women mods high on power ??

Zaph · 12-11-2008 9:26pm

Chucky the tree wrote: »

But seriously, a women in charge of the soccer forum?

And I moderate The Ladies Lounge, so what? Is there an actual point you're trying to make or do you just like pointing out what people already know?

DarkJager wrote: »

For a second there I thought I had somehow gained access to the Sex & Sexuality forum...:D

It's just a little taster for non-subscribers in the hope of enticing a few more people to sign up.

Nerin · 12-11-2008 9:29pm

zuroph wrote: »

try go fcuk urself.

not personal abuse. rather, a retort to it.

thread is far enough off topic. the moderation was extremely heavy handed.

....try another horse pic instead. Game over. 1 credit remaining. Continue?

nicnicnic · 12-11-2008 9:29pm

GuanYin wrote: »

Again, if you want to talk about that kinda shit, go to 365. Here, let me link it for you.

very impressed with how you write sh1t

Nevyn · 12-11-2008 9:30pm

Zaph wrote: »

It's just a little taster for non-subscribers in the hope of enticing a few more people to sign up.

Hush you

No it was me taking this thread a serious as I can.

nicnicnic if you have an issue with how a mod mods a forum then make a proper rational complaint and back it up with links to prove your points instead of sexist twaddle.

dr.bollocko · 12-11-2008 9:31pm

YULETIRED wrote: »

It is funny what bollocky said though, I see what he did there.

Who's Bollocky?

YULETIRED · 12-11-2008 9:33pm

GuanYin wrote: »

I'll grant you there is an off-topic thread, but that is for forum interaction, not for, as you have, the posting of a page full of scantly clad women. There is a slydice forum for that, go there.

Slinky linky please ?

Charlie · 12-11-2008 9:33pm

I see you have employed your usual level of diplomacy when replying to some criticsim.

And yes, that's all I care about when posting in OTT, pics of nude women. :rolleyes:

The majority of times when a pic of a women was posted in OTT, it was of someone who was being discussed or a situation and they are rarely if ever 'scantily clad'. e.g. talking about Entourage and one of it's characters

Shock horror, males talking about women and how they can be good looking.

I have no intention of trying to turn Boards into F365, they are very different beasts. However, you seem to equate anything related to women or sophmoric humour, as vile 365 over the top style content.

Nerin · 12-11-2008 9:34pm

nicnicnic wrote: »

very impressed with how you write sh1t

And i'm equally impressed by your response. Brava

GuanYin · 12-11-2008 9:35pm

YULETIRED wrote: »

Slinky linky please ?

I think it is private (which is another reason that an open-read access forum like soccer shouldn't have them), I'm sure someone can direct you to it, I don't have access.

YULETIRED · 12-11-2008 9:36pm

dr.bollocko wrote: »

Who's Bollocky?

men in general.....if there is one thing women ain't it's bollocky, I'll give em that .......

can someone link me to the slimdice forum please?

yare letting the poker mods away with murder here btw......sexist bollockies

javaboy · 12-11-2008 9:37pm

GuanYin wrote: »

Personally, I get high on good, intellectual stimulus, such as reasoned debate, intelligent insight or even just a well structured opinion.

I was once like you. Eventually I was weaned off the hard stuff onto Questions and Answers. Then onto that crappy Vincent Browne version of Q&A on TV3. Then Joe Duffy. And finally AH. I can proudly say I haven't had a good intellectual reasoned debate in 3 months. It wasn't easy and I'm not out of the woods yet by any means. But I'm making steady progress.

The first step is admitting you have a problem GuanYin. You're half way to being cured.

GuanYin · 12-11-2008 9:41pm

charlie mchugh wrote: »

I see you have employed your usual level of diplomacy when replying to some criticsim.

Why is diplomacy required here?

I'm telling it to you straight, if you'd rather a vague ambiguous answer I'll try in future.

The majority of times when a pic of a women was posted in OTT, it was of someone who was being discussed or a situation and they are rarely if ever 'scantily clad'. e.g. talking about Entourage and one of it's characters

And I said context was fine, but there was no need for a pervert session.

It should be noted that when the minority of the time occurs in this context, you are the majority offender.

Shock horror, males talking about women and how they can be good looking.

There are several forums that exist for this, soccer isn't one of them.

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be and why you have a problem understanding this.

As for 365, well I believe you're the one referencing it all the time, that is my only reason for suggesting you go there.

Nevyn · 12-11-2008 9:44pm

charlie mchugh wrote: »

I see you have employed your usual level of diplomacy when replying to some criticsim.

And yes, that's all I care about when posting in OTT, pics of nude women. :rolleyes:

The majority of times when a pic of a women was posted in OTT, it was of someone who was being discussed or a situation and they are rarely if ever 'scantily clad'. e.g. talking about Entourage and one of it's characters

Shock horror, males talking about women and how they can be good looking.

I have no intention of trying to turn Boards into F365, they are very different beasts. However, you seem to equate anything related to women or sophmoric humour, as vile 365 over the top style content.

T.V. Forum is that way

>

GuanYin I have found such directions tend to help addled males when they get entrenched in just one forum.

GuanYin · 12-11-2008 9:46pm

Thaedydal wrote: »

T.V. Forum is that way
>

GuanYin I have found such directions tend to help addled males when they get entrenched in just one forum.

They're not too hot on multitasking.

That girl isn't even that hot.....

zuroph · 12-11-2008 9:47pm

GuanYin wrote: »

And I said context was fine, but there was no need for a pervert session.

abuse IMO. guys look at women, its not perverted, its normal.

There are several forums that exist for this, soccer isn't one of them.

Isn't it an Off-topic thread, soccer being the "topic"?

stevenmu · 12-11-2008 9:48pm

I still don't get these "fight the power" threads. Unless I'm doing it wrong moderators have very little power at all. Really I think people need to stop taking warnings, infractions, bannings etc so seriously. At the end of the day it' just a few simple clicks on a web page that has a slight impact on the clicks you make on a web page. If people are really worried about the "power" some random anonymous forum moderator has over them they really need to switch off and go out and find a damn good psychiatrist to give them lots and lots of little happy pills.

Nevyn · 12-11-2008 9:50pm

GuanYin wrote: »

They're not too hot on multitasking.

Got to give them a chance to try that way we at least seemed to have tried to be fair.

GuanYin wrote: »

That girl isn't even that hot.....

I agree she's like a 13 year old who got her hand on some of Barbies clothes in her size.

Sully · 12-11-2008 9:50pm

Chick is hot tbh.

This topic smells of paranoia.

Dudess · 12-11-2008 9:50pm

This thread is just an exercise in irony isn't it? It was started by a female who referred to herself as a chauvinist in the first post.

zuroph · 12-11-2008 9:50pm

*entire thread is tongue in cheek steven, welcome. no1's fighting the power, OP is merely stirring.

GuanYin · 12-11-2008 9:51pm

zuroph wrote: »

abuse IMO. guys look at women, its not perverted, its normal.

I'm not even going to dignify that with a direct response

Isn't it an Off-topic thread, soccer being the "topic"?

Maybe you're right. I think I'll just close the thread and eliminate the problem.

I mean if it is going to cause a debate on semantics when I clarify what is and isn't OK in the thread, I know what the easier option for me is.

I guess that concludes the discussion here.

zuroph · 12-11-2008 9:52pm

GuanYin wrote: »

I'm not even going to dignify that with a direct response

fail.

taking ur ball and going home then.

YULETIRED · 12-11-2008 9:52pm

GuanYin wrote: »

They're not too hot on multitasking.

That girl isn't even that hot.....

you are inane woman she is hotter than the sun (not the newspaper with pic of kerry katona)

fyi, if men couldn't multitask, explain the success of the porno industry...

why don't we boys and you girls go for drinks, can't we settle this like men?

Charlie · 12-11-2008 9:54pm

GuanYin wrote: »

Why is diplomacy required here?

I'm telling it to you straight, if you'd rather a vague ambiguous answer I'll try in future.

And I said context was fine, but there was no need for a pervert session.

It should be noted that when the minority of the time occurs in this context, you are the majority offender.

There are several forums that exist for this, soccer isn't one of them.

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be and why you have a problem understanding this.

As for 365, well I believe you're the one referencing it all the time, that is my only reason for suggesting you go there.

It's clear that we see things very differntly, so we'll leave it at that.

Thaedydal wrote: »

T.V. Forum is that way
>

GuanYin I have found such directions tend to help addled males when they get entrenched in just one forum.

These discussions take place in a Off Topic Thread within soccer, the purpose of which is for a everything other than soccer to be discussed. Is it that wrong that a number of us who watch the program talk about it and its stars there, rather than saying 'Oi fellas head on over to T.V with me where we can discuss the merits of Entourage'

The Off Topic Thread has developed into a real good spirited community with the Soccer forum, and it is a credit to the forum. It has become a place where alot of the regulars have gotten to know eachother, shared highs and lows, and just generally have a bit of craic.

Nerin · 12-11-2008 9:55pm

zuroph wrote: »

abuse IMO. guys look at women, its not perverted, its normal.
Isn't it an Off-topic thread, soccer being the "topic"?

Then report it.

Off topic threads can be anything within rules laid out beforehand. They don't give users the right to post anything they want.

6th · 12-11-2008 9:55pm

Dudess wrote: »

This thread is just an exercise in irony isn't it? It was started by a female who referred to herself as a chauvinist in the first post.

Actually Nicky is a guy ...

zuroph · 12-11-2008 9:58pm

Nerin wrote: »

Then report it.

It doesnt bother me that much.

Nerin · 12-11-2008 9:59pm

zuroph wrote: »

It doesnt bother me that much.

Then stop whining over a skinned knee and get on with the arguement about women mods

Latchy · 12-11-2008 9:59pm

Originally Posted by Dudess
This thread is just an exercise in irony isn't it?

And will no doubt bring in a flood of posts from other mods and friends who will rightly or wrongly defend their fellow mods while at the same time defending the OP's right to start such a thread ............i suppose .

Charlie · 12-11-2008 10:00pm

GuanYin wrote: »

I mean if it is going to cause a debate on semantics when I clarify what is and isn't OK in the thread, I know what the easier option for me is.

I guess that concludes the discussion here.

That's just sad and pathetic. I'm not gonna even bother complaining. You know how much that thread means to alot of people.

women mods high on power ??

Comments