Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kane

Options
1246

Comments

  • Options
    #92
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Comic-Book-Guy wrote: »
    Ok you didnt say the word bully.

    But who else has fallen fowl to the gripe of having topics un inevitably dragged off course?

    Once again how is posting an extract from a quarterly report in a thread about the same quarterly report off topic? You and KKV seem to believe it is when that extract mentions Kane. Point made.


  • Options
    #93
    Red Sleeping Beauty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭Red Sleeping Beauty


    rovert wrote: »
    Point made.

    Very good, only took you all day.


  • Options
    #94
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    Very good, only took you all day.

    See the OP mate


  • Options
    #95
    Doctor DooM
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    dr.bollocko wrote: »
    /popcorn.
    So who's a cooler mob for me to join at this juncture?
    Kane sucks or Kane rules?

    Don't get me wrong, Kane does suck considerably.


    I see Orestes has already quoted the thread where rover mentions Kane for no obvious reason... the exact same behaviour as in the Noc forum.

    If it's a joke it's not funny, and displays a lack of understanding on social mechanics in fora.

    Pretentious ape got worked up because of your post Rover. I was reading the forum as it all kicked off.

    You however are not the sole cause of this. But, again, you reap what you sow in fora on boards: Everyone fights over an issue, users moan, the unpaid mods who shouldn't have to deal with that crap say pack it in and create rules to prevent it happening again.

    It is very very hard for me as a mod in the Noc forum to see it as anything other than a cynical attempt to **** stir, Rovert.

    If this is not the case, perhaps you should look at the fact that so many people have said this to at this point means it's really time to adjust how you post.

    But then I tried to get that through to you nicely ages ago, so I can only logically assume you are not trying on purpose at this point.


  • Options
    #96
    Daysha
    Registered Users Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Daysha


    It's times like this I'm glad I rely on other forums to keep up with wrestling ongoings. Regardless of whose fault it is, nearly every PW topic posted here (including this topic) has drifted off topic due to mindless bickering. The mindset of some of the posters there (not naming anyone) needs to drastically change if any future improvements are going to be made to the forum.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #97
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    SDooM wrote: »
    Don't get me wrong, Kane does suck considerably.


    I see Orestes has already quoted the thread where rover mentions Kane for no obvious reason... the exact same behaviour as in the Noc forum.

    If it's a joke it's not funny, and displays a lack of understanding on social mechanics in fora.

    Pretentious ape got worked up because of your post Rover. I was reading the forum as it all kicked off.

    You however are not the sole cause of this. But, again, you reap what you sow in fora on boards: Everyone fights over an issue, users moan, the unpaid mods who shouldn't have to deal with that crap say pack it in and create rules to prevent it happening again.

    It is very very hard for me as a mod in the Noc forum to see it as anything other than a cynical attempt to **** stir, Rovert.

    If this is not the case, perhaps you should look at the fact that so many people have said this to at this point means it's really time to adjust how you post.

    But then I tried to get that through to you nicely ages ago, so I can only logically assume you are not trying on purpose at this point.

    Welcome back see post #71, this is a dead issue.


  • Options
    #98
    Red Sleeping Beauty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭Red Sleeping Beauty


    rovert wrote: »
    See the OP mate

    Source ?


  • Options
    #99
    callaway92
    Registered Users Posts: 14,713 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    Source ?

    The OP


  • Options
    #100
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    Source ?

    Please stop trolling.


  • Options
    #101
    Daysha
    Registered Users Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Daysha


    rovert wrote: »
    Please stop trolling.

    Oh the irony...:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #102
    Doctor DooM
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    rovert wrote: »
    Welcome back see post #71, this is a dead issue.

    No it isn't.


    The reason you are getting restrictions about posting about kane is because of how you are posting about kane.

    You can dodge that as much as you want, it still stands.


    I will bow out now.


  • Options
    #103
    Red Sleeping Beauty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭Red Sleeping Beauty


    deise59 wrote: »
    Oh the irony...:pac:

    Oh really ?
    Post reported for incorrect use of the term irony :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #104
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    deise59 wrote: »
    It's times like this I'm glad I rely on other forums to keep up with wrestling ongoings. Regardless of whose fault it is, nearly every PW topic posted here (including this topic) has drifted off topic due to mindless bickering. The mindset of some of the posters there (not naming anyone) needs to drastically change if any future improvements are going to be made to the forum.

    Well posts like this below dont help. Here is someone from the Pro Wrestling forum trolling me as a few times I dared to ask for what is asked for in the charter namely a:
    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    Source ?


  • Options
    #105
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    SDooM wrote: »
    No it isn't.


    The reason you are getting restrictions about posting about kane is because of how you are posting about kane.

    You can dodge that as much as you want, it still stands.


    I will bow out now.

    Once again this thread isnt about my banning it is how the mention of Kane has become a matter or issue for some.


  • Options
    #106
    Daysha
    Registered Users Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Daysha


    rovert wrote: »
    Well posts like this below dont help. Here is someone from the Pro Wrestling forum trolling me as a few times I dared to ask for what is asked for in the charter namely a:

    Thats EXACTLY what I mean. That's all the forum has turned into. "Wah, wah, he started it, not me. I'm innocent, it's all his fault"

    Look. Man up, stop blaming everyone but yourself and Stop making it seem like theres an agenda against you.

    And before you ask, no, I won't provide a source to back my claim


  • Options
    #107
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    deise59 wrote: »
    Thats EXACTLY what I mean. That's all the forum has turned into. "Wah, wah, he started it, not me. I'm innocent, it's all his fault"

    Even if it is true? Sorry it speaks a lot about a forum when someone gets grieve for asking someone for what is already asked in the charter.
    deise59 wrote: »
    And before you ask, no, I won't provide a source to back my claim

    Then I question the validity of your claim.


  • Options
    #108
    Daysha
    Registered Users Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Daysha


    rovert wrote: »
    Then I question the validity of your claim.

    Oh fine, you win again rovert. You've twisted my arm. I'll give you your source.

    You're posting in it.


  • Options
    #109
    orestes
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    Rovert, what exactly are you trying to accomplish here?

    You asked questions, plenty of people provided you with answers but you are refusing to accept them as possibly being correct because they don't suit your view of the situation. Have you even considered, for one second while reading any of the posts in this thread, that you might be in the wrong at any stage?

    Repeatedly asking questions isn't going to change the answers. Reality doesn't change to suit your beliefs and opinions. You didn't start this thread looking for feedback, you did it to have a whinge.


  • Options
    #110
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    deise59 wrote: »
    Oh fine, you win again rovert. You've twisted my arm. I'll give you your source.

    You're posting in it.

    You are hardly helping then and are guilty of the very same thing you criticising others for.


  • Options
    #111
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,524 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    rovert wrote: »
    Look at post #16 on please:
    http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055416814
    I don't see any evidence of the forum being pro-Kane, and there being an unwritten rule regarding discussion of this person. That thread just looks like a few people arguing, that's all. Have you been reporting the posts?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #112
    Red Sleeping Beauty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭Red Sleeping Beauty


    For teh love of the lolcats!!

    I just hope that some level headed mod(s) come across this horrendous thread and make some sense about it and pursue some course of action. The rest of the regular users who've never gone into PW must be looking at that forum with even more contempt now!


  • Options
    #113
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    Gordon wrote: »
    I don't see any evidence of the forum being pro-Kane, and there being an unwritten rule regarding discussion of this person. That thread just looks like a few people arguing, that's all. Have you been reporting the posts?

    Sorry but have you read the OP, Gordon?

    I never said the forum was pro-Kane. Other posters seem to think it is an unwritten rule not the mods.


  • Options
    #114
    Daysha
    Registered Users Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Daysha


    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    The rest of the regular users who've never gone into PW must be looking at that forum with even more contempt now!

    *slowly nods head*

    First person to post the "internet - serious business" pic wins the interwebz etc


  • Options
    #115
    rovert
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,089 ✭✭✭✭rovert


    deise59 wrote: »
    *slowly nods head*

    First person to post the "internet - serious business" pic wins the interwebz etc

    Snore lads, I think I made my point over and over at this stage.


  • Options
    #116
    orestes
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    rovert wrote: »
    Snore lads, I think I made my point over and over at this stage.

    There was a point to all of this? Really? Well I'll be jiggered


  • Options
    #117
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,524 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    rovert wrote: »
    Sorry but have you read the OP, Gordon?
    Yes.


  • Options
    #118
    Red Sleeping Beauty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭Red Sleeping Beauty


    deise59 wrote: »
    *slowly nods head*

    First person to post the "internet - serious business" pic wins the interwebz etc

    Won't post a pic but this video is worth a watch:



    http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-behave-on-an-internet-forum


  • Options
    #119
    CMpunked
    Registered Users Posts: 14,600 ✭✭✭✭CMpunked


    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    Won't post a pic but this video is worth a watch:



    http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-behave-on-an-internet-forum


    Look at 1:10.

    Thats practically what all this bickering is about.


  • Options
    #120
    Doctor DooM
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,868 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    rovert wrote: »
    Once again this thread isnt about my banning it is how the mention of Kane has become a matter or issue for some.

    circular logic is circular.

    It's become an issue because you keep pushing it so it becomes an issue which you keep pushing.

    There are now two examples of where you have mentioned Kane where it had no place in a thread. You're wriggling under the microscope again rover.

    Listen to people who are trying to help you.

    Realise that if there is no support of your position in feedback, there is probably a reason and it is not other people.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #121
    Zaph
    Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 47,307 ✭✭✭✭Zaph


    alan dunne 27 wrote: »
    Internetz wrestling fans are very cynical in nature.

    Cynical? I would have said misguided, deranged, juvenile or immature maybe, but cynical isn't really the first thing that springs to mind.

    Seriously though, I really can't see what all the fuss is about. From all the dumbass Feedback threads I've seen, it appears that wrestling fans seem to fail to realise one important point - IT'S NOT FCUKING REAL. It's a bunch of grown men in spandex acting to some of the worst scripts ever committed to paper, and that includes pornos, for the entertainment of small children and rednecks. Those of us who have successfully negotiated puberty really don't care, so why the hell is there constantly so much grief about something that only a small minority care about?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement