Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Banned from After Hours

Options
  • 14-10-2008 4:06pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,268 ✭✭✭


    There is thread on AH inviting boards users to post their most controversial opinion. I posted mine and I was banned.

    Surely this is illogical.

    MM
    Post edited by Shield on


«1

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    There's not such thing as logic on boards.ie. Only sweet emotion baby....

    sorry, i'm listening to the song.

    MM


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,867 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    Link to offending post?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭eVeNtInE


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    eVeNtInE wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.
    haha....

    totally justified tbh. I wouldn't say he was trolling, just a complete loon.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Controversial - yes. Bannable - questionable.
    A lot of people have the same opinion.
    OP, PM Karoma and perhaps you get it lifted?

    Btw, just because another user invites you to post doesn't mean you can post anything you like. If the post is considered too offensive you get a smack on the wrist.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,235 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    eVeNtInE wrote: »
    ..........


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭gaz wac


    Im a kinda newbee, but I thought you could say anything in AH, no?

    Some bloke got banned last week for going off topic!! I thought that was the whole point of AH, that you could just say random stuff?


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    gaz wac wrote: »
    Im a kinda newbee, but I thought you could say anything in AH, no?

    AH has a charter, everyone is supposed to read it before posting
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=304451


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭eVeNtInE


    This post has been deleted.


  • Posts: 8,647 [Deleted User]


    I can't really see the logic of banning him.There have been more controversial things said in that thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Xavi6 wrote: »
    Link to offending post?

    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=51791


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,557 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    gaz wac wrote: »
    I thought that was the whole point of AH, that you could just say random stuff?
    No, that's Feedback.

    Wibble.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,912 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ponster


    gaz wac wrote: »
    Im a kinda newbee, but I thought you could say anything in AH, no?

    Some bloke got banned last week for going off topic!! I thought that was the whole point of AH, that you could just say random stuff?

    Nope. You're thinking of a different forum.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,912 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ponster


    biko wrote: »
    Controversial - yes. Bannable - questionable.
    A lot of people have the same opinion..

    Wishing and expressing your hope of the death of 300 million people isn't exactly typical AH banter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    gaz wac wrote: »
    Im a kinda newbee, but I thought you could say anything in AH, no?
    No.
    Some bloke got banned last week for going off topic!!
    Pssst! your ignorance is showing.
    If you're going to get twistedknickeritus, at least let be over something remotely resembling fact.


    biko wrote:
    A lot of people have the same opinion.
    OP, PM Karoma and perhaps you get it lifted?
    And a lot of people have the same opinion re: Irish, blacks, women, and so on and so forth. Such an ignorant statement without any discussion or point of view to back it up is just drivel.
    He did. He gave me a whopping 2 minutes to reply.


    I can't really see the logic of banning him.There have been more controversial things said in that thread.
    And there have been other bans in that thread.
    He was banned because he's a troll (Admittedly, not as bad as he used to be). This is just one time too many & it crossed a line.

    I made it clear from the start of this thread that it's not a free-for-all, so where's the confusion?





    Why has Feedback gone back to the old Feedback?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    It's pretty straightforward really: you post something controversial and provocative... you back it up.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,584 CMod ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Karoma wrote: »
    twistedknickeritus

    I just learnt a squiffy new word :cool: - thanks K. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    Oops, wrong thread!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭wyndham


    الله أكبر.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,268 ✭✭✭mountainyman


    Thanks for clarifying that Karoma.

    I would hope that these now constant posters banging on about Gypsies, 'Knackers' etc. will face the same stalwart use of of the ban button.

    Cheers to Karoma for his courageous stance
    Jeers to Mountainyman for not reading the warning.

    MM


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    Am I the only one that reads the OP's name as 'Mount-Any-Man'?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    I would hope that these now constant posters banging on about Gypsies, 'Knackers' etc. will face the same stalwart use of of the ban button.
    Plenty of them have - deliberately sh1t-stirring language and/or not backing up provocative statements are reprimanded throughout that thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,557 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    Fajitas! wrote: »
    Am I the only one that reads the OP's name as 'Mount-Any-Man'?
    Nope.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Ponster wrote: »
    Wishing and expressing your hope of the death of 300 million people isn't exactly typical AH banter.

    True, 300 milion falls well short of the expected target.

    Mike


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Thanks for clarifying that Karoma.

    I would hope that these now constant posters banging on about Gypsies, 'Knackers' etc. will face the same stalwart use of of the ban button.

    Cheers to Karoma for his courageous stance
    Jeers to Mountainyman for not reading the warning.

    MM

    They have done and will do.
    The ban seems to have done the trick, and you've been sensible... ban reduced to 1 week.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    See!

    Karoma's a good guy and Mountanyman's learned a lesson, THE SYSTEM WORKS!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,130 ✭✭✭✭Kiera


    Fajitas! wrote: »
    Am I the only one that reads the OP's name as 'Mount-Any-Man'?

    He tried to change it a few years ago cause everyone was giving him stick. Each to their own, eh mountanyman ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,556 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    The september 11 attacks were totally justified and from the point of view of the worlds 2 billion poor the only good American is dead American.

    If thats the post, you deserved the ban and a kick in the nuts.

    Overheal, on behalf of ..erm.. myself i apologise.

    I love yanks*


    *except those grit eating redneck southerners :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 83,235 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    snyper wrote: »
    If thats the post, you deserved the ban and a kick in the nuts.

    Overheal, on behalf of ..erm.. myself i apologise.

    I love yanks*


    *except those grit eating redneck southerners :pac:
    when you think about it its not really the OPs opinion, its an observation. Well ok, saying the attacks were justified make you sound, well...yeah.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭Jack Sheehan


    While it's pretty damn distasteful the thread was about your most contoversial opinion.

    On the other hand...if theres a history of this then I suppose a banning is justified.


Advertisement