Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Locus standi

  • 17-11-2008 7:56pm
    #1
    sheamyboy
    Registered Users Posts: 36 ✭


    In what way has locus standi changed in Ireland since Cahill V Sutton and what cases would be prevelent in discussing this??.


Comments

  • #2
    johnnyskeleton
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,535 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    sheamyboy wrote: »
    In what way has locus standi changed in Ireland since Cahill V Sutton and what cases would be prevelent in discussing this??.

    The general postion hasn't changed much, but it is applied differently in different circumstances. Anthony Collins & James Reilly have a good chapter on it in Civil Procedure and the State.


  • #3
    Tom Young
    Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    Humm - if you're being a lazy ass you may just be in luck, as I've been looking into this recently.

    SPUC v Grogan [1989] I.R. 743;
    O'Donovan v AG [1961] I.R. 114;
    McMahon v AG [1972] I.R. 69;
    State (Lynch) v Cooney [1982] I.R. 337;
    Norris v Attorney General [1984] I.R. 36;
    Crotty v An Taoiseach [1987] I.R. 713;
    Iarnrod Eireann v Ireland [1996] I.R. 321;
    Lancefort Limited v An Bord Pleanala, Unrep, Per Morris J. July 6, 1997;
    Riordan v An Tanaiste [1998] 1 ILRM 494;
    Dunne v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government [2004] IEHC 304; and

    Grace v Ireland & Anor [2007] IEHC 90 (March 2007)
    Link Cooney and Sutton to US Case of Valley forge Christian College (1982) 454 US 464 Per Rehnquist J.

    You might want to look at Jus Tertii - (where my assistance ends) but you could look at Cox and CIF v Dublin City Council [2005] I.R. 496.

    Tom


Advertisement