Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish Times reports that all pistols are to be banned

13468918

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    So how does one become an elite shooter? They start as a new shooter, who gets better with practise. If they're only granting permits to existing elite shooters, where are the next generation going to come from?
    Agreed - although a stable of club firearms would be of use here, that's how we managed it with air rifle for years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 329 ✭✭meathshooter


    is there any legal action the ngb,s can take to stop this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭chem


    Anyone else notice, the lack of interest, in the pistol ban by any of the press yesterday? Notting in the TV news or radio!

    Did the whole thing fizzly out for the government? Did the move not make as big a PR stunt as they hoped?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Sparks wrote: »
    Agreed - although a stable of club firearms would be of use here, that's how we managed it with air rifle for years.

    Where would they be kept? You go back to the same problem of having a centralised shopping cart for burglars.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭tonysopprano


    Following on from yesterdays “de facto” ban on pistols , could you please read the items below and comment on them.

    The minister did not announce an instant ban on pistols, because he would have to compensatethe owners of pistols, and the country is broke.

    The minister announced that come renewal next August, any pistol owner will have to comply with
    new stringent security measures (probably something like a strongroom or underground bunker which ordinary Joe Soap will not be able to comply with. This means that Joe Soap is in breach of
    his Firearms Cert and his pistol will be seized with no compensation or he can TRY to sell it to a dealer
    who cannot resell it, so he loses his investment

    Is this any way to treat a citizens of this country, who, by virtue of holding a Firearms Certificate for a
    pistol, are already deemed to be the most law abiding and upstanding members of the communityand have already been cleared by the Gardai to the highest security level, and to add insult to injury,
    by a sly and roundabout way, not compensating them for the many thousands of Euro spent complying
    with all conditions of the Firearms Act

    If you can do the job, do it. If you can't do the job, just teach it. If you really suck at it, just become a union executive or politician.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Tony

    They're sh1ts.

    Accept it and move on. Just remember at the hopefully soon next election.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 63 ✭✭lykoris


    appears the Irish media are incapable of presenting an objective article.

    I have not seen any articles that illustrate how the UK handgun ban has spectacularly failed.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2317307.ece


    There is no link between "licensed" pistol shooters and crime - every knowledgeable shooter knows this but the public is incapable of making that differentiation.

    Licensed means screening/no criminal record/medical history examined/pistol stored in an approved gun safe/only transports 'unloaded' and ammo kept separate to and from a registered firearms range.

    Criminals can get a pistol for EUR70-100 on the streets, there are thousands of them flowing in from eastern europe to the UK and Ireland.....

    banning licensed pistol holders will have literally no impact on criminal access to guns - the two are completely unrelated.

    This weekend I'll be happily shooting a 9mm, a .40 S&W and a .45ACP, thankfully there is no chance of that happening in Luxembourg. We can also buy whatever we want a .50bmg .338lapua to a 9mm MP5 SD (silenced version)....surprisingly enough this isn't the WILD WILD WEST as we are all 'licensed' firearms holders that like our Irish equivalent undergo stringent screening.

    Sad day for the ROI


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Where would they be kept? You go back to the same problem of having a centralised shopping cart for burglars.
    I wasn't saying it was perfect MM, just that if we get stuck in this situation, we'll find some way to cope.
    chem wrote: »
    Anyone else notice, the lack of interest, in the pistol ban by any of the press yesterday? Notting in the TV news or radio!
    Did the whole thing fizzly out for the government? Did the move not make as big a PR stunt as they hoped?
    There's an interesting point in there. What hit the press yesterday was a press release. Not a bill. There's no bill on oireachtas.ie, there's no announced legislation, there's just a statement of intent.

    Now, the next step is the telling one. If the Minister (through the DoJ) goes to the FCP and says "right lads, let's have a chat about this" then that's one thing. And probably the best we can hope for, barring a snap general election that sees a total change in government. But that's not too likely without some sort of economic disaster that has us all more worried about things other than firearms (like, oh I don't know, our morgages and food bills and finding a new job and such). If it goes that way, then yesterday was the Minister being pressured by the media and responding to the media. Rude, but not fatal.

    Of course, if it doesn't go that way, well. That's a whole other kettle of fish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    where are the mods


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Busy banning trolls and deleting troll posts. Please folks, don't feed them. Thanks to those who hit the report button instead.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I wasn't saying it was perfect MM, just that if we get stuck in this situation, we'll find some way to cope.

    Dude! Don't publicly go about saying how you might find ways to cope! Then people won't think there's an issue with whatever new restrictions they want to put on things! "Ah, sure, look, they can do this. What are they whinging about?"

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,472 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    Even Joe Soap knows this latest crap is just a PR stunt for the Gov..act like they're doing something about the gun shootings while spending nothing.
    Fact is the scumbags in Limerick was trying to order RPGS, AK47s and Uzis a few months ago illegally.
    Will this law stop all the shootings in Ireland? Zero chance.
    Only way is to increase Gardai funding and powers and start cracking down heavily on the gangs..handing out life sentences etc, 15+years for drug smuggling, zero tolerance basically on anyone with gang affeliation.
    Will the Governmant do this? Zero chance again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 47 paul1972


    its not just limerick .......its all over and its the people buying the **** that are fueling the problem and i mean the recreational drug users those with money to play with its their money that is paying for all the murder and madness


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    how many tons of drugs come into this country every year .it must be huge . the guys shipping the drugs from x to ireland are armed to the teeth once there load of drugs onto the boat ,truck, or plane they through there weapons it with the drugs and walk away clean , the weapons are a tip for the drug bosses they sell them off to there pushers and partners in crime .taking our firearms will do noting only make a poor excuse of a government temporary look good ,we can fall out with each other and talk about in hear till the cows come home its not going to resolve it.election next your might be a good place to start ,what are the shooting bodys doing .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 63 ✭✭lykoris


    paul1972 wrote: »
    its not just limerick .......its all over and its the people buying the **** that are fueling the problem and i mean the recreational drug users those with money to play with its their money that is paying for all the murder and madness

    and everything you mention has absolutely nothing to do with licensed shooters who participate in pistol shooting.

    It is not by taking away a pistol from a "law abiding licensed citizen with no criminal record" that the Irish govt. will make an impact on "crime related gun shootings." Criminals have easy access to black market firearms from Eastern Europe.

    The UK handgun ban is blatant proof of this fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Wrote up a short bit of background to all this for journalists and the like. Just in case anyone finds it of use.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    From the Irish Times:
    Ban on licensing handguns
    Madam, - Minister for Justice Dermot Ahern's decision to introduce a ban on handguns will do nothing to combat gun crime. Its only purpose is to show that the Minister is "doing something" about the issue. Legal handgun owners are a soft target. The Minister should be doing more to stop the inflow of illegal firearms. - Yours, etc,
    Madam, - We're lucky Dermot Ahern is such a sharp thinker. All those drug lords and gangland killers must be quaking in their boots, waiting for their gun licences to expire. Then they'll have to toddle along to their friendly neighbourhood Garda station and hand them in.

    Gosh, he's really trumped them! I'm sure they'd never dare to try get their hands on a handgun without a Garda vetting and a licence. After all, that'd be against the law. And anyway, where on earth would a drug lord get the money to buy illegal guns? - Yours, etc,
    Madam, - As in Chicago in the 1920s, there is a serious problem in Ireland today over the use of guns by gangsters. The root causes of the two cases are very similar: the prohibition of alcohol in 1920s America, and the prohibition of drugs in Ireland today. Since prohibition means that the distribution of the prohibited substance is left to criminals, the latter get rich, powerful and out of control.

    Rather than addressing the root of the problem by removing prohibition, the Government's solution is to take guns away from law-abiding people, the consequence of which is that now only gangsters will have guns.

    Is there some logic to this that I'm missing? - Yours, etc,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Of course, not all good news. From the Irish Times:
    Arms dealer loses appeal over handgun
    PADDY CLANCY

    A LICENSED arms dealer has been banned from owning a handgun legally held by hundreds of Irish marksmen but which has been described in court as an "extremely dangerous" weapon.

    Judge Kevin Kilrane described dealer Gavin Murray (25) as "an upright and decent man" but turned down his appeal against a ban on owning a Heckler and Koch USP Custom Sport gun that fires 9mm-calibre parabellum ammunition.

    The judge said at Donegal District Court: "It is an extremely dangerous weapon. Gangsters and criminals would give their right arm to have one of them."

    He added: "It would be my hope that legislation would be introduced absolutely banning all hand-held side-arms of this nature from individuals."

    Mr Murray, Drimark, Donegal town, appealed against a refusal by Supt John Dennedy to grant him a licence for the gun.

    The judge's ruling on Wednesday came as Minister for Justice Dermot Ahern said he will be introducing a new ban on handguns, although small-calibre sporting pistols will be excluded.

    Supt Dennedy said he refused a licence under powers authorising him to exercise his discretion. He was concerned Mr Murray did not have good reason for owning the firearm. He agreed Mr Murray held certificates for other firearms but his concerns about this particular gun related to its compactness, ease of concealment and its potential danger to the public.

    Mr Murray, who was recently ranked fourth in a national shooting contest, said he travelled the country, for competitions.

    Judge Kilrane said: "There is plenty of hostile territory from here to Cork. A large number of people would be fully aware he has the firearm and is transporting it. The risk of him being robbed of it is very, very high given the present state of the country and the times in which we live, with robberies, with violence and, worse, death on the streets."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Sparks wrote: »
    Of course, not all good news. From the Irish Times:

    Jeez, since the area is so lawless and out of control you'd imagine the cop and the judge would do something about that instead.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25 JunkieW


    Isn't that some reflection on our sorry state though:
    There is plenty of hostile territory from here to Cork. A large number of people would be fully aware he has the firearm and is transporting it. The risk of him being robbed of it is very, very high given the present state of the country and the times in which we live, with robberies, with violence and, worse, death on the streets

    This from a judge. Jeebus wept, the Minister is stopping handgun licensing because the whole country from top to bottom is hostile territory.

    Good grief :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭G17


    JunkieW wrote: »
    Isn't that some reflection on our sorry state though:

    Dear God, what is happening. Are the people who 'run' our country so out of touch. It is simply astonishing, I'm dumbfounded.

    These sort of comments would make any citizen in that area want to arm themselves when travelling through bandit country.
    "Hey Margaret, it's Julie, will you ride shotgun tomorrow, I have to pop in to Tesco and collect some dry cleaning, oh and Jimmy got his first bullet proof jacket today with the primary school crest on it, it's sooo cute, gotta go now, George wants to go into town, there's a sale on RPGs".


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,679 Mod ✭✭✭✭Rew


    Sit in the courts for a day and watch the judge, most of them are so far from reality that its no surprise we have such crime rates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    JunkieW wrote: »
    This from a judge. Jeebus wept, the Minister is stopping handgun licensing because the whole country from top to bottom is hostile territory.
    Good grief :eek:
    Even the part of me that wants to say "Well, it is Cork we're talking about here" can't quite get the laugh out :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    So far we've only had proposals, right? What is the likelihood that, this by and large having been seen for the sham it is, we won't see any actual legislation drafted, or if we do, it'll be a token shadow of the draconian proposal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    So far we've only had proposals, right?
    An announcement of intent actually, there's been no proposed legislation yet that I've heard of, just the press release.
    What is the likelihood that, this by and large having been seen for the sham it is, we won't see any actual legislation drafted, or if we do, it'll be a token shadow of the draconian proposal?
    Depends on the level of support for sensible action I suppose. Which is rather where the grassroots would come into play. But they really need direction from the shooting bodies in the FCP (the FCP itself, I'm realising, is chaired by the DoJ, so the FCP itself can't really issue a call for grassroots support in this).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭sfakiaman


    This from a judge. Jeebus wept, the Minister is stopping handgun licensing because the whole country from top to bottom is hostile territory.

    Good grief :eek:[/quote]
    Sparks wrote: »
    Even the part of me that wants to say "Well, it is Cork we're talking about here" can't quite get the laugh out :(


    The road from Donegal to Cork runs near my home. All these years I thought the shots were just lads after duck

    Think I'll lock the doors and windows and go back to bed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Sparks wrote: »
    An announcement of intent actually, there's been no proposed legislation yet that I've heard of, just the press release.Depends on the level of support for sensible action I suppose. Which is rather where the grassroots would come into play. But they really need direction from the shooting bodies in the FCP (the FCP itself, I'm realising, is chaired by the DoJ, so the FCP itself can't really issue a call for grassroots support in this).


    On the issue of consultation.

    In work they announced they were putting a phone mast on the roof. Hang on, said the union, we have to be consulted about this.

    In response management, to paraphrase, got everybody together in a room, said "We're putting a phone mast on the roof. Now **** off, you've been consulted".

    I realise the fight has to be fought but I can't help but feel it will be turkeys invited to a panel to discuss the cultural and religious importance of Christmas.

    Everybody else knows what's on the menu for lunch, no matter how much the turkey is hoping for lasagne.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 121 ✭✭Red Renard


    dresden8 wrote: »
    On the issue of consultation.

    In work they announced they were putting a phone mast on the roof. Hang on, said the union, we have to be consulted about this.

    In response management, to paraphrase, got everybody together in a room, said "We're putting a phone mast on the roof. Now **** off, you've been consulted".

    I realise the fight has to be fought but I can't help but feel it will be turkeys invited to a panel to discuss the cultural and religious importance of Christmas.

    Everybody else knows what's on the menu for lunch, no matter how much the turkey is hoping for lasagne.


    White house turkey, the executive pardon by the power of the president
    to save the life of the symbolic turkey.:o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 121 ✭✭Red Renard


    bush-chokes-turkey.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 102 ✭✭Kimber


    Looks like he is choking the turkey or is he choking the chicken;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭chem


    Have been told FCP meeting with gov this monday.

    I have emailed all local FF TDs inviting them to a NI range tomorrow. Relpys to date = 0

    I wanted to show them how its run in NI seen as they used the troubles as part of the reason to ban pistols here. I will post picks tomorrow of what ive shot on the range. Guns our own elected government dont see fit for civil use :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,570 ✭✭✭Rovi


    As posted in the other thread, and it applies equally here:


    Right folks, can we now draw a line under the name calling and similar childish behaviour?
    We all know that feelings are running high and we all feel victimised and put upon, but there's no need to descend to the level of the playground.

    By all means criticise the proponents and supporters of this proposed legislation and most certainly refute their FUD-mongering with well reasoned arguments and cold, hard statistics and facts, but please, let's not demean ourselves by resorting to petty name calling.
    By definition, we're law abiding respectable people (we wouldn't have been granted Firearm Certificates if we were otherwise), let's behave as such.

    I see some posters have had second thoughts on what they wrote and have deleted or edited their posts, thanks to them for that.

    Any further posts in this vein will be deleted, and persistent offenders will be looking at infractions or bans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 Ronin63


    Hi All,
    I`m New to the Forum, But as The owner of a .308 Rifle as well as a Glock 17, Yes a glock, and i`m not a scumbag who goes around killing people, I`m extremely worried about the future of my chosen sport, with all the talk of banning all pistols in the country, it seems to me that shooters as a whole should stand together no matter what your discipline and fight for our sport, a lot of Politicians of late have been picking on the easy Target, that of liscenced Firearms instead of putting their efforts into shutting down the real problem Unliscenced Weapons, Yes i know you all already know this,But surely it`s time to come together and let them know that we who elected them or who they will be coming to for votes have a Voice, we need to get primetime coverage to counteract the bad press our firearms are receiving from people like Ms Mitchell, I have neither the Knoweledge or experience in our sport to do anything except send letters of disaproval to poloticians, but i Have the Email adress of one of Matt Coopers rechearch assistants, it might be good for us to see if he would run a feature on our sport and the un informed views that Politico`s are airing to the Public on primetime Television,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 329 ✭✭meathshooter


    The judge said at Donegal District Court: "It is an extremely dangerous weapon. Gangsters and criminals would give their right arm to have one of them."

    I think to date five handguns have been stolen from licenced holders( I could be wrong)
    all handguns used in crime are imported with drugs,which the politicions cant seem to stop and dont seem to know where to start,this is only a political smokescreen, and as proved in england that there ban has done NOTHINGto stop gun crime.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 121 ✭✭Red Renard


    The judge said at Donegal District Court: "It is an extremely dangerous weapon. Gangsters and criminals would give their right arm to have one of them."

    I think to date five handguns have been stolen from licenced holders( I could be wrong)
    all handguns used in crime are imported with drugs,which the politicions cant seem to stop and dont seem to know where to start,this is only a political smokescreen, and as proved in england that there ban has done NOTHINGto stop gun crime.

    Judges are part responsible for the revolving door that allows the type
    of threat the judge in Donegal claims the competition pistol shooter is under.If by traveling around this country he is vulnerable to attack
    why and what is the solution to this.:rolleyes:

    Spoke with to Garda who target shoots, he put it all down to unfortunate bad timing, had the FCP rapped up last year, pistols would have had more conditions attached but nothing to the extent of imposing a ban on any new licenses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 804 ✭✭✭Sikamick


    Politicians cant seem to stop and dont seem to know where to start,this is only a political smokescreen, and as proved in england that there ban has done NOTHINGto stop gun crime.

    _________________________________________________________________

    Well Said meathshooter, and taking them in between 1972 to 2004 here in Southern Ireland did not stop crime and murders, any pistols used here for gun crime were not licensed during this period of time.

    Also remember the Legitimate Target Pistol Shooter in NI never lost their Firearms Licenses for pistols and rightly so.

    Sikamick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Red Renard wrote: »
    Spoke with to Garda who target shoots, he put it all down to unfortunate bad timing, had the FCP rapped up last year, pistols would have had more conditions attached but nothing to the extent of imposing a ban on any new licenses.
    Frankly, I think if the FCP had wrapped up last year, you'd now have an empty gunsafe and the letter notifying you of the TCO asking for your pistol right now. There's a lot of folks saying the FCP's done nothing, who honestly don't have a clue what the FCP has done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 329 ✭✭meathshooter


    I belive that we would have been worst off today ,only for the work that the fcp have done I know one or two on it and you couldnt get much better to have on our side,but are we to bow to ahandfull of thugs by the commissionors own admissions,whos running the country????


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭thehair


    Sparks wrote: »
    Of course, not all good news. From the Irish Times:

    is the judge telling all and everbody what is going to happand if so how can he get away with saying that:eek: steve


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,222 ✭✭✭Keith186


    Great news. No need for deadly weapons in this country.

    I'm not saying that people who are licensed to use them end up shooting someone but they often fall into the wrong hands and are usually stolen from people's houses to use in crime.

    Also I know a few people with legal guns, most of them are grand but there is one or two scumbags who got shotguns and I wouldn't put it past them using it on someone in a drunken argument.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,570 ✭✭✭Rovi


    Keith186 wrote: »
    Great news. No need for deadly weapons in this country.
    ...and no sports shooter would disagree. Firearms, baseball bats, knives, fists & boots, etc, etc, only become 'deadly weapons' when wielded by people of ill intent.
    Keith186 wrote: »
    I'm not saying that people who are licensed to use them end up shooting someone but they often fall into the wrong hands and are usually stolen from people's houses to use in crime.
    Please read some more of this thread and this forum in general to become educated on this subject.
    Keith186 wrote: »
    Also I know a few people with legal guns, most of them are grand but there is one or two scumbags who got shotguns and I wouldn't put it past them using it on someone in a drunken argument.
    These people have been deemed safe and responsible by their local Garda Superintendent; if however, you have reason to believe that they are otherwise, it's your civic duty to make your concerns known to the Gardai.


  • Subscribers Posts: 4,076 ✭✭✭IRLConor


    Keith186 wrote: »
    Great news. No need for deadly weapons in this country.

    There's no need for a lot of deadly items in this country but we don't ban them. Why pick on handguns?
    Keith186 wrote: »
    I'm not saying that people who are licensed to use them end up shooting someone but they often fall into the wrong hands and are usually stolen from people's houses to use in crime.

    Well, most stolen firearms are not handguns, they're shotguns and rifles neither of which are getting banned. If you wanted to remove the threat of stolen firearms ending up in criminal hands you'd ban all firearms. Of course that would be impractical and a vote loser.

    And, as Sparks has mentioned before, there was one shipment of illegal firearms which was seized by the Gardai which had more handguns in it than all the legally held ones in the country at the time.

    Ultimately, if there is a change in criminal use of firearms due to this ban it will not be statistically significant.
    Keith186 wrote: »
    Also I know a few people with legal guns, most of them are grand but there is one or two scumbags who got shotguns and I wouldn't put it past them using it on someone in a drunken argument.

    Either they're scumbags who are a danger to the community (and hence you should report your concerns to the local Gardai) or they're decent people with no intention of hurting people who should be given the benefit of the doubt. If they are as dangerous as you think you should have enough proof to have their firearms taken from them. If not, you shouldn't accuse them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 329 ✭✭meathshooter


    Keith186 wrote: »
    Great news. No need for deadly weapons in this country.

    I'm not saying that people who are licensed to use them end up shooting someone but they often fall into the wrong hands and are usually stolen from people's houses to use in crime.

    Also I know a few people with legal guns, most of them are grand but there is one or two scumbags who got shotguns and I wouldn't put it past them using it on someone in a drunken argument.

    I dont class my firearms as weapons there are sporting firearms,does this mean the gardai will seize every motor car in the country as they could be classed as deadly weapons and more people are killed every year by them than firearms,pubs will they ban them drink could be argued as the cause of
    of a lot of things


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 540 ✭✭✭dos29


    (This is a long post, please give it a chance!!)
    I am not a civilian pistol shooter,I do shoot pistols with the army.
    I dont own a pistol but had planned on it. I do know a few people who do own pistols. This was NOT something I saw coming. You live your life believing that the people in charge of the country must have SOME slightest bit of cop on to get there in the first place, but no, they have to prove ya wrong. This current train of thought is actually retarded. I do not take this phrase lightly, I mean it is retarded(slowed or delayed in development or progress), by the simple fact that the people making these VERY important decisions are only playing to the media, and what they think is the general public's easiest "get out clause". I am absolutely infuriated by whats happening, and I dont even OWN a pistol!
    On a slightly milder note, I have done what I can so far. All I can do is send e-mail's, and influence everyone I know in any coming election, along with my own vote. My e-mail's have been VERY restrained, given how I feel on the matter(trust me, it contained nothing but FACT).
    I am NOT joking when I say that my next vote will not just be affected, but well and truly decided, by anyone, be they FF, FG, Greens, Labour, Sinn Fein, even if some mythological party starts up just to cut this BS, if some party speaks with logical thought and ACTUAL research on this matter, they WILL get my vote!!
    I really wish someone would make a decision on a course of action. I know this would be made a lot easier by a definate decision being made by the government on what they are ACTUALLY going to do, but seriously, are we gonna stand by while this happens?
    I waited a day or two before doing anything, but I personally feel that we are better off at least trying to educate the people about to pass judgement on this, then trying to crib about it after. Also apparently, numbers in force made the license changes be re-thought(I wasn't personally civi shooting at that stage).
    So.... my decision was.....
    To write as well informed an e-mail as I could possibly produce, to as many politicians as might read it(I even included links to this thread, and the one in the political forum). No verbal assault, no personal criticism, just plain common sense. If nothing else, it might at least inform some il-informed politico on the realities of what exactly this will change in terms of crime- NOTHING!!!
    My personal feelings are- the more people that do the same thing the better. It will NOT do any harm,(so long as they're civil!!), and at least we have at least TRIED to do something while we're stuck in limbo.
    I do NOT take the credit for such a plan, a lot of people have already done just this, AND suggested it in this very thread, I am merely seeing the sense in what they were saying, and I've put that sense at the bottom of a very long post! Now you see what I meant at the top!
    In my next post, I'll put the majority of what I sent in my e-mails. It might connect who I am to this forum, but no harm.
    Lastly, fair play to everyone who posted reason here, and didn't turn it into a muck throwing competition.There's a lot of very knowledgeable and credible facts in here to shed light on something not a lot of people know about!
    AND thanks to the Mod's, I know it took some work to keep it as clean as it is!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 540 ✭✭✭dos29


    As promised...


    Sir,



    I am adding this line, after finishing writing, to plead that you read as much as possible of what I have written. It took some time,

    (and ended up being longer than I had anticipated!), and I would be hugely grateful if it was given the time I think this matter warrents.



    My name is *********. I am one of your constituents.

    This is the first time I have written to any politician, so hopefully you will appreciate that what I'm writing about is something I feel strongly about. The matter I wish to refer to is that of the current proposed changes to firearms law. To be perfectly honest, I'm astounded at the mentality of how this situation is being approached.

    To give you my background on this, I am a serving member of the Irish Defence Forces, serving in *******. I am very well trained in the use of firearms, both rifle and pistol.

    I am also a keen shooter with civilian firearms, owning a rifle and a shotgun. I do not own a pistol, but I do know plenty of people who do, and had hoped to own one at some stage after doing a safety course on them with a civilian club. I only use my firearms for target shooting. The rifle for paper targets, and the shotgun for clay pigeon shooting.

    I am therefore informed enough to know that Irish pistol shooting is one of the safest sports in the country, along with the other shooting disciplines. The safety precautions that are in practice, and strongly enforced, are the strictest and safest I have come across. By this I do not mean that Irish military standards are lax, more that the civilian world of shooting has taken what is needed to run the activity of shooting safely, and furthered it.

    Civilians do not take the responsabilities of a firearm any way lightly. They treat them with utmost respect, and are well aware of the dangers involved with ALL firearms. Pistols are treated no differently. This analogy that is being drawn between gun crime in Ireland, and legally licensed pistols, would be laughable if it was not for the consequences of what is being suggested at the moment.

    The simple facts are-

    The supposedly dramatic increase in licensed pistols is not due to an upsurge in people trying to arm themselves, but is due to the fact that they were confiscated on a "temporary" order in 1972 which lasted 32 years! Finally being handed back in 2004, this brought the figures from 1500 pre 1972, to 0 quite dramatically. At the moment it is estimated that there are currently 1800 licensed pistols in Ireland. That is actually, per capita, a decrease. How many people would have taken up the sport in the intervening years?

    The vast majority of licensed pistols in Ireland are either air powered or rimfire(.22 calibre). These are the Olympic discipline type of pistol. The minority of licensed pistols are full bore, which is the larger calibres. These also have they're place in a lot of international shooting competitions. Irish full bore pistol shooting is only just starting to flourish after such a long period of non existence. We have people doing VERY well at an international level. These pistols are used ONLY for competition shooting.

    Contrary to seemingly popular belief, not all pistols licensed in Ireland are "dreaded Glock's". Glock is a manufacturer of pistols, and yes some(very few) are licensed in Ireland, but they are ONLY used for target/competition shooting. There are others which have the same capabilities and are used in the very same way.

    The notion that another "Dunblane" type incident is an inevitablity, is simply not true, and is being used solely as a scare tactic for the uneducated. There are procedures already in place to prevent that, and that incident was partly due to a failing on the side of the powers that be. The criteria already in place are, you must have a secure storage facility which gets inspected by a designated member of the Gardai, you must have a monitered alarm on your home, you must only use the pistol at an authorised facility(range), you must be a member of an autorised facility(range), the Gardai must carry out a background check on you, including any health problems, which would of course include mental health.

    If a comparison must be drawn with the current situation, you need only look across the water to England to see where this mentality of banning licensed pistols having an effect on gun crime, has failed miserably. There have been international study's which have shown that banning licensed pistols have no effect on gun crime. The figures were requested for how many legally held firearms in Ireland had been involved in a crime, and the response from the Gardai was, the results would be too small to justify the manpower involved in retrieving them! Thats firearms, of which there are over 200,000!

    My personal belief is that it is quite possible that NO legally held pistols have been involved in any crime!

    The majority of the public were not event aware that pistols had become legal againg in Ireland! Does that say enough about how removed the target shooting world is from gun crime, and how much it is NOT a matter for public concern?

    What I am getting at is, it appears to be knee jerk reaction to a problem which has absolutely no possibility of being solved by the measures which seem to be on the way. In the process, a lot of people who have invested very heavily in a sport they love, will be losing everything. If there is a cap placed on the amount of people who can hold licenses, what new talent will enter the field? If any of the currently licensed pistols are banned, who will re-emburse for the pistols now illegal? What will happen to the clubs around the country which were built for pistol shooting and provide a livelihood to some?

    The criminals and thugs of our country do not care about legal, licensed pistols. It is far too easy for them to acquire guns by other means, and they have a much better selection for what they wish to use them for than what is currently licensed in Ireland. If they were to use a licensed firearm, it is far too easy to track , and get caught with then one which is acquired by "other" means. I think I saw a figure of an estimate on illegal firearms in Ireland around the 200,000 mark. Which is the problem category? Legal or Illegal?

    I hope I've pointed out as much as is possible, how wrong and needless it is to punish the innocent, upstanding people in this matter, who by having a license for any firearm have already prooved themselves to the Gardai, for the failings of the criminals of Ireland, who will not be affected in any slightest way by any decisions made in this matter.

    A lot of people are seeing this current situation as a good example of idiotic policy from an idiotic government. I know I am not alone in thinking that my vote come any election, will be well and truly decided by how this fiasco plays out. Somebody could make a serious name for themselves by speaking up about this matter and using common sense.

    To finish, I am including 3 links to an internet forum called www.boards.ie . The first 2, are from the shooting section, which has 2 topic's which have been started for discussion on this very matter. Obviously it is quite objective in its views, but there are a lot of points and facts which the public are not aware of on this issue.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055416847



    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055422137



    The second link is to the politics forum, where it is viewed and discussed by people who are more objective by simply not being shooters(mostly). I personally feel that this is a good cross section of the general publics sentiments.



    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055422465



    Lastly I would like to sincerely thank you, for taking the time to read, what I have taken the time to write.

    I sincerely hope some sense can be seen with this siuation, because it honestly seems absurd to me.



    Yours hopefully

    This is what I thought was needed to be sent. I hope more decide to at least send something which portrays they're disapproval of whats happening. And if a course of action is decided on by the representatives, I will be more than willing to do my part.

    DOS29


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Jonty


    Keith186 wrote: »
    Also I know a few people with legal guns, most of them are grand but there is one or two scumbags who got shotguns and I wouldn't put it past them using it on someone in a drunken argument.

    Keith, to label somebody a scumbag one would need proof that the person in question was of dubious character and not just a young lad in a tracksuit with a baseball cap. He might be a scumbag to you but to others he could be an upstanding citizen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18 FowlerC


    Keith186 wrote: »
    I'm not saying that people who are licensed to use them end up shooting someone but they often fall into the wrong hands

    Citation needed here. You seem to have information in this regard that the Gardaí do not.
    and are usually stolen from people's houses to use in crime.
    Again, citation needed. This is contrary to evidence others have produced.

    Also I know a few people with legal guns, most of them are grand but there is one or two scumbags who got shotguns and I wouldn't put it past them using it on someone in a drunken argument.

    Anecdotes prove nothing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 329 ✭✭meathshooter


    if they are so worried about legally held handguns why dont they ballistically test every gun that way they could trace it back to the gun if there was a crime


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    This is what I sent to the members of the Oireachtas a few days ago - I have received some answers, for which I am grateful.

    There has been some markedly favorable comment - which gives me some hope.

    Whereas I seriously doubt that there will be any outright support for the shooting sports - I do believe that an informed house will prevent the government from making a "snap" decision which has no merit.
    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I am contacting you with reference to the recent attempts, by both the Government and the Media to criminalise the Target shooting community in Ireland.

    There has been a dedicated campaign to associate the legally licensed pistol owners of Ireland with the increase in gun crime in Ireland.
    This is patently false.

    There has been an attempt to indicate to the wider public that the target pistol community in some way offer a threat to their safety.
    This is absolutely not true.

    This has all been leading to a call for a complete ban on the licensing of pistols which, in total, will have no other result bar the abolishing of a range of sports. This, in turn, will have a knock on effect on the local economy of the authorised target ranges where we practice our sports.

    The target pistol shooting community are one of the few sections of Irish society (Members of An Garda Síochána being another group) who are required be to certified as being law abiding. They are duty bound to ensure that the firearms they are licensed to own to do not fall into the wrong hands and are required by the Gardaí to meet strict security requirements to ensure this.

    As a licensed pistol owner I had to undergo rigorous vetting in order to achieve my license.

    This involved;

    o Proving membership of an authorised shooting range,
    o Provision of proof of use (range attendance records, competition participation and results)
    o A Garda security background check,
    o Installing an alarm and safe in my residence.
    o Home inspection by the local Garda Crime Prevention Officer.

    Following my success in each of these requirements my license application was forwarded to the Superintendent of my district for his consideration.

    When this license was issued I then had to apply to the Department of Justice in order to complete the purchase of the pistol for which the license had been issued.

    These, I personally find, to be totally acceptable requirements in order to ensure the clean record of the target shooting community.

    I have since attained a PSNI Visitors Permit, requiring me to again undergo stringent security checks, so that I can compete in Northern Ireland. More recently I have attained my European Firearms pass allowing me to compete abroad, which I have done on three separate occasions, to date.

    Whereas the Ministers statement mentioned exemptions for Olympic sports, I wish to highlight the fact that the Olympic shooting disciplines comprise a very small percentage of the target sports in Ireland.

    There have been questions in the Dáil on a number of occasions as to the number of legally held pistols which have been used in a crime. The Gardaí have not been able to indicate this, which would lead me to believe that there have been none.
    The statistic always quoted is the total number of legally held firearms which have been used in a crime - this number will invariably be shotguns, licenses for which do not have such strict security requirements.

    I, personally, believe that this is simply an attempt to be seen to "do something" in response to the murder of Mr. Shane Geoghan in Limerick recently. I feel it is deplorable to use the memory of this poor man to further an unrelated political agenda.

    The Governments attention should be focused on the criminals who perpetrated this terrible crime. Gun crime in Ireland is not perpetrated by either legally held pistols nor licensed pistol holders. Removing these sports from the Irish landscape will have absolutely no effect on gun crime as there is absolutely no relationship.

    I have invested considerable time, effort and expense in order to be allowed to compete in my chosen sports and feel that I am being victimised and prevented from progressing in this arena in order to fulfill a political agenda.

    I would like to know what you, personally, and your parties views are on this topic and what, if indeed anything, you or your party plan to do to ensure that this travesty does not occur.

    I can be contacted via email or telephone, but must decline from offering you my address due to the security arrangements I must adhere to.

    Yours in Sport,

    *********


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    Bananaman wrote: »
    This is what I sent to the members of the Oireachtas a few days ago - I have received some answers, for which I am grateful.

    There has been some markedly favorable comment - which gives me some hope.

    Whereas I seriously doubt that there will be any outright support for the shooting sports - I do believe that an informed house will prevent the government from making a "snap" decision which has no merit.

    i think dont worrie about it like every thing with this government it will never happen ,its just another smoke screen to take the heat off them .they will rant and rave Hoff and Puff eat lunch and move on to something else .this country is in some much shxt at the moment our pistols are the last of there problems


Advertisement