Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

hugh heffner.... would you really??

Options
135

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    As a 19 year old laydee-

    God no. What a sleazebag. I usually like older guys (well, not that much older) but to me 'Heff' is the personification of sexism. It's no wonder that women are not respected for the minds or talents but only their fake tits and young girls think to be a glamour model would be a great career. Makes me so mad! On principle alone, no, no, no! ( And i don't get his supposed 'charm' or 'charisma'- he wears pj's all day- sexy! :rolleyes:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Acacia wrote: »
    As a 19 year old laydee-

    God no. What a sleazebag. I usually like older guys (well, not that much older) but to me 'Heff' is the personification of sexism. It's no wonder that women are not respected for the minds or talents but only their fake tits and young girls think to be a glamour model would be a great career. Makes me so mad! On principle alone, no, no, no! ( And i don't get his supposed 'charm' or 'charisma'- he wears pj's all day- sexy! :rolleyes:)

    I'd hardly call him the personification of "Sexism". He's simply a guy living the dream. Surrounds himself with happy (mostly hot) people who just party 24/7.

    As for Holly leaving him. Of course that was going to happen. He already has a wife and kids (they live next door), and has made it very clear to any of the girls in his life that he will never marry again. She on the other hand made no secret of her ambition to marry him. So it was only a matter of time but this happened.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    dotsman wrote: »
    I'd hardly call him the personification of "Sexism". He's simply a guy living the dream. Surrounds himself with happy (mostly hot) people who just party 24/7.

    Because women are replaceable machines who should be chucked on the rubbish heap as soon as a younger or hotter model comes along. ;)

    It's the fact that people think he's ''living the dream'' that worries me. It all seems rather shallow and pointless to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,196 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    sam34 wrote: »
    ah now, did you really have to say that, ewwwwwww
    gross

    /pukes
    Bet it tastes like prune juice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭FruitLover


    JaneyMc wrote: »
    Do you watch 'Girls of the Playboy Mansion' or whatever it's called?

    I watch it for the articles.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    Bet it tastes like prune juice.

    /sam34 curls up in corner sobbing


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,719 ✭✭✭The Last Bandit


    Bet it tastes like prune juice.

    Ah thats just plain nasty :eek:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Acacia wrote: »
    Because women are replaceable machines who should be chucked on the rubbish heap as soon as a younger or hotter model comes along. ;)
    But she chucked him:eek:
    Acacia wrote: »
    It's the fact that people think he's ''living the dream'' that worries me. It all seems rather shallow and pointless to me.
    OK...
    has lead a very long and very interesting life - check
    has a great relationship with his kids who he loves very much and they love him - check
    has had an extremely successful career, building a media empire from scratch - check
    has had sex with more women than he can remember - check
    has had sex with some of the most beautiful women in the world (or at least are "regarded as the most beautiful women in the world") - check
    has fulfilled every fantasy (including, him, a big bed and seven hot naked horny women!) - check (that deserves a double check:D)
    has met some of the most famous and important people of the second half of the 20th century, counting many of them as his friends - check
    turned his home into the most famous house in the world - check
    still good friends with his estranged wife (not many can claim that!) - check
    has crazy parties almost every day (while the highlight of most people's lives when they're that age is going to mass) - check

    You call it "shallow and pointless". Most of us call it the dream life.

    And that's what it is, that's why he's successful. That's what he's famous for. He actually fulfils his fantasies (while most of us wake up, open our eyes and go about the same old thing).


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    Acacia wrote: »
    Because women are replaceable machines who should be chucked on the rubbish heap as soon as a younger or hotter model comes along. ;)

    It's the fact that people think he's ''living the dream'' that worries me. It all seems rather shallow and pointless to me.

    being happy is pointless?

    your being fairly naieve imo if you dont think the girls get just as much out of it as he does

    the girls choose to try out for the position no1 forces them. they are living lives that many many teenage girls would dream about and alot i imagine never grow out of dreaming it and alot of women would probably do it for free and im sure they are very very well paid for it


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    being happy is pointless?

    your being fairly naieve imo if you dont think the girls get just as much out of it as he does

    the girls choose to try out for the position no1 forces them. they are living lives that many many teenage girls would dream about and alot i imagine never grow out of dreaming it and alot of women would probably do it for free and im sure they are very very well paid for it

    Right...:rolleyes:

    Well, I'm not so ''naieve'' (naive) as to think the girls don't get anything out of it. They get money, and as you say they are well paid for it, but if you have sex for money, what does that make you? It's glorified prostitution no matter how you spin it. I'm not a prude, I've no problems with people doing that if it makes them happy, what's worrying is the growing trend among young women who think that is the best career option available and the best way to make money.

    ''No1 forces them''. Yes, nobody holds a gun to their heads and tells them to do it. But they're socially conditioned to believe that it's okay to sell yourself and be viewed solely as a sex object. And be sold the lie that it's liberating. I saw a programme recently about a famous French porn star (forget her name). Why did she lead that kind of life? She had mental problems ( such as severe depression), for one, and admitted to wanting attention. I'm sure this is pretty common for the women who end up in this line of work ( though of course not everybody can be tarred with the same brush).

    I'm sure a lot of teenage girls do dream about this kind of life (parties, money, etc). I'm saying that it's shallow and pointless to me. I would rather be valued for my mind and actions, rather than the size of my breasts. If these girls never grow out of this 'dream' of being a Playboy bunny, then they have problems, in my opinion.

    I think the evidence from this thread is that in fact a lot of women wouldn't do what they do, and certainly not for free.
    dotsman wrote: »
    But she chucked him:eek:


    OK...
    has lead a very long and very interesting life - check
    has a great relationship with his kids who he loves very much and they love him - check
    has had an extremely successful career, building a media empire from scratch - check
    has had sex with more women than he can remember - check
    has had sex with some of the most beautiful women in the world (or at least are "regarded as the most beautiful women in the world") - check
    has fulfilled every fantasy (including, him, a big bed and seven hot naked horny women!) - check (that deserves a double check:D)
    has met some of the most famous and important people of the second half of the 20th century, counting many of them as his friends - check
    turned his home into the most famous house in the world - check
    still good friends with his estranged wife (not many can claim that!) - check
    has crazy parties almost every day (while the highlight of most people's lives when they're that age is going to mass) - check

    You call it "shallow and pointless". Most of us call it the dream life.

    And that's what it is, that's why he's successful. That's what he's famous for. He actually fulfils his fantasies (while most of us wake up, open our eyes and go about the same old thing).

    I'm not talking about his most recent girlfriend. There have been scores of women who passed through the place, who are forgotten about when they passed their prime.

    Your post is full of generalisations and inaccuracies. Heff's life is not everyone's dream life, and in my opinion, I would find it shallow and pointless.
    Personally, I couldn't care less about meeting famous people or having them as friends, or being insanely rich. Sex is great, but if it was just meaningless sex for decades with people I had no emotional connection with (perhaps he has emotional connections with some of the bunnies, I don't know), then it would frankly get depressing after a while.

    As for most people not fulfilling their fantasies. Perhaps if people stopped chasing after this elusive 'perfect' life and were happy with more real, meaningful things, people would be a lot happier. Just my 2 cents.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Acacia wrote: »
    Your post is full of generalisations and inaccuracies.
    Really? Pot, kettle...


    Generalisation No 1: Every bunny is there purely for money.

    Acacia wrote: »
    Right...:rolleyes:

    Well, I'm not so ''naieve'' (naive) as to think the girls don't get anything out of it. They get money, and as you say they are well paid for it, but if you have sex for money, what does that make you? It's glorified prostitution no matter how you spin it. I'm not a prude, I've no problems with people doing that if it makes them happy, what's worrying is the growing trend among young women who think that is the best career option available and the best way to make money.
    OK, you are totally missing the point if you think it's all about money. It's about the life. It's about the 24 hour party, the fun, the happiness, the glamour, the experience. It's just like any other "celebrity" job.


    Generalisation No 2: "They" are socially conditioned to sell themselves and be viewed solely as a sex object.
    Generalisation No 3: Most girls working in the Adult industry must have mental problems
    Acacia wrote: »
    ''No1 forces them''. Yes, nobody holds a gun to their heads and tells them to do it. But they're socially conditioned to believe that it's okay to sell yourself and be viewed solely as a sex object. And be sold the lie that it's liberating. I saw a programme recently about a famous French porn star (forget her name). Why did she lead that kind of life? She had mental problems ( such as severe depression), for one, and admitted to wanting attention. I'm sure this is pretty common for the women who end up in this line of work ( though of course not everybody can be tarred with the same brush).
    So any girl who enjoys sex and is involved in the adult industry must have something wrong with her? You watch a documentary on 1 girl and apply it to most girls in an entire global industry? What does that say about your social conditioning?

    P.S. I see the girls as far more than sex objects (see below)


    Generalisation No 4: They are only valued for their breasts. (It couldn't be that he enjoys their company or anything like that)

    Acacia wrote: »
    I would rather be valued for my mind and actions, rather than the size of my breasts.
    And the bunnies, are they not valued for both (which is no doubt better?). Having seen a the show, I have to say that I would love to hang with Kendra and Bridget, and not in a sexual way. They've an incredible EQ and look to be so much fun to be around.



    Acacia wrote: »
    I think the evidence from this thread is that in fact a lot of women wouldn't do what they do, and certainly not for free.
    Are you calling some of the girls here hoors;)?


    Generalisation No 5: And what a whopping generalisation it is.
    Acacia wrote: »
    I'm not talking about his most recent girlfriend. There have been scores of women who passed through the place, who are forgotten about when they passed their prime.
    Names?


    Acacia wrote: »
    Heff's life is not everyone's dream life, and in my opinion, I would find it shallow and pointless.
    Never said it was yours nor everybody's dream. I said it was HIS dream. It happens to be a dream life that many would relate to, and with slight variations, I would imagine most people (definitely most guys) would love.
    Acacia wrote: »
    Personally, I couldn't care less about meeting famous people or having them as friends, or being insanely rich. Sex is great, but if it was just meaningless sex for decades with people I had no emotional connection with (perhaps he has emotional connections with some of the bunnies, I don't know), then it would frankly get depressing after a while.
    Yes he has had emotional connections with many of them, is still friends with a lot of them, went out with a good few of them, and even married one of them!

    After 82 years, he's still a very happy man!
    Acacia wrote: »
    As for most people not fulfilling their fantasies. Perhaps if people stopped chasing after this elusive 'perfect' life and were happy with more real, meaningful things, people would be a lot happier. Just my 2 cents.
    What have you got against dreams/fantasies? You're 19, so maybe haven't enough life experience, but most people, upon adulthood, accept they will never fulfil their dreams. It doesn't stop them from dreaming. It doesn't stop them from achieving some of their dreams. And it certainly doesn't stop them from applauding and respecting someone who has fulfilled their dreams


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    dotsman wrote: »
    Really? Pot, kettle...


    Generalisation No 1: Every bunny is there purely for money.


    OK, you are totally missing the point if you think it's all about money. It's about the life. It's about the 24 hour party, the fun, the happiness, the glamour, the experience. It's just like any other "celebrity" job.


    Generalisation No 2: "They" are socially conditioned to sell themselves and be viewed solely as a sex object.
    Generalisation No 3: Most girls working in the Adult industry must have mental problems


    So any girl who enjoys sex and is involved in the adult industry must have something wrong with her? You watch a documentary on 1 girl and apply it to most girls in an entire global industry? What does that say about your social conditioning?

    P.S. I see the girls as far more than sex objects (see below)


    Generalisation No 4: They are only valued for their breasts. (It couldn't be that he enjoys their company or anything like that)


    And the bunnies, are they not valued for both (which is no doubt better?). Having seen a the show, I have to say that I would love to hang with Kendra and Bridget, and not in a sexual way. They've an incredible EQ and look to be so much fun to be around.




    Are you calling some of the girls here hoors;)?


    Generalisation No 5: And what a whopping generalisation it is.


    Names?



    Never said it was yours nor everybody's dream. I said it was HIS dream. It happens to be a dream life that many would relate to, and with slight variations, I would imagine most people (definitely most guys) would love.


    Yes he has had emotional connections with many of them, is still friends with a lot of them, went out with a good few of them, and even married one of them!

    After 82 years, he's still a very happy man!


    What have you got against dreams/fantasies? You're 19, so maybe haven't enough life experience, but most people, upon adulthood, accept they will never fulfil their dreams. It doesn't stop them from dreaming. It doesn't stop them from achieving some of their dreams. And it certainly doesn't stop them from applauding and respecting someone who has fulfilled their dreams

    1. I suspect that money is a large part of it, somehow. None of them are doing it for free, are they?

    2. Most women are socially conditioned to view themselves as sex objects. They are constantly bombarded with images of what a beautiful woman is and believe that this is a good way to make money. I direct your attention here http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/161/161338_naked_ambition_rubs_off_on_teen_girls.html

    63% of 15-19 year old girls in Britain would rather be glamour models than a teacher or nurse.

    3. Not necessarily every woman in the industry, but a lot seem to have self-esteem issues. For example, Jodie Marsh who was badly bullied at school. I did say you couldn't tar every woman with the same brush, but you missed that bit, I see.

    4. Okay, you personally don't see them as sex objects, but I imagine the vast amounts of men who buy Playboy or similar magazines aren't doing it for the stimulating intellectual debate. And if the woman's personality is so important, why don't they have Mary Harney-look-a-likes in there? The woman's bodies are prioritised as the most important thing.

    5. I wouldn't dream of it. :p You said in your first post a lot of women would like to live the bunny life, even for free, however the vast majority of the posters here have said they wouldn't do it even if they were drugged.:eek:

    6. Because I know the name of every bunny who passed through the place. Well, what about Anna Nicole Smith? Wasn't she a Playmate of the Year? I think she was more or less forgotten about by the time of her death though.

    7. As for dreams and fantasies, I have no problem with them. Clearly my dreams and fantasies would differ from yours, and indeed, Heff's. My point is it saddens me to live in a world where women's looks are more important than her mind and opinions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 732 ✭✭✭Cmol


    Anyone read the autobiography of the ex playmate / girlfriend?

    Its a good read... Shows a different side of the whole playboy mansion / Hugh Heffner than we see on the show and things!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 132 ✭✭Summerjones


    Cmol wrote: »
    Anyone read the autobiography of the ex playmate / girlfriend?

    Its a good read... Shows a different side of the whole playboy mansion / Hugh Heffner than we see on the show and things!

    What was the different side? Was that his ex wife that wrote it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Pitcher or catcher?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,606 ✭✭✭Jumpy


    So, to add to this debate.. If you would do Heff, would you do Stan Lee?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Acacia wrote: »
    1. I suspect that money is a large part of it, somehow. None of them are doing it for free, are they?
    If you think so. Don't get me wrong, of course the money plays a part. But I think the unique lifestyle, glamour, partying etc is also a major part.
    Acacia wrote: »
    2. Most women are socially conditioned to view themselves as sex objects. They are constantly bombarded with images of what a beautiful woman is and believe that this is a good way to make money. I direct your attention here http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/161/161338_naked_ambition_rubs_off_on_teen_girls.html

    63% of 15-19 year old girls in Britain would rather be glamour models than a teacher or nurse.

    That survey is complete bull. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Tabloids printing off controversial results of some BS survey is not fact. Without seeing what the questions where, what the sample was etc, it is impossible to tell the quality of those results. (Take for example, the survey was supposed to be done by a website called (www.thelab.tv) - but it doesn't friggin exist! And when you try to goole it, pretty much the only results that come are regarding this particular survey.

    That's not to say that there aren't teeenage girls who are impressionable. In fact from what I remember, teenage girls are always impressionable! - and being a teacher is never the ultimate dream of any 15 year old!

    It's women who make these other women famous, build them up and then destroy them. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Hugh Hefner or what he stands for.
    Acacia wrote: »
    3. Not necessarily every woman in the industry, but a lot seem to have self-esteem issues. For example, Jodie Marsh who was badly bullied at school. I did say you couldn't tar every woman with the same brush, but you missed that bit, I see.

    In your opnion! But guess what, everybody's got issues. A lot of people were bullied at some stage, or had a fight with their parents, or got turned down by someone they love etc...

    Why are you insisting in this belief that there must be something wrong with them to enjoy what they do?
    Acacia wrote: »
    4. Okay, you personally don't see them as sex objects, but I imagine the vast amounts of men who buy Playboy or similar magazines aren't doing it for the stimulating intellectual debate. And if the woman's personality is so important, why don't they have Mary Harney-look-a-likes in there? The woman's bodies are prioritised as the most important thing.

    Have you actually ever read a Playboy? It certainly sounds like you haven't. From my experience, it's mainly girls who end up reading Playboy! For the record, it mainly consists of politics, sport, music, movies, economy, interviews with interesting people etc. But the anti-sex brigade always seem to focus on the fact that there is a centrfold (ie 3 or 4 pages in the middle with the playmate of the month)

    FHM/Loaded/Nuts etc - for intellectually retarded teenagers
    Pornon mags - for those without an internet connection;)
    Acacia wrote: »
    5. I wouldn't dream of it. :p You said in your first post a lot of women would like to live the bunny life, even for free, however the vast majority of the posters here have said they wouldn't do it even if they were drugged.:eek:

    I think you are confusing me with someone else. I never said anything that would even resemble "a lot of women would like to live the bunny life, even for free"
    Acacia wrote: »
    6. Because I know the name of every bunny who passed through the place. Well, what about Anna Nicole Smith? Wasn't she a Playmate of the Year? I think she was more or less forgotten about by the time of her death though.

    Anne Nicole Smith was a nobody until she met Hef. After achieving her fame/fortune, she moved on from Playboy. Ended up with an even older, richer man, went through the lawsuits, did here reality tv show, became a mess, died.

    Throughout her entire life, Hef was there for her, and it is widely know that they were close right up to her death.

    The fact of the matter is that you are claiming that he treats women as "replaceable machines who should be chucked on the rubbish heap as soon as a younger or hotter model comes along". Yet you cannot provide one single example (and with the hundreds of women he's been with, it should be very easy to provide a dozen!)

    The fact of the matter is that it is usually the other way aound. Typically, the girl in question has reached her desired level of fame etc, gettting tired of the constant partying and parts ways.

    The fact that these same girls always reappear at various parties of his over the subsequent years, would only show that there were no hard feelings etc. It is quiet common to see 50-year women at the mantion you know, many of them, former playmates.girlfreinds etc who are still friends.
    Acacia wrote: »
    7. As for dreams and fantasies, I have no problem with them. Clearly my dreams and fantasies would differ from yours, and indeed, Heff's. My point is it saddens me to live in a world where women's looks are more important than her mind and opinions.

    But again, you seem to focus purely on their looks. I say that it is you who regards them as "sex objects", because that's all you ever seem to think they are. I (and I would hope most people) see them as merely fun, attractive, bubbly etc. An who wouldn't want these types of people in their lives?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 132 ✭✭Summerjones


    Jumpy wrote: »
    So, to add to this debate.. If you would do Heff, would you do Stan Lee?

    Ah yeah, he's cool lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 732 ✭✭✭Cmol


    What was the different side? Was that his ex wife that wrote it?

    Nope not his ex wife, she was a girlfriend / playmate / bunny... whatever they're called!

    She was around just before the show launched.... basically she was saying that their lives were controlled by hef - he tells them where they can go and when... Yes, they get an allowance but she claimed it wasnt a fortune in relation to what they were expected to do with it (in regards to clothes and the whole look they are supposed to pull off 24/7) and if they needed any extra money for anything it would all have to be laid out for hef with good reaons as to why they needed it.... All the celebrity gigs they go to - she said that they would all be made to leave whenever heff wanted to which was usually well before midnight, just when the partys were kicking off, then he would take his viagra just in time for when they got home... also just stuff about the mansion - all those manky rat dogs the girls have? They have the run of the place and most are not house trained, she said that it looked like most of the rooms that we see on the show have been done up specifically for the show..

    I dont know how well ive explained this, it is a good read though!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    Heff makes us over 40's feel positively young ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 118 ✭✭Nursy


    You explained it well that sounds interesting! I already new they had an allowance that's why some of them are still going to University. Yeah you cannot be a house bunny all your life..hi..hi...

    Ah sure I think it's a bit of both Heff is probably nice enough,I presume he doesn't harrass them for sex a lot and they get some fame etc... It can launch a carreer.
    I have nothing against playboy or glamour models..I would myself live in a bikini if I was that well built :D
    It's just that I am not into sex with grandads...:eek: but again some people are desperate for fame etc... In a sense it provides good entertainment....

    Cmol wrote: »
    Nope not his ex wife, she was a girlfriend / playmate / bunny... whatever they're called!

    She was around just before the show launched.... basically she was saying that their lives were controlled by hef - he tells them where they can go and when... Yes, they get an allowance but she claimed it wasnt a fortune in relation to what they were expected to do with it (in regards to clothes and the whole look they are supposed to pull off 24/7) and if they needed any extra money for anything it would all have to be laid out for hef with good reaons as to why they needed it.... All the celebrity gigs they go to - she said that they would all be made to leave whenever heff wanted to which was usually well before midnight, just when the partys were kicking off, then he would take his viagra just in time for when they got home... also just stuff about the mansion - all those manky rat dogs the girls have? They have the run of the place and most are not house trained, she said that it looked like most of the rooms that we see on the show have been done up specifically for the show..

    I dont know how well ive explained this, it is a good read though!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    dotsman wrote: »
    If you think so. Don't get me wrong, of course the money plays a part. But I think the unique lifestyle, glamour, partying etc is also a major part.



    That survey is complete bull. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Tabloids printing off controversial results of some BS survey is not fact. Without seeing what the questions where, what the sample was etc, it is impossible to tell the quality of those results. (Take for example, the survey was supposed to be done by a website called (www.thelab.tv) - but it doesn't friggin exist! And when you try to goole it, pretty much the only results that come are regarding this particular survey.

    That's not to say that there aren't teeenage girls who are impressionable. In fact from what I remember, teenage girls are always impressionable! - and being a teacher is never the ultimate dream of any 15 year old!

    It's women who make these other women famous, build them up and then destroy them. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Hugh Hefner or what he stands for.



    In your opnion! But guess what, everybody's got issues. A lot of people were bullied at some stage, or had a fight with their parents, or got turned down by someone they love etc...

    Why are you insisting in this belief that there must be something wrong with them to enjoy what they do?



    Have you actually ever read a Playboy? It certainly sounds like you haven't. From my experience, it's mainly girls who end up reading Playboy! For the record, it mainly consists of politics, sport, music, movies, economy, interviews with interesting people etc. But the anti-sex brigade always seem to focus on the fact that there is a centrfold (ie 3 or 4 pages in the middle with the playmate of the month)

    FHM/Loaded/Nuts etc - for intellectually retarded teenagers
    Pornon mags - for those without an internet connection;)



    I think you are confusing me with someone else. I never said anything that would even resemble "a lot of women would like to live the bunny life, even for free"



    Anne Nicole Smith was a nobody until she met Hef. After achieving her fame/fortune, she moved on from Playboy. Ended up with an even older, richer man, went through the lawsuits, did here reality tv show, became a mess, died.

    Throughout her entire life, Hef was there for her, and it is widely know that they were close right up to her death.

    The fact of the matter is that you are claiming that he treats women as "replaceable machines who should be chucked on the rubbish heap as soon as a younger or hotter model comes along". Yet you cannot provide one single example (and with the hundreds of women he's been with, it should be very easy to provide a dozen!)

    The fact of the matter is that it is usually the other way aound. Typically, the girl in question has reached her desired level of fame etc, gettting tired of the constant partying and parts ways.

    The fact that these same girls always reappear at various parties of his over the subsequent years, would only show that there were no hard feelings etc. It is quiet common to see 50-year women at the mantion you know, many of them, former playmates.girlfreinds etc who are still friends.



    But again, you seem to focus purely on their looks. I say that it is you who regards them as "sex objects", because that's all you ever seem to think they are. I (and I would hope most people) see them as merely fun, attractive, bubbly etc. An who wouldn't want these types of people in their lives?

    1. Which seems like a shallow and pointless lifestyle to me. Don't kid yourself. Would these women be in the magazine or the mansion if they weren't beautiful? You haven't addressed why there are no conventionally 'un-attractive' women featured in the magazine. Whether they're getting paid in cold hard cash or in free drinks or in tickets to VIP events, they're still selling their sexuality.

    2. I still say there's quite a high percentage of young girls who value their looks as their most valuable asset. Having just left the secondary school system,I can say that this type of attitude is rife. Being pretty and using your looks to get the top of the pecking order is considered acceptable. Why wouldn't it be though? The media focus on a woman's looks over anything else- when they are interviews it's always about their diet or their appearance, and not much else.

    Perhaps not being a teacher is high on a teenager's priority list, but what about careers where they use their minds or talents to make money, instead of relying on their sexuality? A doctor, a scientist, etc, etc.

    Other women are responsible for this attitude too, but Heff, and his huge empire, was hugely influential in bringing about this situation.

    3. I've read all of these magazines. I believe FHM/Loaded/Nuts all have sections on sport, music, etc. also. Why are these magazines for intellectually-retarded teenagers, but Playboy isn't?

    And yes, the internet is much easier for downloading the auld pron, than a magazine.:p But Playboy, Nuts, etc, are all part of the sex industry.

    In any case, what about the Playboy TV channel? I haven't seen much besides nudity on that.

    4. Sure , a lot of people have got issues. The problem is when a woman thinks taking her clothes off for money will solve her self-esteem problems (like Jodie Marsh has tried to do.) Again, I've said twice that I'm not generalizing every woman in the industry. From what I've read, it seems to be a common problem in the industry. Again, I said in my first post if the woman in question is happy then fair play to her- but if she's doing it to cover up feelings of inadequacy then it's simply not healthy.

    5. Yes, you're right, that was PeakOutput. You said somehthing ( in jest, I'm sure) about me saying that the LL ladies were 'hoors'. I was trying to clear that up, because that's not what I meant.

    6. She ended up a drug-addicted mess, though, didn't she? You asked for a name and I gave you one. It's not Heff's responsibilty to sort out the girls' personal lives, that's not what I meant. But they are certainly swept to the side once they're past their prime ,as it were.

    Call me cynical, but I find it hard to believe that after trying so hard to get into this magical land of parties and all they've ever dreamed of, that the girls in question all simply get tired of the whole thing. And around the same time as the Heff finds himself a younger girlfriend? All a happy coincidence , I'm sure.:pac:

    Oh, the older ladies turn up at the parties, but do they feature much in the magazine or tv channel? Do they share Heff's bed? No, because he has indeed found a younger model to replace them.

    7. Yes, fun, attractive, bubbly people who mostly happen to be size 8's with double-D boobs and long hair. And we all know it's their fabulous personality people focus on when they're photographed semi-naked.

    Beleive me, I would love if this was the case, but it's simply not. They're presented as sex objects. Trying to suggest other wise is ridiculous.

    And I'm not anti-sex. I don't particularly care if a woman takes her clothes off (better that than the overly-repressive society we had here years ago, that's for sure). But it is my opinion that women in the adult industry are a representation of how a woman's looks are treated as her most valuable asset.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭panda100


    Acacia wrote: »
    4. Sure , a lot of people have got issues. The problem is when a woman thinks taking her clothes off for money will solve her self-esteem problems (like Jodie Marsh has tried to do.) .
    Acacia,I agree with everything you say!

    But apparently Jordan,in boards.ie standards, is the role model of a empowered,intelligent savy buisness women?? This is the same Jordan who got a nose job,liposuction and a boob reduction last year? All life threatening procedures,while she had three kids.? but she is the eptimome of intellignece and buisness savy that we as women are meant to admire? And If we dont admire her 'sucess' through her body we're obviously just jealous?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1035829/We-want-just-like-Jordan-Shocking-stories-teens-want-follow-glamour-models-footsteps.htmlmeant ???




    Acacia wrote: »
    And I'm not anti-sex. I don't particularly care if a woman takes her clothes off (better that than the overly-repressive society we had here years ago, that's for sure). But it is my opinion that women in the adult industry are a representation of how a woman's looks are treated as her most valuable asset.

    Your not anti-sex. The image of sex given out by playboy is not pro-female sex. Its a fake image of female sex.I dont think men are really turned on by fake baloon plastic breasts which are so abused by surgery that you have no nerve endings left, flat torsos, bleached blonde hair etc,but men are lead to believe this is what is attractive.Unfotunatly Capitalism makes huge profits of us wanting to be someone else so as long as we have capitalism we will have fake playboy bunnies and women acting turned on when there not really turned on just to make money of men who are so confused by consumerism that they dont realise that its realy affection,love and company that are the biggest turn ons.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    wow this thread has completely gone off topic

    it was me that said i know loads of girls who would live the playboy bunny lifestyle without any extra insentives and i stand by it, maybe they will grow out of it but the fact remains.

    porn isnt a symbol of anything its just another industry that will always be there

    women can look at it as degradation of women if they like but an argument can be made that its actually taking advantage of a natural instinct in guys so who is losing out? the guy who has to pay to get off or the woman who is getting paid? that argument is a slippery slope i know but my pojnt is basically that its not black and white.

    hugh isnt a bad guy because of the business he runs he is simply a business man. the playboy bunnys are part of that business, he knows it they know it most people choose to ignore it and just see the glamour side but its just good marketing.

    the girls arent sluts just because of the business they are in, its a business they make money and thats fine

    its how each of them act outside of that business arrangement that defines how they are as people, is heff a chauvinistic(sp) prick or an old style gentleman who loves female company. are they slappers who just whip their tits out or sharp operators who see this multibillion dollar industry as a stepping stone to greater things?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Clare Bear wrote: »
    I feel sorry for him in a way. With all his women and money, have any of them really ever truly loved him? Doubt it.

    He has had a number of proper relationships.

    Pretty people who show their tits for money are capable of being in love as well, you know...
    Acacia wrote: »
    mental problems...I'm sure this is pretty common for the women who end up in this line of work

    I've worked in the sex industry somewhat for about 10 years, and I assure you the number of people with "mental illness" in the sex industry is just the same as the number of people with mental illness in more "normal" industries.

    You might find this hard to grasp, but not everyone thinks like you - there are a lot of people who think nudity and sexual arousal are natural, healthy things. In fact, I think it is somewhat bizarre to think nudity and sexual arousal are something to be ashamed of. Afterall, both of these things are utterly natural and human.

    Everyone is different. Respect the fact that although you may not like to show your tits for money, a lot of people have no issue with it. They are not bad people - they are just different than you.

    Btw, I am a feminist. I believe women should be allowed do whatever they want. Trying to stop them from doing this shows a lack of faith in women.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,879 ✭✭✭Kya1976


    Not a chance!!! toyboys ftw!!!!:pac::pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭Acacia


    AARRRGH wrote: »

    I've worked in the sex industry somewhat for about 10 years, and I assure you the number of people with "mental illness" in the sex industry is just the same as the number of people with mental illness in more "normal" industries.

    You might find this hard to grasp, but not everyone thinks like you - there are a lot of people who think nudity and sexual arousal are natural, healthy things. In fact, I think it is somewhat bizarre to think nudity and sexual arousal are something to be ashamed of. Afterall, both of these things are utterly natural and human.

    Everyone is different. Respect the fact that although you may not like to show your tits for money, a lot of people have no issue with it. They are not bad people - they are just different than you.

    Btw, I am a feminist. I believe women should be allowed do whatever they want. Trying to stop them from doing this shows a lack of faith in women.

    I would actually be really interested in knowing the amount of women involved in the adult/sex industry who suffer from low self-esteem and body issues. From some of the stories I've heard, it seems to be common i.e. women with self-esteem issues seem to graviate towards it.However, I'll repeat myself for the third time- you can't label every woman in the industry as somebody with emotional problems. It seems people here like to pick and choose what part of my posts they'll respond to because it fits their argument.

    ''You might find this hard to grasp, but not everyone thinks like you'':rolleyes:

    When did I ever say sex and arousal were not natural or human? When did I ever say sex was shameful? You might find this hard to grasp but putting words in somebody's mouth does not constitute an effective argument. If you had read my previous post properly you might have noticed this:
    Acacia wrote: »

    And I'm not anti-sex. I don't particularly care if a woman takes her clothes off (better that than the overly-repressive society we had here years ago, that's for sure).

    That is, I would be the first person to say that sex is nothing to be ashamed of and the attitude towards women and sex in this country 50 years ago was ridiculous. My question is this; why do you assume that just because I don't think it's a positive thing for a woman to value her body as an asset over her mind/intelligence/talents, that I'm against sex somehow? At least, that's the impression I'm getting from your post.

    I'm well aware that everyone is different and I do respect other people's opinions. And where did I say that they were bad people? Again, you seem to have missed this part of my post:
    Acacia wrote: »
    Again, I said in my first post if the woman in question is happy then fair play to her-

    I'm just giving my honest opinion on the subject.

    I agree with the final part of your post- I would consider myself a feminist, and that women should be 'allowed' to do whatever they want. However, I'm not lacking in faith in women. Both women and men are involved in the sex industry, after all.However, I don't agree with an industry that exploits vulnerable women ( I'll repeat that this is not every woman) and a culture that tells women that their looks and bodies are their most valuable asset.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    =AARRRGH;57547497]He has had a number of proper relationships.

    Pretty people who show their tits for money are capable of being in love as well, you know...


    You might find this hard to grasp, but not everyone thinks like you - there are a lot of people who think nudity and sexual arousal are natural, healthy things. In fact, I think it is somewhat bizarre to think nudity and sexual arousal are something to be ashamed of. Afterall, both of these things are utterly natural and human.

    Everyone is different. Respect the fact that although you may not like to show your tits for money, a lot of people have no issue with it. They are not bad people - they are just different than you.



    Amen .Nudity and sexual arousal are indeed normal natural healthy things .Repressive thoughts can make people believe the opposite imo .

    If we lived in a warmer sunnier climate we would also wear less clothes which would, or might, also upset some people


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,241 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    Heffner? Geeeeeeeeez! No way! He's better than 4 times my age, plus I have to be in love with someone which eliminates mere celebrity attraction.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Acacia wrote: »
    I would actually be really interested in knowing the amount of women involved in the adult/sex industry who suffer from low self-esteem and body issues. From some of the stories I've heard, it seems to be common i.e. women with self-esteem issues seem to graviate towards it.

    I think you'll find there are lots of women with low self esteem in EVERY industry. Low self esteem is kinda common, you know?

    Just like people who experienced child abuse. Yep, they work in every industry.

    Acacia wrote: »
    When did I ever say sex and arousal were not natural or human? When did I ever say sex was shameful?

    It's as clear as day you have issues with the concept of nudity and sex. If you didn't, you wouldn't be trying so hard to convince us that women who choose to show their body to the world have emotional issues or low self esteem.

    Acacia wrote: »
    However, I don't agree with an industry that exploits vulnerable women ( I'll repeat that this is not every woman) and a culture that tells women that their looks and bodies are their most valuable asset.

    I'm sorry to break this to you, but there are bad people in EVERY industry. That's right - there are some bad people in the sex industry. Just like there are bad people in the fashion industry (your clothes were probably made using child labour) and in the food industry (do you think every animal is killed humanely?). Every industry has problems!

    It really annoys me that people try to find problems in the adult industry, ignoring the fact that their arguments could be applied to any industry.

    I work in the IT industry and I assure you there are just as many damaged and bad people working with software as there are working with nudity.

    I repeat: just because you wouldn't take your clothes off for money doesn't mean every thinks like you or is like you. We are all different.


Advertisement