MICK FOLEY QUESTION!!!

D.Q · 20-10-2008 3:17pm #1

hey,

I was reading the Hardcore Diaries there recently, and there were certain allusions made in the book that i didnt get the first time i read it and still dont now.

difference is im a member of this forum now, and you guys seem to know yiz shiz.

so what is the story with HHH bein a bit of an oul bollocks?
and with flair and foley?

also....if anyones read it? wanna discuss it?

gimmick · 20-10-2008 3:25pm

So its 3 questions, and only one about Foley

I stopped reading it, as it is rubbish.

Re HHH, lets not start on that again. Best bet is type HHH into search here and see what the general vibe is.

rovert · 20-10-2008 3:27pm

DieselQueen wrote: »

so what is the story with HHH bein a bit of an oul bollocks?

It seems that HHH has a problem with everyone saying without the feud(s) with Foely he wouldnt be where he is today. Foley is in my opinion is hyper sensitive and the fact HHH rarely if ever gives Mick props for helping him to establish himself as main eventer bothers Foley.

DieselQueen wrote: »

and with flair and foley?

Foley was critical about Flair in his first book. As Foley thought Flair sabotaged him in WCW. Flair maintained in his book he couldnt do nothing of the sort as all he was concerned about was keeping his own job as wrestler/booker. In Flair's book called Foley as glorified stunt man and compared him to Brutus Beefcake as Flair wanted to issue a receipt to Foely's comments in his book eventhough Flair never read it and only knew second hand what Foley said. They eventually worked everything out and worked together. They are now appartently on good terms.

rovert · 20-10-2008 3:32pm

In other words no one had more input into making HHH a main eventer compared to Foley by a very wide, inordinate margin.

PretentiousApe · 20-10-2008 4:09pm

Didn't Foley full-on bitch about Ric Flair's controversial antics in one of his books, though? Heard something about him suggesting that Flair was a sex-addict.

Gerard.C · 20-10-2008 4:46pm

Rovet, why do you double post so much?

rovert · 20-10-2008 5:07pm

PretentiousApe wrote: »

Didn't Foley full-on bitch about Ric Flair's controversial antics in one of his books, though? Heard something about him suggesting that Flair was a sex-addict.

Nope beside the stories everyone else tells.

Gerard.C wrote: »

Rovet, why do you double post so much?

So much?

Lord TSC · 20-10-2008 5:28pm

PretentiousApe wrote: »

Didn't Foley full-on bitch about Ric Flair's controversial antics in one of his books, though? Heard something about him suggesting that Flair was a sex-addict.

Wait? Flair is a sex adict? Who would have guessed it

>_____>

DRakE · 20-10-2008 7:40pm

gimmick wrote: »

I stopped reading it, as it is rubbish.

me too. i loved foleys first book, i was a big fan. the hardcore diaries are so bitter than i'm just not arsed with him anymore

D.Q · 20-10-2008 7:57pm

DRakE wrote: »

me too. i loved foleys first book, i was a big fan. the hardcore diaries are so bitter than i'm just not arsed with him anymore

they really are, hes such a moany cu*t in it really.

and imo he has no right to be bitter, his storyline ideas are totally woeful.

PretentiousApe · 20-10-2008 8:02pm

I always thought Foley was a bit of hypocritical character. He likes to keep things PG on the mic', while he's had some of the most violent matches in WWF history. He's like a strange mixture of Hulk Hogan and Necrobutcher.

ShawnRaven · 20-10-2008 8:04pm

Hardly, he's a guy who does what his boss tells him, simple as.
If you read his previous books, you'd know that he was the first to defend WWE during the PTC around 99-00, when he was able to count a lot more violence in shows like E.R, etc.

callaway92 · 20-10-2008 8:08pm

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Hardly, he's a guy who does what his boss tells him, simple as.
If you read his previous books, you'd know that he was the first to defend WWE during the PTC around 99-00, when he was able to count a lot more violence in shows like E.R, etc.

whats that?

ShawnRaven · 20-10-2008 8:11pm

The nazi's who try to pull shows off television because the parents of Little Joey scream concern, yet see fit to let him sit there when CSI is on!

It's also what the RTC were a pisstake of.

Fozzy · 20-10-2008 9:49pm

ShawnRaven wrote: »

The nazi's who try to pull shows off television because the parents of Little Joey scream concern, yet see fit to let him sit there when CSI is on!

It's also what the RTC were a pisstake of.

CSI's a bad example: http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/shows/main.asp?shwid=346 :pac:

The book was interesting in a certain way. It revealed more of a different side to Mick

ShawnRaven · 20-10-2008 9:55pm

Fozzy wrote: »

CSI's a bad example: http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/shows/main.asp?shwid=346 :pac:

That was exactly my point Foz.
Parents will bitch about the likes of Pro Wrestling, UFC etc.
However there are some parents that will have no problem with their kids in the room while CSI is on.

Handsome Bob · 20-10-2008 10:00pm

ShawnRaven wrote: »

The nazi's who try to pull shows off television because the parents of Little Joey scream concern, yet see fit to let him sit there when CSI is on!

It's also what the RTC were a pisstake of.

Movies are the ones that suffer these days. You'll never see Carnage in a Spider-man film because Sony will never make a Rated R film. The British Film Censor Board was vilified for only making TDK 12A, even though there was no dwelling on blood, injury or violence(their own rules for a 12A). And I'm pretty sure we're not going to get a rated R Terminator film come June.:rolleyes:

ShawnRaven · 20-10-2008 10:05pm

LZ5by5 wrote: »

And I'm pretty sure we're not going to get a rated R Terminator film come June.:rolleyes:

At the risk of going off topic here, but after Rise Of The Machines, i'm hoping i'll never see another Terminator movie again.

MICK FOLEY QUESTION!!!

Comments