominee and is possibly on the cusp of the presidency. It only took 143 years after the 13th amendment was passed to happen, and 43 years after Jim Crow was eradicated.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 470 ✭✭Craft25


    a person votes entirely in their own personal interest, this is the whole basis of liberal democratic systems: to enable essentially selfish creatures to live together in an orderly peaceful society

    it is in every single black persons interest to vote for obama as the symbolic significance of his election will lead to a huge increase in their opportunities and raise exponentially the heights to which they may aim in life

    average whites on the other hand stand only to lose by voting mcCain, they have no skin based barriers at present so can only make choice on other factors.. essentially economic issues

    therefore blacks arent voting to keep any group of people down, rather solely in their own / their childrens interests


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 zero_the_hero


    It's a question of context. It's not racist for the same reasons that we would frown on the notion of "straight pride" or "masculinism".


Advertisement