Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Impact Spoilers

13»

Comments

  • #102
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    rovert wrote: »
    Why did Joe never take back his locker room from Booker

    Why did Joe let Booker keep the title for a month then later freaked out about Booker taking it

    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSYcGavrBf0

    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=pZPkaJ5bALo


  • #103
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    I'd say Joes a tweener myself.

    No he is a babyface he is denoted in the script as a babyface. Joe was been turned into a crying, unlikable babyface because TNA can’t create likable characters.
    EdK wrote: »
    Maybe he's neither maybe he's just a normal guy with grey areas, Am I the only one who thinks the whole face/heel thing is played out?

    No you are wrong here, the dynamic still works a look at all the most popular TV shows, films and Wrestling feuds will tell you that. Vince Russo couldn’t write Batman, House etc. Russo’s version of shades of grey never works as fails to understand that ultimately characters need likable traits for audiences to care.
    Fozzy wrote: »
    He's a heel? :confused:

    We need another leaked Impact script

    You know a company has problems when it comes to characterisation and story telling when they have to denote a character’s allegiance everytime they (re)appear on scene.
    EdK wrote: »
    Yes I know heel/face is Wrestling 101 but in this day and age is anyone truly bad or truly good

    That’s not shades of grey though. Wrestling characters always had their motivations.

    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSYcGavrBf0

    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=pZPkaJ5bALo

    Him lamenting the fact he doesnt have the belt occured after those videos.
    Booker still has Joes locker room. How dumb and unlikable does Joe come across in those videos btw. Booker wasnt giving Joe a hand out the belt was Joe's property which Booker T stole.


  • #104
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    rovert wrote: »
    How dumb and unlikable does Joe come across in those videos btw.

    I would have said likeable and a man that you can relate with as he doesn't consider himself above anybody.

    After going through all of the segments of the 2 month Booker/Joe feud, I could not find Joe looking for his locker room back or complaining about not having his title.

    And after asking you for examples of how the Joe/Nash feud doesn't make sense, you talk about the Booker/Joe feud.


  • #105
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    I would have said likeable and a man that you can relate with as he doesn't consider himself above anybody.

    After going through all of the segments of the 2 month Booker/Joe feud, I could not find Joe looking for his locker room back or complaining about not having his title.

    And after asking you for examples of how the Joe/Nash feud doesn't make sense, you talk about the Booker/Joe feud.

    If Joe was likable he wuoldnt be as booed as often as he is. simple as.

    Ill search around but I do remember both happening.

    The Joe/Nash feud hasnt started yet. Im talking about the backstory. Nash was a part of the Booker/Joe fued.


  • #106
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    You talk as if he is booed out of the building every week.

    Not a major part though and it was in attempt to teach to a lesson about the mental side of wrestling so it was a part of the Joe/Nash feud and not really the Joe/Booker feud.


  • #107
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    You talk as if he is booed out of the building every week.

    Not a major part though and it was in attempt to teach to a lesson about the mental side of wrestling so it was a part of the Joe/Nash feud and not really the Joe/Booker feud.

    Did I say it was? You what the term backstory means right?


  • #108
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    To be fair, the last eight months between Joe and Nash can't all be considered backstory. Its all part of the feud.


  • #109
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Machismo Fan wrote: »
    To be fair, the last eight months between Joe and Nash can't all be considered backstory. Its all part of the feud.

    Nope the fued began when Nash turned on Joe. You know what the word feud means, right. Sorry but needs to be asked.


  • #110
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,847 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    No Surrender = Joe booed outta builing..Of course this was in Canada and CC was in the match...Bound 4 Glory = Joe being booed more than Sting even though Sting was supposedly the heel..


  • #111
    Machismo Fan
    Registered Users Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭Machismo Fan


    rovert wrote: »
    Nope the fued began when Nash turned on Joe.

    Fair enough.


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    I dont want to even acknowledge last night's show going by the spoilers.


  • #113
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    "The Main Event Mafia" - Worst name for a stable ever. Makes "The Dungeon of Doom" sound a whole lot better.


  • #114
    Bubs101
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,478 ✭✭✭Bubs101


    Hearing a Bryan and Vinny show on TNA for the first time is a glorious thing. Sounds retardedly bad


  • #115
    Fozzy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭Fozzy


    When have TNA ever delivered on a major announcement?


  • #116
    callaway92
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,847 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Whats the announcement that they make regarding Mick foley??


  • #117
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    callaway92 wrote: »
    Whats the announcement that they make regarding Mick foley??

    He is a shareholder (think Flair in 2002) now *yawn*
    Bubs101 wrote: »
    Hearing a Bryan and Vinny show on TNA for the first time is a glorious thing. Sounds retardedly bad

    I thought that might have been you posting on the boards.

    Fun show this week the callers were better than usual btw.


  • #118
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    samoajoeodb250.gif

    CANT WAIT JOE VS AJ FOR THE AFFECTIONS OF ODB


  • #119
    the flananator
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,431 ✭✭✭the flananator


    rovert wrote: »
    samoajoeodb250.gif

    CANT WAIT JOE VS AJ FOR THE AFFECTIONS OF ODB

    :D


  • #120
    Bubs101
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,478 ✭✭✭Bubs101


    I'm looking forward to Petey vs. Steiner which could be very entertaining if Petey just immitates him for the whole match.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement