Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

International waters and shipping drugs

  • 08-11-2008 1:05pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭


    In light of thursdays record haul something popped into my mind

    the navy boarded the vessel 200 miles off the coast then escorted the yacht in to cork.
    what right have they to board a vessel in international waters ?
    and what if they werent going to ireland say they were on there way to norway which is what they could say and theres no way to prove otherwise.
    do the government have any business meddeling in this?
    fair enough if it was within 12 miles but surely irish law doesnt cover that far out, and do they have a defence of out of juristiction ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,544 ✭✭✭Hogzy


    200miles off the coast is actually Irish waters. believe it or not our waters are huge and were extended.
    We have one of the largest territorial waters in the world
    Read this:
    http://archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/2007/04/07/story305438.asp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 860 ✭✭✭rondeco


    Also, the maximum sentence these guys can get is 7 years...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Where do the 3 mile and 12 mile limits come into effect?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,535 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    rondeco wrote: »
    Also, the maximum sentence these guys can get is 7 years...

    How is that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    There was a case only very recently in the irish courts. Whereby the irish navy stopped a private sail boat and entered the boat without permission and were heavy handed with the owner.

    It was determined that the navy had acted unlawfully as they were outside the 12 mile nautical limit and therefore had nor right to enter the boat owners boat.

    So the limit is 12 mile or thereabouts. International law might be different and allow a boat to be escorted to a particular country and then searched.I know that new laws were being created to allow british navy ships to aprrehend pirates.
    Perhaps this is a result of that development.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana



    So the limit is 12 mile or thereabouts. International law might be different and allow a boat to be escorted to a particular country and then searched.I know that new laws were being created to allow british navy ships to aprrehend pirates.
    Perhaps this is a result of that development.
    So these lads could have told the Navy to piss off as they were outside the 12 mile limit?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,655 ✭✭✭1966


    Just wondering what happens the drugs that they caught. how long are they kept after testing and are they incinerated or what ???


  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    1966 wrote: »
    Just wondering what happens the drugs that they caught. how long are they kept after testing and are they incinerated or what ???

    Eh, we are having a financial crisis, they are selling them on don't you know! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,494 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    At sea, the flag government* could give in this case the Irish government permission to board the boat. AFAIK, if there is no flag, any government can board the boat and I think there is a presumption of piracy** in such cases.

    The 200NM*** limit is the economic exclusion zone only, not territorial waters. Irelands territorial waters are 12NM based on an extended baseline (that is outside minor islands).

    * The country where the boat is registered.
    ** The state of being a pirate, as opposed to any actual acts of piracy.
    *** 1NM = 2000 yards = 1809 metres


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭IRISH RAIL


    Then going by that victor it was an illegal boarding as the boat was deregistered and they knew they were smugglers as opposed pirates the dea was tracking them
    it wasnt a luck search but a pre meditated one and not for piracy.
    wonder would that stand up?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,494 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    IRISH RAIL wrote: »
    Then going by that victor it was an illegal boarding as the boat was deregistered and they knew they were smugglers as opposed pirates the dea was tracking them
    it wasnt a luck search but a pre meditated one and not for piracy.
    wonder would that stand up?
    They were flying the Red Ensign - the civil version of the Union Jack.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭IRISH RAIL


    So I assume the custums in ireland will have to show that they recieved permission in court when the hoodlums are being tried?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭Bogger77


    Victor wrote: »
    They were flying the Red Ensign - the civil version of the Union Jack.
    Had the boat not re-registered as British flagged boat, hence it was non flag at the time, ie presumed pirate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    The ship was tracked using satellite. The high seas act does allow a ship to be arrested if followed/chased uninterrupted by either aeroplane or ship but has a strict criteria and and you must make some form of contact with the ship.

    This ship might have been OFF radio and actively avoiding contact with customs Navy etc.. Then was tracked using satellite and arrested conveniently in the 200 mile economic zone.

    Perhaps satellite tracking might also be a valid means of chasing/following a ship in order to arrest it. I mean how can a aeroplane arrest a ship, it can't physically arrest it, (apart from certain types of aircraft) anymore than a sateliite can, therefore it was arrested via satellite it seems.

    Page 1


    Convention on the High Seas 1958

    (a)
    That the ship is engaged in piracy; or

    2. In the cases provided for in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) above, the warship may proceed to verify the
    ship’s right to fly its flag. To this end, it may send a boat under the command of an officer to the suspected ship.
    Page 7
    7
    If suspicion remains after the documents have been checked, it may proceed to a further examination on board
    the ship, which must be carried out with all possible consideration.
    3. If the suspicions prove to be unfounded, and provided that the ship boarded has not committed any act
    justifying them, it shall be compensated for any loss or damage that may have been sustained


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Johnny Utah


    pirelli wrote: »
    There was a case only very recently in the irish courts. Whereby the irish navy stopped a private sail boat and entered the boat without permission and were heavy handed with the owner.

    It was determined that the navy had acted unlawfully as they were outside the 12 mile nautical limit and therefore had nor right to enter the boat owners boat.

    So the limit is 12 mile or thereabouts. International law might be different and allow a boat to be escorted to a particular country and then searched.I know that new laws were being created to allow british navy ships to aprrehend pirates.
    Perhaps this is a result of that development.


    Like this fella here? :D

    sparrow.jpg




    pirelli wrote: »
    The ship was tracked using satellite. The high seas act does allow a ship to be arrested if followed/chased uninterrupted by either aeroplane or ship but has a strict criteria and and you must make some form of contact with the ship.

    This ship might have been OFF radio and actively avoiding contact with customs Navy etc.. Then was tracked using satellite and arrested conveniently in the 200 mile economic zone.

    Perhaps satellite tracking might also be a valid means of chasing/following a ship in order to arrest it. I mean how can a aeroplane arrest a ship, it can't physically arrest it, (apart from certain types of aircraft) anymore than a sateliite can, therefore it was arrested via satellite it seems.


    Easy, just lift it up with a really big helicopter. Haven't you seen swordfish? :D




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭IRISH RAIL


    so it flew the red ensign ok
    the us government were tracking them ok
    the us government knew what they were doing
    the irish government knew what they were doing

    but drug running is not piracy
    the ship did not commit an act of piracy
    both governments knew that but still went outside the zone to intercept the craft so not having a valid reason to search the ship would that not predujice the case ?

    and also the offence would be conspiracy to smuggle in to the state
    can they prove they were coming to the state ? they could say we were on our way to russia and this feckin irish ejit arrives in international waters boards us in bad weather and makes us go to his country

    now maybe im missing some super legislation here but isnt that kidnapping ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,494 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Who's to say they didn't have permission form the British govenment to board. While strictly speaking they would be committing an offence of possession in Britain, the British and Irish governments have laws allowing the prosecution of offences that occured in the other jurisdiction.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    The ship was deregistered so flying the Red Ensign meant nothing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 Vote09ireland


    The ship was in international waters and, according to the wikipedia page on the issue(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Seabight) were about to colapse, so the irish navy boarded
    Dances with waves was until recently (july) registered in britain but de registered so officially wasn't registered anywhere

    Because they weren't in Irish waters they were charged with possession of cocaine knowing the drug was to be imported into a country other than Ireland. Which is an act with extra terrestrial effect. and only carries 7 years max


    Aiden Kelly
    Irish organiser (and legal eagle)
    Voter Registration Campaign for European Elections 09 Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,494 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Bond-007 wrote: »
    The ship was deregistered so flying the Red Ensign meant nothing.
    I don't think it meant "nothing" - it would give UK officials the perfect right to board.

    If a vessel isn't flying any national flag, any state could board it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭IRISH RAIL


    mmm this has turned interesting
    so they will only get 7 years for 700 million (roughly) of coke
    if you charge them with trying to smuggle to ireland or britan you still have to prove they were going to britain
    sounds to me like they went in too soon ( i know the weater was bad and the ship was in danger)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 Vote09ireland


    IRISH RAIL wrote: »
    mmm this has turned interesting
    so they will only get 7 years for 700 million (roughly) of coke
    if you charge them with trying to smuggle to ireland or britan you still have to prove they were going to britain
    sounds to me like they went in too soon ( i know the weater was bad and the ship was in danger)


    They are being charged with importing into a country other than Ireland so all they have to prove is that it wasn't going to ireland

    If they had waited, worse case senario, the ship would have colapsed, dumping its cargo and spreading the people and the drugs across the channel, wind dependant

    If you think in a more positive light, although i see your point, 700 million euro worth of coke has been captured and is another scalp in Europe on the drug traffickers

    And as this is the second big haul in roughly a year it will show trafficker that they will get captured which is a far better return

    As this was an international operation if they had gone further france or england would have taken them it was bad weather that meant irish navy had to capture them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭IRISH RAIL


    OH GOD yea get it off the streets and well done to all involved
    it could have been a lot worse if i was running drugs worth that much id have a few countermeasures onboard.
    I just tought like most people that once you were out in international waters you were immune from prosecution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 Vote09ireland


    Theoretically that's thrue but allot of extra judicial rules have been created to deal with pedophiles, drugs and the biggy WAR on Terrorism


Advertisement