Brush up your Shakespeare/An thig leat Bearla?

cabinteelytom

'Foreign workers may have to prove English proficiency' is an article in today's www.irishexaminer.ie. Minister Lenihan floats this idea for 'migrant workers renewing their work permits'. So he wants your reactions.
How are they going to do that? Would it be through an expensive publicly funded standardised test in supervised conditions incorporating an accurate identity check? Perhaps like a driving test?; and you know how well that works-hooray for the public-sector. Will there be an appeals procedure? Will the Equality Commission have a veto on this initiative? Will this be in place of, or in addition to, a labour-needs test?
Comment:This faint-hearted, apologetic, piecemeal proposal will not rescue the Government's pretence to be building a 'knowledge economy' but is an example of the de Tocqueville principle, 'the most dangerous time for bad Government is when it tries to reform'.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

cabinteelytom

The intra-EU movement of workers is a freedom of the EU club, from which we also benefit. We can go to Switzerland or Spain and get out the rain for a bit. But bringing in people from outside the EU is almost entirely down to our own national regulations (which are described by the arriveandthrive.com website as 'relatively straightforward and inexpensive' and our Green Card as 'probably the easiest work permit to secure in the western world today'.) That's nice isn't it?
Belatedly the Government is beginning to consider the long-term financial liability posed by temporarily-employed, low-skilled, poorly educated people in a State with generous welfare, health and education services, and, after the fact, thinking it should test them for basic communication skills.
This is such an admission of incompetence.
Only employers have benefitted from these regulations. The taxpayer is left with all the liabilities of poor policy.

O'Morris

donegalfella wrote:

This post has been deleted.

It's obvious that this is aimed at non-Europeans and therefore it only applies to people who don't have the same colour skin as us. I'm going to hold my breath until I hear that Mary Coughlan has reminded her cabinet colleague of this fact. She was quick to remind Leo Veradcar of it so I would expect her to be as vocal in condemning members of her own party for such blatant racism.

SeanW

It's about bloody time. I think the government has finally realised that "multiculturalism" is a joke - I saw positive steps when the new government introduced a Minister for Integration - we don't want to follow the mistakes of the U.K, Germany etc and bring in a whole bunch of people from far away who have no intention of ever integrating into our society and in some cases violently resist integration. Like this.

We have a right - and I would argue a duty to ourselves - to demand that anyone coming to our country to live should learn our language and attempt to integrate into our society.

Anything that helps this is proper order.

leninbenjamin

I think it's necessary tbh. I'm sure most of us have plenty of first hand experiences where language barriers have caused more headaches than they should, some of my worst experiences are after a visit to our local A&E where a doc. could barely understand my symptoms. Other experiences relate to our 3rd level institutions where some lecturers I've had could barely hold one to one conversation in English, let along make themselves clear enough to the hundred or so people in the theatre.

And for those who immediately jump to play the racism card, it's not racism it's common sense. particularly in relation to people who provide critical and skilled services where good communication is essential.

As for implementing it; why don't they just use something like TOEFL or equivalent to save exchequer expense like the Unis do (just demand a higher score than the Unis do currently)? leave it up to the applicants to sort out getting the qualification.

djpbarry

cabinteelytom wrote: »

The intra-EU movement of workers is a freedom of the EU club, from which we also benefit. We can go to Switzerland...

You fail at EU geography.

cabinteelytom wrote: »

Belatedly the Government is beginning to consider the long-term financial liability posed by temporarily-employed, low-skilled, poorly educated people in a State with generous welfare, health and education services...

We have generous welfare, health and education services? Are they hidden somewhere?

djpbarry

SeanW wrote: »

It's about bloody time. I think the government has finally realised that "multiculturalism" is a joke - I saw positive steps when the new government introduced a Minister for Integration - we don't want to follow the mistakes of the U.K, Germany etc and bring in a whole bunch of people from far away who have no intention of ever integrating into our society and in some cases violently resist integration. Like this.

Indeed. I estimate that improved proficiency in the English language among the immigrant population should save countless young women's lives. Or was there another point to linking to that story?

I've asked this on several threads before and I don't believe I've ever received a response, but I'll try again; what exactly is "integration"?

Thomas_S_Hunterson

Finally I might be able to order my subway in under 2 minutes.

dsmythy

O'Morris wrote: »

It's obvious that this is aimed at non-Europeans and therefore it only applies to people who don't have the same colour skin as us. I'm going to hold my breath until I hear that Mary Coughlan has reminded her cabinet colleague of this fact. She was quick to remind Leo Veradcar of it so I would expect her to be as vocal in condemning members of her own party for such blatant racism.

Dunno, there's a lot of white people in Georgia as well as <enter non-english speaking predominantly white country not in the EU>.

If you want to cut down on imported workers and you can't do it to EU workers then you can only target non-EU workers. There's no other way!Coughlan was wrong claiming racism against Varadkar and would be wrong doing the same in this case. If the EU freedom of movement didn't exist then they would be targeted more since they make up the big majority of imported workers. But it does, and here we are with this proposal.

CDfm

Whats wrong with it - the PC crowd are too sensitive on these issues.

Id go further and have a proficiency test in Irish. Forget Skakespeare read Peig Sayers and live in the Blaskets for a year to earn citizenship.

Then they will appreciate it.

dsmythy

djpbarry wrote: »

Indeed. I estimate that improved proficiency in the English language among the immigrant population should save countless young women's lives. Or was there another point to linking to that story?

I've asked this on several threads before and I don't believe I've ever received a response, but I'll try again; what exactly is "integration"?

It's probably like a sort of anti-multiculturalism although multiculturalism and integration are often mentioned in the same breath.

To me it is the attempted process, with contributions from both sides, to get a long to total term migrant and the children of said migrant to fit a particular social paradigm, which states roughly (in Ireland's case), "The subject identifies as being primarily Irish and is identified by the majority of others as being primarily Irish".

The initial migrant for me has a low chance of fitting this profile compared with the child of the migrant whom i think in the right environment and with the correct policies has a very high chance of gaining that level of Irish identity.

What exactly is this government's idea of integration anyway?

djpbarry

CDfm wrote: »

Id go further and have a proficiency test in Irish.

You might want to start with the 90% of the native population who can’t speak the language.

dsmythy wrote: »

It's probably like a sort of anti-multiculturalism although multiculturalism and integration are often mentioned in the same breath.

And both are, at best, rather vague concepts.

dsmythy wrote: »

To me it is the attempted process, with contributions from both sides, to get a long to total term migrant and the children of said migrant to fit a particular social paradigm, which states roughly (in Ireland's case), "The subject identifies as being primarily Irish and is identified by the majority of others as being primarily Irish".

First part of that is fine, but I don’t see why migrants should have to consider themselves Irish. I myself would have more of an affiliation with Dublin than I would with Ireland. Besides, if an Irish person emigrates, there’s no way that they’re going to adopt the nationality of the country that they emigrate to, so I’m not sure why immigrants to Ireland should be expected to “swap” nationalities.

On the whole English-language issue, obviously it makes sense that immigrants can communicate with others, but on the other hand, I don’t think immigrants are going to get terribly far without it, particularly in the long term, so most will take it upon themselves to learn, hence the boom in English language schools. Personally, I think the problem is being blown out of proportion; I can’t say that I have problems communicating with non-Irish people in shops, cafes, restaurants or wherever. Sure you could travel to just about any city in Europe and the chances are that staff in the service industries will be able to communicate through English, at least at a basic level.

Besides, even without a language proficiency test, I can’t imagine it would be terribly easy to obtain a work permit without being able to speak English?

podge79

It's all well and good attempting to force migrants to learn the language but it's all pointless if the nation - not just the govt - does not accept them positively and make concrete efforts to help them into settling into a new life here.

Migrants are not going to become part of the native community if they are all "ghettoised" together in areas and forgotten about, mistreated, misused exploited.

If we expect them to integrate/assimilate into our society we must also take into account customs and traditions from where they come and respect them - within the certain contexts of our society (obviously).

But it into perspective we would have same difficulties going to another country to live - we would learn the language and 'integrate' - but it would be difficult at first and would take time.

CDfm

djpbarry wrote: »

You might want to start with the 90% of the native population who can’t speak the language.
And both are, at best, rather vague concepts.
First part of that is fine, but I don’t see why migrants should have to consider themselves Irish. I myself would have more of an affiliation with Dublin than I would with Ireland. Besides, if an Irish person emigrates, there’s no way that they’re going to adopt the nationality of the country that they emigrate to, so I’m not sure why immigrants to Ireland should be expected to “swap” nationalities.

Thats all very fine - but consider this - if I go to a dinner party I dont embarrass my host or I wont be invited back, if I go to a club Idont start a fight or I will be thrown out and barred or if I go to a church I dont light up a ciggerette and singing Slayer Satanist songs. Its just not on.

Immigrants are the same - they need to assimilate.

If you go to a country you are a guest. In the US if you become a citizen you have to swear allegience to the flag. And I agree thats the US but we should expect migrants to be good "citizens".

I have Sri Lankan friends who retain their identity and support their national team at football and cricket. But they also support their county team at football. Thats them I wouldnt expect that from everyone.

There is nothing wrong with any of that but I would expect people to take some interest in their community and show respect for its laws and traditions.

O'Morris

dsmythy wrote:

Coughlan was wrong claiming racism against Varadkar and would be wrong doing the same in this case.

She could at least try to be consistent though.

djparry wrote:

I myself would have more of an affiliation with Dublin than I would with Ireland.

And bhfuil tu ag togail an urine? No real Dubliner would ever say such a thing.

djpbarry wrote:

Besides, if an Irish person emigrates, there’s no way that they’re going to adopt the nationality of the country that they emigrate to, so I’m not sure why immigrants to Ireland should be expected to “swap” nationalities.

That's a very good point and it's something that people such as myself have been saying all along. The idea that immigrants are just going to abandon their nationality and their former allegiances and that we'll all become one big happy 'New Irish' family after a generation is pure fantasy.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

djpbarry

CDfm wrote: »

Thats all very fine - but consider this - if I go to a dinner party I dont embarrass my host or I wont be invited back, if I go to a club Idont start a fight or I will be thrown out and barred or if I go to a church I dont light up a ciggerette and singing Slayer Satanist songs. Its just not on.

Immigrants are the same - they need to assimilate.

So if immigrants don’t start fights in clubs and don’t smoke in churches, then they are deemed to have assimilated?

CDfm wrote: »

If you go to a country you are a guest.

I disagree. I’ve lived abroad in the past and I regarded myself as a resident, not a guest. I was paying taxes to the host countries (when some of the locals were not) so I certainly did not feel as though I was “visiting”; I was an active member of society.

O'Morris wrote: »

No real Dubliner would ever say such a thing.

One just did.

O'Morris wrote: »

The idea that immigrants are just going to abandon their nationality and their former allegiances and that we'll all become one big happy 'New Irish' family after a generation is pure fantasy.

That’s not what I said at all; you’re deliberately twisting my words. What I’m saying is I don’t believe it is necessary for someone to consider themselves Irish in order for them to be a valuable member of society in this country. Just because a minority of the population consider themselves to be, say, Polish rather than Irish, it doesn’t mean the whole country is going to descend into chaos. I could decide tomorrow that I’m going to be Argentine rather than Irish; what difference would it make?

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Oh, I know. Some of my family and friends are US citizens, but they do not necessarily consider themselves American. If asked where they are from, they will reply with Ireland, Pakistan, Britain or wherever.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

CDfm

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Brendan Behan wasnt illiterate - I know you will say James Joyce but he had trouble with grammar and spelling so he wouldnt be in the running as greatest writter of all time.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

CDfm

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Brendan Behan Is one of the greatest writers of all time. John B. Keane another.

Shakespeare - nah - cant stand him. Joyce is low grade porn masquerading as high brow literature. Even his publishing house Shakespeare and Co published porn as did many french publishers of that era.

Cant see why foreign nationals wouldnt be able to recognise a cupla focail or the National Anthem and react appropriately when it is played. Its just good manners really.

Really - we should expect migrants who come to live here to be law abiding etc - and just like the USA does we should put some thought and value into it.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

CDfm

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

To my shame Ive read them.

Beckett is bad but more action packed than Ibsen - who is plain boring. Sean O'Casey or Brecht are streets ahead.

Yeats - what can I say - Maude has a lucky escape from that lovesick puppy.

I stand by my choice and add Andy McNab as a true giant in literature.

donegalfella

donegalfella wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Foreigners are in fact learing Irish in increasing numbers, Gaelchultur , in Dublin, now have 2 seperate classes per week, for foreigners, with no previous knowledge of the language.

http://www.gaelchultur.com/index.php?view_course_details=true&course_id=100208&tid=4&lang=ga

even a few years ago, attending an advanced class Irish language class, in the class was an african lad, whoose daughter was attending a Gaelscoil, a Czech guy, who now works through Irish in DCU, and an English girl, who became a primary school teacher, after getting honours in Irish in the leaving cert, (and developing a very strong Donegal accent)

I remember going for a pint with the African guy, and meeting some pals, and much to their embarrasment having to switch to English so they could understand.

djpbarry

Deleted User wrote: »

Foreigners are in fact learing Irish in increasing numbers, Gaelchultur , in Dublin, now have 2 seperate classes per week, for foreigners, with no previous knowledge of the language.

The point is that it would be ridiculous to make proficiency in the Irish language a requirement for citizenship. Hell, 25% of the population are functionally illiterate of English, never mind Irish.

What percentage of the non Irish population, in Ireland is "functionally illiterate of English"?

CDfm

djpbarry wrote: »

The point is that it would be ridiculous to make proficiency in the Irish language a requirement for citizenship. Hell, 25% of the population are functionally illiterate of English, never mind Irish.

Just because your multi-cultural doesnt mean everyone else is.

Well if they are such an addition to our country they should have no problem mastering a bit or at least knowing we have a national anthem- what it sounds like -and know that it is customary to stand quitely not sit during it and not to speak. That would get you kicked out of the Portabello Hotel- where they take things like that seriously.

I dont know where you get your 25% functionally illiterate from but I assume its meant to amuse. Illiteracy is not funny and you should know better.

CDfm

Deleted User wrote: »

What percentage of the non Irish population, in Ireland is "functionally illiterate of English"?

the CIA puts Irish literacy rates at 99%

The OECD have a literacy survey which says that 1 in 4 adults between 16 & 64 have problems doing things such as reading a bottle of aspirin.

In Navan - if they tested filing out a bookie slip and checking winnings that would drop dramaticaly.

But still its a cruel jibe to make fun of the uneducated Ireland wasnt always as well of as it is now.