Are many irish men circumcized ? which is best ?

lucozader

thanks

Thomas_S_Hunterson

Very few.

Ireland has a very small Jewish population and circumcision isn't really done here.

aidan_walsh

Which is the best circumcized Irish man?

SoWatchaWant

I know of only one guy.

javaboy

Men's Health thread on this: http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055386976

Varkov

A potato peeler is best.

pierrot

as a rule, no. most americans will be. any supposed hygiene benefits are arguable. some say it was the religious lot who put pressure on the medical lot to encourage its practice back in the day. to desensitise the nob, and make young fellas **** less

Berty

You do not have to be jewish to be circumcised.

Most people do not get the choice of whether or not they get it chopped or not. Usually down within a few weeks of birth.

Circumcision in this country is more a basis of choice by parents for personal reasons.

Its not going to yield much results. Those having circumcision done will not generally know anything else and those who have not had it done would not want it done on account of knives/scalpels and penises in the same sentence.

javaboy

Varkov wrote: »

A potato peeler is best.

I disagree. Necrotizing fasciitis is best.

Berty

pierrot wrote: »

to desensitise the nob, and make young fellas **** less

The opposite in fact. It exposes more nerve endings.

Thomas_S_Hunterson

quirke_folder wrote: »

The opposite in fact. It exposes more nerve endings.

The skin becomes 'calloused' (can't think of a better word) so sensitivity is actually decreased.

dsmythy

quirke_folder wrote: »

Its not going to yield much results. Those having circumcision done will not generally know anything else and those who have not had it done would not want it done on account of knives/scalpels and penises in the same sentence.

^^^ What he said.

I'm circumcised. Is it better? Frucked if i know. I prefer it this way but like i said... ^^^ What he said.

panda100

Sean_K wrote: »

The skin becomes 'calloused' (can't think of a better word) so sensitivity is actually decreased.

Ouch!
I dont think I've ever seen a circumicsed penis.Just googled a pic of one(what better way to spend a Wedensday afternoon!)and it looks wierd!

funk-you

Nope, most Irish guys have ninja willies. They wear the hood to sneak up on ya when you least expect it. True story.

-Funk

mcauley

javaboy wrote: »

Men's Health thread on this: http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055386976

search option ftw!

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

you can actually regrow the foreskin if you're unhappy some asshole with a knife chopped an important part of your dick off, and I'm pretty sure that with time the sensitivity comes back.

Turd Ferguson

javaboy wrote: »

I disagree. Necrotizing fasciitis is best.

You were just waiting to use that one, werent you

Malari

panda100 wrote: »

Ouch!
I dont think I've ever seen a circumicsed penis.Just googled a pic of one(what better way to spend a Wedensday afternoon!)and it looks wierd!

Me either. In fact I didn't know if I had seen one or not...I had to ask my boyfriend what it would look like if it was circumcised!

javaboy

Mordeth wrote: »

you can actually regrow the foreskin if you're unhappy some asshole with a knife chopped an important part of your dick off, and I'm pretty sure that with time the sensitivity comes back.

Yeah but can you sue the asshole for genital mutilation?

Turd Ferguson wrote: »

You were just waiting to use that one, werent you

It seemed appropriate.

Nichololas

I put speed holes in mine. Decreases wind resistance.

chin_grin

http://www.totalvideos.co.uk/watch.aspx?v=VK3_qIJxw20&t=yt

Too much?

brianthebard

Can you get your banjo string cut 'loosened' without having to get the full circumcision?

javaboy

/faints

brianthebard

chin_grin wrote: »

http://www.totalvideos.co.uk/watch.aspx?v=VK3_qIJxw20&t=yt

Too much?

Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus
Oh jesus

That...did they have to use a drill for it?? *sympathy shiver* man that was harsh....and I had to be cooking sausages for dinner today as well...

tallaght01

I don't see massive reasons for Irish guys to be circumcised. I mean, it's no major harm, but for most guys it's not wholy neccesary. It improves hygiene, though.

I can see why parents in developing countries would want their sons to be circumcised.

Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV by about 60%.

It probably has a significant reduction in transmission of other STDs.

It virtually eradicates penile cancer.

I had it done, and my wanger doesn't feel any different. But, the oul recouperation period can be pretty rough:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055180001&highlight=boner+wednesday

chin_grin

brianthebard wrote: »

Can you get your banjo string cut 'loosened' without having to get the full circumcision?

What and attach a machine head to it?

twang twang twang twang

"What're yeh doin love?"

twang twang twang twang,

"tuning up for you babe-eh aw huh!"

Dave147

pierrot wrote: »

as a rule, no. most americans will be. any supposed hygiene benefits are arguable. some say it was the religious lot who put pressure on the medical lot to encourage its practice back in the day. to desensitise the nob, and make young fellas **** less

I'm circumcised and **** more than I thought was humanly possible..

javaboy

Dave147 wrote: »

I'm circumcised and **** more than I thought was humanly possible..

I'm not and trust me on this. I'm much more of a wanker than you are.

chin_grin

Dave147 wrote: »

I'm circumcised and **** more than I thought was humanly possible..

Them there's ****-off talk!

"It's a **** off............it's a **** off."

ejmaztec

Dave147 wrote: »

I'm circumcised and **** more than I thought was humanly possible..

Have you tried girls?

thelordofcheese

pierrot wrote: »

most americans will be.

*shakes head*
Americans.
Always doin' it wrong.

javaboy

chin_grin wrote: »

Them there's ****-off talk!

"It's a **** off............it's a **** off."

Chichester Rules. No switching hands. No lube. One A4 page of **** material per contender.

Dave147

ejmaztec wrote: »

Have you tried girls?

Yeah, they suck, I'm a big fan of giving myself a stranger, did you ever give yourself a stranger?

I don't live with my gf so can't have sex 7 days a week, the **** has to suffice.

Dave147

javaboy wrote: »

Chichester Rules. No switching hands. No lube. One A4 page of **** material per contender.

Jesus, I'll be there all night!!

chin_grin

Dave147 wrote: »

Yeah, they suck, I'm a big fan of giving myself a stranger, did you ever give yourself a stranger?

I don't live with my gf so can't have sex 7 days a week, the **** has to suffice.

STRANGER DANGER!
STRANGER DANGER!

johnnyrotten

The hood is there for a reason - leave it be unless theres a medical reason

javaboy

Dave147 wrote: »

ejmaztec wrote:

Have you tried girls?

Yeah, they suck

The good ones do.

Malari

javaboy wrote: »

The good ones do.

I thought the naughty ones did?

thelordofcheese

Malari wrote: »

I thought the naughty ones did?

Aye, and they swallow too.

chin_grin

Malari wrote: »

I thought the naughty ones did?

How did this thread start? Oh yeah, blowjobs.

Maybe you could get a lady that could suck start a leaf blower and get her to circumsize you that way?

Heh, "Circumsize me". All I can think about is that fat f*ck who went a month eating McDonalds....hmm <strokes chin>

FlutterinBantam

Without the hood the bell goes dry and leathery.

You could lash it into a leaf blower and get no reaction.

I like the warmth of the foreskin,and like the auld clit, you can peel her back when needed,and she slips back under the covers when in "standby" mode.


All about keeping the organ moist.

Mr Benevolent

From my experience, circumcision means lasting half an hour instead of 3 minutes.

Wertz

If nature didn't have a purpose for the foreskin, we wouldn't have been born with one. Why the hell would you have it voluntarily removed?

anti-venom

tallaght01 wrote: »

I don't see massive reasons for Irish guys to be circumcised. I mean, it's no major harm, but for most guys it's not wholy neccesary. It improves hygiene, though.

I can see why parents in developing countries would want their sons to be circumcised.

Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV by about 60%.

It probably has a significant reduction in transmission of other STDs.

It virtually eradicates penile cancer.

I had it done, and my wanger doesn't feel any different. But, the oul recouperation period can be pretty rough:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055180001&highlight=boner+wednesday

I had It done too years ago. Makes no difference at all to sensitivity. Agree too that the recuperation period was pretty rough. Twice I had to return to the hospital to have it restitched. Twice I woke in the morning with a hardon and to find the stitches had opened. No kidding.

anti-venom

anti-venom wrote: »

I had It done too years ago. Makes no difference at all to sensitivity. Agree too that the recuperation period was pretty rough. Twice I had to return to the hospital to have it restitched. Twice I woke in the morning with a hardon and to find the stitches had opened. No kidding.

Had it done, too. Also haven't noticed any difference to sensitivity. I think thats just some myth.

Recuperating period was a pain in the cock. Literally, obviously. But thankfully, i never had to return to the hospital. I actually think that getting it done is one of the best choices i ever made. But then again, i havent really made any worthwhile choices with my life, so it doesnt have much to contend with.

Overheal

Health and Hygeine aside, an infant circumcision generally tends to carry little weight on the kid's self-love habits later, not knowing anything else. Those that choose to get circumcised later in life (well, besides having it wrapped in bandages for a week, that must hurt) argue that while for the first month or so its very sensitive, it eventually does callous.

Sexually, the removal of the foreskin in intercourse generates more friction/stimulation between man and woman as opposed to the foreskin rolling on/off like a tank tread. Coupled with the perceived change in sensitivity - it generally means more fun for her, for longer than normal periods of time.

I had it done at childbirth so I couldnt argue the sensitivity issue one way or the other.

javaboy

Confab wrote: »

From my experience, circumcision means lasting half an hour instead of 3 minutes.

So it's a bad thing then? Uncircumised you can (theoretically) ejaculate 10 times in the same time it takes someone who's been cut to rub just one out. I think I'll keep mine.

Wertz wrote: »

If nature didn't have a purpose for the foreskin, we wouldn't have been born with one. Why the hell would you have it voluntarily removed?

Appendix.

javaboy

Hands up all the boys who crossed their legs at some point while reading this thread (or viewing chin_grin's video).


o/

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Most guys aren't, in my experience anyway. Makes **** all difference for the girl if any of you **** were wondering.

Overheal

why would i want to unload 10 times more in the same course of time? I can understand the benefit if I were trying to carpet bomb a uterus, but otherwise, no.

Wertz

javaboy wrote: »

Appendix.

Different scenario.
If my foreskin developed something that threatened me with imminent death unless I had it removed, it'd be gone.
I don't see paediatricians lining up at the doors of maternity wards to pre-emptively lop out appendices from new borns...

[edit] Additionally: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermiform_appendix#Function